Repeated training with augmentative vibrotactile feedback increases object manipulation performance

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Stepp, Cara E ^a,b   An, Qi ^c   Matsuoka, Yoky ^c  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FORCE; HAND PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDEX FINGER; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT MANIPULATION; SENSORY STIMULATION; TACTILE FEEDBACK; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; VIBROTACTILE STIMULATION; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; BIOMECHANICS; COGNITION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; HAND; LEARNING; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORY FEEDBACK; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOUCH; VIBRATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICS; COGNITION; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOVEMENT; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIBRATION;

EID: 84857590738     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032743     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Schultz AE, Kuiken TA, (2011) Neural interfaces for control of upper limb prostheses: the state of the art and future possibilities. PM&R 3: 55-67.
2. Pylatiuk C, Schulz S, Doderlein L, (2007) Results of an Internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users. Prosthet Orthot Int 31: 362-370.
3. Biddiss E, Beaton D, Chau T, (2007) Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2: 346-357.
4. Cranny A, Cotton D, Chappell S, Beeby S, White N, (2005) Thick-film force, slip, and temperature sensors for a prosthetic hand. Meas Sci Technol 16: 931-941.
5. Pylatiuk C, Kargov A, Schulz S, (2006) Design and evaluation of a low-cost force feedback system for myoelectric prosthetic hands. J Prosthet Orthot 18: 57-61.
6. Carrozza MC, Cappiello G, Micera S, Edin BB, Beccai L, et al. (2006) Design of a cybernetic hand for perception and action. Biol Cybern 95: 629-644.
7. Zollo L, Roccella S, Guglielmelli E, Carrozza MC, Dario P, (2007) Biomechatronic Design and Control of an Anthropomorphic Artificial Hand for Prosthetic and Robotic Applications. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech 12: 418-429.
8. Castro MC, Cliquet A, (1997) A low-cost instrumented glove for monitoring forces during object manipulation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 5: 140-147.
9. Kaczmarek KA, Webster JG, Bach-y-Rita P, Tompkins WJ, (1991) Electrotactile and Vibrotactile Displays for Sensory Substitution Systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 38: 1-16.
10. Shannon GF, (1976) A comparison of alternative means of providing sensory feedback on upper limb prostheses. Med Biol Eng 14: 289-294.
11. Lanzetta M, Perani D, Anchisi D, Rosen B, Danna M, et al. (2004) Early use of artificial sensibility in hand transplantation. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 38: 106-111.
12. Riso RR, (1999) Strategies for providing upper extremity amputees with tactile and hand position feedback-moving closer to the bionic arm. Technol Health Care 7: 401-409.
13. Scott RN, Brittain RH, Caldwell RR, Cameron AB, Dunfield VA, (1980) Sensory-feedback system compatible with myoelectric control. Med Biol Eng Comput 18: 65-69.
14. Shannon GF, (1979) A myoelectrically-controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback. Med Biol Eng Comput 17: 73-80.
15. Agnew PJ, Shannon GF, (1981) Training program for a myo-electrically controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback system. Am J Occup Ther 35: 722-727.
16. Schmidl H, (1977) The importance of information feedback in prostheses for the upper limbs. Prosthet Orthot Int 1: 21-24.
17. Geng B, Yoshida K, Jensen W, (2011) Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 8: 9.
18. Micera S, Navarro X, Carpaneto J, Citi L, Tonet O, et al. (2008) On the use of longitudinal intrafascicular peripheral interfaces for the control of cybernetic hand prostheses in amputees. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 16: 453-472.
19. Dhillon GS, Horch KW, (2005) Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 13: 468-472.
20. London BM, Jordan LR, Jackson CR, Miller LE, (2008) Electrical stimulation of the proprioceptive cortex (area 3a) used to instruct a behaving monkey. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 16: 32-36.
21. Chatterjee A, Chaubey P, Martin J, Thakor N, (2008) Testing a prosthetic haptic feedback simulator with an interactive force matching task. J Prosthet Orthot 20: 27-34.
22. Stepp CE, Matsuoka Y, (2010) Relative to direct haptic feedback, remote vibrotactile feedback improves but slows object manipulation. 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Buenos Aires, Argentina pp. 2089-2092.
23. Mann RW, Reimers SD, (1970) Kinesthetic Sensing for the EMG Controlled "Boston Arm". IEEE Trans Man Mach Syst 11: 110-115.
24. Patterson PE, Katz JA, (1992) Design and evaluation of a sensory feedback system that provides grasping pressure in a myoelectric hand. J Rehabil Res Dev 29: 1-8.
25. Stepp CE, Matsuoka Y, (2011) Object Manipulation Improvements with Single Session Training Outweigh the Differences among Stimulation Sites during Vibrotactile Feedback. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 19: 677-685.
26. Karni A, Meyer G, Rey-Hipolito C, Jezzard P, Adams MM, et al. (1998) The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 861-868.
27. Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E, (1996) Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382: 252-255.
28. Miller LA, Lipschutz RD, Stubblefield KA, Lock BA, Huang H, et al. (2008) Control of a six degree of freedom prosthetic arm after targeted muscle reinnervation surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89: 2057-2065.
29. Verrillo RT, (1992) Vibration Sensation in Humans. Music Percept 9: 281-302.
30. Verrillo RT, (1970) Subjective Magnitude Functions for Vibrotaction. IEEE Trans Man Mach Syst 11: 19-24.
31. Kirchner WK, (1958) Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. J Exp Psychol 55: 352-358.
32. Leung YY, Bensmaia SJ, Hsiao SS, Johnson KO, (2005) Time-Course of Vibratory Adaptation and Recovery in Cutaneous Mechanoreceptive Afferents. J Neurophysiol 94: 3037-3045.
33. Stepp CE, Chang C, Malhotra M, Matsuoka Y, (2011) Vibrotactile feedback aids EMG control of object manipulation. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Boston, MA, USA pp. 1061-1064.