Moving just like you: Motor interference depends on similar motility of agent and observer

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Kupferberg, Aleksandra ^a   Huber, Markus ^a   Helfer, Bartosz ^a   Lenz, Claus ^b   Knoll, Alois ^b   Glasauer, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOINT FUNCTION; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVATION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; ROBOTICS; VIDEORECORDING;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT;

EID: 84862981368     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039637     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Sebanz N, Bekkering H, Knoblich G, (2006) Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn Sci 10: 70-76.
2. Brass M, Bekkering H, Prinz W, (2001) Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychol. 106: 3-22.
3. Jeannerod M, (1994) The Representing Brain: Neural Correlates of Motor Intention and Imagery. Behav Brain Sci 17: 187-202.
4. Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G, (1996) Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119: 593-609.
5. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L, (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27: 169-192.
6. Jeannerod M, (2001) Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14: S103-109.
7. Iacoboni M, Molnar-Szakacs I, Gallese V, Buccino G, Mazziotta JC, et al. (2005) Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biol 3: e79.
8. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V, (2001) Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 661-670.
9. Prinz W, (1997) Perception and action planning. Eur J Cogn Psychol 9: 129-154.
10. Kilner JM, Paulignan Y, Blakemore SJ, (2003) An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Curr Biol 13: 522-525.
11. Chaminade T, Franklin D, Oztop E, Cheng G, (2005) Motor interference between humans and humanoid robots: Effect of biological and artificial motion. Int C Devel Learn 96-101.
12. Oztop E, Franklin DW, Chaminade T, Cheng G, (2005) Human-humanoid interaction: is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? Int J Hum Robot 2: 537.
13. Kupferberg A, Glasauer S, Huber M, Rickert M, Knoll A, et al. (2011) Biological movement increases acceptance of humanoid robots as human partners in motor interaction. AI & Society 26: 339-345.
14. Shen Q, Kose-Bagci H, Saunders J, Dautenhahn K, (2011) The Impact of Participants' Beliefs on Motor Interference and Motor Coordination in Human-Humanoid Interaction. IEEE Trans Auton Ment Dev 3: 6-16.
15. Lenz C, Nair S, Knoll A, Rösel W, Gast J, et al. (2008) Joint-Action for Humans and Industrial Robots for Assembly Tasks. Proc 17th IEEE Int Symp on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 130-135.
16. Flash T, Hogan N, (1985) The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5: 1688-1703.
17. Huber M, Rickert M, Knoll A, Brandt T, Glasauer S, (2008) Human-Robot Interaction in Handing-Over Tasks. Proc 17th IEEE Int Symp on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 107-112.
18. Albert NB, Peiris Y, Cohen G, Miall RC, Praamstra P, (2010) Interference effects from observed movement in Parkinson's disease. J Motor Behav 42: 145-149.
19. Capa RL, Marshall PJ, Shipley TF, Salesse RN, Bouquet CA, (2011) Does motor interference arise from mirror system activation? The effect of prior visuo-motor practice on automatic imitation. Psychol Res 75: 152-157.
20. Bouquet C, Gaurier V, Shipley T, Toussaint L, Blandin Y, (2007) Influence of the perception of biological or non-biological motion on movement execution. J Sports Sci 25: 519-530.
21. Gowen E, Stanley J, Miall RC, (2008) Movement interference in autism-spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia 46: 1060-1068.
22. Stanley J, Gowen E, Miall RC, (2007) Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus. J Exp Psychol Human 33: 915-926.
23. Breazeal C, Buchsbaum D, Gray J, Gatenby D, Blumberg B, (2005) Learning from and about others: Towards using imitation to bootstrap the social understanding of others by robots. Artif Life 11: 31-62.
24. Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G, Rizzolatti G, (1995) Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol 73: 2608-2611.
25. Craighero L, Bello A, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G, (2002) Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures. Neuropsychologia 40: 492-502.
26. Stürmer B, Aschersleben G, Prinz W, (2000) Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: A study of imitation. J Exp Psychol Human 26: 1746-1759.
27. Chartrand TL, Bargh JA, (1999) The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 76: 893-910.
28. Trout DL, Rosenfeld HM, (1980) The effect of postural lean and body congruence on the judgment of psychotherapeutic rapport. J Nonverbal Behav 4: 176-190.
29. Bouquet CA, Shipley TF, Capa RL, Marshall PJ, (2011) Motor contagion: goal-directed actions are more contagious than non-goal-directed actions. Exp Psychol 58: 71-78.
30. Meltzoff AN, (1995) Understanding the Intentions of Others. Re-enactment of Intended Acts by 18-Month-Old Children. Dev Psychol 31: 838-850.
31. Kamewari K, Kato M, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hiraki K, (2005) Six-and-a-half-month-old children positively attribute goals to human action and to humanoid-robot motion. Cognitive Dev 20: 303-320.
32. Hofer T, Hauf P, Aschersleben G, (2005) Infant's perception of goal-directed actions performed by a mechanical device. Infant Behav Dev 28: 466-480.
33. Woodward AL, (1998) Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition 69: 1-34.
34. Chaminade T, Cheng G, (2009) Social cognitive neuroscience and humanoid robotics. J Physiol Paris 103: 286-295.
35. Gazzola V, Rizzolatti G, Wicker B, Keysers C, (2007) The anthropomorphic brain: the mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. Neuroimage 35: 1674-1684.
36. Oberman, Mccleery J, Ramachandran V, Pineda J, (2007) EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots. Neurocomputing 70: 2194-2203.
37. Cross ES, Liepelt R, de C Hamilton AF, Parkinson J, Ramsey R, et al. (2011) Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network. Hum Brain Mapp, [Epub ahead of print].
38. Peeters R, Simone L, Nelissen K, Fabbri-Destro M, Vanduffel W, et al. (2009) The Representation of Tool Use in Humans and Monkeys: Common and Uniquely Human Features. J Neurosci 29: 11523-11539.
39. Saygin AP, Chaminade T, Ishiguro H, Driver J, Frith C, (2012) The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 7: 413-422.
40. Kilner J, Hamilton AF, Blakemore SJ, (2007) Interference effect of observed human movement on action is due to velocity profile of biological motion. Soc Neurosci 2: 158-166.
41. Shen Q, Kose-Bagci H, Saunders J, Dautenhahn K, (2009) An experimental investigation of interference effects in human-humanoid interaction games. Proc 18th IEEE Int Symp on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 291-298.