Neural correlates of the rubber hand illusion in amputees: A report of two cases

Neurocase

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 407-420

  Schmalzl, Laura ^a   Kalckert, Andreas ^a   Ragnö, Christina ^b   Ehrsson, H Henrik ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b Red Cross Hospital   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Amputees; fMRI; Multisensory integration; Prosthetics; Rubber hand illusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPUTATION; ANGULAR GYRUS; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; CASE REPORT; DISABLED PERSON; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; EXTRASTRIATE BODY AREA; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HAND PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; ILLUSION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE STUMP; PRECENTRAL SULCUS; PREMOTOR CORTEX; QUESTIONNAIRE; RUBBER HAND ILLUSION; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SUPRAMARGINAL GYRUS; TACTILE STIMULATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ARM; BRAIN MAPPING; LIMB PROSTHESIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM LIMB; PSYCHOLOGY;

ADULT; AMPUTEES; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOM LIMB; QUESTIONNAIRES; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84898013343     PISSN: 13554794     EISSN: 14653656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13554794.2013.791861     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Antfolk, C., Balkenius, C., Lundborg, G., Rosén, B., & Sebelius, F. (2010). Design and technical construction of a tactile display for sensory feedback in a hand prosthesis system. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 9, 50. doi:10.1186/1475-925X-9-50
2. Avillac, M., Deneve, S., Olivier, E., Pouget, A., & Duhamel, J. R. (2005). Reference frames for representing visual and tactile locations in parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 941-949.
3. Bekrater-Bodmann, R., Foell, J., Diers, M., & Flor, H. (2012). The perceptual and neuronal stability of the rubber hand illusion across contexts and over time. Brain Research, 1452, 130-139. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.001
4. Berlucchi, G., & Aglioti, S. M. (2010). The body in the brain revisited. Experimental Brain Research, 200, 25-35.
5. Blanke, O., Ortigue, S., Landis, T., & Seeck, M. (2002). Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions. Nature, 419, 269-270.
6. Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
7. Brozzoli, C., Gentile, G., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). That's near my hand! Parietal and premotor coding of hand-centered space contributes to localization and self-attribution of the hand. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 14573-14582.
8. Brozzoli, C., Gentile, G., Petkova, V. I., & Ehrsson H. H. (2011). fMRI-adaptation reveals a cortical mechanism for the coding of space near the hand. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 9023-9031.
9. Clower, D. M., Dum, R. P., & Strick, P. L. (2005). Basal ganglia and cerebellar inputs to "AIP." Cerebral Cortex, 15, 913-920.
10. Clower, D. M., West, R. A., Lynch, J. C., & Strick, P. L. (2001). The inferior parietal lobule is the target of output from the superior colliculus, hippocampus, and cerebellum. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 6283-6291.
11. Corradi Dell'Acqua, C., & Rumiati, R. I. (2007). What the brain knows about the body: Evidence for dissociable representations. In F. Santoianni & C. Sabatano (Eds.), Brain development in learning environments: Embodied cognition and perceptual learning (pp. 50-64). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
12. Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293, 2470-2473.
13. Dum, R. P., Li, C., & Strick, P. L. (2002). Motor and nonmotor domains in the monkey dentate. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 978, 289-301.
14. Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). The concept of body ownership and its relation to Multisensory integration. In B. E. Stein (Ed.), The New Handbook of Multisensory Processes (pp. 775-792). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Ehrsson, H. H., Holmes, N. P., & Passingham, R. E. (2005). Touching a rubber hand: Feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 10564-10573.
16. Ehrsson, H. H., Rosén, B., Stockselius, A., Ragnö, C., Köhler, P., & Lundborg, G. (2008). Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own. Brain, 131, 3443-3452.
17. Ehrsson, H. H., Spence, C., & Passingham, R. E. (2004). That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science, 305, 875-877.
18. Ehrsson, H. H., Weich, K., Weiskopf, N., Dolan, R. J., & Passingham, R. E. (2007). Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. PNAS, 104, 9828-9833.
19. Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Luppino, G., Matelli, M., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4). Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 141-157.
20. Fogassi, L., Raos, V., Franchi, G., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., & Matelli, M. (1999). Visual responses in the dorsal premotor area F2 of the macaque monkey. Experimental Brain Research, 128, 194-199.
21. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Gallagher, P., & MacLachlan, M. (1999). Psychological adjustment and coping in adults with prosthetic limbs. Behavioral Medicine, 25, 117-124.
23. Gentile, G., Petkova, V., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2011). Integration of visual and tactile signals from the hand in the human brain: An fMRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 105, 910-922.
24. Graziano, M. S. (1999). Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. PNAS, 96, 10418-10421.
