Prediction of intent in robotics and multi-agent systems

Cognitive Processing

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 151-158

  Demiris, Yiannis ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; ROBOTICS;

ALGORITHMS; ATTENTION; HUMANS; INTENTION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROBOTICS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 34547841279     PISSN: 16124782     EISSN: 16124790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10339-007-0168-9     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Acosta-Calderon CA, Hu H (2005) Robot imitation: body schema and body percept. J Appl Bionics Biomech 2(3-4):131-148. ISSN 1176-2322
2. Aggarwal A, Cai Q (1999) Human motion analysis: a review. Comput Vis Image Underst 73(3):428-440
3. Anderson JR, Boyle CF, Corbett AT, Lewis MW (1990) Cognitive modelling and intelligent tutoring. Artif Intell 42:7-49
4. Arkin RC (1998) Behavior based robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge
5. Beetz M, Kirchlechner B, Lames M (2005) Computerised real-time analysis of football games. Pervasive Comput 4(3):33-39
6. Bekkering H, Wohlschläger A, Gattis M (2000) Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Q J Exp Psychol 53A:153-164
7. Bishop C (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, Heidelberg
8. Blakemore S-J, Decety J (2001) From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:561-567
9. Bratman ME (1990) What is Intention? In: Cohen PR, Morgan JL, Pollack ME (eds) Intentions in communication, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 15-32
10. Bratman ME (1992) Shared cooperative activity. Philos Rev 101(2):327-341
11. Breazeal C, Berlin M, Brooks A, Gray J, Thomaz A (2006) Using perspective taking to learn from ambiguous demonstrations. Rob Auton Syst 54(5):385-393
12. Brooks (1986) A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE J Robot Autom RA-2, pp 14-23
13. Brooks R, Meltzoff AN (2002) The importance of eyes: how infants interpret adult looking behavior. Dev Psychol 38:958-966
14. Brooks R, Meltzoff AN (2005) The development of gaze following and its relation to language. Dev Sci 8:535-543
15. Buxton H (2003) Learning and understanding dynamic scene activity: a review. Image Vis Comput 21:125-136
16. Byrne RW, Russon AE (1998) Learning by imitation: a hierarchical approach. Behav Brain Sci 21(5):667-684
17. Cohen PR, Levesque HJ (1990) Intention is choice with commitment. Artif Intell 42:213-261
18. Csibra G, Gergely G (1998) The teleological origins of mentalistic action explanations: a developmental hypothesis. Dev Sci 1:255-259
19. Csibra G, Gergely G (2007) 'Obsessed with goals': functions and mechanisms of teleological interpretation of actions in humans. Acta Psychologica 124:60-78
20. Dearden A, Demiris Y (2005) Learning forward models for robots. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI), Edinburgh, pp 1440-1445
21. Demiris Y, Hayes G (2002) Imitation as a dual-route process featuring predictive and learning components: a biologically plausible computational model. In: Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv CL (eds) Imitation in animals and artifacts. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 327-361
22. Demiris Y, Johnson M (2003) Distributed, predictive perception of actions: a biologically inspired robotics architecture for imitation and learning. Connect Sci 15:231-243
23. Demiris Y, Khadhouri B (2006) Hierarchical attentive multiple models for execution and recognition of actions. Rob Auton Syst 54:361-369
24. Demiris Y, Simmons G (2006) Perceiving the unusual: temporal properties of hierarchical motor representations for action perception. Neural Netw 19:272-284
25. Devaney M, Ram A (1998) Needles in a haystack: plan recognition in large spatial domains involving multiple agents. In: Proceedings of the 15th national conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI-98, pp 942-947
26. Flanagan JR, Johansson RS (2003) Action plans used in action observation. Nature 424:769-771
27. Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G (1996) Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119:593-609
28. Gleissner B, Meltzoff AN, Bekkering H (2000) Children's coding of human action: cognitive factors influencing imitation in 3-year-olds. Dev Sci 3:405-414
29. Grosz BJ, Hunsberger L (2006) The dynamics of intention in collaborative activity. Cogn Syst Res 7:259-272
30. Hamilton A, Grafton ST (2007) The motor hierarchy: from kinematics to goals and intentions. In: Haggard P, Rossetti Y, Kawato M (eds) Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition, attention and performance XXII, chap 18 (in press)
31. Hesslow G (2002) Conscious thought as simulation of behaviour and perception. Trends Cogn Sci 6(6):242-247
