A 3D Toolbox to Enhance Physiological Relevance of Human Tissue Models

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 757-769

  Picollet D'hahan, Nathalie ^a,c,d   Dolega, Monika E ^a,c,d   Liguori, Lavinia ^b,c   Marquette, Christophe ^e   Le Gac, Séverine ^f   Gidrol, Xavier ^a,c,d   Martin, Donald K ^b,c  

^a CEA GRENOBLE   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE TIMC IMAG   (France)

^c UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^d INSERM   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

3D models; 3D scaffolds; microfluidics; microtechnologies; organs on chip

Indexed keywords

CELL ENGINEERING; MICROFLUIDICS; PHYSIOLOGY;

3-D SCAFFOLDS; 3D MODELS; ELASTOMERIC MEMBRANES; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; MICRO TECHNOLOGY; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; ON CHIPS; PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITION;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

POLYELECTROLYTE;

BASEMENT MEMBRANE; BIOPRINTING; CELL AGGREGATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL SURFACE; CYTOLOGY; DRUG SCREENING; EXOCRINE GLAND; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GLAND TISSUE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL CULTURE; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; LAB ON A CHIP; MICROFLUIDICS; MICROTECHNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TISSUE CULTURE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT; TUMOR SPHEROID; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL CULTURE; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CYTOPLASM; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYSIS; TISSUE MICROARRAY;

CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELLS, CULTURED; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMANS; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORGANOIDS; TISSUE ARRAY ANALYSIS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84991204291     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.06.012     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. 1 Fitzgerald, K.A., et al. Life in 3D is never flat: 3D models to optimise drug delivery. J. Control. Release 215 (2015), 39–54.
2. 2 Breslin, S., O'Driscoll, L., Three-dimensional cell culture: the missing link in drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 18 (2013), 240–249.
3. 3 Xu, X., et al. Three-dimensional in vitro tumor models for cancer research and drug evaluation. Biotechnol. Adv. 32 (2014), 1256–1268.
4. 4 Campbell, J.J., Watson, C.J., Three-dimensional culture models of mammary gland. Organogenesis 5 (2009), 43–49.
5. 5 Li, X.J., et al. Microfluidic 3D cell culture: potential application for tissue-based bioassays. Bioanalysis 4 (2012), 1509–1525.
6. 6 Weigelt, B., et al. The need for complex 3D culture models to unravel novel pathways and identify accurate biomarkers in breast cancer. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 69-70 (2014), 42–51.
7. 7 O'Brien, L.E., et al. Opinion: Building epithelial architecture: insights from three-dimensional culture models. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3 (2002), 531–537.
8. 8 Choudhury, D., et al. Exploitation of physical and chemical constraints for three-dimensional microtissue construction in microfluidics. Biomicrofluidics, 5, 2011, 022203.
9. 9 Chung, K., Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems. Nature 497 (2013), 332–337.
10. 10 Picollet-D'hahan, N., et al. Translating microtechnologies into tissue engineering, pharmacology and cancer research. Biotech Int., 2010 http://www.biotech-online.com/featured-articles/translating-microtechnologies-into-tissue-engineering-pharmacology-and-cancer-research/trackback/1/.
11. 11 Sinha, R., et al. A medium throughput device to study the effects of combinations of surface strains and fluid-flow shear stresses on cells. Lab Chip 15 (2015), 429–435.
12. 12 Marsano, A., et al. Beating heart on a chip: a novel microfluidic platform to generate functional 3D cardiac microtissues. Lab Chip 16 (2016), 599–610.
13. 13 Ma, C., et al. On-chip construction of liver lobule-like microtissue and its application for adverse drug reaction assay. Anal. Chem. 88 (2016), 1719–1727.
14. 14 Huh, D., et al. From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends Cell Biol. 21 (2011), 745–754.
15. 15 Caplin, J.D., et al. Microfluidic organ-on-a-chip technology for advancement of drug development and toxicology. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 4 (2015), 1426–1450.
16. 16 Yum, K., et al. Physiologically relevant organs on chips. Biotechnol. J. 9 (2014), 16–27.
17. 17 Bhatia, S.N., Ingber, D.E., Microfluidic organs-on-chips. Nat. Biotech. 32 (2014), 760–772.
18. 18 Esch, E.W., et al. Organs-on-chips at the frontiers of drug discovery. Nature 14 (2015), 248–260.
19. 19 Sung, J.H., et al. Microfabricated mammalian organ systems and their integration into models of whole animals and humans. Lab Chip 13 (2013), 1201–1212.
20. 20 Marx, V., Tissue engineering: organs from the lab. Nature 522 (2015), 373–377.
21. 21 Eisenstein, M., Artificial organs: honey, I shrunk the lungs. Nature 519 (2015), S16–S18.
22. 22 Huh, D., et al. Acoustically detectable cellular-level lung injury induced by fluid mechanical stresses in microfluidic airway systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (2007), 18886–18891.
23. 23 Huh, D., et al. Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip. Science 328 (2010), 1662–1668.
24. 24 Stucki, A.O., et al. A lung-on-a-chip array with an integrated bio-inspired respiration mechanism. Lab Chip 15 (2015), 1302–1310.
25. 25 Sung, J.H., et al. Microscale 3D hydrogel scaffold for biomimetic gastrointestinal (GI) tract model. Lab Chip. 11 (2011), 389–392.
26. 26 No, D-Y., et al. 3D liver models on a microplatform: well-defined culture, engineering of liver tissue and liver-on-a-chip. Lab Chip 15 (2015), 3822–3837.
27. 27 Kim, H.J., et al. Contributions of microbiome and mechanical deformation to intestinal bacterial overgrowth and inflammation in a human gut-on-a-chip. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 14 (2015), E7–E15.
28. 28 Bischel, L.L., et al. Microfluidic model of ductal carcinoma in situ with 3D, organotypic structure. BMC Cancer, 15, 2015, 12.
29. 29 Dolega, M.E., et al. Facile bench-top fabrication of enclosed circular microchannels provides 3D confined structure for growth of prostate epithelial cells. PLoS ONE, 9, 2014, e99416.