25. Graziano, M. S. A., & Gandhi, S. (2000). Location of the polysensory zone in the precentral gyrus of anesthetized monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 135, 259-266.
26. Hagura, N., Oouchida, Y., Aramaki, Y., Okada, T., Matsumura, M., Sadato, N., & Naito, E. (2009). Visuokinesthetic perception of hand movement is mediated by cerebro-cerebellar interaction between the left cerebellum and right parietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 176-186.
27. Hsiao, S. S., Fettiplace, M., & Darbandi, B. (2011). Sensory feedback for upper limb prostheses. In A. Green & G. Venkatasamy (Eds.), Progress in brain research: Enhancing performance for action and perception - Multisensory integration, neuroplasticity and neuroprosthetics (pp. 69-81). Oxford: Elsevier.
28. Jackson, A., & Fetz, E. (2011). Interfacing with the computational brain. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 19, 534-541.
29. Johansson, R. S., & Flanagan, J. R. (2009). Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 345-359.
30. Jones, L. A. (2011). Tactile communication systems: Optimizing the display of information. In A. Green & G. Venkatasamy (Eds.), Progress in brain research: Enhancing performance for action and perception - Multisensory integration, neuroplasticity and neuroprosthetics (pp. 113-128). Oxford: Elsevier.
31. Kuiken, T. A., Marasco, P. D., Lock, B. A., Harden, R. N., & Dewald, P. A. (2007). Redirection of cutaneous sensation from the hand to the chest skin of human amputees with targeted reinnervation. PNAS, 104, 20061-20066.
32. Lloyd, M. D. (2007). Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain and Cognition, 64, 104-109.
33. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 412, 150-157.
34. Lundborg, G., & Rosén, B. (2001) Sensory substitution in prosthetics. Hand Clinics, 17, 481-488.
35. Marasco, P. D., Kim, K., Colgate, J. E., Peshkin, M., & Kuiken, T. A. (2011). Robotic touch shifts perception of embodiment to a prosthesis in targeted reinnervation amputees. Brain, 134,747-758.
36. Naito, E., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2006). Somatic sensation of hand-object interactive movement is associated with activity in the left inferior parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 3783-3790.
37. Naito, E., Roland, P. E., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2005). Role of area 2 and dominance of the right hemisphere in human kinaesthesia. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 1020-1034.
38. Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2003). Brain-machine interfaces to restore motor function and probe neural circuits. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 417-422.
39. Orioli, P. J., & Strick, P. L. (1989). Cerebellar connections with the motor cortex and the arcuate premotor area: An analysis employing retrograde transneuronal transport of WGA-HRP. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 288, 612-626.
40. Pavani, F., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch: Out of the body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11, 353-359.
41. Petkova, V. I., Björnsdotter, M., Gentile, G., Jonsson, T., Li, T. Q., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2011). From part to whole-body ownership in the multisensory brain. Current Biology, 21, 1-5.
42. Petkova, V. I., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2008). If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLoS One, 3, e3832.
43. Rosén, B., Ehrsson, H. H., Antfolk, C., Cipriani, C., Sebelius, F., & Lundborg, G. (2009). Referral of sensation to an advanced humanoid robotic hand prosthesis. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 43, 260-266.
44. Saxe, R., Jamal, N., & Powell, L. (2006). My body or yours? The effect of visual perspective on cortical body representations. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 178-182.
45. Schmalzl, L., Thomke, E., Ragnö, C., Nilseryd, M., Stockselius, A., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2011). "Pulling telescoped phantoms out of the stump": Manipulating the perceived position of phantom limbs using a full-body illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 121. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00121
46. Schwartz, A. B. (2004). Cortical neural prosthetics. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 487-507.
47. Sebelius, F. C., Rosén, B., & Lundborg, G. N. (2005). Refined myoelectric control in below-elbow amputees using artificial neural networks and a data glove. Journal of Hand Surgery, 30, 780-789.
48. Tsakiris, M., Carpenter, L., James, D., & Fotopoulou, A. (2010). Hands only illusion: Multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 343-352.
49. Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 80-91.
50. Tsakiris, M., Schutz-Bosbach, S., & Gallagher, S. (2007). On agency and body-ownership: Phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 645-660.
51. Velliste, M., Perel, S., Spalding, M. C., Whitford, A. S., & Schwartz, A. B. (2008). Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding. Nature, 453, 1098-1101.
52. Weiner, K. S., & Grill-Spector, K. (2013). Neural representations of faces and limbs neighbor in human high-level visual cortex: Evidence for a new organization principle. Psychological Research, 77, 74-97. doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0392-x
53. Wolpert, D. M., Diedrichsen, J., & Flanagan, J. R. (2011). Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 739-751.
54. Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1212-1217.
55. Zopf, R., Truong, S., Finkbeiner, M., Friedman, J., & Williams, M. A. (2011). Viewing and feeling touch modulates hand position for reaching. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1287-1293.