Robots as intentional agents: Using neuroscientific methods to make robots appear more social

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue OCT, 2017, Pages

  Wiese, Eva ^a   Metta, Giorgio ^b   Wykowska, Agnieszka ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Attribution of intentionality; Human robot interaction; Mind perception; Social neuroscience; Social robotics

Indexed keywords

EID: 85030532644     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01663     Document Type: Review

References (267)

1. Adolphs, R. (2009). The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60, 693-716. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.3514
2. Allman, J. M., Hakeem, A., Erwin, J. M., Nimchinsky, E., and Hof, P. (2001). The anterior cingulate cortex: the evolution of an interface between emotion and cognition. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 935, 107-117. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03476.x
3. Ames, D. L., Jenkins, A. C., Banaji, M. R., and Mitchell, J. P. (2008). Taking another person's perspective increases self-referential neural processing. Psychol. Sci. 19, 642-644. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02135.x
4. Amodio, D. M., and Frith, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 268-277. doi: 10.1038/nrn1884
5. Anzalone, S. M., Tilmont, E., Boucenna, S., Xavier, J., Jouen, A.-L., Bodeau, N., et al. (2014). How children with autism spectrum disorder behave and explore the 4-dimensional (spatial 3D+ time) environment during a joint attention induction task with a robot. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 8, 814-826. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.03.002
6. Arbib, M. A., Billard, A., Iacoboni, M., and Oztop, E. (2000). Synthetic brain imaging: grasping, mirror neurons and imitation. Neural Netw. 13, 975-997. doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00070-8
7. Balas, B., and Tonsager, C. (2014). Face animacy is not all in the eyes: evidence from contrast chimeras. Perception 43, 355-367. doi: 10.1068/p7696
8. Barch, D. M., Braver, T. S., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T., Ollinger, J., and Snyder, A. (2001). Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of response modality and processing domain. Cereb. Cortex 11, 837-848. doi: 10.1093/cercor/11.9.837
9. Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
10. Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). "The empathizing system: a revision of the 1994 model of the mindreading system," in Origins of the Social Mind, eds B. Ellis and D. Bjorklund (New York City, NY: Guilford Publications).
11. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., and Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition 21, 37-46. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8
12. Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why Would Anyone Believe in God?. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
13. Bartneck, C. (2003). "Interacting with an embodied emotional character," in Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, DPPI, Pittsburgh, PA, 55-60. doi: 10.1145/782896.782911
14. Bartneck, C., and Reichenbach, J. (2005). Subtle emotional expressions of synthetic characters. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 62, 179-192. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.11.006
15. Basteris, A., Nijenhuis, S. M., Stienen, A. H., Buurke, J. H., Prange, G. B., and Amirabdollahian, F. (2014). Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 11:111. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-111
16. Bastian, B., and Haslam, N. (2010). Excluded from humanity: the dehumanizing effects of social ostracism. J. Exp.Soc. Psychol. 46, 107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.022
17. Becchio, C., Adenzato, M., and Bara, B. (2006). How the brain understands intention: different neural circuits identify the componential features of motor and prior intentions. Conscious. Cogn. 15, 64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.03.006
18. Becker-Asano, C., Ogawa, K., Nishio, S., and Ishiguro, H. (2010). "Exploring the uncanny valley with Geminoid HI-1 in a real-world application," in Proceedings of IADIS International Conference Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction, Freiburg, 121-128.
19. Bekele, E., Crittendon, J. A., Swanson, A., Sarkar, N., and Warren, Z. E. (2014). Pilot clinical application of an adaptive robotic system for young children with autism. Autism 18, 598-608. doi: 10.1177/1362361313479454
20. Bering, J. M., and Johnson, D. D. P. (2005). O Lord, you perceive my thoughts from afar: recursiveness and the evolution of supernatural agency. J. Cogn. Cult. 5, 118-141. doi: 10.1163/1568537054068679
21. Birks, M., Bodak, M., Barlas, J., Harwood, J., and Pether, M. (2016). Robotic seals as therapeutic tools in an aged care facility: a qualitative study. J. Aging Res. 2016, 1-7. doi: 10.1155/2016/8569602
22. Bisio, A., Sciutti, A., Nori, F., Metta, G., Fadiga, L., Sandini, G., et al. (2014). Motor contagion during human-human and human-robot interaction. PLOS ONE 9:e106172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106172
23. Blakemore, S.-J., and Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 561-567. doi: 10.1038/35086023
24. Brass, M., Derrfuss, J., and von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: a functional double dissociation. Neuropsychologia 43, 89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.018
25. Brass, M., Schmitt, R., Spengler, S., and Gergely, G. (2007). Investigating action understanding: inferential processes versus action simulation. Curr. Biol. 17, 2117-2121. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.057
26. Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Rob. Auton. Syst. 42, 167-175. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00373-1
27. Breazeal, C., Buchsbaum, D., Gray, J., Gatenby, D., and Blumberg, B. (2005). Learning from and about others: towards using imitation to bootstrap the social understanding of others by robots. Artif. Life 11, 31-62. doi: 10.1162/1064546053278955
28. Breazeal, C., Edsinger, A., Fitzpatrick, P., and Scassellati, B. (2001). Active vision for sociable robots. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 31, 443-453. doi: 10.1109/3468.952718
29. Breazeal, C., and Scassellati, B. (1999). "How to build robots that make friends and influence people," in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS'99, Vol. 2, Kyoto, 858-863. doi: 10.1109/IROS.1999.812787
30. Brentano, F. (1874). Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, trans. Rancurello, A. C., Terrell, D. B., and McAlister, L. L. London: Routledge.
31. Brooks, A. G., and Breazeal, C. (2006). "Working with robots and objects: revisiting deictic reference for achieving spatial common ground," in Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, (New York City, NY: Association for Computing Machinery), 297-304. doi: 10.1145/1121241.1121292
32. Brooks, R. A., Breazeal, C., Marjanovic, M., Scassellati, B., and Williamson, M. M. (1999). "The cog project: building a humanoid robot," in Computation for Metaphors, Analogy, and Agents, ed. C. L. Nehaniv (Berlin: Springer), 52-87.
33. Brothers, L. (2002). "The social brain: a project for integrating primate behavior and neurophysiology in a new domain," in Foundations in Social Neuroscience, ed. J. T. Cacioppo (London: MIT Press), 367-385.
34. Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., et al. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13, 400-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2001.01385.x
35. Burleigh, T. J., Schoenherr, J. R., and Lacroix, G. L. (2013). Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 759-771. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.021
36. Bush, G., Luu, P., and Posner, M. I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 215-222. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01483-2
37. Cabibihan, J. J., Javed, H., Ang, M. Jr., and Aljunied, S. M. (2013). Why robots? a survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 5, 593-618. doi: 10.1007/s12369-013-0202-2
38. Cao, Z., Simon, T., Wei, S. E., and Sheikh, Y. (2016). Realtime Multi-Person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. arXiv:1611.08050v2
39. Caruana, N., McArthur, G., Woolgar, A., and Brock, J. (2016). Simulating social interactions for the experimental investigation of joint attention. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 74, 115-125. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.022
40. Castano, E., and Giner-Sorolla, R. (2006). Not quite human: infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 90, 804-818. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.804
41. Castelli, F., Happé, F., Frith, U., and Frith, C. (2000). Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage 12, 314-325. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0612
42. Castledine, A. R., and Chalmers, C. (2011). LEGO robotics: an authentic problem solving tool? Des. Technol. Educ. 16, 19-27.
43. Cavanna, A. E., and Trimble, M. R. (2006). The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 129, 564-583. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl004
44. Cehajic, S., Brown, R., and Gonzalez, R. (2009). What do I care? Perception of ingroup responsibility and dehumanization as predictors of empathy felt for the victim group. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 12, 715-729. doi: 10.1177/1368430209347727
45. Chaminade, T., and Cheng, G. (2009). Social cognitive neuroscience and humanoid robotics. J. Physiol. Paris 103, 286-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2009.08.011
46. Chaminade, T., and Decety, J. (2002). Leader or follower? Involvement of the inferior parietal lobule in agency. Neuroreport 13, 1975-1978. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200210280-00029
47. Chaminade, T., Hodgins, J., and Kawato, M. (2007). Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated character's actions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2, 206-216. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm017
48. Chaminade, T., Rosset, D., Da Fonseca, D., Nazarian, B., Lutcher, E., Cheng, G., et al. (2012). How do we think machines think? An fMRI study of alleged competition with an artificial intelligence. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:103. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00103
49. Chaminade, T., Zecca, M., Blakemore, S. J., Takanishi, A., Frith, C. D., Micera, S., et al. (2010). Brain response to a humanoid robot in areas implicated in the perception of human emotional gestures. PLOS ONE 5:e11577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011577
50. Chang, C., Lee, J., Chao, P., Wang, C., and Chen, G. (2010). Exploring the possibility of using humanoid robots as instructional tools for teaching a second language in primary school. Educ. Technol. Soc. 13, 13-24.
51. Chang, C. F., Hsu, T. Y., Tseng, P., Liang, W. K., Tzeng, O. J., Hung, D. L., et al. (2013). Right temporoparietal junction and attentional reorienting. Hum. Brain Mapp. 34, 869-877. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21476
52. Cheetham, M., Suter, P., and Jancke, L. (2011). The human likeness dimension of the "uncanny valley hypothesis": behavioral and functional MRI findings. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:126. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00126
53. Cheetham, M., Suter, P., and Jancke, L. (2014). Perceptual discrimination difficulty and familiarity in the uncanny valley: more like a "Happy Valley.". Front. Psychol. 5:1219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01219
54. Chong, T. T., Cunnington, R., Williams, M. A., Kanwisher, N., and Mattingley, J. B. (2008). fMRI adaptation reveals mirror neurons in human inferior parietal cortex. Curr. Biol. 18, 1576-1580. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.068
55. Church, W., Ford, T., Perova, N., and Rogers, C. (2010). "Physics with robotics: using Lego Mindstorms in high school education," in Proceedings of Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium, Stanford, CA, 47-49.
56. Cikara, M., Bruneau, J. L., and Saxe, S. T. (2011). From agents to objects: sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 540-551. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21497
57. Cortellessa, G., Scopelliti, M., Tiberio, L., Koch Svedberg, G., Loutfi, A., and Pecora, F. (2008). "A cross-cultural evaluation of domestic assistive robots," in Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems, Arlington, VA.