30. 30 Sánchez, P.L., et al. Acellular human heart matrix: a critical step toward whole heart grafts. Biomaterials 61 (2015), 279–289.
31. 31 Mallis, P., et al. Evaluation of decellularization in umbilical cord artery. Transplant. Proc. 46 (2014), 3232–3239.
32. 32 Nichols, J.E., et al. Giving new life to old lungs: methods to produce and assess whole human paediatric bioengineered lungs. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 2016, 10.1002/term.2113.
33. 33 Mazza, G., et al. Decellularized human liver as a natural 3D-scaffold for liver bioengineering and transplantation. Sci. Rep., 5, 2015, 13079.
34. 34 Gao, G., Cui, X., Three-dimensional bioprinting in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biotechnol. Lett. 38 (2016), 203–211.
35. 35 Ozbolat, I.T., Bioprinting scale-up tissue and organ constructs for transplantation. Trends Biotechnol. 33 (2015), 395–400.
36. 36 Sung-Hwan, K., et al. Microwell fabrication methods and applications for cellular studies. Biomedical Eng. Lett. 3 (2013), 131–137.
37. 37 Mercey, E., et al. The application of 3D micropatterning of agarose substrate for cell culture and in situ comet assays. Biomaterials 31 (2010), 3156–3165.
38. 38 Rivron, N.C., et al. Tissue deformation spatially modulates VEGF signaling and angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 (2012), 6886–6891.
39. 39 Sridhar, A., et al. Microstamped Petri dishes for scanning electrochemical microscopy analysis of arrays of microtissues. PLoS ONE, 9, 2014, e93618.
40. 40 Hardelauf, H., et al. Microarrays for the scalable production of metabolically relevant tumor spheroids: a tool for modulating chemosensitivity traits. Lab Chip 11 (2011), 419–428.
41. 41 Kelm, J.M., et al. Method for generation of homogeneous multicellular tumor spheroids applicable to a wide variety of cell types. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 83 (2003), 173–180.
42. 42 Messner, S., et al. Multi-cell type human liver microtissues for hepatotoxicity testing. Arch. Toxicol. 87 (2013), 209–213.
43. 43 Tung, Y.C., et al. High-throughput 3D spheroid culture and drug testing using a 384 hanging drop array. Analyst 136 (2011), 473–478.
44. 44 Falkenberg, N., et al. Three-dimensional microtissues essentially contribute to preclinical validations of therapeutic targets in breast cancer. Cancer Med. 5 (2016), 703–710.
45. 45 Dolega, M.E., et al. Controlled 3D culture in matrigel microbeads to analyze clonal acinar development. Biomaterials 52 (2015), 347–357.
46. 46 Dufva, M., Microchips for cell-based assays. Methods Mol. Biol. 509 (2009), 135–144.
47. 47 Hiroaki, O., et al. Metre-long cell-laden microfibres exhibit tissue morphologies and functions. Nat. Mater. 12 (2013), 584–590.
48. 48 Leijten, J., et al. Advancing tissue engineering: a tale of nano-, micro-, and macroscale integration. Small 2 (2016), 2130–2145.
49. 49 Sackmann, E.K., et al. The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research. Nature 507 (2014), 181–189.
50. 50 Young, E.W., Beebe, D.J., Fundamentals of microfluidic cell culture in controlled microenvironments. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39 (2010), 1036–1048.
51. 51 van Duinen, V., et al. Microfluidic 3D cell culture: from tools to tissue models. Curr. Op. Biotech. 35 (2015), 118–126.
52. 52 Harink, B., et al. Regeneration-on-a-chip? The perspectives on use of microfluidics in regenerative medicine. Lab Chip 13 (2013), 3512–3528.
53. 53 Fung, W-To., et al. Microfluidic platform for controlling the differentiation of embryoid bodies. Lab Chip 9 (2009), 2591–2595.
54. 54 Chen, S.Y., et al. Microfluidic array for three-dimensional perfusion culture of human mammary epithelial cells. Biomed. Microdevices 13 (2011), 753–758.
55. 55 Ayuso, J.M., et al. Study of the chemotactic response of multicellular spheroids in a microfluidic device. PLoS ONE, 10, 2015, e0139515.
56. 56 Kim, C., et al. A quantitative microfluidic angiogenesis screen for studying anti-angiogenic therapeutic drugs. Lab Chip 15 (2015), 301–310.
57. 57 Boussommier-Calleja, A., et al. Microfluidics: a new tool for modeling cancer–immune interactions. Trends Cancer 2 (2016), 1–19.
58. 58 McMillan, K.S., et al. Emulsion technologies for multicellular tumor spheroid radiation assays. Analyst 141 (2016), 100–110.
59. 59 Sabhachandani, P., et al. Generation and functional assessment of 3D multicellular spheroids in droplet based microfluidics platform. Lab Chip 16 (2016), 497–505.
60. 60 Wang, Y., et al. Geometrically controlled preparation of various cell aggregates by droplet-based microfluidics. Anal. Methods 7 (2015), 10040–10051.
61. 61 Fai, C.H., et al. Rapid formation of multicellular spheroids in double-emulsion droplets with controllable microenvironment. Sci. Rep., 3, 2013, 3462.
