Nuclear morphologies: their diversity and functional relevance

Chromosoma

Volumn 126, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 195-212

  Skinner, Benjamin M ^a   Johnson, Emma E P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chromatin; Differentiation; Eukaryote; Gene expression; Shape

Indexed keywords

CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CHROMATIN; CYTOSKELETON; DIFFERENTIATION; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; EUKARYOTE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; LEUKOCYTE; MORPHOLOGY; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR SHAPE; SMOOTH MUSCLE CELL; SPERMATOZOON; SWIMMING; ANIMAL; CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; CYTOLOGY; EUKARYOTIC CELL; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; HUMANS;

EID: 84986332733     PISSN: 00095915     EISSN: 14320886     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00412-016-0614-5     Document Type: Review

References (172)

1. Abe T, Takano K, Suzuki A et al (2004) Myocyte differentiation generates nuclear invaginations traversed by myofibrils associating with sarcomeric protein mRNAs. J Cell Sci 117:6523–6534. doi:10.1242/jcs.01574
2. Agmon N, Liefshitz B, Zimmer C et al (2013) Effect of nuclear architecture on the efficiency of double-strand break repair. Nat Cell Biol 15(6):694–9. doi:10.1038/ncb2745
3. Ballarò B, Florena AM, Franco V et al (2008) An automated image analysis methodology for classifying megakaryocytes in chronic myeloproliferative disorders. Med Image Anal 12:703–712. doi:10.1016/j.media.2008.04.001
4. Barbosa AD, Sembongi H, Su W-M et al (2015) Lipid partitioning at the nuclear envelope controls membrane biogenesis. Mol Biol Cell 26:3641–3657. doi:10.1091/mbc.E15-03-0173
5. Baroux C, Pecinka A, Fuchs J, et al. (2016) Non-random chromosome arrangement in triploid endosperm nuclei. Chromosoma 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00412-016-0578-5
6. Bastián Y, Roa-Espitia AL, Mújica A, Hernández-González EO (2010) Calpain modulates capacitation and acrosome reaction through cleavage of the spectrin cytoskeleton. Reprod Camb Engl 140:673–684. doi:10.1530/REP-09-0545
7. Bedford JM, Cooper GW, Phillips DM, Dryden GL (1994) Distinctive features of the gametes and reproductive tracts of the Asian musk shrew, Suncus murinus. Biol Reprod 50:820–834
8. Beguelini MR, Bueno LM, Caun DL et al (2014) Ultrastructure of spermatogenesis in the short-tailed fruit bat, Carollia perspicillata (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae: Carollinae). J Morphol 275:111–123. doi:10.1002/jmor.20202
9. Bell ES, Lammerding J (2016) Causes and consequences of nuclear envelope alterations in tumour progression. Eur J Cell Biol. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2016.06.007
10. Bickmore WA, van Steensel B (2013) Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes. Cell 152:1270–1284. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.001
11. Birkhead TR, Immler S, Pellatt EJ, Freckleton R (2006) Unusual Sperm Morphology in the Eurasian Bullfinch (Pyrrhula pyrrhula) (Morfología Espermática Inusual en Pyrrhula pyrrhula). Auk 123:383–392
12. Birkhead TR, Giusti F, Immler S, Jamieson BGM (2007) Ultrastructure of the unusual spermatozoon of the Eurasian bullfinch (Pyrrhula pyrrhula). Acta Zool 88:119–128. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6395.2007.00259.x
13. Błaszczak Z, Kreysing M, Guck J (2014) Direct observation of light focusing by single photoreceptor cell nuclei. Opt Express 22:11043–11060. doi:10.1364/OE.22.011043
14. Braekeleer MD, Nguyen MH, Morel F, Perrin A (2015) Genetic aspects of monomorphic teratozoospermia: a review. J Assist Reprod Genet 32:615–623. doi:10.1007/s10815-015-0433-2
15. Breed WG, Musser GG (1991) Sulawesi and Philippine rodents (Muridae): a survey of spermatozoal morphology and its significance for philogenetic inference. American Museum novitates ; no. 3003
16. Breed WG, Yong H-S (1986) Sperm morphology of murid rodents from Malaysia and its possible phylogenetic significance. American Museum novitates ; no. 2856
17. Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A (2007) Beneficial suicide: why neutrophils die to make NETs. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:577–582. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1710
18. Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A (2012) Neutrophil extracellular traps: Is immunity the second function of chromatin? J Cell Biol 198:773–783. doi:10.1083/jcb.201203170
19. Burke B, Stewart CL (2006) The laminopathies: the functional architecture of the nucleus and its contribution to disease. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 7:369–405. doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.7.080505.115732
20. Burtner CR, Kennedy BK (2010) Progeria syndromes and ageing: what is the connection? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:567–578. doi:10.1038/nrm2944
21. Bussolati G, Marchiò C, Gaetano L et al (2008) Pleomorphism of the nuclear envelope in breast cancer: a new approach to an old problem. J Cell Mol Med 12:209–218. doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00176.x
22. Buxboim A, Swift J, Irianto J et al (2014) Matrix elasticity regulates lamin-A, C phosphorylation and turnover with feedback to actomyosin. Curr Biol CB 24:1909–1917. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.001
23. Chan Y-K, Tsai M-H, Huang D-C et al (2010) Leukocyte nucleus segmentation and nucleus lobe counting. BMC Bioinf 11:558. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-558
24. Chandra T, Kirschner K, Thuret J-Y et al (2012) Independence of repressive histone marks and chromatin compaction during senescent heterochromatic layer formation. Mol Cell 47:203–214. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.010
25. Chandra T, Ewels PA, Schoenfelder S et al (2015) Global reorganization of the nuclear landscape in senescent cells. Cell Rep 10:471–483. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.055
26. Chang W, Worman HJ, Gundersen GG (2015) Accessorizing and anchoring the LINC complex for multifunctionality. J Cell Biol 208:11–22. doi:10.1083/jcb.201409047
27. Chen B, Gilbert LA, Cimini BA et al (2013) Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell 155:1479–1491. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.001
28. Chihara J, Nakajima S (1989) Induction of hypodense eosinophils and nuclear hypersegmentation of eosinophils by various chemotactic factors and lymphokines in vitro. Allergy Asthma Proc 10:27–32. doi:10.2500/108854189778968515
29. Cibulka J, Fraiberk M, Forstova J (2012) Nuclear actin and lamins in viral infections. Viruses 4:325–347. doi:10.3390/v4030325
30. Claver JA, Quaglia AIE (2009) Comparative morphology, development, and function of blood cells in nonmammalian vertebrates. J Exot Pet Med 18:87–97. doi:10.1053/j.jepm.2009.04.006
31. Cocquet J, Ellis PJI, Mahadevaiah SK et al (2012) A Genetic Basis for a Postmeiotic X Versus Y Chromosome Intragenomic Conflict in the Mouse. PLoS Genet 8:e1002900. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002900
32. Collings DA, Carter CN, Rink JC et al (2000) Plant nuclei can contain extensive grooves and invaginations. Plant Cell 12:2425
33. Coutton C, Escoffier J, Martinez G et al (2015) Teratozoospermia: spotlight on the main genetic actors in the human. Hum Reprod Update 21:455–485. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv020
34. Cremer T, Cremer M (2010) Chromosome Territories. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003889
35. Crisp M, Liu Q, Roux K et al (2006) Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm role of the LINC complex. J Cell Biol 172:41–53. doi:10.1083/jcb.200509124
36. Curnow SJ, Fairclough M, Schmutz C et al (2010) Distinct types of fibrocyte can differentiate from mononuclear cells in the presence and absence of serum. PLoS One 5:e9730. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009730
37. Czapiewski R, Robson MI, Schirmer EC (2016) Anchoring a Leviathan: How the Nuclear Membrane Tethers the Genome. Front Genet. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00082
38. Denais CM, Gilbert RM, Isermann P et al (2016) Nuclear envelope rupture and repair during cancer cell migration. Science 352:353–358. doi:10.1126/science.aad7297
39. Diamond DA, Berry SJ, Umbricht C et al (1982) Computerized image analysis of nuclear shape as a prognostic factor for prostatic cancer. Prostate 3:321–332
40. Dolivo D, Hernandez S, Dominko T (2016) Cellular lifespan and senescence: a complex balance between multiple cellular pathways. BioEssays 38:S33–S44. doi:10.1002/bies.201670906