58. Costa, A., Torriero, S., Oliveri, M., and Caltagirone, C. (2008). Prefrontal and temporo-parietal involvement in taking others' perspective: TMS evidence. Behav. Neurol. 19, 71-74. doi: 10.1155/2008/694632
59. Critchley, H. D., Mathias, C. J., Josephs, O., O'Doherty, J., Zanini, S., Dewar, B. K., et al. (2003). Human cingulate cortex and autonomic control: converging neuroimaging and clinical evidence. Brain 126, 2139-2152. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg216
60. Cross, E. S., Liepelt, R., Hamilton, A. F. C., Parkinson, J., Ramsey, R., Stadler, W., et al. (2011). Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 2238-2254. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21361
61. Cullen, H., Ryota, K., Bahrami, B., and Rees, G. (2014). Individual differences in anthropomorphic attributions and human brain structure. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 1276-1280. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst109
62. Cushman, F. (2008). Crime and punishment: distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition 108, 353-380. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006
63. Dautenhahn, K. (2003). Roles and functions of robots in human society: implications from research in autism therapy. Robotica 21, 443-452. doi: 10.1017/S0263574703004922
64. de Guzman, M., Bird, G., Banissy, M. J., and Catmur, C. (2016). Self-other control processes in social cognition: from imitation to empathy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Sci. 371, 20150079. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0079
65. De Santis, A., Siciliano, B., De Luca, A., and Bicchi, A. (2008). An atlas of physical human-robot interaction. Mech. Mach. Theory 43, 253-270. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2007.03.003
66. Decety, J., and Chaminade, T. (2003). When the self represents the other: a new cognitive neuroscience view on psychological identification. Consci. Cogn. 12, 577-596. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00076-X
67. Decety, J., and Grèzes, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 172-178. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01312-1
68. Demiris, Y. (2007). Prediction of intent in robotics and multi-agent systems. Cogn. Process. 8, 151-158. doi: 10.1007/s10339-007-0168-9
69. Demiris, Y., Aziz-Zadeh, L., and Bonaiuto, J. (2014). Information processing in the mirror neuron system in primates and machines. Neuroinformatics 12, 63-91. doi: 10.1007/s12021-013-9200-7
70. Demoulin, S., Cortes, B. P., Viki, T. G., Rodriguez, A. P., Rodriguez, R. T., Paladino, M. P., et al. (2009). The role of ingroup identification in infra-humanization. Int. J. Psychol. 44, 4-11. doi: 10.1080/00207590802057654
71. Deska, J. C., Almaraz, S. M., and Hugenberg, K. (2016). Of mannequins and men: ascriptions of mind in faces are bounded by perceptual and processing similarities to human faces. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 8, 183-190. doi: 10.1177/1948550616671404
72. Dinstein, I., Hasson, U., Rubin, N., and Heeger, D. J. (2007). Brain areas selective for both observed and executed movements. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 1415-1427. doi: 10.1152/jn.00238.2007
73. Druin, A., and Hendler, J. A. (2000). Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
74. Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). When I need a human: motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Soc. Cogn. 26, 143-155. doi: 10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143
75. Epley, N., and Caruso, E. M. (2009). "Perspective taking: misstepping into others' shoes," in Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation, eds K. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein, and J. A. Suhr (New York, NY: Psychology Press). doi: 10.4135/9781412958479.n397
76. Epley, N., Morewedge, C. K., and Keysar, B. (2004). Perspective taking in children and adults: equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 40, 760-768. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.002
77. Epley, N., Waytz, A., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol. Rev. 114, 864-886. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
78. Farrer, C., Franck, N., Georgieff, N., Frith, C. D., Decety, J., and Jeannerod, M. (2003). Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage 18, 324-333. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(02)00041-1
79. Feil-Seifer, D., and Mataric, M. J. (2009). "Human robot interaction," in Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, ed. R. A. Meyers (New York, NY: Springer), 4643-4659.
80. Fernandes, E., Fermé, E., and Oliveira, R. (2006). "Using robots to learn function in math class," in Proceedings of the ICMI 17 Study Conference, eds L. H. Son, N. Sinclair, J. B. Lagrange, and C. Hoyles (Hanoi: Hanoi University of Technology).
81. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., and Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
82. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., and Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82, 878-902. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
83. Flandorfer, P. (2012). Population ageing and socially assistive robots for elderly persons: the importance of sociodemographic factors for user acceptance. Int. J. Popul. Res. 2012, 13. doi: 10.1155/2012/829835
84. Freeman, J. B., and Ambady, N. (2010). MouseTracker: software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behav. Res. Methods 42, 226-241. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.226
85. Friesen, C. K., and Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 5, 490-495. doi: 10.3758/BF03208827
86. Frith, C. D., and Frith, U. (2006a). How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Res. 1079, 36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.126
87. Frith, C. D., and Frith, U. (2006b). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50, 531-534. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.001
88. Frith, U., and Frith, C. D. (2001). The biological basis of social interaction. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 10, 151-155. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00137
89. Frith, U., and Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358, 459-473. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1218
90. Fujita, M., and Kitano, H. (1998). Development of an autonomous quadruped robot for robot entertainment. Auton. Agent. 5, 7-18. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5735-7_2
91. Gallagher, H. L., and Frith, C. D. (2003). Functional imaging of "theory of mind.". Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 77-83. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00025-6
92. Gallagher, H. L., Happé, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U., and Frith, C. D. (2000). Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of 'theory of mind' in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia 38, 11-21. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00053-6
93. Gallagher, H. L., Jack, A., Roepstorff, A., and Frith, C. (2002). Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. Neuroimage 16:814. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1117
94. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., and Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119, 593-609. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.2.593
95. Gallese, V., Keysers, C., and Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 396-403. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.002
96. Gao, T., McCarthy, G., and Scholl, B. J. (2010). The wolfpack effect perception of animacy irresistibly influences interactive behavior. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1845-1853. doi: 10.1177/0956797610388814
97. Gazzola, V., Rizzolatti, G., Wicker, B., and Keysers, C. (2007). The anthropomorphic brain: the mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. Neuroimage 35, 1674-1684. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.003
98. Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. Am. Psychol. 46, 107-119. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107
99. Gilbert, D. T., Lieberman, M. D., Morewedge, C. K., and Wilson, T. D. (2004). The peculiar longevity of things not so bad. Psychol. Sci. 15, 14-19. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501003.x
100. Gilbert, D. T., and Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychol. Bull. 117, 21-38. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21
101. Gold, K., Doniec, M., Crick, C., and Scassellati, B. (2009). Robotic vocabulary building using extension inference and implicit contrast. Artif. Intell. 173, 145-166. doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2008.09.002
102. Goldstone, R. L., and Hendrickson, A. T. (2010). Categorical perception. Cogn. Sci. 1, 69-78. doi: 10.1002/wcs.26
103. Gonsior, B., Sosnowski, S., Buß, M., Wollherr, D., and Kühnlenz, K. (2012). "An emotional adaption approach to increase helpfulness towards a robot," in Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference, Vilamoura, 2429-2436. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2012.6385941