62. 62 Picollet-D'hahan, N., et al. The modulation of attachment, growth and morphology of cancerous prostate cells by polyelectrolyte nanofilms. Biomaterials 34 (2013), 10099–10108.
63. 63 Abbott, R.D., et al. Strategies for improving the physiological relevance of human engineered tissues. Trends Biotechnol. 33 (2015), 401–407.
64. 64 Abeille, F., et al. Continuous microcarrier-based cell culture in a benchtop microfluidic bioreactor. Lab Chip 14 (2014), 3510–3518.
65. 65 Estrada, M.F., et al. Modelling the tumour microenvironment in long-term microencapsulated 3D co-cultures recapitulates phenotypic features of disease progression. Biomaterials 78 (2016), 50–61.
66. 66 Ravi, M., et al. 3D cell culture systems: advantages and applications. J. Cell. Physiol. 230 (2015), 16–26.
67. 67 Song, H.H., et al. Hydrogels to model 3D in vitro microenvironment of tumor vascularization. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 15 (2014), 19–29.
68. 68 Maghdouri-White, Y., et al. Bioengineered silk scaffolds in 3D tissue modeling with focus on mammary tissues. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 59 (2016), 1168–1180.
69. 69 Mehta, G., et al. Opportunities and challenges for use of tumor spheroids as models to test drug delivery and efficacy. J. Control. Release 164 (2012), 192–204.
70. 70 Capulli, A.K., et al. Fibrous scaffolds for building hearts and heart parts. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 96 (2016), 83–102.
71. 71 Girdhari, R., Weimin, L., 3D scaffolds in breast cancer research. Biomaterials 81 (2016), 135–156.
72. 72 Carvalho, M.R., et al. Evaluating biomaterial- and microfluidic-based 3D tumor models. Trends Biotechnol. 33 (2015), 667–678.
73. 73 Shepard Neiman, J.A., et al. Photopatterning of hydrogel scaffolds coupled to filter materials using stereolithography for perfused 3D culture of hepatocytes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 112 (2015), 777–787.
74. 74 Markovic, M., et al. Hybrid tissue engineering scaffolds by combination of three-dimensional printing and cell photoencapsulation. J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med. 6 (2015), 0210011–0210017.
75. 75 Loo, Y., Hauser, C.A.E., Bioprinting synthetic self-assembling peptide hydrogels for biomedical applications. Biomed. Mater., 11, 2016, 014103.
76. 76 Martin, D.K., (eds.) Nanobiotechnology of Biomimetic Membranes, 2007, Springer, NY (ISBN 978-0-387-37738-4).
77. 77 Stidder, B., et al. Biomimetic membrane system composed of a composite interpenetrating hydrogel film and a lipid bilayer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22 (2012), 4259–4267.
78. 78 Decher, G., Hong, J., Buildup of ultrathin multilayer films by a self-assembly process, 1 consecutive adsorption of anionic and cationic bipolar amphiphiles on charged surfaces. Makromol. Chem. Macromol. Symp. 46 (1991), 321–327.
79. 79 Matsusaki, M., et al. Layer-by-layer assembly through weak interactions and their biomedical applications. Adv. Mater. Weinheim, 24, 2012, 454e74.
80. 80 Sher, P., et al. Assembly of cell-laden hydrogel fiber into non-liquefied and liquefied 3D spiral constructs by perfusion-based layer-by-layer technique. Biofabrication, 7, 2015, 011001.
81. 81 Battle, A.R., et al. Novel engineered ion channel provides controllable ion permeability for polyelectrolyte microcapsules coated with a lipid membrane. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19 (2009), 201–208.
82. 82 El Ichi, S., et al. Bioelectrodes modified with chitosan for long-term energy supply from the body. Energ. Environ. Sci. 8 (2015), 1017–1026.
83. 83 Benien, P., Swami, A., 3D tumor models: history, advances and future perspectives. Future Oncol. 10 (2014), 1311–1327.
84. 84 Murphy, S.V., Atala, A., 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat. Biotechnol. 32 (2014), 773–785.
85. 85 Lancaster, M.A., et al. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature 501 (2013), 373–379.
86. 86 Takasato, M., et al. Kidney organoids from human iPS cells contain multiple lineages and model human nephrogenesis. Nature 526 (2015), 564–569.
87. 87 Hsiao, A.Y., et al. Microfluidic system for formation of PC-3 prostate cancer co-culture spheroids. Biomaterials 30 (2009), 3020–3027.
88. 88 Fu, C.Y., et al. A microfluidic chip with a U-shaped microstructure array for multicellular spheroid formation, culturing and analysis. Biofabrication, 6, 2014, 015009.
89. 89 Yoshimoto, K., et al. Inverted pattern formation of cell microarrays on poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) gel patterned surface and construction of hepatocyte spheroids on unmodified PEG gel microdomains. Lab Chip 9 (2009), 1286–1289.
90. 90 Kim, H.J., Ingber, D.E., Gut-on-a-chip microenvironment induces human intestinal cells to undergo villus differentiation. Integr. Biol.(5), 2013, 1130–1140.