Arguing In and Across Disciplinary Boundaries: Legitimizing Strategies in Applied Linguistics and Cultural Studies

Advances in Language and Education

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 185-200

  Hood, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85187607332     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Bernstein, B. (1990), Class, Codes and Control, Volume IV: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge.
2. Bernstein, B. (1999), ‘Vertical and horizontal discourse: an essay’. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, (2), 157–73.
3. Hewings, A. and Hewings, M. (2001), ‘Anticipatory ‘it’ in academic writing: an indicator of disciplinary difference and developing disciplinary knowledge’, in M. Hewings (ed.), Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press, pp. 119–214.
4. Hood, S. (2004), ‘Managing attitude in undergraduate academic writing: a focus on the introductions to research reports’, in L. Ravelli and R. Ellis (eds), Analysing Academic Writing: Contextualised Frameworks. London: Continuum, pp. 22–44.
5. Hood, S. and Martin, J. R. (2007), ‘Invoking attitude: the play of graduation in appraising discourse’, in J. Webster, C. Matthiessen and R. Hasan (eds), Continuing Discourse on Language. London: Equinox, vol. 2, pp. 195–220.
6. Huckin, T. (2001), ‘Abstracting from abstracts’, in M. Hewings (ed.), Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press, pp. 93–103.
7. Hyland, K. (1999), ‘Academic attribution: citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge’. Applied Linguistics, 20, 341–67.
8. Hyland, K. (2000), Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Pearson.
9. Martin, J. R. (1992), English Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10. Martin, J. R. (2000), ‘Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English’, in S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 142–75.
11. Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2003), Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.
12. Maton, K. (2000a) ‘Languages of legitimation: The structuring significance for intellectual fields of strategic knowledge claims’. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21, (2), 147–67.
13. Maton, K. (2000b), ‘Recovering pedagogic discourse: A Bernsteinian approach to the sociology of educational knowledge’. Linguistics & Education, 11, (1), 79–98.
14. Moore, R. and Maton, K. (2001), ‘Founding the sociology of knowledge: Basil Bernstein, intellectual fields and the epistemic device’, in A. Morais, I. Neves, B. Davies, and H. Daniels (eds), Towards a Sociology of Pedagogy: The Contribution of Basil Bernstein to Research. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 153–82.
15. Prior, P. (1994), ‘Response, revision, disciplinarity: A micro-history of a dissertation prospectus in sociology’. Written Communication, 11, (4), 483–533.
16. Samraj, B. (2000), ‘Discursive practices in graduate level content course: The case of environmental science’. Text, 20, 347–72.
17. Samraj, B. (2004), ‘An exploration of a genre set: research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines’. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 141–56.
18. Swales, J. M. (1990), Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Yang, R. and Allison, D. (2004), ‘Research articles in applied linguistics: studies from a functional perspective’. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 264–79.
20. Hood, S. (2004), ‘Appraising Research: Taking a Stance in Academic Writing’ (unpublished PhD thesis. University of Technology, Sydney).
21. Schlunke, K. (1999), ‘An Autobiography of the Bluff Rock Massacre’ (unpublished PhD thesis. University of Western Sydney).