Abusive Supervision: A Meta-Analysis and Empirical Review

Journal of Management

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 1940-1965

  Mackey, Jeremy D ^a   Frieder, Rachel E ^b   Brees, Jeremy R ^c   Martinko, Mark J ^d  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON   (United States)

^d FLORIDA A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

abusive supervision; justice; meta analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 85020384099     PISSN: 01492063     EISSN: 15571211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0149206315573997     Document Type: Article

References (158)

1. Aguinis H., Dalton D. R., Bosco F. A., Pierce C. A., Dalton C. M., 2011. Meta-analytic choices and judgment calls: Implications for theory building and testing, obtained effect sizes, and scholarly impact. Journal of Management, 37: 5-38.
2. Aguinis H., Gottfredson R. K., Joo H., 2013. Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 16: 270-301.
3. *Alexander K., 2011. Abusive supervision as a predictor of deviance and health outcomes: The exacerbating role of narcissism and social support. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.
4. *Aryee S., Chen Z. X., Sun L.-Y., Debrah Y. A., 2007. Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 191-201.
5. *Aryee S., Sun L. Y., Chen Z. X. G., Debrah Y. A., 2008. Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4: 393-411.
6. Aytug Z. G., Rothstein H. R., Zhou W., Kern M. C., 2012. Revealed or concealed? Transparency of procedures, decisions, and judgment calls in meta-analyses. Organizational Research Methods, 15: 103-133.
7. *Bamberger P. A., Bacharach S. B., 2006. Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress, and subordinate personality into account. Human Relations, 59: 723-752.
8. *Bardes M., 2009. Aspects of goals and rewards systems as antecedents of abusive supervision: The mediating effect of hindrance stress. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida, Orlando.
9. *Barling J., Christie A., Turner N., 2008. Pseudo-transformational leadership: Towards the development and test of a model. Journal of Business Ethics, 81: 851-861.
10. Becker T. E., 2005. Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8: 274-289.
11. Berry C. M., Ones D. S., Sackett P. R., 2007. Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 410-424.
12. *Biron M., 2010. Negative reciprocity and the association between perceived organizational ethical values and organizational deviance. Human Relations, 63: 875-897.
13. Blau P. M., 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14. Bowling N. A., Beehr T. A., 2006. Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 998-1012.
15. *Bowling N. A., Michel J. S., 2011. Why do you treat me badly? The role of attributions regarding the cause of abuse in subordinates’ responses to abusive supervision. Work & Stress, 25: 309-320.
16. *Breaux D. M., Perrewé P. L., Hall A. T., Frink D. D., Hochwarter W. A., 2008. Time to try a little tenderness? The detrimental effects of accountability when coupled with abusive supervision. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15: 111-122.
17. *Brees J., Mackey J., Martinko M., Harvey P., 2014. The mediating role of perceptions of abusive supervision in the relationship between personality and aggression. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21: 403-413.
18. *Brown M. E., Treviño L. K., Harrison D. A., 2005. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97: 117-134.
19. *Burris E. R., Detert J. R., Chiaburu D. S., 2008. Quitting before leaving: The mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 912-922.
20. *Burton J. P., Hoobler J. M., 2011. Aggressive reactions to abusive supervision: The role of interactional justice and narcissism. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 5: 389-398.
21. *Burton J. P., Hoobler J. M., Kernan M. C., 2011. When research setting is important: The influence of subordinate self-esteem on reactions to abusive supervision. Organization Management Journal, 8: 139-150.
22. *Burton J. P., Hoobler J. M., Scheuer M. L., 2012. Supervisor workplace stress and abusive supervision: The buffering effect of exercise. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27: 271-279.
23. *Byrne A., Dionisi A. M., Barling J., Akers A., Robertson J., Lys R., Wylie J., Dupré K., 2014. The depleted leader: The influence of leaders’ diminished psychological resources on leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 25: 344-357.
24. *Camps J., Decoster S., Stouten J., 2012. My share is fair, so I don’t care: The moderating role of distributive justice in the perception of leaders’ self-serving behavior. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11: 49-59.
25. *Carlson D., Ferguson M., Hunter E., Whitten D., 2012. Abusive supervision and work-family conflict: The path through emotional labor and burnout. The Leadership Quarterly, 23: 849-859.
26. *Carlson D. S., Ferguson M., Perrewé P. L., Whitten D., 2011. The fallout from abusive supervision: An examination of subordinates and their partners. Personnel Psychology, 64: 937-961.
27. Carlson K. D., Wu J., 2012. The illusion of statistical control: Control variable practice in management research. Organizational Research Methods, 15: 413-435.
28. Chan M. L. E., McAllister D. J., 2014. Abusive supervision through the lens of employee state paranoia. Academy of Management Review, 39: 44-66.
29. *Chen H., 2011. Work ethic and workplace behavior: Essays on direct and moderated relationships across national cultures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Dallas.
30. *Chi S.-C. S., Liang S.-G., 2013. When do subordinates’ emotion-regulation strategies matter? Abusive supervision, subordinates’ emotional exhaustion, and work withdrawal. The Leadership Quarterly, 24: 125-137.
31. *Chu L.-C., 2014. Mediating toxic emotions in the workplace: The impact of abusive supervision. Journal of Nursing Management, 22: 953-963.
32. Cohen-Charash Y., Spector P. E., 2001. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86: 278-321.
33. Colquitt J. A., Conlon D. E., Wesson M. J., Porter C. O. L. H., Ng K. Y., 2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 425-445.
34. Cropanzano R., Mitchell M., 2005. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31: 874-900.
35. Dalton D. R., Aguinis H., Dalton C. M., Bosco F. A., Pierce C. A., 2012. Revisiting the file drawer problem in meta-analysis: An assessment of published and nonpublished correlation matrices. Personnel Psychology, 65: 221-249.
36. *Decoster S., Camps J., Stouten J., 2014. The mediating role of LMX between abusive supervision and work behaviors: A replication and extension. American Journal of Business, 29: 61-75.
37. *Decoster S., Camps J., Stouten J., Vandevyvere L., Tripp T. M., 2013. Standing by your organization: The impact of organizational identification and abusive supervision on followers’ perceived cohesion and tendency to gossip. Journal of Business Ethics, 118: 623-634.
38. *Detert J. R., Treviño L. K., Burris E. R., Andiappan M., 2007. Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 993-1005.
39. *Duffy M. K., Ferrier W. J., 2003. Birds of a feather.. ? How supervisor-subordinate dissimilarity moderates the influence of supervisor behaviors on workplace attitudes. Group & Organization Management, 28: 217-248.
40. *Dupré K. E., Inness M., Connelly C. E., Barling J., Hoption C., 2006. Workplace aggression in teenage part-time employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 987-997.
41. *Eesley D. T., Meglich P. A., 2013. Empirical evidence of abusive supervision in entrepreneurial and small firms. Journal of Ethics & Entrepreneurship, 3: 39-59.
42. Fassina N. E., Jones D. A., Uggerslev K. L., 2008. Meta-analytic tests of relationships between organizational justice and citizenship behavior: Testing agent-system and shared-variance models. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29: 805-828.
43. Folger R., Cropanzano R., 2001. Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In Greenberg J., Folger R., (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice: 1-55. Lexington, MA: New Lexington.
44. Geyskens I., Krishnan R., Steenkamp J.-B. E.M., Cunha P. V., 2009. A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. Journal of Management, 35: 393-419.
45. *Gopalkrishnan P., 2013. Abusive supervision and group-level perceptions: Looking at the social context of abuse in the workplace. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.
46. *Gregory B. T., Osmonbekov T., Gregory S. T., Albritton M. D., Carr J. C., 2013. Abusive supervision and citizenship behaviors: Exploring boundary conditions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28: 628-644.
47. *Haggard D. L., Robert C., Rose A. J., 2011. Co-rumination in the workplace: Adjustment trade-offs for men and women who engage in excessive discussions of workplace problems. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26: 27-40.
48. *Hannah S. T., Schaubroeck J. M., Peng A. C., Lord R. G., Trevino L. K., Kozlowski S. W. J., Avolio B. J., Dimotakis N., Doty J., 2013. Joint influences of individual and work unit abusive supervision on ethical intentions and behaviors: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98: 579-592.
49. *Harris K. J., Harvey P., Harris R. B., Cast M., 2013. An investigation of abusive supervision, vicarious abusive supervision, and their joint impacts. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153: 38-50.
50. *Harris K. J., Harvey P., Kacmar K. M., 2011. Abusive supervisory reactions to coworker relationship conflict. The Leadership Quarterly, 22: 1010-1023.
51. *Harris K. J., Kacmar K. M., Zivnuska S., 2007. An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. The Leadership Quarterly, 18: 252-263.
52. *Harris K. J., Lambert A., Harris R. B., 2013. HRM effectiveness as a moderator of the relationships between abusive supervision and technology work overload and job outcomes for technology end users. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43: 1686-1695.
53. *Harvey P., Harris K. J., Gillis W. E., Martinko M. J., 2014. Abusive supervision and the entitled employee. The Leadership Quarterly, 25: 204-217.
54. *Harvey P., Stoner J., Hochwarter W., Kacmar C., 2007. Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 18: 264-280.
55. *Henle C. A., Gross M. A., 2014. What have I done to deserve this? Effects of employee personality and emotion on abusive supervision. Journal of Business Ethics, 122: 461-474.
56. Hershcovis M. S., Turner N., Barling J., Arnold K. A., Dupré K. E., Inness M., LeBlanc M. M., Sivanathan N., 2007. Predicting workplace aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 228-238.
57. *Hobman E. V., Restubog S. L. D., Bordia P., Tang R. L., 2009. Abusive supervision in advising relationships: Investigating the role of social support. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58: 233-256.
58. Hochwarter W. A., Ferris G. R., Hanes T. J., 2011. Multi-study packages in organizational science research. In Ketchen D., Bergh D., (Eds.), Building methodological bridges: Research methodology in strategy and management: 163-199. Bingley, England: Emerald Group.
59. *Hoobler J., Brass D., 2006. Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 1125-1133.
60. *Hoobler J. M., Hu J., 2013. A model of injustice, abusive supervision, and negative affect. The Leadership Quarterly, 24: 256-269.
61. Hu C., Wu T.-Y., Wang Y.-H., 2011. Measurement equivalence/invariance of the abusive supervision measure across workers from Taiwan and the United States. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 145: 111-131.
62. Humphrey S. E., 2011. What does a great meta-analysis look like? Organizational Psychology Review, 1: 99-103.
63. Hunter J. E., Schmidt F. L., 2004. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Hunter J. E., Schmidt F. L., Le H., 2006. Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 594-612.
65. *Inness M., Barling J., Turner N., 2005. Understanding supervisor-targeted aggression: A within-person between-jobs design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 731-739.
66. *Jian Z., Kwan H. K., Qiu Q., Liu Z. Q., Kim F. H.-K., 2012. Abusive supervision and frontline employees’ service performance. The Service Industries Journal, 32: 683-698.
67. *Kacmar K. M., Whitman M. V., Harris K. J., 2013. The lingering impact of abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 18: 51-71.
68. Kepes S., Banks G. C., McDaniel M., Whetzel D. L., 2012. Publication bias in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15: 624-662.
69. Kepes S., McDaniel M. A., Brannick M. T., Banks G. C., 2013. Meta-analytic reviews in the organizational sciences: Two meta-analytic schools on the way to MARS (the meta-analytic reporting standards). Journal of Business and Psychology, 28: 123-143.
70. *Kernan M. C., Watson S., Chen F. F., Kim T. G., 2011. How cultural values affect the impact of abusive supervision on worker attitudes. Cross Cultural Management, 18: 464-484.
71. *Kiazad K., Restubog S. L. D., Zagenczyk T. J., Kiewitz C., Tang R. L., 2010. In pursuit of power: The role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 44: 512-519.
72. *Kiewitz C., Restubog S. L. D., Zagenczyk T. J., Scott K. D., Garcia P. R. J. M., Tang R. L., 2012. Sins of the parents: Self-control as a buffer between supervisors’ previous experience of family undermining and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervision. The Leadership Quarterly, 23: 869-882.
73. Klaussner S., 2014. Engulfed in the abyss: The emergence of abusive supervision as an escalating process of supervisor-subordinate interaction. Human Relations, 67: 311-332.
74. Lapierre L. M., Spector P. E., Leck J. D., 2005. Sexual versus nonsexual workplace aggression and victims’ overall job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10: 155-169.
75. Le H., Oh I. S., Shaffer J., Schmidt F., 2007. Implications of methodological advances for the practice of personnel selection: How practitioners benefit from meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21: 6-15.
76. *Lee S., Yun S., Srivastava A., 2013. Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between abusive supervision and creativity in South Korea. The Leadership Quarterly, 24: 724-731.
77. *Lian H., Brown D. J., Ferris D. L., Liang L. H., Keeping L. M., Morrison R., 2014. Abusive supervision and retaliation: A self-control framework. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 116-139.
78. *Lian H., Ferris D. L., Brown D. J., 2012a. Does power distance exacerbate or mitigate the effects of abusive supervision? It depends on the outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 107-123.
79. *Lian H., Ferris D. L., Brown D. J., 2012b. Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader-member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117: 41-52.
80. *Lian H., Ferris D. L., Morrison R., Brown D. J., 2014. Blame it on the supervisor or the subordinate? Reciprocal relations between abusive supervision and organizational deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99: 651-664.
81. *Lin W., Wang L., Chen S., 2013. Abusive supervision and employee well-being: The moderating effect of power distance orientation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 62: 308-329.
82. Lipsey M. W., Wilson D. B., 2001. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
83. *Liu D., Liao H., Loi R., 2012. The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1187-1212.
84. *Liu J., Kwan H. K., Wu L., Wu W., 2010. Abusive supervision and subordinate supervisor-directed deviance: The moderating role of traditional values and the mediating role of revenge cognitions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83: 835-856.
85. *Liu X.-Y., Wang J., 2013. Abusive supervision and organizational citizenship behaviour: Is supervisor-subordinate guanxi a mediator? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24: 1471-1489.
86. *Mackey J. D., Ellen B. P., III Hochwarter W. A., Ferris G. R., 2013. Subordinate social adaptability and the consequences of abusive supervision perceptions in two samples. The Leadership Quarterly, 24: 732-746.
87. *Mackey J. D., Frieder R. E., Perrewé P. L., Gallagher V. C., Brymer R. A. in press. Empowered employees as social deviants: The role of abusive supervision. Journal of Business and Psychology. doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9345-x
88. Markovsky B., 1985. Toward a multilevel distributive justice theory. American Sociological Review, 50: 822-839.
89. Martinko M. J., Harvey P., Brees J. R., Mackey J., 2013. A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34: S120-S137.
90. *Martinko M. J., Harvey P., Sikora D., Douglas S. C., 2011. Perceptions of abusive supervision: The role of subordinates’ attribution styles. The Leadership Quarterly, 22: 751-764.
91. *Mawritz M. B., Dust S. B., Resick C. J., 2014. Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: Does conscientiousness matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 99: 737-747.
92. *Mawritz M. B., Folger R., Latham G. P., 2014. Supervisors’ exceedingly difficult goals and abusive supervision: The mediating effects of hindrance stress, anger, and anxiety. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35: 358-372.
93. *Mawritz M. B., Mayer D. M., Hoobler J. M., Wayne S. J., Marinova S. V., 2012. A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 65: 325-357.
94. *Mitchell M. S., Ambrose M. L., 2007. Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 1159-1168.
95. *Mitchell M. S., Ambrose M. L., 2012. Employees’ behavioral reactions to supervisor aggression: An examination of individual and situational factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 1148-1170.
96. Mosier C. I., 1943. On the reliability of a weighted composite. Psychometrika, 8: 161-168.
97. *Nandkeolyar A. K., Shaffer J. A., Li A., Ekkirala S., Bagger J., 2014. Surviving an abusive supervisor: The joint roles of conscientiousness and coping strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99: 138-150.
98. Nielsen M. B., Matthiesen S. B., Einarsen S., 2010. The impact of methodological moderators on prevalence rates of workplace bullying: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83: 955-979.
99. *Ogunfowora B., 2013. When the abuse is unevenly distributed: The effects of abusive supervision variability on work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34: 1105-1123.
100. *Onyishi I. E., 2012. Abusive supervision and prosocial organizational behavior: A study of workers in the banking industry in Nigeria. The African Symposium, 12: 96-103.
