Prediction in Joint Action: What, When, and Where

Topics in Cognitive Science

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 353-367

  Sebanz, Natalie ^a   Knoblich, Guenther ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Action simulation; Joint action; Joint attention; Mental state attribution; Mirror system; Perception action links; Prediction

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

COGNITION; COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 68749090151     PISSN: 17568757     EISSN: 17568765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., Prinz, W., & Knoblich, G. (2008). Action co-representation: The joint SNARC effect. Social Neuroscience, 3, 410-420.
2. Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Gattis, M. (2000). Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 153-164.
3. Blakemore, S., Frith, C., & Wolpert, D. (1999). Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 551-559.
4. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 62-81.
6. Davidson, P., & Wolpert, D.M. (2003). Motor learning and prediction in a variable environment. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 1-6.
7. Eilan, N., Hoerl, C., Mc Cormack, T., & Roessler, J. (2004). Joint attention: Communication and other minds. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
8. Erlhagen, W., & Bicho, E. (2006). The dynamic neural field approach to cognitive robotics. Journal of Neural Engineering, 3, R36-R54.
9. Erlhagen, W., & Jancke, D. (2004). The role of action plans and cognitive factors in motion extrapolation: A modelling study. Visual Cognition, 11, 315-341.
10. Fetzer A (Ed.) (2007). Context and appropriateness: Micro meets macro. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
11. Flach, R., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2004). Recognizing one's own clapping: The role of temporal cues in self-recognition. Psychological Research, 11, 147-156.
12. Flanagan, J. R., & Johansson, R. S. (2003). Action plans used in action observation. Nature, 424, 769-771.
13. Grafton, S., & Hamilton, A. (2007). Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Human Movement Science.
14. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73-99.
15. Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Henrich, J., & Mc Elreath, R. (2003). The evolution of cultural evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 123-135.
17. Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265-288.
18. Huygens, C. (1665). Kort onderwijs aengaende het gebruyck der Horologien tot het vinden der Lenghten van Oost en West. The Hague.
19. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Holt.
20. Jordan, J. S., & Hunsinger, M. (2008). Learned patterns of action effect anticipation contribute to the spatial displacement of continuously moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 113-124.
21. Keller, P. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In F. Morganti, A. Carassa & G. Riva (Eds.), Enacting intersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective on the study of interactions (pp. 205-221). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
22. Keller, P., Knoblich, G., & Repp, B. (2007). Pianists duet better when they play with themselves. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 102-111.
23. Kilner, J. M., Vargas, C., Duval, S., Blakemore, S.-J., & Sirigu, A. (2004). Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1299-1301.
24. Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2001). Predicting action effects: Interactions between perception and action. Psychological Science, 12, 467-472.
25. Knoblich, G., & Jordan, S. (2002). The mirror system and joint action. In M. I. Stamenov & V. Gallese (Eds.), Mirror neurons and the evolution of brain and language (pp. 115-124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Knoblich, G., & Jordan, S. (2003). Action coordination in individuals and groups: Learning anticipatory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 1006-1016.
27. Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Recognition of self-generated actions from kinematic displays of drawing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 456-465.
28. Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2008). Evolving intentions for social interaction: From entrainment to joint action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 363, 2021-2031.
29. Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umilta, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: Action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297, 846-848.
30. Lakin, J., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14, 334-339.
31. Lotze, H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie und oder Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
32. Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Brechte, Y., Vicsek, T., & Barabasi, A.-L. (2000). The sound of many hands clapping. Nature, 403, 849-850.
33. Ouillier, O., De Guzman, G. C., Jamtzen, K. J., Lagarde, J., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2008). Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding. Social Neuroscience, 3, 178-192.
34. Oztop, E., Kawato, M., & Arbib, M. A. (2006). Mirror neurons and imitation: A computationally guided review. Neural Networks, 19, 254-271.
35. Pacherie, E., & Dokic, J. (2006). From mirror neurons to joint actions. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 101-112.
36. Pierno, A. C., Becchio, C., Wall, M. B., Smith, A. T., Turella, L., & Castiello, U. (2006). When gaze turns into grasp. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 2130-2137.
37. Prinz, W. (1990). A common-coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 167-201). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
38. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154.
39. Ramnani, N., & Miall, R. C. (2004). A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 85-90.
40. Repp, B. H., & Knoblich, G. (2004). Perceiving action identity: How pianists recognize their own performances. Psychological Science, 15, 604-609.
41. Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R., Goodman, J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 26, 867-891.
42. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
43. Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. (2004). What's at the top in the top-down control of action? Script-sharing and 'top-top' control of action in cognitive experiments. Psychological Research, 68, 189-198.
44. Sato, A. (2008). Action observation modulates auditory perception of the consequence of others' actions. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1219-1227.
45. Schmidt, R. C., Bienvenu, M., Fitzpatrick, P. A., & Amazeen, P. G. (1998). A comparison of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination: Coordination breakdowns and coupling strength. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 884-900.
46. Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W. (2007). Perceptual resonance: Action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 349-355.
47. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006a). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70-76.
48. Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2008). From mirroring to joint action. In I. Wachsmuth, M. Lenzen & G. Knoblich (Eds.), Embodied communication (pp. 129-150). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
49. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others' actions: Just like one's own? Cognition, 88, B11-B21.
50. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1234-1246.
51. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Wascher, E. (2006b). Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning and control in co-acting individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 859-870.
52. Sebanz, N., Rebbechi, D., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Frith, C. (2007). Is it really my turn? An event-related f MRI study of task sharing. Social Neuroscience, 2, 81-95.
53. Stanley, J., Gowen, E., & Miall, C. (2007). Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 915-926.
54. Tollefsen, D. (2005). Let's pretend! Children and joint action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 35, 75-97.
55. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675-735.
56. Vygotsky, L.S. (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol.1): Problems of general psychology. Including the volume Thinking and Speech. New York: Plenum.
57. Watanabe, K. (2008). Behavioral speed contagion: Automatic modulation of movement timing by observation of body movements. Cognition, 106, 1514-1524.
58. Welsh, T. N., Elliott, D., Anson, J. G., Dhillon, V., Weeks, D. J., Lyons, J. L., & Chua, R. (2005). Does Joe influence Fred's action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neuroscience Letters, 385, 99-104.
59. Williams, J. H. G., Waiter, G. D., Perra, O., Perrett, D. I., & Whiten, A. (2005). An f MRI study of joint attention experience. Neuroimage, 25, 133-140.
60. Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460-473.