104. Gould, S. J. (1996). Can we truly know sloth and rapacity? Nat. Hist. 105, 18-57.
105. Graf, B., Parlitz, C., and Hägele, M. (2009). "Robotic home assistant care-O-bot 3 product vision and innovation platform," in Human-Computer Interaction. Novel Interaction Methods and Techniques. HCI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. J. A. Jacko (Berlin: Springer), 312-320. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02577-8_34
106. Grafton, S. T., and Hamilton, A. F. (2007). Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Hum. Mov. Sci. 26, 590-616. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.05.009
107. Graham, J., and Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: religions bind individuals into moral communities. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 14, 140-150. doi: 10.1177/1088868309353415
108. Gray, H. M., Gray, K., and Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315, 619. doi: 10.1126/science.1134475
109. Gray, K., and Wegner, D. M. (2008). The sting of intentional pain. Psychol. Sci. 19, 1260-1262. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02208.x
110. Gray, K., Young, L., and Waytz, A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychol. Inq. 23, 101-124. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387
111. Grèzes, J., Berthoz, S., and Passingham, R. E. (2006). Amygdala activation when one is the target for deceit: Did he lie to you or someone else? Neuroimage 30, 601-608. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.038
112. Grèzes, J., Frith, C., and Passingham, R. E. (2004). Brain mechanisms for inferring deceit in the actions of others. J. Neurosci. 24, 5500-5505. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0219-04.2004
113. Gutsell, J. N., and Inzlicht, M. (2012). Intergroup differences in the sharing of emotive states: neural evidence of an empathy gap. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 596-603. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr035
114. Hackel, L. M., Looser, C. E., and Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). Group membership alters the threshold for mind perception: the role of social identity, collective identification, and intergroup threat. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 52, 15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.12.001
115. Haley, K. J., and Fessler, D. M. T. (2005). Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evol. Hum. Behav. 26, 245-256. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.01.002
116. Harnad, S. (1987). "Psychophysical and cognitive aspects of categorical perception: a critical overview," in Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition, ed. S. Harnad (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press).
117. Harris, L. T., and Fiske, S. T. (2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low-neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychol. Sci. 17, 847-853. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01793.x
118. Harris, L. T., and Fiske S. T. (2011). "Perceiving humanity or not: a social neuroscience approach to dehumanized perception," in Social Neuroscience: Toward Understanding the Underpinnings of the Social Mind, eds A. Todorov, S. T. Fiske, and D. A. Prentice (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 123-134.
119. Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: an integrative review. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10, 252-264. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003-4
120. Hato, Y., Satake, S., Kanda, T., Imai, M., and Hagita, N. (2010). "Pointing to space: modeling of deictic interaction referring to regions," in 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Boca Raton, FL, 301-308. doi: 10.1145/1734454.1734559
121. Hein, G., Silani, G., Preuschoff, K., Batson, C. D., and Singer, T. (2010). Neural responses to ingroup and outgroup members' suffering predict individual differences in costly helping. Neuron 68, 149-160. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.003
122. Hertz, N., and Wiese, E. (2017). "Social facilitation with nonhuman agents: possible or not?," in Proceedings of HFES 2017, Austin, TX.
123. Hinds, P., Roberts, T., and Jones, H. (2004). Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Hum. Comput. Interact. 19, 151-181. doi: 10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_7
124. Hogan, N., and Krebs, H. I. (2004). Interactive robots for neuro-rehabilitation. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 22, 349-358.
125. Hoyt, C. L., Blascovich, J., and Swinth, K. R. (2003). Social inhibition in immersive virtual environments. Presence 12, 183-195. doi: 10.1162/105474603321640932
126. Huey, E. D., Krueger, F., and Grafman, J. (2006). Representations in the human prefrontal cortex. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 15, 167-171. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00429.x
127. Hynes, C. A., Baird, A. A., and Grafton, S. T. (2006). Differential role of the orbital frontal lobe in emotional versus cognitive perspective-taking. Neuropsychologia 44, 374-383. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.06.011
128. Iacoboni, M. (2005). Neural mechanisms of imitation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 632-637. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.10.010
129. Jackson, P. L., Brunet, E., Meltzoff, A. N., and Decety, J. (2006). Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you would feel pain: an event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 44, 752-761. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.015
130. Jacob, P. (2014). "Intentionality," in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E. Zalta Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
131. Johnson, M., and Demiris, Y. (2005). Perceptual perspective taking and action recognition. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2, 32. doi: 10.5772/5775
132. Kajopoulos, J., Wong, A. H. Y., Yuen, A. W. C., Dung, T. A., Tan, Y. K., and Wykowska, A. (2015). "Robot-assisted training of joint attention skills in children diagnosed with autism," in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, eds G. Randy, T. Yuzuru, and W. Wolfgang (Berlin: Springer), 296-305. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5-30
133. Kaneko, K., Kanehiro, F., Morisawa, M., Miura, K., Nakaoka, S. I., and Kajita, S. (2009). "Cybernetic human HRP-4C," in Proceedings of the 9th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Humanoids, Paris, 7-14. doi: 10.1109/ICHR.2009.5379537
134. Kaplan, F. (2004). Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots. Int. J. HR 1, 465-480. doi: 10.1142/S0219843604000289
135. Kätsyri, J., Förger, K., Mäkäräinen, M., and Takala, T. (2015). A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness. Front. Psychol. 6:390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00390
136. Kawato, M. (1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 718-727. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00028-8
137. Keysers, C., and Perrett, D. I. (2004). Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 501-507. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.09.005
138. Keysers, C., Wicker, B., Gazzola, V., Anton, J. L., Fogassi, L., and Gallese, V. (2004). A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron 42, 335-346. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00156-4
