Cultivating science: Negotiating discourse in the popular texts of Stephen Jay Gould

Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 35-62

  Fuller, Gillian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071587700     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203982327-13     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Bakhtin, M.M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. M.Holquist (ed.) M.Holquist and C.Emerson (trans.) Austin: University of Texas Press.
2. Bakhtin, M.M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. V.W.McGee (trans.) Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Bazerman, C. 1993. ‘Intertextual Self-Fashioning: Gould and Lewontin’s representations of the literature’ in J.Selzer (ed.) Understanding Scientific Prose. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Benjamin, W. 1969. The Task of the Translator’ in H.Arendt (ed.) H.Zohn (trans.) Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books.
5. Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. London: Polity Press.
6. Dawkins, S. 1992. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Eger, M. 1993. ‘Hermeneutics and the New Epic of Science’ in M.W.McRae (ed.) The Literature of Science: Perspectives on popular scientific writing. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
8. Fahnestock, J. 1993a. ‘Accommodating Science-The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts’ in M.W.McRae (ed.) The Literature of Science: perspectives on popular scientific writing. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
9. Fahnestock, J. 1993b. ‘Tactics of Evaluation in Gould and Lewontin’s ‘The Spandrels of San Marco’ in J.Selzer (ed.) Understanding Scientific Prose. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
10. Fuller, G. 1995. ‘Engaging Cultures: Negotiating discourse in popular science’, unpublished PhD thesis. Sydney University.
11. Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity Press.
12. Gould, S.J. 1992. Bully for Brontosaurus. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
13. Halliday, M.A.K. 1979. Language As a Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
14. Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Grammar (second edition). London: Edward Arnold.
15. Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. 1985. Language, Text and Context. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
16. Halliday, M.A.K. and Martin, J.R. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and discursive power. London: The Falmer Press.
17. Harvey, D. 1989. The Condition of Post-Modernity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
18. Hawking, S. 1990. A Brief History of Time. New York: Bantam.
19. Kelley, R.T. 1993. ‘Order out of Chaos: The Writerly Discourse of Semi-popular Scientific Texts’ in M.W.McRae (ed.) The Literature of Science: Perspectives on popular scientific writing. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
20. Lovejoy, D. 1991. ‘The Dialectical Palaeontologist: popular writings of Stephen Jay Gould’, review article in Science and Society, 55. (2) 197-208.
21. Martin, J.R. 1992. English Text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
22. Masur, L. 1993. ‘StephenJay Gould’s Vision of History’ in M.W.McRae (ed.) The Literature of Science: Perspectives on popular scientific writing. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
23. Matthiessen, C. 1992. ‘Language on language: the grammar of semiosis’ Social Semiotics 1(2) 69-111.
24. Midgley, M. 1994. Science as Salvation: A modern myth and its meaning. London: Routledge.
25. Myers, G. 1990. Writing Biology: The social construction of popular science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
26. Myers, G. 1991. ‘Lexical Cohesion and Specialised Knowledge in Science and Popular Science Texts’. Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal vol. 14, 1-26. Ablex Publishing Co.
27. Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. 1985. Order out of Chaos-Man’s New Dialogue with Nature London: Flamingo.
28. Selzer, J. (ed.). 1993. Understanding Scientific Prose. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
29. Shortland, J. and Gregory, M. 1991. Communicating Science: A handbook. London: Longman.
30. Snow, C.P. 1964. The Two Cultures: And a second look. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. White, H. 1980. ‘The Value of Narrativity in The Representation of Reality’ Critical Inquiry Autumn 5-27.
32. Wignell, P. 1992. ‘Technicality and Abstraction in Sociology’, paper presented to the International Systemic Functional Conference, Macquarie University, Australia, July 1992.