Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing

Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-227

  Hood, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014717188     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9780230274662     Document Type: Book

References (262)

1. Ahmad, U.K. 1997. Research article introductions in Malay: Rhetoric in an emerging research community. In A. Duszak (ed.), Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 272-303.
2. Atkinson, D & A. Curtis. 2000. Preparing to write your MPhil/PhD. Hong Kong: Department of English, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
3. Bakhtin, M.M. 1935 [1981]. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Edited by M. Holquist, translated by C. Emerson & M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
4. Bakhtin, M.M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Edited by M. Holquist, translated by V.W. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. Barton, E.L. 1993. Evidentials, argumentation, and epistemological stance. College English, 55 (7): 745-69.
6. Bazerman, C. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7. Bazerman, C. 1994. Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & B. Medway (eds.) Genres and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor. pp. 79-101.
8. Bednarek, M. 2008. Emotion Talk Across Corpora. Basingstoke/ New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
9. Bednarek, M. & J. R. Martin (eds.) 2010. New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London / New York: Continuum.
10. Berkenkotter, C. & T.N. Huckin 1995. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition / Culture / Power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Bereiter, C. & M. Scardamalia. 1987. The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Bernstein, B. 1975. Class, Codes and Control, Volume III: Towards a Theory of Educational Transmissions. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
13. Bernstein, B. 1996. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research and Critique. London: Taylor and Francis.
14. Bernstein, B. 1990. Class, Codes and Control, Volume IV: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.
15. Bernstein, B. 1999. Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20 (2): 157-73.
16. Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Revised edn. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
17. Berry, M. 1981. Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In M.C. Coulthard & M. Montogmery (eds.), Studies in Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. pp. 120-45.
18. Bhatia, V.K. 1993. Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
19. Biber, D. & S. Conrad 2001. Register variation: A corpus approach. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 175-96.
20. Biber, D. & E. Finegan. 1989. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9 (1): 93-124.
21. Bizzell, P. 1992. Academic Discourse and Critical Consciousness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
22. Bloor, M. 1998. English for Specific Purposes: the preservation of a species (some notes on a recently evolved species and in the contribution of John Swales to its preservation and protection). English for Specific Purposes, 17 (1): 47-66.
23. Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24. Bourdieu, P. & L.J.D. Wacquant 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25. Bourne. J. 2003. Vertical discourse: The role of the teacher in the transmission and acquisition of decontextualised language. European Educational Research Journal, 2 (4): 496-521.
26. Brown, P. & S. Levinson 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Bunton D. 2002. Generic moves in Ph.D Introduction chapters. In J. Flowerdew (ed.) Academic Discourse. London: Longman. pp. 57-75.
28. Burrough-Boenisch, J. 2003. Shapers of published NNS research articles. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12 (3): 223-43.
29. Bybee, J. & S. Fleischman 1995. Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
30. Candlin, C.N. 1998. Researching writing in the academy: Participants, texts, processes and practices. In C.N. Candlin & G.A. Plum (eds.) Researching Academic Literacies. Sydney: Macquarie University. pp. 1-28.
31. Carvalho, L., A. Dong & K. Maton 2009. Legitimating design: A sociology of knowledge account of the field. Design Studies 30 (5): 483-502.
32. Chafe, W. 1986. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.) Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. pp. 261-73.
33. Channell, J. 1994. Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Channell, J. 2000. Corpus-based analysis of evaluative lexis. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 39-55.
35. Charles, M. 2003. 'This mystery ': A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (4): 313-26.
36. Chatman, S. 1978. Story and Discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
37. Christie, F. 1991a. First and second order registers in education. In E. Ventola (ed.) Functional and Systemic linguistics: Approaches and Uses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 235-56.
38. Christie, F. 1991b. Pedagogical and content registers in a writing lesson. Linguistics and Education, 3: 203-24.
39. Christie, F. 1997. Curriculum macrogenres as forms of initiation into a culture. In F. Christie & J.R. Martin (eds.) Genres and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Cassell. pp. 134-60.
40. Christie, F. (ed.) 1999. Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness: Linguistic and Social Processes. London: Continuum.
41. Christie, F. 2002. Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Functional Perspective. London: Continuum.
42. Christie, F. & J. R. Martin (eds.) 1997. Genres and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Cassell.
43. Christie, F. & J.R. Martin (eds.) 2007. Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives. London: Continuum.
44. Coe, R. 1994. 'An arousing and fulfilment of desires': The rhetoric of genre in the process era -and beyond. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (eds.) Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis. pp. 181-90.
45. Coe, R., L. Lingard & T. Teslenko (eds.) 2002. The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre. Cresskill NJ: Hampton Press.
46. Coffin, C. 2004. Arguing about how the world is and how the world should be: The role of argument in IELTS tests. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3 (3): 229-46.
47. Coffin, C. 2009. Historical Discourse: The Language of Time, Cause and Evaluation. London: Continuum.
48. Coffin, C. & A. Hewings 2004. IELTS as preparation for tertiary writing: Distinctive interpersonal and textual strategies. In L. Ravelli & R. Ellis (eds.) Academic Writing in Context: Social-functional Perspectives on Theory and Practice. London: Continuum. pp. 153-71.
49. Coffin, C. & B. Mayor 2004. Authorial voice and interpersonal tenor in novice academic writing. In D. Banks (ed.) Text and Texture: Aspects of Text from a Systemic Viewpoint. Paris: L'Harmattan. pp. 239-64.
50. Connor, U.M. & A. Mauranen 1999. Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18: 47-62.
51. Conrad, S. & D. Biber 2000. Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 57-73.
52. Crismore, A. 1989. Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as a Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang.
53. Crookes, G. 1986. Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7 (1): 57-70.
54. Dascal, M. 2001. Reputation and refutation: Negotiating merit. In E. Weigand & M. Dascal (eds.) Negotiation and Power in Dialogic Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 3-17.
55. Doherty, C. 2008. Student subsidy of the internationalized curriculum: Knowing, voicing and producing the Other. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 16 (3): 269-88.
56. Drury, H. 1991. The use of systemic linguistics to describe student summaries at university level. In E. Ventola (ed.) Functional and Systemic Linguistics: Approaches and Uses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp.431-56.
57. Dudley-Evans, T. 1994. Genre analysis: An approach to text analysis in ESP. In M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge. pp. 219-28).
58. Dudley-Evans, T. 1997. Genre models for the teaching of academic writing to second language speakers: Advantages and disadvantages. In T. Miller (ed.) Functional Approaches to Written Text. Washington DC: USIA. pp. 150-9.
59. Duszak, A. 1997. Analyzing digressiveness in Polish academic texts. In A. Duszak (ed.) Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 323-41.
60. Eggins, S. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.
61. Eggins, S. & D. Slade 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.
62. Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
63. Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Text Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
64. Feez, S., R. Iedema & P.P. R. White 2008. Media Literacy. Sydney: NSW Adult Migrant Education Service.
65. Flowerdew, J. 1999. Writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8 (2): 123-45.
66. Flowerdew, J. 2001. Issues in EAP: A preliminary perspective. In J. Flowerdew & M.Peacock, Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 8-24.
67. Flowerdew, J. & M. Peacock (eds.) 2001. Research Perspectives in English for Academic Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Forey, G. & G. Thompson (eds.) 2009. Text Type and Texture. London: Equinox.
69. Freedman, A. & P. Medway (eds.) 1994. Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.
70. Fuller, G. 1998. Cultivating science: Negotiating discourse in the popular texts of Stephen Jay Gould. In J.R. Martin & R. Veel (eds.) Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London: Routledge. pp.35-62.
71. Geisler, C. 1994. Academic Literacy and the Nature of Expertise: Reading, Writing and Knowing in Academic Philosophy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
72. Gilbert, G. & M. Mulkay 1984. Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientific Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Gotti, M (ed.) 2009. Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.
74. Groom, N. 2000. Attribution and averral revisited: Three perspectives on manifest intertextuality in academic writing. In P. Thompson (ed.) Patterns and Perspectives: Insights for EAP Writing Practice. Reading, UK: CALS, The University of Reading. pp. 15-26.
75. Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
76. Halliday, M.A.K. 1979. Modes of meaning and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure, and their determination by different semantic functions. In D.J Allerton, E. Carney & D. Holdcroft (eds.) Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 57-79.
77. Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
78. Halliday, M. A. K. 2002. On Grammar. Volume 1 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday edited by J.J. Webster. London: Continuum.
79. Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan 1985. Language, Text and Context: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
80. Halliday, M.A.K. & J.R. Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer.
81. Halliday, M.A.K. & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen 1999. Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.