139. Kidd, C. D., and Breazeal, C. (2008). "Robots at home: understanding long-term human-robot interaction," in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Nice, 3230-3235. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2008.4651113
140. Kilner, J. M., Neal, A., Weiskopf, N., Friston, K. J., and Frith, C. D. (2009). Evidence of mirror neurons in human inferior frontal gyrus. J. Neurosci. 29, 10153-10159. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2668-09.2009
141. Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y., and Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Curr. Biol. 13, 522-525. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00165-9
142. Knapp, M. L., Hall, J. A., and Horgan, T. G. (2013). Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction, 8th Edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
143. Knoblich, G., and Jordan, J. S. (2003). Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. J. Exp. Psychol. 29, 1006-1016. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.1006
144. Kory, J., and Breazeal, C. (2014). "Storytelling with robots: learning companions for preschool children's language development," in Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), eds P. A. Vargas and R. Aylett (Washington, DC: IEEE), doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926325
145. Kozima, H., and Nakagawa, C. (2007). "A robot in a playroom with preschool children: longitudinal field practice," in Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human interactive Communication (RO-MAN), New York, NY, 1058-1059. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2007.4415238
146. Krach, S., Hegel, F., Wrede, B., Sagerer, G., Binkofski, F., and Kircher, T. (2008). Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fMRI. PLOS ONE 3:e2597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002597
147. Krall, S. C., Rottschy, C., Oberwelland, E., Bzdok, D., Fox, P. T., Eickhoff, S. B., et al. (2015). The role of the right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction as revealed by ALE meta-analysis. Brain Struct. Funct. 220, 587-604. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0803-z
148. Krall, S. C., Volz, L. J., Oberwelland, E., Grefkes, C., Fink, G. R., and Konrad, K. (2016). The right temporoparietal junction in attention and social interaction: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37, 796-807. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23068
149. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G. E. (2012). "Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks," in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, 1097-1105.
150. Kulic, D., and Croft, E. A. (2005). Safe planning for human-robot interaction. J. Field Robot. 22, 383-396. doi: 10.1002/rob.20073
151. Kupferberg, A., Huber, M., Helfer, B., Lenz, C., Knoll, A., and Glasauer, S. (2012). Moving just like you: motor interference depends on similar motility of agent and observer. PLOS ONE 7:e39637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039637
152. Lee, M. K., Kiesler, S., Forlizzi, J., Srinivasa, S., and Rybski, P. (2010). "Gracefully mitigating breakdowns in robotic services," in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Pittsburgh, PA, 203-210.
153. Leslie, A. M., Friedman, O., and German, T. P. (2004). Core mechanisms in theory of mind. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 528-533. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.001
154. Leyens, J. P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., et al. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: the attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 4, 186-197. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_06
155. Liberman, A. M., and Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21, 1-36. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6
156. Looser, C. E., Guntupalli, J. S., and Wheatley, T. (2013). Multivoxel patterns in face-sensitive temporal regions reveal an encoding schema based on detecting life in a face. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 8, 799-805. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss078
157. Looser, C. E., and Wheatley, T. (2010). The tipping point of animacy: how, when, and where we perceive life in a face. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1854-1862. doi: 10.1177/0956797610388044
158. Loughnan, S., and Haslam, N. (2007). Animals and androids: implicit associations between social categories and nonhumans. Psychol. Sci. 18, 116-121. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01858.x
159. MacDorman, K. F., Green, R. D., Ho, C.-C., and Koch, C. T. (2009). Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25, 695-710. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.026
160. Mandell, A., Smith, M., and Wiese, E. (2017). "Mind perception in humanoid agents has negative effects on cognitive processing," in Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Austin, TX.
161. Martin, R. F., Carlos, A. D., Jose Maria, C. P., Gonzalo, A. D., Raul, B. M., Rivero, S., et al. (2013). Robots in therapy for dementia patients. J. Phys. Agents 7, 49-56.
162. Martini, M. C., Gonzalez, C. A., and Wiese, E. (2016). Seeing minds in others-Can agents with robotic appearance have human-like preferences? PLOS ONE 11:e0146310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146310
163. Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., and Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 255-260. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4
164. McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L., Smith, V., and Trouard, T. A. (2001). A functional imaging study of cooperation in two person reciprocal exchange. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 11832-11835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.211415698
165. Metta, G., Natale, L., Nori, F., Sandini, G., Vernon, D., Fadiga, L., et al. (2010). The iCub humanoid robot: an open-systems platform for research in cognitive development. Neural Netw. 23, 1125-1134. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.010
166. Metta, G., Sandini, G., Natale, L., Craighero, L., and Fadiga, L. (2006). Understanding mirror neurons: a bio-robotic approach. Interact. Stud. 7, 197-232. doi: 10.1075/is.7.2.06met
167. Metta, G., Sandini, G., Vernon, D., Natale, L., and Nori, F. (2008). "The iCub humanoid robot: an open platform for research in embodied cognition," in Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems, Gaithersburg, MD.
168. Mitchell, J. P. (2008). Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind. Cereb. Cortex 18, 262-271. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm051
169. Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., and Banaji, M. R. (2006). Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron 50, 655-663. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.040
170. Mitchell, W. J., Szerszen, K. A., Lu, A. S., Schermerhorn, P. W., Scheutz, M., and MacDorman, K. F. (2011). A mismatch in the human realism of face and voice produces an uncanny valley. Iperception 2, 10-12. doi: 10.1068/i0415
171. Mizuuchi, I., Yoshikai, T., Sodeyama, Y., Nakanishi, Y., Miyadera, A., Yamamoto, T., et al. (2006). "Development of musculoskeletal humanoid kotaro," in Proceedings of The 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, FL.
