Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 695-710

  MacDorman, Karl F ^a   Green, Robert D ^a   Ho, Chin Chang ^a   Koch, Clinton T ^a  

^a Indiana University   (United States)

Author keywords

Anthropomorphism; Facial perception; Masahiro Mori; Social cognitive neuroscience; Uncanny valley

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMORPHISM; FACIAL PERCEPTION; MASAHIRO MORI; SOCIAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; UNCANNY VALLEY;

LANDFORMS; RISK PERCEPTION; TEXTURES;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 65049089619     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.026     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Andrews T.J., Schluppeck D., Homfray D., Matthews P., and Blakemore C. Activity in the fusiform gyrus predicts conscious perception of Rubin's vase-face illusion. Neuroimage 17 (2002) 890-901
2. Atkinson A.P., Heberlein A.S., and Adolphs R. Spared ability to recognise fear from static and moving whole-body cues following bilateral amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia 45 12 (2007) 2772-2782
3. Bailenson J.N., Swinth K.R., Hoyt C.L., Persky S., Dimov A., and Blascovich J. The independent and interactive effects of embodied-agent appearance and behavior on self-report, cognitive, and behavioral markers of copresence in immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14 4 (2005) 379-393
4. Barbeau E.J., Taylor M.J., Regis J., Marquis P., Chauvel P., and Liegeois-Chauvel C. Spatio temporal dynamics of face recognition. Cerebral Cortex 18 5 (2008) 997-1009
5. Bartneck, C. (2008). Who like androids more: Japanese or US Americans? In 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 553-557). Munich: IEEE.
6. Becker E. The denial of death (1973), Free Press, New York
7. Burgoon J.K., Bonito J.A., Bengtsson B., Cederberg C., Lundeberg M., and Allspach L. Interactivity in human-computer interaction: A study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behavior 16 6 (2000) 553-574
8. Canemaker J. A part-human, part-cartoon species (2004), The New York Times
9. Carmel D., and Bentin S. Domain specificity versus expertise: Factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition 83 (2002) 1-29
10. Carr L., Iacoboni M., Dubeau M., Mazziotta J., and Lenzi G. Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 9 (2003) 5497-5502
11. Chaminade T.D., Hodgin J.K., and Kawato M. Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated characters' actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2 3 (2007) 206-216
12. Cole J. Empathy needs a face. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (2001) 51-68
13. Conway C.A., Jones B.C., DeBruine L.M., and Little A. Evidence for adaptive design in human gaze preference. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences 275 1630 (2008) 63-69
14. Costa M., and Corassa L. Aesthetic phenomena as supernormal stimuli: The case of eye, lip and lower-face size and roundness in artistic portraits. Perception 35 2 (2006) 229-246
15. Cunningham M.R. Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 5 (1986) 925-935
16. Cunningham M.R., Roberts A.R., Barbee A.P., Druen P.B., and Wu C.-H. "Their ideas of beauty are on the whole the same as ours?" Consistency and variability in cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 2 (1995) 261-279
17. Davis M., and Whalen P.J. The amygdala: Vigilance and emotion. Molecular Psychiatry 6 1 (2001) 13-34
18. Del Cul A., Baillet S., and Dehaene S. Brain dynamics underlying the nonlinear threshold for access to consciousness. PLoS Biology 5 10 (2007) 2408-2423
19. Diamond R., and Carey S. Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 2 (1986) 107-117
20. Downing P.E., Jiang Y., Shuman M., and Kanwisher N. A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 293 (2001) 2470-2473
21. Ekman P., and Friesen W.V. A new pan-cultural facial expression of emotion. Motivation and Emotion 10 2 (1986) 159-168
22. Emery N.J. The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 24 (2000) 581-604
23. Etcoff N. Survival of the prettiest: The science of beauty (1999), Doubleday, New York
24. Farah M.J., Rabinowitz C., Quinn G.E., and Liu G.T. Early commitment of neural substrates for face recognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology 17 (2000) 117-123
25. Gallese V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., and Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119 (1996) 593-609
26. Gauthier I., and Logothetis N.K. Is face recognition not so unique after all?. Cognitive Neuropsychology 17 (2000) 125-142
27. Gazzola V., Rizzolatti G., Wicker B., and Keysers C. The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. NeuroImage 35 4 (2007) 1674-1684
28. Geller T. Overcoming the uncanny valley. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 28 4 (2008) 11-17
29. Giddon D.B., Sconzo R., Kinchen J.A., and Evans C.A. Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences. The Angle Orthodontist 66 6 (1996) 441-448
30. Gong L. How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Computers in Human Behavior 24 4 (2008) 1494-1509
31. Gouskos, C. (2006). The depths of the uncanny valley. Game Spot. Available from http://www.gamespot.com/features/6153667/index.html.
32. Grammer K., and Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology 108 3 (1994) 233-243
33. Green R.D., MacDorman K.F., Ho C.-C., and Vasudevan S.K. Sensitivity to the proportions of faces that vary in human likeness. Computers in Human Behavior 24 5 (2008) 2456-2474
34. Grezes J., Armony J., Rowe J., and Passingham R. Activations related to "mirror" and "canonical" neurones in the human brain: An fmri study. Neuroimage 18 (2003) 928-937
35. Grill-Spector K., Knouf N., and Kanwisher N. The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification. Nature Neuroscience 7 5 (2004) 555-562
36. Haidt J., McCauley C., and Rozin P. Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences 16 (1993) 701-713
37. Hanson, D. (2006). Exploring the aesthetic range of humanoid robots. In Proceedings of the ICCS/CogSci-2006 long symposium: Toward social mechanisms of android science (pp. 16-20).
38. Hasson U., Hendler T., Ben Bashat D., and Malach R. Vase or face? A neural correlate of shape-selective grouping processes in the human brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13 (2001) 744-753
39. Haxby J.V., Gobbini M.I., Furey M.L., Ishai A., Schouten J.L., and Pietrini P. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 293 (2001) 2425-2430
40. Henss R. Perceiving age and attractiveness in facial photographs. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21 (1991) 933-946
41. Ho, C. -C., MacDorman, K. F., & Pramono, Z. A. D. (2008). Human emotion and the uncanny valley: A GLM, MDS, and isomap analysis of robot video ratings. In ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction.
42. Jabbi M., Bastiaansen J., and Keysers C. A common anterior insula representation of disgust observation, experience and imagination shows divergent functional connectivity pathways. PLoS ONE 3 8 (2008) e2939
43. wg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology 78 2 (1993) 306-309
44. Jones B.C., Little A.C., and Perrett D.I. When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception 33 5 (2004) 569-576
45. Jones D. Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny: Cross-cultural evidence and implications. Current Anthropology 36 5 (1995) 723-748
46. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., and Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 17 (1997) 4302-4311
47. Keysers C., and Gazzola V. Integrating simulation and theory of mind: From self to social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 5 (2007) 194-196
48. Krach S., Hegel F., Wrede B., Sagerer G., Binkofski F., and Kircher T. Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fmri. PLoS ONE 3 7 (2008) e2597
49. Langlois J.H., Kalakanis L., Rubenstein A.J., Larson A., Hallam M., and Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 126 3 (2000) 390-423
50. Langlois J.H., and Roggman L.A. Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science 1 2 (1990) 115-121
51. Langlois J.H., Roggman L.A., Casey R.J., Ritter J.M., Rieser-Danner L.A., and Jenkins V.Y. Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of a stereotype. Developmental Psychology 23 3 (1987) 363-369
52. Law Smith M.J., Perrett D.I., Jones B.C., Cornwell R.E., Moore F.R., Feinberg D.R., et al. Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences 273 1583 (2006) 135-140
53. Little A.C., and Jones B.C. Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences 270 (2003) 1759-1763
54. MacDorman, K. F. (2006). Subjective ratings of robot video clips for human likeness, familiarity, and eeriness: An exploration of the uncanny valley. In ICCS/CogSci-2006 long symposium: Toward social mechanisms of android science. Vancouver, Canada.
55. MacDorman K.F., and Ishiguro H. The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies 7 3 (2006) 297-337
56. MacDorman, K. F., Minato, T., Shimada, M., Itakura, S., Cowley, S. J., & Ishiguro, H. (2005). Assessing human likeness by eye contact in an android testbed. In Proceedings of the XXVII annual meeting of the cognitive science society. Stresa, Italy.
57. MacDorman K.F., Vasudevan S.K., and Ho C.-C. Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures. AI and Society 23 4 (2009) 485-510
58. MacGillivray C. How psychophysical perception of motion and image relates to animation practice. Imaging and Visualization, International Conference on Computer Graphics (2007) 81-88
59. MacMillan, D. (2007). Navigating the uncanny valley. Business Week. Available from http://businessweek.com/innovate/content/aug2007/id20070817_955317.htm.
60. Manning J.T., Gage A.R., Diver M.J., Scutt D., and Fraser W.D. Short-term changes in asymmetry and hormones in men. Evolution and Human Behavior 23 (2002) 95-102