32. Hommel B, Musseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24:849-937
33. Isham V (1981) An introduction to spatial point processes and markov random fields. Int Stat Rev 49:21-43
34. Jackson PL, Meltzoff AN, Decety J (2006) Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking. Neuroimage 31:429-439
35. Jain AK, Zhong Y, Dubuisson-Jolly M-P (1998) Deformable template models: a review. Signal Processing 71:109-129
36. Jansen B, Belpaeme T (2006) A computational model of intention reading in imitation. Rob Auton Syst 54(5):394-402
37. Johnson MR, Demiris Y (2005) Perceptual perspective taking and action recognition. Int J Adv Rob Syst 2:301-308
38. Kanno T, Nakata K, Furuta K (2003) A method for team intention inference. Int J Hum Comput Stud 58:393-413
39. Karniel A (2002) Three creatures named forward model. Neural Netw 15:305-307
40. Kott A, McEneaney WM (eds) (2006) Adversarial reasoning: computational approaches to reading the opponent's mind. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London
41. Liberman AM, Cooper FS, Shankweiler DP, Studdert-Kennedy M (1967) Perception of the speech code. Psychol Rev 74:431-361
42. Meltzoff AN (1995) Understanding the intentions of others: re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Dev Psychol 31:838-850
43. Meltzoff AN (2005) Imitation and other minds: the "Like Me" hypothesis. In: Hurley S, Chater N (eds) Perspectives on imitation: from neuroscience to social science. MIT Press, Cambridge, vol 2, pp 55-77
44. Meltzoff AN (2007a) 'Like me': a foundation for social cognition. Dev Sci 10:126-134
45. Meltzoff AN (2007b) The 'like me' framework for recognizing and becoming an intentional agent. Acta Psychologica 124:26-43
46. Meltzoff AN, Brooks R (2004) Developmental changes in social cognition with an eye towards gaze following. In: Carpenter M, Tomasello M (eds) Action-based measures of infants' understanding of others' intentions and attention. Symposium conducted at the Biennial meeting of the International Conference on Infant Studies, Chicago
47. Miall RC, Wolpert DM (1996) Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 9:1265-1279
48. Moeslund TB, Granum E (2000) A survey of computer vision-based human motion capture. Comput Vis Image Underst 81(3):231-268
49. Moeslund TB, Hilton A, Kruger V (2006) A survey of advances in vision-based human motion capture and analysis. Comput Vis Image Underst 104:90-126
50. Narendra KS, Balakrishnan J (1997) Adaptive control using multiple models. IEEE Trans Autom Control 42(2):171-187
51. Pezzulo G, Calvi G (2006) A schema based model of the praying mantis. From animals to animats. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on simulation of adaptive behaviour. Springer LNAI, vol 4095, pp 211-223
52. Roweis S, Ghahramani Z (1999) A unifying review of linear Gaussian models. Neural Comput 11(2):305-345
53. Schaal S (1999) Is Imitation learning the route to humanoid robots?. Trends Cogn Sci 3:233-242
54. Schaal S, Ijspeert A, Billard A (2003) Computational approaches to motor learning by imitation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:537-547
55. Scott SK, Johnsrude IS (2003) The neuroanatomical and functional organisation of speech perception. Trends Neurosci 26(2):100-107
56. Sonenberg L, Tidhar G (1999) Observations on team-oriented mental state recognition. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI-1999 workshop on team modelling and plan recognition
57. Sukthankar G, Sycara K (2006) Simultaneous team assignment and behavior recognition from spatio-temporal agent traces. In: Proceedings of 21st national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-06)
58. Tambe M (1996) Tracking dynamic team activity. In: Proceedings of the national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI)
59. Tani J, Nolfi S (1999) Learning to perceive the world as articulated: an approach for hierarchical learning in sensory motor systems. Neural Netw 12:1131-1141
60. Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call K, Behne T, Moll H (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behav Brain Sci 28:675-735
61. Trafton J, Cassimatis N, Bugajska M, Brock D, Mintz F, Schultz A (2005) Enabling effective human-robot interaction using perspective taking in robots. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 35(4):460-470
62. Wohlschlager A, Gattis M, Bekkering H (2003) Action generation and action perception in imitation: an instance of the ideomotor principle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:501-515
63. Wolpert DM, Kawato M (1998) Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw 11:1317-1329
64. Wolpert DM, Doya K, Kawato M (2003) A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:593-602