'Robot' hand illusion under delayed visual feedback: Relationship between the senses of ownership and agency

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 2016, Pages

  Ismail, Mohamad Arif Fahmi ^a   Shimada, Sotaro ^a  

^a MEIJI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROBOT HAND ILLUSION; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL FEEDBACK; HAND; LIMB PROSTHESIS; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SENSORY FEEDBACK; TOUCH; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PROPRIOCEPTION; REACTION TIME; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84979991966     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159619     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Gallagher S. Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000; 4: 14-21. PMID: 10637618
2. Tsakiris M, Schutz-Bosbach S, Gallagher S. On agency and body-ownership: Phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections. Consciousness and Cognition 2007; 16: 645-660. PMID: 17616469
3. Botvinick M, Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998; 391: 756-756. PMID: 9486643
4. Armel KC, Ramachandran VS. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceeding Biological Sciences 2003; 270: 1499-1506.
5. Tsakiris M, Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Perform 2005; 31: 80-91.
6. Longo MR, Schuur F, Kammers MP, Tsakiris M, Haggard P. What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 2008; 107: 978-998. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.004 PMID: 18262508
7. Shimada S, Fukuda K, Hiraki K. Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PLoS ONE 2009; 4(7): e6185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006185 PMID: 19587780
8. Shimada S, Suzuki T, Yoda N, Hayashi T. Relationship between sensitivity to visuotactile temporal discrepancy and the rubber hand illusion. Neuroscience Research 2014; 85: 33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2014.04.009 PMID: 24874005
9. Romano D, Caffa E, Hernandez-Arieta A, Brugger P, Maravita A. The robot hand illusion: Inducing proprioceptive drift through visuo-motor congruency. Neuropsychologia 2015; 70: 414-420. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.033 PMID: 25446964
10. Alimardani M, Nishio S, Ishiguro H. Humanlike robot hands controlled by brain activity arouse illusion of ownership in operators. Scientific Reports 2013; 3: 2396. doi: 10.1038/srep02396 PMID: 23928891
11. Caspar EA, De Beir A, Magalhaes De Saldanha Da Gama PA, Yernaux F, Cleeremans A, Vanderborght B. New frontiers in the rubber hand experiment: When a robotic hand becomes one's own. Behavior Research Methods 2014; 47: 744-755.
12. Rosen B, Ehrsson HH, Antfolk C, Cipriani C, Sebelius F, Lundborg G. Referral of sensation to an advanced humanoid robotic hand prosthesis. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 2009; 43(5): 260-266. doi: 10.3109/02844310903113107 PMID: 19863429
13. Kalckert A, Ehrsson HH. Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: A dissociation of ownership and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012; 6: 40. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00040 PMID: 22435056
14. Cunningham DW, Chatziastros A, von der Heyde M, Bülthoff HH. Driving in the future: Temporal visuomotor adaptation and generalization. Journal of Vision 2001; 1(2): 88-98. PMID: 12678604
15. Stetson C, Cui X, Montague PR, Eagleman DM. Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation. Neuron 2006; 51(5): 651-659. PMID: 16950162
16. Rohde M, Scheller M, Ernst MO. Effects can precede their cause in the sense of agency. Neuropsychologia 2014; 65: 191-196. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.011 PMID: 25447071
17. de la Malla C, López-Moliner J, Brenner E. Seeing the last part of a hitting movement is enough to adapt to a temporal delay. Journal of Vision 2012; 12(10): 1-15
18. Heron J, Hanson JVM, Whitaker D. Effect before cause: Supramodal recalibration of sensorimotor timing. PLoS ONE 2009; 4: e7681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007681 PMID: 19890383
19. Sugano Y, Keetels M, Vroomen J. Adaptation to motor-visual and motor-auditory temporal lags transfer across modalities. Experimental Brain Research 2010; 201(3): 393-399. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2047-3 PMID: 19851760
20. Toida K, Ueno K, Shimada S. Recalibration of subjective simultaneity between self-generated movement and delayed auditory feedback. NeuroReport 2014; 25: 284-288. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000079 PMID: 24217393
21. Toida K, Ueno K, Shimada S. Neural basis of the time window for subjective motor-auditory integration. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2016; 9: 688. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00688 PMID: 26779000
22. Kalckert A, Ehrsson HH. The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: Comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 2014; 26: 117-132. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.02.003 PMID: 24705182