101. Organ D. W., Ryan K., 1995. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48: 775-802.
102. *Palanski M., Avey J. B., Jiraporn N., 2014. The effects of ethical leadership and abusive supervision on job search behaviors in the turnover process. Journal of Business Ethics, 121: 135-146.
103. *Peng A. C., Schaubroeck J. M., Li Y., 2014. Social exchange implications of own and coworkers’ experiences of supervisory abuse. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1385-1405.
104. *Pyc L. S., 2011. The moderating effects of workplace ambiguity and perceived job control on the relations between abusive supervision and employees’ behavioral, psychological, and physical strains. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY.
105. *Rafferty A. E., Restubog S. L. D., 2011. The influence of abusive supervisors on followers’ organizational citizenship behaviours: The hidden costs of abusive supervision. British Journal of Management, 22: 270-285.
106. *Rafferty A. E., Restubog S. L. D., Jimmieson N. L., 2010. Losing sleep: Examining the cascading effects of supervisors’ experience of injustice on subordinates’ psychological health. Work & Stress, 24: 36-55.
107. *Restubog S. L. D., Scott K. L., Zagenczyk T. J., 2011. When distress hits home: The role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees’ responses to abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96: 713-729.
108. Rothstein H. R., Sutton A. J., Borenstein M., 2005. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
109. Rupp D. E., 2011. An employee-centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility. Organizational Psychology Review, 1: 72-94.
110. *Scheuer M. L., 2013. Linking abusive supervision to engagement and burnout: An application of the differentiated job demands-resource model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.
111. Schmidt F. L., Le H., 2004. Software for the Hunter-Schmidt meta-analysis methods. Iowa City: University of Iowa, Department of Management and Organizations.
112. Schyns B., Schilling J., 2013. How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24: 138-158.
113. *Shao P., Resick C. J., Hargis M. B., 2011. Helping and harming others in the workplace: The roles of personal values and abusive supervision. Human Relations, 64: 1051-1078.
114. Shao R., Rupp D. E., Skarlicki D. P., Jones K. S., 2013. Employee justice across cultures: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 39: 263-301.
115. Shapiro D. L., 2001. The death of justice theory is likely if theorists neglect the “wheels” already invented and the voices of the injustice victims. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58: 235-242.
116. *Shoss M. K., Eisenberger R., Restubog S. L. D., Zagenczyk T. J., 2013. Blaming the organization for abusive supervision: The roles of perceived organizational support and supervisor’s organizational embodiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98: 158-168.
117. *Siegel J. L., 2011. A multi-level model examining the effects of unit-level culture on abusive supervision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
118. Spector P. E., Bauer J. A., Fox S., 2010. Measurement artifacts in the assessment of counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Do we know what we think we know? Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 781-790.
119. *Sulea C., Fine S., Fischmann G., Sava F. A., Dumitru C., 2013. Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating effects of personality. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12: 196-200.
120. Sutton R. I., 2007. The no asshole rule: Building a civilized workplace and surviving one that isn’t. New York: Warner Business Books.
121. *Taylor A. M., 2012. Cultivating an engaged workforce: The roles of leader personality, motivation, and leadership style. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa.
122. *Taylor M., 2004. The relationships between workplace violence, deviant workplace behavior, ethical climate, organizational justice, and abusive supervision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University, Alhambra, CA.
123. *Tepper B. J., 2000. Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 178-190.
124. Tepper B. J., 2007. Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33: 261-289.
125. *Tepper B. J., Carr J. C., Breaux D. M., Geider S., Hu C., Hua W., 2009. Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees’ workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109: 156-167.
126. *Tepper B. J., Duffy M. K., Henle C. A., Lambert L. S., 2006. Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59: 101-123.
127. *Tepper B. J., Duffy M. K., Hoobler J. M., Ensley M. D., 2004. Moderators of the relationship between coworkers’ organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees’ attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89: 455-465.
128. *Tepper B. J., Duffy M. K., Shaw J. D., 2001. Personality moderators of the relationships between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 974-983.
129. Tepper B. J., Henle C. A., 2011. A case for recognizing distinctions among constructs that capture interpersonal mistreatment in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32: 487-498.
130. *Tepper B. J., Henle C. A., Lambert L. S., Giacalone R. A., Duffy M. K., 2008. Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organization deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 721-732.