61. Manning J.T., and Pickup L.J. Symmetry and performance in middle distance runners. International Journal of Sports Medicine (1998) 205-209
62. Manning J.T., Scutt D., and Lewis-Jones D.I. Developmental stability, ejaculate size and sperm quality in men. Evolution and Human Behavior (1998) 273-282
63. Mori M. Bukimi no tani [The uncanny valley]. Energy 7 4 (1970) 33-35
64. Norton K.I., Olds T.S., Olive S., and Dank S. Ken and Barbie at life size. Sex Roles 43 3-4 (1996) 287-294
65. Nowak K.L., and Biocca F. The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism of users' sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12 5 (2003) 481-494
66. Ohman A. Fear and anxiety: Evolutionary, cognitive, and clinical perspectives. In: Lewis M., and Haviland-Jones J.M. (Eds). Handbook of emotions (2000), The Guliford Press, New York 573-593
67. Olson I.R., and Marshuetz C. Facial attractiveness is appraised in a glance. Emotion 5 4 (2005) 498-502
68. Pollick, F. E. (in press). In search of the uncanny valley. In K. Grammer, & A. Juett (Eds.), Analog communication: Evolution, brain mechanisms, dynamics, simulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, The Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology.
69. Powers, A., & Kiesler, S. (2006). The advisor robot: Tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes. Proceedings of the First ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-robot interaction.
70. Preston S., and de Waal F. Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2002) 1-72
71. Pyszczynski T., Greenberg J., and Solomon S. A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theory. Psychological Review 106 4 (1999) 835-845
72. Ramey, C. H. (2005). The uncanny valley of similarities concerning abortion, baldness, heaps of sand, and humanlike robots. In Proceedings of views of the uncanny valley workshop: IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots (pp. 8-13). Tsukuba, Japan.
73. Rhodes G., Proffitt F., Grady J.M., and Sumich A. Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5 4 (1998) 659-669
74. Rhodes G., and Tremewan T. Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness. Psychological Science 7 2 (1996) 105-110
75. Rhodes G., Yoshikawa S., Clark A., Lee K., McKay R., and Akamatsu S. Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-Western cultures: In search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception 30 5 (2001) 611-625
76. In: Rhodes G., and Zebrowitz L.A. (Eds). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary cognitive and social perspectives (2002), Ablex, Westport, CT
77. Rozin P., and Fallon A.E. A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review 94 (1987) 23-41
78. Salvia J., Sheare J.B., and Algozzine B. Facial attractiveness and personal-social development. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 3 3 (1975) 171-178
79. Seyama J., and Nagayama R.S. The uncanny valley: The effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 16 4 (2007) 337-351
80. Soler C., Nunez M., Gutierrez R., Nunez J., Medina P., Sancho M., et al. Facial attractiveness in men provides clues to semen quality. Evolution and Human Behavior 24 (2003) 199-207
81. Solomon S., Greenberg J., and Pyszczynski T. Tales from the crypt: The role of death in life. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 33 (1998) 9-43
82. Spiridon M., and Kanwisher N. How distributed is visual category information in human occipito-temporal cortex? An fMRI study. Neuron 35 (2002) 1157-1165
83. Tai Y.F., Scherfler C., Brooks D.J., Sawamoto N., and Castiello U. The human premotor cortex is mirror only for biological actions. Current Biology 14 (2004) 117-120
84. Thornhill R., and Gangestad S.W. Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (1999) 452-460
85. Thornhill R., and Gangstead S. Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance. Human Nature 4 (1993) 237-269
86. Tovée M.J., Hancock P.J.B., Mahmoodi S., Singleton B.R.R., and Cornelissen P.L. Human female attractiveness: Waveform analysis of body shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 269 (2002) 2205-2213
87. Turkle S. Authenticity in the age of digital companions. Interaction Studies 8 3 (2007) 501-517
88. Turkle S., Taggart W., Kidd C.D., and Daste O. Relational artifacts with children and elders: The complexities of cybercompanionship. Connection Science 18 4 (2006) 347-361
89. Vinayagamoorthy, V., Steed, A., & Slater, M. (2005). Building characters: Lessons drawn from virtual environments. In Toward social mechanisms of android science: A COGSCI 2005 workshop (pp. 119-126). Stresa, Italy.
90. Westen D., Blagov P., Harenski K., Kilts C., and Hamann S. Neural bases of motivated reasoning: An fMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 US Presidential Election. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 11 (2006) 1947-1958
91. Willis J., and Todorov A. First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science 17 7 (2006) 592-598
92. Zacharek, S. (2007). Pirates of the Caribbean: At world's end. Salon.