172. Moore, C., and Dunham, P. (1995). Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
173. Mori, M. (1970). Bukimi no tani [the uncanny valley]. Energy 7, 33-35.
174. Mubin, O., Stevens, C. J., Shadid, S., Al Mahmud, A., and Dong, J. J. (2013). A review of the applicability of robots in education. Technol. Educ. Learn. 1, 1-7. doi: 10.2316/Journal.209.2013.1.209-0015
175. Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M., and Fried, I. (2010). Single neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Curr. Biol. 20, 750-756. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.045
176. Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philos. Rev. 83, 435-450. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107341050.014
177. Neven, L. (2010). 'But obviously not for me': robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociol. Health Illn. 32, 335-347. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01218.x
178. Nomura, M., Iidaka, T., Kakehi, K., Tsukiura, T., Hasegawa, T., Maeda, Y., et al. (2003). Frontal lobe networks for effective processing of ambiguously expressed emotions in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 348, 113-116. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00768-7
179. Oberman, L. M., McCleery, J. P., Ramachandran, V. S., and Pineda, J. A. (2007). EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots. Neurocomputing 70, 2194-2203. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2006.02.024
180. O'Donnell, P. A., and Lozano-Pérez, T. (1989). "Deadlock-free and collision-free coordination of two robot manipulators," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 89, Cambridge, MA, 484-489. doi: 10.1109/ROBOT.1989.100033
181. Oh, J. H., Hanson, D., Kim, W. S., Han, Y., Kim, J. Y., and Park, I. W. (2006). "Design of android type humanoid robot Albert HUBO," in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Secaucus, NJ, 1428-1433. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2006.281935
182. Ohnishi, T., Moriguchi, Y., Matsuda, H., Mori, T., Hirakata, M., Imabayashi, E., et al. (2004). The neural network for the mirror system and mentalizing in normally developed children: an fMRI study. Neuroreport 15, 1483-1487. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000127464.17770.1f
183. Ohtsubo, Y. (2007). Perceiver intentionality intensifies blameworthiness of negative behaviors: blame-praise asymmetry in intensification effect. J. Psychol. Res. 49, 100-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2007.00337.x
184. Özdem, C., Wiese, E., Wykowska, A., Müller, H., Brass, M., and Van Overwalle, F. (2016). Believing androids-fMRI activation in the right temporo-parietal junction is modulated by ascribing intentions to non-human agents. Soc. Neurosci. 12, 582-593. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1207702
185. Oztop, E., Franklin, D., Chaminade, T., and Gordon, C. (2005). Human-humanoid interaction: is a humanoid robot perceived as a human. Int. J. HR 2, 537-559. doi: 10.1142/S0219843605000582
186. Oztop, E., Kawato, M., and Arbib, M. (2006). Mirror neurons and imitation: a computationally guided review. Neural Netw. 19, 254-271. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.02.002
187. Oztop, E., Kawato, M., and Arbib, M. A. (2013). Mirror neurons: functions, mechanisms and models. Neurosci. Lett. 540, 43-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.10.005
188. Park, S., and Catrambone, R. (2007). Social facilitation effects of virtual humans. Hum. Factors 49, 1054-1060. doi: 10.1518/001872007X249910
189. Perner, J., Aichhorn, M., Kronbichler, M., Staffen, W., and Ladurner, G. (2006). Thinking of mental and other representations: the roles of left and right temporo-parietal junction. Soc. Neurosci. 1, 245-258. doi: 10.1080/17470910600989896
190. Pfeifer, R., Lungarella, M., and Iida, F. (2012). The challenges ahead for bio-inspired 'soft' robotics. Commun. ACM 55, 76-87. doi: 10.1145/2366316.2366335
191. Pobric, G., and Hamilton, A. (2006). Action understanding requires the left inferior frontal cortex. Curr. Biol. 16, 524-529. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.033
192. Pointeau, G., Petit, M., and Ford Dominey, P. (2013). "Embodied simulation based on autobiographical memory," in Living Machines, eds N. F. Lepora, A. Mura, H. G. Krapp, P. F. M. J. Verschure, and T. J. Prescott (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 240-250. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-39802-5-21
193. Prange, G. B., Jannink, M. J. A., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C. G. M., Hermens, H. J., and Ijzerman, M. J. (2006). Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 43, 171-184. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2005.04.0076
194. Press, C., Bird, G., Flach, R., and Heyes, C. (2005). Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. Cogn. Brain Res. 25, 632-640. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.020
195. Press, C., Gillmeister, H., and Heyes, C. (2006). Bottom-up, not top-down, modulation of imitation by human and robotic models. Eur. J. Neurosci. 24:2415-2419. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05115.x CrossRef Full Text Press, C., Gillmeister, H., and Heyes, C. (2007). Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 2509-2514. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0774
196. Preston, S. D., and de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav. Brain Sci. 25, 1-72. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X02000018
197. Repp, B. H. (1984). "Categorical perception: issues, methods, findings," in Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice, Vol. 10, ed. J. Lass (New York, NY: Academic Press), 243-335. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-608610-2.50012-1
198. Ricks, D. J., and Colton, M. B. (2010). "Trends and considerations in robot assisted autism therapy," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Anchorage, AK, 4354-4359. doi: 10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509327
199. Riedl, R., Mohr, P., Kenning, P., Davis, F. D., and Heekeren, H. (2014). Trusting humans and avatars: a brain imaging study based on evolution theory. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 30, 83-113. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222300404
200. Riether, N., Hegel, F., Wrede, B., and Horstmann, G. (2012). "Social facilitation with social robots?," in Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Boston, MA, 41-47. doi: 10.1145/2157689.2157697
201. Rizzolatti, G., and Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 169-192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
202. Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Te Boekhorst, R., and Billard, A. (2005). Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 4, 105-120. doi: 10.1007/s10209-005-0116-3
203. Rosset, E. (2008). It's no accident: our bias for intentional explanations. Cognition 108, 771-780. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.001