82. Halliday, M.A.K. & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd rev. edn. London: Edward Arnold.
83. Harding, S. (ed.) 2004. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. New York: Routledge. pp. 127-40.
84. Hart, C. 1998. Doing a Literature Review. London: Sage.
85. Hawes, T. & S. Thomas 1997. Tense choices in citations. Research in the Teaching of English 31 (3): 393-414.
86. Hewings, A. & M. Hewings 2001. Anticipatory 'it' in academic writing: an indicator of disciplinary difference and developing disciplinary knowledge. In M. Hewings (ed.) Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press. pp. 119-214.
87. Hoey, M. 2000. Persuasive rhetoric in linguistics: a stylistic study of some features of the language of Noam Chomsky. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 28-37.
88. Hood, S. 2004. Appraising Research: Taking a Stance in Academic Writing. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Technology, Sydney.
89. Hood, S. 2004. Managing attitude in undergraduate academic writing: A focus on the introductions to research reports. In L. Ravelli & R. Ellis (eds.) Analysing Academic Writing: Contextualised Frameworks. London: Continuum. pp. 22-44.
90. Hood, S. 2006. The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5: 37-49.
91. Hood, S. 2007. Arguing in and across disciplinary boundaries: Legitimizing strategies in applied linguistics and cultural studies. In R. Whittaker, M.O'Donnell & A. McCabe (eds.) Advances in Language Education. London: Continuum. pp. 185-200.
92. Hood, S. 2008. Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meaning in processes of change. Linguistics and Education, 19: 351-65.
93. Hood, S. 2009. Texturing interpersonal meaning in academic argument: Pulses and prosodies of value. In G. Forey & G. Thompson (eds.) Text Type and Texture. London: Equinox. pp. 214-33.
94. Hood, S. & G. Forey 2008. The interpersonal dynamics of call-centre interactions: Co-constructing the rise and fall of emotion. Discourse and Communication, 2 (4): 389-409.
95. Hood, S. & J.R. Martin 2007. Invoking attitude: The play of graduation in appraising discourse. In J. Webster, C. Matthiessen & R. Hasan (eds.) Continuing Discourse on Language, Volume 2. London: Equinox. pp. 739-64.
96. Hopkins, A. & T. Dudley-Evans 1988. A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 5: 107-20.
97. Huckin, T. 2001. Abstracting from abstracts. In M. Hewings (ed.) Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press. pp. 93-103.
98. Hunston, S. 1994. Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge. pp.191-218.
99. Hunston, S. 1995. A corpus study of some English verbs of attribution. Functions of Language, 2 (2): 133-58.
100. Hunston, S. 2000. Evaluation and the planes of discourse: status and value in persuasive texts. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp.176-207.
101. Hunston, S. & J. Sinclair. 2000. A local grammar of evaluation. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 74-101.
102. Hunston, S. & G. Thompson (eds.) 2000. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
103. Hyland, K. 1998. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
104. Hyland, K. 1999. Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20: 341-67.
105. Hyland, K. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
106. Hyland, K. 2000. 'It might be suggested that': Academic hedging in student writing. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Series S.16: 83-97.
107. Hyland, K. 2002. Genre: Language, context and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22: 113-35.
108. Hyland, K. 2002. Specificity revisited: How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes, 21: 385-95.
109. Hyland, K. 2005. Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
110. Hyland, K. 2009. Constraint vs creativity: Identity and disciplinarity in academic writing. In M. Gotti (ed.) Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang. pp. 25-52.
111. Hyland, K. & L. Hamp-Lyons 2002. EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1 (1): 1-12.
112. Hyon, S. 1996. Genre in three traditions: implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30: 693-722.
113. Iedema, R. 2003. Discourses of Post-bureaucratic Organization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
114. Johns. A. M. 1997. Text, Role, and Context: Developing Academic Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
115. Kaldor, S. & J. Rochecouste 2002. General academic writing and discipline specific academic writing. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 25 (2): 29-47.
116. Knight, N. M. 2010. Wrinkling complexity: Concepts of identity and affiliation in humour. In M. Bednarek & J.R. Martin (eds.) New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London: Continuum.
117. Kuo, C-H. 1999. The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18 (2): 121-38.
118. Labov, W. & J. Waletzky 1967. Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (ed.) Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts (Proceedings of the 1966 Spring meeting of the American Ethnological Society). Seattle: University of Washington Press. pp. 12-44.
119. Lamont, A. & K. Maton 2008. Choosing music: Exploratory studies into the low uptake of music GCSE. British Journal of Music Education, 25 (3): 267-82.
120. Lee, S.H. 2008. Attitude in undergraduate essays. Prospect, 23 (3): 43-58.
121. Lemke, J.L. 1998. Resources for attitudinal meaning; Evaluative orientations in text semantics. Functions of Language, 5 (1): 33-56.
122. Luckett, K. 2009. The relationship between knowledge structure and curriculum: A case study in sociology. Studies in Higher Education, 34 (4): 441-53.
123. MacDonald, S.P. 1994. Professional Academic Writing: In the Humanities and the Social Sciences. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
124. Macken-Horarik, M. 2003. Appraisal and the special instructiveness of narrative. Text, 32 (2): 285-312.
125. Macken-Horarik, M. & J. R. Martin (eds.) 2003. Special edition of Text (Negotiating Heteroglossia: Social Perspectives on Evaluation), 23 (2).
126. Malcolm, L. 1987. What rules govern tense usage in scientific articles? English for Specific Purposes, 6: 31-44.
127. Martin, J.R. 1985. Factual Writing. Geelong: Deakin University Press. Reprinted 1989. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
128. Martin, J.R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
129. Martin, J.R. 1992. Macro-proposals: Meaning by degree. In W.C. Mann & S.A. Thompson (eds.) Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 359-96.
130. Martin, J.R. 1995. Reading positions/positioning readers: Judgement in English. Prospect, 10 (20): 27-37.
131. Martin, J.R. 1996. Evaluating disruption: Symbolising theme in junior secondary narrative. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (eds.) Literacy in Society. London: Longman. pp. 124-69.
132. Martin, J.R. 1997. Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie & J.R. Martin (eds.) Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Cassell. pp. 3-39.
133. Martin, J.R. 1999 Mentoring semogenesis: Genre-based literacy pedagogy revisited. In F. Christie (ed.) Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness: Linguistic and Social Processes. London: Cassell. pp. 123-55.
134. Martin, J.R. 2000. Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Texts: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 142-75.
135. Martin, J.R. 2002. Meaning beyond the clause: SFL perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22: Discourse and Dialogue: 52-74.
136. Martin, J.R. 2002. From little things big things grow: Ecogenesis. In R.Coe, L. Lijngard & T. Teslenko (eds.) The Rhetoric and the Ideology of Genre. Cresskill. NJ: hampron Press. pp. 243-71.
137. Martin, J.R. 2007. Construing knowledge: A functional linguistics perspective. In F. Christie & J.R. Martin (eds.) Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy. London: Continuum. pp. 34-64.
138. Martin, J.R. 2008. Innocence: Realisation, instantiation and individuation in a Botswanan town. In N. Knight & A. Mahboob (eds.) Questioning Linguistics. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 27-54.
139. Martin, J.R. 2009. Boomer dreaming: The texture of recolonisation in a lifestyle magazine. In G. Forey & G. Thompson (eds.) Text Type and Texture. London: Equinox. pp. 252-84.
140. Martin, J.R. 2010. Affiliation: Realisation, instantiation and individuation in a Botswanan town. In M. Bednarek & J.R. Martin (eds.) New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London: Continuum.
141. Martin J.R. & C.M.I.M. Matthiessen 1991. Systemic typology and topology. In F. Christie (ed.) Literacy in Social Processes: Papers from the Inaugural Australian Systemic Linguistics Conference, held at Deakin University, January 1990. Darwin: Centre for Studies in Language in Education, Northern Territory University. pp. 345-83.
142. Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. 2007. Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. Second edn. London: Continuum.
143. Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. 2008. Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.
144. Martin, J.R. & J. Rothery 1981. The ontogenesis of written genre. Working Papers in Linguistics 2: Writing Project - Report 1981. Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney. pp.1-59.
145. Martin, J.R. & M. Stenglin 2007. Materialising reconciliation: Negotiating difference in a post-colonial exhibition. In T. Royce & W. Bowcher (eds.) New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 215-38.
146. Martin, J.R. & P.R.R. White 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke/ New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
147. Maton, K. 2000a. Languages of legitimation: The structuring significance for intellectual fields of strategic knowledge claims. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21 (2): 147-67.
148. Maton, K. 2000b. Recovering pedagogic discourse: A Bernsteinian approach to the sociology of educational knowledge. Linguistics and Education, 11 (1): 79-98.
149. Maton, K. 2002. Popes, kings and cultural studies: Placing the commitment to non-disciplinarity in historical context. In S. Herbrechter (ed.) Cultural Studies: Interdisciplinarity and Translation. Amsterdam: Rodopi. pp. 31-53.
150. Maton, K. 2003. Relexivity, relationsism, and research: Pierre Bourdieu and the epistemic conditions of social scientific knowledge. Space and Culture, 6 (1): 52-65.
151. Maton, K. 2006. On knowledge structures and knower structures. In R. Moore, M. Arnot, J. Beck & H. Daniels (eds.) Knowledge, Power and Educational Reform: Applying the Sociology of Basil Bernstein. London: Routledge. pp. 44-59.
152. Maton, K. 2007. Knowledge-knower structures in intellectual and educational fields. In F. Christie & J.R. Martin (eds.) Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives. London: Continuum. pp. 87-108.
153. Maton, K. 2009. Cumulative and segmented learning: Exploring the role of curriculum structures in knowledge-building. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30 (1): 43-57.
154. Maton, K. & J. Muller 2007. A sociology for the transmission of knowledge. In F. Chrisite & J.R. Martin (eds.) Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives. London: Continuum. pp. 14-33.
155. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 1988. Representational issues in systemic functional grammar. In J. D. Benson & W. S. Greaves (eds.) Systemic Functional Approaches to Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. pp. 136-75.
156. Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. 1995. Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English Systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishing.
157. Mauranen, A. 1996. Discourse competence: Evidence form thematic development in native and non-native texts. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (eds.) Academic Writing: Intertextual and Textual Issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp.195-230.
158. McDonald, E. 1994. Completive verb compounds in Modern Chinese: a new look at an old problem. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 22 (2): 317-61.
159. McKenna, B. 1997. How engineers write: An empirical study of engineers' report writing. Applied Linguistics, 18: 189-211.
160. McNamara, M.S. 2009. Academic leadership in nursing: Legitimating the discipline in contested spaces. Journal of Nursing Management, 17 (4): 484-93.
161. Millar, C. 1994. Genre as social action. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (eds.) Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis. pp. 23-42.
162. Moore, R. & K. Maton 2001. Founding the sociology of knowledge: Basil Bernstein, intellectual fields and the epistemic device. In A. Morais, I. Neves, B. Davies & H. Daniels (eds.) Towards a Sociology of Pedagogy: The Contribution of Basil Bernstein to Research. New York: Peter Lang. pp. 153-82.
163. Muller, J. 2000. Reclaiming Knowledge: Social Theory, Curriculum, and Education Policy. London: Routledge Falmer.
164. Muller, J. 2007. On splitting hairs: Hierarchy, knowledge and the school curriculum. In F. Christie & J.R. Martin (eds.) Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives. London: Continuum. pp. 65-86.
165. Murphy A.C. 2005. Markers of attribution in English and Italian opinion articles: A comparative corpus based study. International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English (ICAME), 29: 131-50.
166. Myers, G. A. 1989. The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 10 (1): 1-35.
167. Myers, G.A. 1996. Strategic vagueness in academic writing. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (eds.) Academic Writing: Intertextual and Textual Issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 3-17.
168. North, S. 2005. Disciplinary variation in the use of Theme in undergraduate essays. Applied Linguistics 26 (3): 431-52.
169. Nwogu, K. N. 1997. The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes 16 (2): 119-38.
170. Orlikowski, W. J. & J. Yates 1994. Genre repertoire: Examining the structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 541-74.
171. Palmer, F.R. (ed.) 1970. Prosodic Analysis. London: Oxford University Press.
172. Paltridge, B. 1997. Genre, Frames and Writing in Research Settings. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
173. Perelman, C. & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
174. Plum, G.A. 1998. Doing psychology, doing writing: Student voices in academic writing in psychology. In C.N. Candlin & G.A. Plum (eds.) Researching Academic Literacies. Sydney: Macquarie University,pp. 211-88.
175. Poynton, C. 1985[1989]. Language and Gender: Making the Difference. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press. [Republished 1989 Oxford: Oxford University Press.]
