Mind perception in humanoid agents has negative effects on cognitive processing

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 2017-October, Issue , 2017, Pages 1585-1589

  Mandell, Arielle R ^a   Smith, Melissa ^a   Wiese, Eva ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERGONOMICS; HUMAN ENGINEERING;

COGNITIVE LOADS; COGNITIVE PROCESSING; HUMANOID AGENTS; INTERNAL STATE;

HUMAN REACTION TIME;

EID: 85028041788     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1541931213601760     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Adolphs, R. (1999). Social cognition and the human brain. Trends in cognitive sciences, 3(12), 469-479.
2. Castelli, F., Happé, F., Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2000). Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage, 12(3), 314-325.
3. Cheetham, M., Suter, P., and Jancke L. (2011). The human likeness dimension of the "uncanny valley hypothesis": behavioral and functional MRI findings. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 5(126). 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00126
4. Cheetham M., Suter P., Jancke L. (2014). Perceptual discrimination difficulty and familiarity in the uncanny valley: more like a "Happy Valley." Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1219). 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01219
5. Demoulin, S., and Cortes, B. P., Viki, T. G., Rodriguez, A. P., and Rodriguez, R. T., Paladino, M. P., & Leyens, J. P. (2009). The role of in-group identification in infra-humanization. International Journal of Psychology, 44(1), 4-11.
6. Dennett, D. (2003). Who's on first? Heterophenomenology explained. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9-10), 19-30.
7. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886.
8. Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50(4), 531-534.
9. Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812), 619.
10. Hackel, L. M., and Looser, C. E., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). Group membership alters the threshold for mind perception: The role of social identity, collective identification, and intergroup threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 15-23.
11. Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological Science, 17(10), 847-853.
12. Leyens, J. P., and Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 186-197.
13. Looser, C. E., & Wheatley, T. (2010). The tipping point of animacy: How, when, and where we perceive life in a face. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1854-1862.
14. Martini, M. C., and Gonzalez, C. A., & Wiese, E. (2016). Seeing minds in others-Can agents with robotic appearance have human-like preferences?. PloS one, 11(1), e0146310.
15. Powers, K. E., and Worsham, A. L., Freeman, J. B., Wheatley, T., & Heatherton, T. F. (2014). Social Connection Modulates Perceptions of Animacy. Psychological Science, 25(10) 1-6. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614547706
16. Wagner, D. D., and Kelley, W. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (2011). Individual differences in the spontaneous recruitment of brain regions supporting mental state understanding when viewing natural social scenes. Cerebral Cortex, 21(12), 2788-2796.
17. Wheatley, T., Weinberg, A., Looser, C., Moran, T., & Hajcak, G. (2011). Mind perception: Real but not artificial faces sustain neural activity beyond the N170/VPP. PloS one, 6(3), e17960.