204. Ruby, P., and Decety, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 546-550.
205. Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Braithwaite, J. J., Andrews, B. J., and Bodley Scott, S. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. J. Exp. Psychol. 36, 1255-1266. doi: 10.1037/a0018729
206. Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Chiavarino, C., and Humphreys, G. W. (2004). Left temporo-parietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 499-500. doi: 10.1038/nn1223
207. Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., and Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science 300, 1755-1758. doi: 10.1126/science.1082976
208. Saxe, R., and Kanwisher, N. (2003). People thinking about thinking people: the role of the temporo-parietal junction in "theory of mind.". Neuroimage 19, 1835-1842. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00230-1
209. Saxe, R., and Powell, L. J. (2006). It's the thought that counts: specific brain regions for one component of theory of mind. Psychol. Sci. 17, 692-699. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01768.x
210. Saxe, R., and Wexler, A. (2005). Making sense of another mind: the role of the right temporo-parietal junction. Neuropsychologia 43, 1391-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.02.013
211. Saygin, A. P. (2007). Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. Brain 130, 2452-2461. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm162
212. Saygin, A. P., Chaminade, T., Ishiguro, H., Driver, J., and Frith, C. (2012). The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 413-422. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr025
213. Saygin, A. P., Wilson, S. M., Hagler, D. J. Jr., Bates, E., and Sereno, M. I. (2004). Point-light biological motion perception activates human premotor cortex. J. Neurosci. 24, 6181-6188. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0504-04.2004
214. Scassellati, B. (2001). Foundations for a Theory of Mind for a Humanoid Robot, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
215. Scassellati, B. (2002). Theory of mind for a humanoid robot. Auton. Robots 12, 13-24. doi: 10.1037/e445252005-001
216. Scassellati, B., Admoni, H., and Mataric, M. (2012). Robots for use in autism research. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, 275-294. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150036
217. Schein, C., and Gray, K. (2015). The unifying moral dyad liberals and conservatives share the same harm-based moral template. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41, 1147-1163. doi: 10.1177/0146167215591501
218. Scholz, J., Triantafyllou, C., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Brown, E. N., and Saxe, R. (2009). Distinct regions of right temporo-parietal junction are selective for theory of mind and exogenous attention. PLOS ONE 4:e4869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004869
219. Scopelliti, M., Giuliani, M. V., and Fornara, F. (2005). Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 4, 146-155. doi: 10.1007/s10209-005-0118-1
220. Sebanz, N., and Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where. Top. Cogn. Sci. 1, 353-367. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024
221. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., and Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. J. Exp. Psychol. 31, 1234-1246. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1234
222. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., and Wascher, E. (2006). Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning and control in co-acting individuals. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 859-870. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.859
223. Serre, T., Wolf, L., and Poggio, T. (2005). "Object recognition with features inspired by visual cortex," in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 2, Washington, DC, 994-1000. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2005.254
224. Seyama, J., and Nagayama, R. S. (2007). The uncanny valley: effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. Presence 16, 337-351. doi: 10.1162/pres.16.4.337
225. Shariff, A. F., and Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychol. Sci. 18, 803-809. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983
226. Sharkey, N. (2008). The ethical frontiers of robotics. Science 322, 1800-1801. doi: 10.1126/science.1164582
227. Shibata, T., Mitsui, T., Wada, K., Touda, A., Kumasaka, T., Tagami, K., et al. (2001). "Mental commit robot and its application to therapy of children," in Proceedings of IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Como, 1053-1058. doi: 10.1109/AIM.2001.936838
228. Silva, R., Louro, L., Malheiro, T., Erlhagen, W., and Bicho, E. (2016). Combining intention and emotional state inference in a dynamic neural field architecture for human-robot joint action. Adapt. Behav. 24, 350-372. doi: 10.1177/1059712316665451
229. Singer, T. (2006). The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: review of literature and implications for future research. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 30, 855-863. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.011
230. Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., and Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303, 1157-1162. doi: 10.1126/science.1093535
231. Spunt, R. P., Meyer, M. L., and Lieberman, M. D. (2015). The default mode of human brain function primes the intentional stance. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27, 1116-1124. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00785
232. Steinbeis, N. (2016). The role of self-other distinction in understanding others' mental and emotional states: neurocognitive mechanisms in children and adults. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Sci. 371:20150074. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0074
233. Sugiyama, O., Kanda, T., Imai, M., Ishiguro, H., and Hagita, N. (2006). Human-like conversation with gestures and verbal cues based on three-layer attention-drawing model. Conn. Sci. 18, 379-402. doi: 10.1080/09540090600890254
234. Suzuki, Y., Galli, L., Ikeda, A., Itakura, S., and Kitazaki, M. (2015). Measuring empathy for human and robot hand pain using electroencephalography. Sci. Rep. 5:15924. doi: 10.1038/srep15924
235. Takayama, L., Ju, W., and Nass, C. (2008). "Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: what everyday people think robots should do," in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, Amsterdam, 25-32.
