It's no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations

Cognition

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 771-780

  Rosset, Evelyn ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action perception; Development; Explanatory biases; Heuristics and biases; Intentional explanation; Intentionality; Social cognition

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACCIDENTS; COMPREHENSION; CULTURE; HUMANS; INTENTION; JUDGMENT; MENTAL RECALL; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 51249089237     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baldwin D., and Baird J. Discerning intentions in dynamic human action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (2001) 171-178
2. Baron-Cohen S. Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge
3. Baron J., and Hershey J. Outcome bias in decision evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (1988) 569-579
4. Barrett J.L. Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 29-34
5. Boyer P. Religious thought and behavior as by-products of brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 119-124
6. Burger J. Motivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: A meta-analysis of the defensive-attribution hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 90 (1981) 496-512
7. Cohen J.D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., and Provost J. PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 25 (1993) 257-271
8. Guthrie S. Why gods? A cognitive theory. In: Andresen J. (Ed). Religion in mind: Cognitive perspectives on religious belief, ritual, and experience (2001), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY 94-111
9. Kelemen D. Are children 'intuitive theists'? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science 15 (2004) 295-301
10. Knobe J. Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation. Philosophical Psychology 16 (2003) 309-324
11. Kordes-de Vaal J. Intention and the omission bias: Omissions perceived as nondecisions. Acta Psychologica 93 (1996) 161-172
12. Langer E.J. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (1975) 311-328
13. Lerner M.J. The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion (1980), Plenum, New York
14. Lockhart R.S., and Craik F.I. Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology 44 (1990) 87-112
15. Malle B.F., and Knobe J. The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33 (1997) 101-121
16. Mawson A. Intentional injury and the behavioral syndrome. Aggression and Violent Behavior 10 (2005) 375-405
17. Miller P.H., and Aloise P.A. Young children's understanding of the psychological causes of behavior: A review. Child Development 60 (1989) 257-285
18. Orobio de Castro B., Veerman J., Koops W., Bosch J., and Monshouwer H. Hostile attributional intent and aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development 74 (2002) 329-345
19. Preissler M., and Bloom P. Two-year-olds use artist intention to understand drawings. Cognition 106 (2008) 512-518
20. Premack D. The infant's theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition 36 (1990) 1-16
21. Rosset E. Intentional until proven otherwise: Evidence of an explanatory bias in children and adults. Dissertation Abstracts International 68 (2007) 2689
22. Shiffrin R.M., and Atkinson R.C. Storage and retrieval processes in long-term memory. Psychological Review 76 (1969) 179-193
23. Shultz T.R., Wells D., and Sarda M. Development of the ability to distinguish intended actions from mistakes, reflexes, and passive movements. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 19 (1980) 301-310
24. Wegner D.M. The illusion of conscious will (2002), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA