I See What You Mean: How Attentional Selection Is Shaped by Ascribing Intentions to Others

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Wiese, Eva ^a   Wykowska, Agnieszka ^a   Zwickel, Jan ^a   Müller, Hermann J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; NORMAL HUMAN; ROBOTICS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CUES; EMOTIONS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; ROBOTICS; SOCIAL FACILITATION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84866860119     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045391     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Turing AM, (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59: 433-460.
2. Dennett DC (2003) True believers: the intentional strategy and why it works. In eds O'Connor T, Robb, D Philosophy of Mind: Contemporary Readings. London: Routledge. 370-390.
3. Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In eds Cole P, Morgan JL Syntax and Semantics. Speech acts. New York: Academic Press. 41-58.
4. Tomasello M (2010) Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Adolphs R, (1999) Social cognition and the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci 3(12): 469-479.
6. Brothers L, (1990) The social brain: a project for integrating primate behavior and neurophysiology in a new domain. Concepts Neurosci 1: 27-51.
7. Frith CD, Frith U, (2006) How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Research 1079: 36-46.
8. Gallagher HL, Jack AI, Roepstorff A, Frith CD, (2002) Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. Neuroimage 16(3): 814-821.
9. Baron-Cohen S (1995) Mindblindness: an essay on autism and theory of mind. Boston: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
10. Teufel C, Fletcher PC, Davis G, (2010) Seeing other minds: attributed mental states influence perception, Trends Cogn Sci. 14(8): 376-382.
11. Teufel C, Alexis DM, Todd H, Lawrence-Owen AJ, Clayton NS, et al. (2009) Social cognition modulates sensory coding of observed gaze direction. Curr Biol 19(15): 1274-1277.
12. Teufel C, Alexis DM, Clayton NS, Davis G, (2010) Mental-state attribution drives rapid, reflexive gaze following. Atten Percept Psychophys 72(3): 695-705.
13. Frischen A, Bayliss AP, Tipper SP, (2007) Gaze Cuing of Attention: Visual Attention, Social Cognition, and Individual Differences. Psychol Bull 133(4): 694-724.
14. Friesen CK, Kingstone A, (1998) The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychon Bull Rev 5: 490-495.
15. Nummenmaa L, Calder A, (2009) Neural mechanisms in social attention. Trends Cogn Sci 13(3): 135-143.
16. Hood BM, Willen JD, Driver J, (1998) Adult's eyes trigger shifts of visual attention in human infants. Psychol Sci 9(2): 131-134.
17. Driver J, Davis G, Ricciardelli P, Kidd P, Maxwell E, et al. (1999) Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Vis Cogn 6: 509-540.
18. Friesen CK, Ristic J, Kingstone A, (2004) Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30: 319-329.
19. Downing P, Dodds CM, Bray D, (2004) Why does the gaze of others direct visual attention? Visual Cogn 11: 71-79.
20. Ristic J, Kingstone A, (2005) Taking control of reflexive social attention. Cognition 94(3): B55-B65.
21. Kawai N, (2011) Attentional shift by eye gaze requires joint attention: Eye gaze cues are unique to shift attention. Jpn Psychol Res 53: 292-301.
22. Wimmer H, Perner J, (1983) Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception Cognition. 13(1): 103-128.
23. Leslie AM, Frith U, (1988) Autistic children's understanding of seeing, knowing and believing Brit J Dev Psychol. 6: 315-324.
24. Lundqvist D, Flykt A, Öhman A (1998) The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces (KDEF). Stockholm: Department of Neurosciences Karolinska Hospital.
25. Jonides J, Mack R, (1984) On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit. Psychol Bull 96: 29-44.
26. George N, Conty L, (2008) Facing the gaze of others. Neurophysiol 38: 197-207.
27. Senju A, Hasegawa T, (2011) Direct gaze captures visuospatial attention. Vis Cogn 12(1): 127-144.
28. Bayliss AP, Tipper SP, (2006) Predictive gaze cues and personality judgments: should eyes trust you? Psychol Sci 17(6): 514-520.
29. Admoni H, Bank C, Tan J, Toneva M, Scassellati B (2011) Robot gaze does not reflexively cue human attention. Proc of the 33rd CogSci: 1983-1988.
30. Quadflieg S, Mason MF, Macrae CN, (2004) The owl and the pussycat: Gaze cues and visuospatial orienting. Psychon Bull Rev 11(5): 826-831.
31. Posner MI, Cohen Y (1984) Components of visual orienting. In eds Bouma H, Bouwhuis DG, Attention and Performance X. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. 531-556.
32. Grezes J, Frith CD, Passingham RE, (2004a) Brain mechanisms for inferring deceit in the actions of others. J Neurosci 24(24): 5500-5505.
33. Grezes J, Frith CD, Passingham RE, (2004b) Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and the others: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 21(2): 744-750.
34. Saxe R, Wexler A, (2005) Making sense of another mind: the role of the right temporo-parietal junction. Neuropsychologia 43(10): 1391-1399.
35. Heider F, Simmel M, (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am J Psychol 57: 246-259.
36. Abell F, Happé F, Frith U, (2000) Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Cognitive Dev 15(1): 1-16.
37. Klein A, Zwickel J, Prinz W, Frith U, (2009) Animated triangles: An eye tracking investigation. Q J Exp Psychol 62(6): 1189-1197.
38. Castelli F, Happé F, Frith U, Frith C, (2000) Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage 12(3): 314-325.
39. Zwickel J, (2009) Agency attribution and visuospatial perspective taking. Psychon Bull Rev 16(6): 1089-1093.
40. Cousineau D, (2005) Confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 1(1): 42-45.