131. *Tepper B. J., Moss S. E., Duffy M. K., 2011. Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54: 279-294.
132. *Tepper B. J., Moss S., Lockhart D., Carr J., 2007. Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates’ psychological distress. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1169-1180.
133. *Thau S., Bennett R. J., Mitchell M. S., Marrs M. B., 2009. How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108: 79-92.
134. *Thau S., Mitchell M. S., 2010. Self-gain or self-regulation impairment? Tests of competing explanations of the supervisor abuse and employee deviance relationship through perceptions of distributive justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 1009-1031.
135. *Thoroughgood C. N., Tate B. W., Sawyer K. B., Jacobs R., 2012. Bad to the bone: Empirically defining and measuring destructive leader behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19: 230-255.
136. *Thun N. B., 2009. Character strengths in leadership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
137. van den Bos K. 2003. On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85: 482-498.
138. Viswesvaran C., Ones D. S., 1995. Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48: 865-885.
139. Viswesvaran C., Ones D. S., 2002. Examining the construct of organizational justice: A meta-analytic evaluation of relations with work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 38: 193-203.
140. *Wang W., Mao J., Wu W., Liu J., 2012. Abusive supervision and workplace deviance: The mediating role of interactional justice and the moderating role of power distance. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50: 43-60.
141. *Wei F., Si S., 2013. Psychological contract breach, negative reciprocity, and abusive supervision: The mediated effect of organizational identification. Management and Organization Review, 9: 541-561.
142. *Wei F., Si S., 2013. Tit for tat? Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating effects of locus of control and perceived mobility. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30: 281-296.
143. *Wheeler A. R., Halbesleben J. R. B., Whitman M. V., 2013. The interactive effects of abusive supervision and entitlement on emotional exhaustion and co-worker abuse. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86: 477-496.
144. *Whitman M. V., Halbesleben J. R. B., Holmes IV O. 2014. Abusive supervision and feedback avoidance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35: 38-53.
145. *Whitman M. V., Halbesleben J. R. B., Shanine K. K., 2013. Psychological entitlement and abusive supervision: Political skill as a self-regulatory mechanism. Health Care Management Review, 38: 248-257.
146. Wood J. A., 2008. Methodology for dealing with duplicate study effects in a meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 11: 79-95.
147. *Wu L.-Z., Kwan H. K., Liu J., Resick C. J., 2012. Work-to-family spillover effects of abusive supervision. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27: 714-731.
148. *Wu T., Hu C., 2009. Abusive supervision and employee emotional exhaustion: Dispositional antecedents and boundaries. Group & Organization Management, 34: 143-169.
149. *Wu T.-Y., Hu C., 2013. Abusive supervision and subordinate emotional labor: The moderating role of openness personality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43: 956-970.
150. *Wu T.-Y., Hu C., Yang C.-C., 2013. Abusive supervision and workload demands from supervisors: Exploring two types of supervisor-related stressors and their association with strain. Stress and Health, 29: 190-198.
151. *Xiaqi D., Kun T., Chongsen Y., Sufang G., 2012. Abusive supervision and LMX: Leaders’ emotional intelligence as antecedent variable and trust as consequence variable. Chinese Management Studies, 6: 257-270.
152. *Xu E., Huang X., Lam C. K., Miao Q., 2012. Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33: 531-543.
153. *Yagil D., 2006. The relationship of abusive and supportive workplace supervision to employee burnout and upward influence tactics. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 6: 49-65.
154. *Yagil D., Ben-Zur H., Tamir I., 2011. Do employees cope effectively with abusive supervision at work? An exploratory study. International Journal of Stress Management, 18: 5-23.
155. *Zellars K. L., Tepper B. J., Duffy M. K., 2002. Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1068-1076.
156. *Zhang H., Kwan H. K., Zhang X., Wu L.-Z., 2014. High core self-evaluators maintain creativity: A motivational model of abusive supervision. Journal of Management, 40: 1151-1174.
157. *Zhang Y., 2013. Leaders’ daily work demands, recovery, and leadership behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Phoenix.
158. *Zhao H., Peng Z., Han Y., Sheard G., Hudson A., 2013. Psychological mechanism linking abusive supervision and compulsory citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation study. The Journal of Psychology, 147: 177-195.