How do we think machines think? An fMRI study of alleged competition with an artificial intelligence

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue MAY 2012, 2012, Pages

  Chaminade, Thierry ^a   Rosset, Delphine ^a,b   Da Fonseca, David ^a,c   Nazarian, Bruno ^a   Lutcher, Ewald ^d   Cheng, Gordon ^d   Deruelle, Christine ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b HÔPITAL SAINTE MARGUERITE   (France)

^c Child and Adolescent Psychopathology Unit Salvator Hospital Public Assistance Marseille Hospitals University Aix Marseille II   (France)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Artificial intelligence; fMRI; Neuroscience; Social cognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRECUNEUS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PREMOTOR CORTEX; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 84933677033     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00103     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Amodio, D. M., and Frith, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 268-277.
2. Badre, D. (2008). Cognitive control, hierarchy, and the rostro-caudal organization of the frontal lobes. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 193-200.
3. Billard, A., Robins, B., Nadel, J., and Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Building Robota, a mini-humanoid robot for the rehabilitation of children with autism. Assist. Technol. 19, 37-49.
4. Cabeza, R., Dolcos, F., Graham, R., and Nyberg, L. (2002). Similarities and differences in the neural correlates of episodic memory retrieval and working memory. Neuroimage 16, 317-330.
5. Cavanna, A. E., and Trimble, M. R. (2006). The precuneus: a reviewofits functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 129, 564-583.
6. Chaminade, T., and Cheng, G. (2009). Social cognitive neuroscience and humanoid robotics. J. Physiol. Paris 103, 286-295.
7. Chaminade, T., and Decety, J. (2001). A common framework for perception and action: neuroimaging evidence. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 879-882.
8. Chaminade, T., and Kawato, M. (2011). "Mutual benefits of using humanoid robots in social neuroscience," in Handbook of Social Neuroscience, eds J. Decety and J. T. Cacioppo (Oxford: Oxford University Press USA), 974-991.
9. Chaminade, T., Zecca, M., Blakemore, S. J., Takanishi, A., Frith, C. D., Micera, S., Dario, P., Rizzolatti, G., Gallese, V., and Umilta, M. A. (2010). Brain response to a humanoid robot in areas implicated in the perception of human emotional gestures. PLoS One 5:e11577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011577
10. Cross, E. S., Liepelt, R., de, C. H. A. F., Parkinson, J., Ramsey, R., Stadler, W., and Prinz, W. (2011). Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network. Hum. Brain Mapp. doi: 10.1002/ hbm.21361. [Epub ahead of print].
11. Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 362, 679-704.
12. Dennett, D. C. (1987). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. du Boisgueheneuc, F., Levy, R., Volle, E., Seassau, M., Duffau, H., Kinkingnehun, S., Samson, Y., Zhang, S., and Dubois, B. (2006). Functions of the left superior frontal gyrus in humans: a lesion study. Brain 129, 3315-3328.
14. Duvernoy, H. M. (1999). The Human Brain: Surface, Blood Supply, and Three-Dimensional Anatomy, 2nd edn, completely revised. Wien New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
15. Eickhoff, S. B., Paus, T., Caspers, S., Grosbras, M. H., Evans, A. C., Zilles, K., and Amunts, K. (2007). Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitec-tonic areas revisited. Neuroimage 36, 511-521.
16. Frith, C. D., and Frith, U. (1999). Interacting minds-a biological basis. Science 286, 1692-1695.
17. Gallagher, H., Jack, A., Roepstorff, A., and Frith, C. (2002). Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. Neuroimage 16, 814.
18. Hamilton, A. F., and Grafton, S. T. (2006). Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. J. Neurosci. 26, 1133-1137.
19. Hutton, C., Bork, A., Josephs, O., Deichmann, R., Ashburner, J., and Turner, R. (2002). Image distortion correction in fMRI: a quantitative evaluation. Neuroimage 16, 217-240.
20. James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology. New York, NY: Holt.
21. Koechlin, E., Ody, C., and Kouneiher, F. (2003). The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science 302, 1181-1185.
22. Krach, S., Hegel, F., Wrede, B., Sagerer, G., Binkofski, F., and Kircher, T. (2008). Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fMRI. PLoS One 3:e2597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002597
23. Krach, S., Paulus, F. M., Bodden, M., and Kircher, T. (2010). The rewarding nature of social interactions. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 4:22. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00022
24. Mataric, M., Tapus, A., Winstein, C., and Eriksson, J. (2009). Socially assistive robotics for stroke and mild TBI rehabilitation. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 145, 249-262.
25. McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L., Smith, V., and Trouard, T. (2001). A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 11832-11835.
26. Nagahama, Y., Okada, T., Katsumi, Y., Hayashi, T., Yamauchi, H., Sawamoto, N., Toma, K., Nakamura, K., Hanakawa, T., Konishi, J., Fukuyama, H., and Shibasaki, H. (1999). Transient neural activity in the medial superior frontal gyrus and precuneus time locked with attention shift between object features. Neuroimage 10, 193-199.
27. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuro-psychologia 9, 97-113.
28. Petrides, M. (2005). Lateral prefrontal cortex: architectonic and functional organization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360, 781-795.
29. Rilling, J. K., Sanfey, A. G., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., and Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions. Neuroimage 22, 1694-1703.
30. Rizzolatti, G., and Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 169-192.
31. Saxe, R., and Kanwisher, N. (2003). People thinking about thinking people. The role of the temporo-parietal junction in "theory of mind". Neuroimage 19, 1835-1842.
32. Saygin, A. P., Chaminade, T., Ishiguro, H., Driver, J., and Frith, C. (2011). The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. doi: 10.1093/ scan/nsr025. [Epub ahead of print].
33. Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., and Martinez, A. (2001). Mapping of contralateral space in retinotopic coordinates by a parietal cortical area in humans. Science 294, 1350-1354.
34. Simon, O., Mangin, J. F., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., and Dehaene, S. (2002). Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation, and language-related areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron 33, 475-487.
35. Spreckelmeyer, K. N., Krach, S., Kohls, G., Rademacher, L., Irmak, A., Konrad, K., Kircher, T., and Grunder, G. (2009). Anticipation of monetary and social reward differently activates mesolimbic brain structures in men and women. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 4, 158-165.
36. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind Lang. 49, 433-460.