236. Tani, J., Ito, M., and Sugita, Y. (2004). Self-organization of distributedly represented multiple behavior schemata in a mirror system: reviews of robot experiments using RNNPB. Neural Netw. 17, 1273-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2004.05.007
237. Tapus, A., and Mataric, M. J. (2006). Towards socially assistive robotics. Int. J. Robot. Soc. Jpn. 24, 576-578. doi: 10.7210/jrsj.24.576
238. Tapus, A., Mataric, M. J., and Scasselati, B. (2007). Socially assistive robotics [Grand challenges of robotics]. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 14, 35-42. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2007.339605
239. Tapus, A., Peca, A., Aly, A., Pop, C. A., Jisa, L., Pintea, S., et al. (2012). Children with autism social engagement in interaction with Nao, an imitative robot-A series of single case experiments. Interact. Stud. 13, 315-347. doi: 10.1075/is.13.3.01tap
240. Thrun, S. (2002). Probabilistic robotics. Commun. ACM 45, 52-57. doi: 10.1145/504729.504754
241. Triebel, R., Arras, K., Alami, R., Beyer, L., Breuers, S., Chatila, R., et al. (2016). "Spencer: a socially aware service robot for passenger guidance and help in busy airports," in Field and Service Robotics, eds D. Wettergreen and T. Barfoot (Cham: Springer), 607-622. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27702-8_40
242. Tversky, B., and Hard, B. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: spatial perspective taking. Cognition 110, 124-129. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.008
243. Umilta, M. A., Kohler, E., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L., Fadiga, L., Keysers, C., et al. (2001). I know what you are doing. A neurophysiological study. Neuron 31, 155-165. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00337-3
244. van Overwalle, F. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 829-858. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20547
245. van Schie, H. T., Mars, R. B., Coles, M. G., and Bekkering, H. (2004). Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 549-554. doi: 10.1038/nn1239
246. Vollm, B. A., Taylor, A. N., Richardson, P., Corcoran, R., Stirling, J., McKie, S., et al. (2006). Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task. Neuroimage 29, 90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.022
247. Wada, K., and Shibata, T. (2006). "Robot therapy in a care house-its sociopsychological and physiological effects on the residents," in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, FL, 3966-3971.
248. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Musha, T., and Kimura, S. (2005). "Effects of robot therapy for demented patients evaluated by EEG," in Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton, AB, 1552-1557.
249. Wagner, D. D., Kelley, W. M., and Heatherton, T. F. (2011). Individual differences in the spontaneous recruitment of brain regions supporting mental state understanding when viewing natural social scenes. Cereb. Cortex 21, 2788-2796. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr074
250. Ward, S. A., Parikh, S., and Workman, B. (2011). Health perspectives: international epidemiology of ageing. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 25, 305-317. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2011.05.002
251. Warren, Z. E., Zheng, Z., Swanson, A. R., Bekele, E., Zhang, L., Crittendon, J. A., et al. (2015). Can robotic interaction improve joint attention skills? J. Autism Dev. Dis. 45, 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1918-4
252. Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., and Epley, N. (2010a). Who sees human? The importance and stability of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5, 219-232. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369336 CrossRef Full Text Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N., and Wegner, D. M. (2010b). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 383-388. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.006
253. Weis, P., and Wiese, E. (2017). "Cognitive conflict as possible cause for the uncanny valley," in Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA. Wheatley, T., Weinberg, A., Looser, C., Moran, T., and Hajcak, G. (2011). Mind perception: real but not artificial faces sustain neural activity beyond the N170/VPP. PLOS ONE 6:e17960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017960
254. Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J. P., Gallese, V., and Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of us disgusted in my insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40, 655-664. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00679-2
255. Wiese, E., Wykowska, A., Zwickel, J., and Müller, H. J. (2012). I see what you mean: how attentional selection is shaped by ascribing intentions to others. PLOS ONE 7:e45391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045391
256. Wimmer, H., and Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition 13, 103-128. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
257. Wood, J. N., and Grafman, J. (2003). Human prefrontal cortex: processing and representational perspectives. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 139-147. doi: 10.1038/nrn1033
258. Woods, S., Dautenham, K., and Kaouri, C. (2005). "Is someone watching me?-Consideration of social facilitation effects in human-robot interaction experiments," in IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, CIRA, Espoo, 53-60. doi: 10.1109/CIRA.2005.1554254
259. Wykowska, A., Chaminade, T., and Cheng, G. (2016). Embodied artificial agents for understanding human social cognition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 371:20150375. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0375
260. Wykowska, A., Chellali, R., Al-Amin, M. Md, and Müller, H. J. (2014a). Implications of robot actions for human perception. How do we represent actions of the observed robots?. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 6, 357-366. doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0239-x
261. Wykowska, A., Wiese, E., Prosser, A., and Müller, H. J. (2014b). Beliefs about the minds of others influence how we process sensory information. PLOS ONE 9:e94339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094339
262. Yamaoka, F., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., and Hagita, N. (2007). How contingent should a lifelike robot be? The relationship between contingency and complexity. Conn. Sci. 19, 143-162. doi: 10.1145/1121241.1121294
263. Yamazaki, R., Christensen, L., Skov, K., Chang, C., Damholdt, M., Sumioka, H., et al. (2016). Intimacy in phone conversations: anxiety reduction for danish seniors with hugvie. Front. Psychol. 7:537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00537
264. Zanbaka, C., Ulinski, A., Goolkasian, P., and Hodges, L. F. (2007). Social responses to virtual humans: Implications for future interface design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI, San Jose, CA, 1561-1570. doi: 10.1145/1240624.1240861
265. Zink, C. F., Kempf, L., Hakimi, S., Rainey, C. A., Stein, J. L., and Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2011). Vasopressin modulates social recognition-related activity in the left temporoparietal junction in humans. Trans. Psychiatry 1:e3. doi: 10.1038/tp.2011.2
266. Zlotowski, J., Proudfoot, D., Yogeeswaran, K., and Bartneck, C. (2015). Anthropomorphism: opportunities and challenges in human-robot interaction. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7, 347-360. doi: 10.1007/s12369-014-0267-6
267. Zwickel, J. (2009). Agency attribution and visuo-spatial perspective taking. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 1089-1093. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.6.1089