176. Poynton, C. 1996. Amplification as grammatical prosody: Attitudinal motivation in the nominal group. In M. Berry & M.A.K. Halliday (eds.) Meaning and Form: Systemic Functional Interpretations. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. pp. 211-27.
177. Ravelli, L.J. 2004. Familiar territory, shifting grounds: Aspects of organization in written texts. In L. Ravelli & R. Ellis (eds.) Academic Writing in Context: Social-functional Perspectives on Theory and Practice. London: Continuum.
178. Ravelli, L. & R. Ellis (eds.) 2004. Academic Writing in Context: Social-functional Perspectives on Theory and Practice. London: Continuum.
179. Richards, K. 2009. A hard act to follow: Conference debate and student argument. In M. Gotti (ed.) Commonality and Individuality in Academic Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang. pp. 83-113.
180. Rothery, J. 1990. Story Writing in Primary School: Assessing Narrative Type Genres. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Sydney.
181. Rothery, J. & M. Stenglin 1994. Writing a Book Review: A Unit of Work for Junior Secondary English (Write it Right resources for literacy and learning). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Programme.
182. Rothery, J. & M. Stenglin 2000. Interpreting literature: The role of appraisal. In L. Unsworth (ed.) Researching Language in Schools and Communities: Functional Linguistic Perspectives. London: Cassell. pp. 222-44.
183. Salager-Meyer, F. 1992. A text type and move analysis study of verb tenses and modality distribution in medical English abstracts. English for Specific Purposes 11 (2): 93-114.
184. Salager-Meyer, F. 1994. Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes 13 (2): 149-70.
185. Salager-Meyer, F. 1997. 'I think that perhaps you should': A study of hedges in written scientific discourse. In T. Miller (ed.) Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. Washington, DC: USIA. pp. 105-18.
186. Samraj, B. 2002. Introductions in research articles: variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 21 (1): 1-17.
187. Schleppergrell, M.J. 2002. Challenges of the science register for ESL students: Errors and meaning-making. In M. J. Schleppegrell & M.C. Colombi (eds.) Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages: Meaning with Power. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 119-42.
188. Sinclair, J. 1981. Planes of discourse. In S.N.A. Rizvi (ed.) The Two-fold Voice: Essays in Honour of Ramesh Mohan. Salzburg: University of Salzburg. pp. 70-89.
189. Sinclair, J. 1987. Mirror for a Text. Manuscript. University of Birmingham.
190. Sinclair, J.M. 1991. Corpus, Concordance and Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
191. Stewart, D. 2009. Semantic Prosody: A Critical Evaluation. London: Routledge.
192. Stenglin, M. 2004. Packaging Curiosities: Towards a Grammar of Threedimensional Space. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of Sydney.
193. Stillar, G.F. 1998. Analyzing Everyday Texts: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Perspectives. London: Sage.
194. Stotesbury, H. 2003. Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (4): 327-41.
195. Stubbs, M. 1996. Text and Corpus Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
196. Swales, J.M. 1987. Utilizing the literatures in teaching the research paper: Early work on introductions. TESOL Quarterly, 21: 41-67.
197. Swales, J.M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
198. Swales, J. M. 1996. Occluded genre in the academy: The case of the submission letter. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (eds.) Academic Writing: Intertextual and Textual Issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 45-58.
199. Swales, J. M. 1998. Other Floors, Other Voices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
200. Swales, J.M. 2002. On models of applied discourse analysis. In C.N. Candlin (ed.) Research and Practice in Professional Discourse. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong. pp. 61-78.
201. Swales, J.M. 2009. When there is no perfect text: Approaches to EAP practitioner's dimemma. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8 (1): 5-13
202. Swales, J.M. & C.B. Feak 2000. English in Today's Research World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
203. Swales, J.M. & S. Lindemann 2002. Teaching the literature review to international graduate students. In A. Johns (ed.) Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp.105-19.
204. Tadros, A. 1993. The pragmatics of text averral and attribution in academic texts. In M. Hoey (ed.) Data, Description, Discourse. London: HarperCollins. pp. 98-114.
205. Thetala, P. 1997. Evaluated entities and parameters of value in academic research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 16 (2): 101-18.
206. Thompson, G. 1996. Voices in a text: Discourse perspectives in language reports. Applied Linguistics, 17 (4): 501-30.
207. Thompson, G. 1998. Resonance in text. In A. Sanchez-Mararro & R. Carter (eds.) Linguistic Choice Across Genres: Variation in Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 29-63.
208. Thompson, G. & S. Hunston 2000. Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-27.
209. Thompson, G. & Y. Ye 1991. Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12 (4): 365-82.
210. Thompson, G & J. Zhou 2000. Evaluation and organisation in text: The structuring role of evaluative disjuncts. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (eds.) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 121-41.
211. Thompson, P. & C. Tribble. 2001. Looking at citations: Using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning & Technology, 5 (3): 91-110.
212. Thompson, S. 1997. Presenting Research: A Study of Interaction in Academic Language. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Liverpool.
213. Vande Kopple, W. 1985. Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36: 82-93.
214. Van Leeuwen, T. 2007. Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse and Communication, 1 (1): 91-112.
215. Veel, R. 1998. The greening of school science: Ecogenesis in secondary classrooms. In J.R. Martin & R. Veel (eds.) Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science. London; Routledge. pp. 114-51.
216. Ventola, E. 1987. The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Pinter.
217. Ventola, E. & A. Mauranen (eds.) 1996. Academic Writing: Intertextual and Textual Issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
218. Ventola. E., C. Shalom & S. Thompson (eds.) 2002. The Language of Conferencing. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
219. Weltman, D. 2003. The pragmatics of peremptory assertion: An ideological analysis of the word 'just' in local politicians' denials of politics. Discourse and Society, 14 (3): 349-73.
220. White, P.R.R. 2000. Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: Reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging. In M. Coulthard, J. Cotterill & F. Rock (eds.) Working with Dialogue. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. pp. 67-80.
221. White, P.R.R. 2003. Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Appraisal (Special edition of Text) 23 (2): 259-84.
222. White, P.R.R. 2003. Appraisal: The language of evaluation and stance. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Ostman, J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics Online. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
223. White, P.R.R. 2003. Appraisal: The language of attitudinal evaluation and intersubjective stance. Appraisal website, URL: www.grammatics.com/appraisal.
224. Wignell, P. 2004. Vertical and horizontal discourse and the social sciences. Paper presented at Reclaiming Knowledge Conference, University of Sydney.
225. Wignell, P. 2007. Vertical and horizontal discourse and the social sciences. In F. Christie & J.R. Martin (eds.) Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Functional Linguistic and Sociological Perspectives. London: Continuum. pp. 184-204.
226. Xiao, R. Z. & A. M. McEnery 2006. Collocation, semantic prosody and near synonymy: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Linguistics, 27 (1): 103-29.
227. Yang Ruiying & D. Allison 2004. Research articles in applied linguistics: studies from a functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes 23 (3): 264-79.
228. Zappavigna, M., P. Dwyer & J.R. Martin 2008. Syndromes of meaning: Exploring patterned coupling in a NSW Youth Justice Conference. In A. Mahboob & N. Knight (eds.) Questioning Linguistics. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp.103-17.
229. Basturkmen, H. 1999. Discourse in MBA seminars: Towards a description for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18 (1): 63-80.
230. Brandt, C.B. 2008. Discursive geographies in science: Space, identity, and scientific discourse among indigenous women in higher education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3: 703-30.
231. Curtis, A. & A. Herron 1998. On being less innovative: Peer groups and process writing in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Language in Education, 1 (1): 99-118.
232. Donovan, J., C.E. Mader & J. Shinsky 2006. Constructive student feedback: Online vs. traditional course evaluations. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5 (3): 283-96.
233. Fedorova,T.V., A.S. Vilesov, S.A. Kurzeev, E.V. Stepanova, E.O. Landesman & O.V. Koroleva 2006. Development of a novel enzyme-redox-mediator system based on a fungal laccase and ruthenium complexes. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 42 (6): 550-7.
234. Kalamees, T., J. Vinha & J. Kurnitski 2006. Indoor humidity loads and moisture production in lightweight timber-frame detached houses. Journal of Building Physics, 29 (3): 219-28.
235. Lee, I. 1997. Peer reviews in a Hong Kong tertiary classroom. TESL Canada Journal/La Revue TESL du Canada, 15 (1): 58-65.
236. Li Yongyan & J. Flowerdew 2007. Shaping Chinese novice scientists' manuscripts for publication. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16: 100-17.
237. Littler, J. 2005. Beyond the boycott: Anti-consumerism, cultural change and the limits of reflexivity. Cultural Studies, 19 (2): 227-52.
238. Lumley, T. & B. O'Sullivan 2005. The effect of test-taker gender, audience and topic on task performance in tape-mediated assessment of speaking. Language Testing, 22 (4): 415-37.
239. Johnson, S., S. R. Aragon, N. Shaik & N. Palms-Rivas 2000. Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning, 11 (1): 29-49.
240. Martin, A. & H. Marsh 2005. Motivating boys and motivating girls: Does teacher gender really make a difference? Australian Journal of Education, 49 (3): 320-34.
241. Massoud, L.A. & Kuipers, J.C. 2008. Objectification and the inscription of knowledge in science classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 19: 211-24.
242. Moser, I. 2005. On becoming disabled and articulating alternatives: The multiple modes of ordering disability and their interferences. Cultural Studies, 19 (6): 667-700.
243. Olitsky, S. 2006. Structure, agency and the development of students' identities as learners. Journal of Cultural Studies of Science Education 1(4): 745-66.
244. O'Neal, K. 2009. The comparison between asynchronous online discussion and traditional classroom discussion in an undergraduate education course. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5 (1): 88-96.
245. Painter, C. 1986. The role of interaction in learning to speak and learning to write. Applied Linguistics Association of Australia, Occasional Papers 9. pp. 62-97.
246. Pioch, D., B. Jürgen, S. Evers, K.-H. Maurer, M. Hecker & T. Schweder 2007. At-line monitoring of bioprocess-relevant marker genes. Engineering Life Science, 7 (4): 373-9.
247. Roche, V. & L. Lemasters 2006. Satisfaction with online learning: A comparative descriptive study. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5 (3): 317-32.
248. Rosemary, M.J., V. Suryanarayanan, I. Maclaren & T. Pradeep 2006. Aniline incorporated silica nanobubbles. Journal of Chemical Science, 118 (5): 375-84.
249. Roychoudhury, A., D.J Tippins & S.E. Nichols 1995. Gender-inclusive science teaching: A feminist-constructivist approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (9): 897-24.
250. Ryan, A. 2008. Indigenous knowledge in the science curriculum: Avoiding neocolonialism. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3: 663-702.
251. Saeed, A. & Z. Ashraf 2006. Sodium borohydride reduction of aromatic carboxylic acids via methylesters. Journal of Chemical Science, 118 (5): 419-23.
252. Schlunke, K. 1999. An Autobiography of the Bluff Rock Massacre. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Western Sydney.
253. Shildrick, M. 2005. The disabled body, genealogy and undecidability. Cultural Studies, 19 (6): 755-70.
254. Souto-Manning 2006. A critical look at bilingualism discourse in public schools: autoethnographic reflections of a vulnerable observer. Bilingual Research Journal, 30 (2): 559-77.
255. Tinker Sachs, G. 2000. Teacher and researcher autonomy in action research. Prospect, 15 (3): 35-51.
256. Ubukata, Y. 2007. The role of particulate organic matter and acetic acid in the removal of phosphate in anaerobic/aerobic activated sludge processes. Engineering Life Science, 7 (1): 61-66.
257. Unsworth, L. 2004. Multiliteracies, e-literature and English teaching. In Conference Proceedings: Multiliteracies & English teaching K-12 in the age of information & communication technologies. Australian Literacy Educators' Association and The University of New England, NSW.
258. Westermann, J., M. Schneider, J. Platzek & O. Petrov 2007. Practical synthesis of a heterocyclic immunosuppressive Vitamin D analogue. Organic Process Research and Development, 11: 200-5.
259. Woodley, A. 1985. Taking account of mature students. In D. Jaques & J. Richardson (eds.) The Future of Higher Education. Guildford: SRHE and NFERNelson. Extract in J. Bell 1993. Doing Your Research Project. Buckingham: Open University Press.
260. Wright. L.J. 2008. Writing science and objectification: Selecting, organizing, and decontextualing knowledge. Linguistics and Education, 19 (3): 265-93.
261. Yates, L. 1999. Transitions and the year 7 experience: A report from the 12 to 18 Project. Australian Journal of Education, 43 (1): 24-41.
262. Younsi, R., D. Kocaefe, S. Poncsak & Y. Kocaefe 2006. A diffusion-based model for transient high temperature treatment of wood. Journal of Building Physics, 30 (2): 113-23.