41. Downing Meisner A, Klaus AV, O’Leary MA (2005) Sperm head morphology in 36 species of artiodactylans, perissodactylans, and cetaceans (Mammalia). J Morphol 263:179–202. doi:10.1002/jmor.10297
42. Dvořáková K, Moore HDM, Šebková N, Paleček J (2005) Cytoskeleton localization in the sperm head prior to fertilization. Reproduction 130:61–69. doi:10.1530/rep.1.00549
43. Ellenberg J, Siggia ED, Moreira JE et al (1997) Nuclear membrane dynamics and reassembly in living cells: targeting of an inner nuclear membrane protein in interphase and mitosis. J Cell Biol 138:1193
44. Ezer D, Zabet NR, Adryan B (2014) Physical constraints determine the logic of bacterial promoter architectures. Nucleic Acids Res 42(7):4196–207. doi:10.1093/nar/gku078
45. Fawcett DW (1970) A comparative view of sperm ultrastructure. Biol Reprod 2:90–127. doi:10.1095/biolreprod2.Supplement_2.90
46. Ferraguti M, Garbelli C (2006) The spermatozoon of a “living fossil”: Tubiluchus troglodytes (Priapulida). Tissue Cell 38:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.tice.2005.05.001
47. Finlan LE, Sproul D, Thomson I et al (2008) Recruitment to the nuclear periphery can alter expression of genes in human cells. PLoS Genet 4:e1000039. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000039
48. Franke WW, Schinko W (1969) Nuclear shape in muscle cells. J Cell Biol 42:326–331
49. Fricker M, Hollinshead M, White N, Vaux D (1997) Interphase nuclei of many mammalian cell types contain deep, dynamic, tubular membrane-bound invaginations of the nuclear envelope. J Cell Biol 136:531–544. doi:10.1083/jcb.136.3.531
50. Funkhouser CM, Sknepnek R, Shimi T et al (2013) Mechanical model of blebbing in nuclear lamin meshworks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:3248–3253. doi:10.1073/pnas.1300215110
51. Gerashchenko MV, Chernoivanenko IS, Moldaver MV, Minin AA (2009) Dynein is a motor for nuclear rotation while vimentin IFs is a “brake.”. Cell Biol Int 33:1057–1064. doi:10.1016/j.cellbi.2009.06.020
52. Gillies EA, Cannon RM, Green RB, Pacey AA (2009) Hydrodynamic propulsion of human sperm. J Fluid Mech 625:445–474. doi:10.1017/S0022112008005685
53. Goldmann O, Medina E (2013) The expanding world of extracellular traps: not only neutrophils but much more. Front Immunol. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00420
54. Gomendio M, Roldan ERS (2008) Implications of diversity in sperm size and function for sperm competition and fertility. Int J Dev Biol 52:439–447. doi:10.1387/ijdb.082595mg
55. Gostjeva EV, Zukerberg L, Chung D, Thilly WG (2006) Bell-shaped nuclei dividing by symmetrical and asymmetrical nuclear fission have qualities of stem cells in human colonic embryogenesis and carcinogenesis. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 164:16–24. doi:10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2005.05.005
56. Gostjeva EV, Koledova V, Tomita-Mitchell A et al (2009) Metakaryotic stem cell lineages in organogenesis of humans and other metazoans. Organogenesis 5:191–200
57. Gruhl AN, Gostjeva EV, Thilly WG et al (2010) Human fetal/tumor metakaryotic stem cells: pangenomic homologous pairing and telomeric end-joining of chromatids. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 203:203–208. doi:10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.08.015
58. Gupta S, Marcel N, Sarin A, Shivashankar GV (2012) Role of actin dependent nuclear deformation in regulating early gene expression. PLoS One 7:e53031. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053031
59. Harada T, Swift J, Irianto J et al (2014) Nuclear lamin stiffness is a barrier to 3D migration, but softness can limit survival. J Cell Biol 204:669–682. doi:10.1083/jcb.201308029
60. Hoffmann K, Dreger CK, Olins AL et al (2002) Mutations in the gene encoding the lamin B receptor produce an altered nuclear morphology in granulocytes (Pelger–Huët anomaly). Nat Genet 31:410–414. doi:10.1038/ng925
61. Hoffmann K, Sperling K, Olins AL, Olins DE (2007) The granulocyte nucleus and lamin B receptor: avoiding the ovoid. Chromosoma 116:227–235. doi:10.1007/s00412-007-0094-8
62. Hong KM, Burdick MD, Phillips RJ et al (2005) Characterization of human fibrocytes as circulating adipocyte progenitors and the formation of human adipose tissue in SCID mice. FASEB J 19:2029–2031. doi:10.1096/fj.05-4295fje
63. Huber MD, Gerace L (2007) The size-wise nucleus: nuclear volume control in eukaryotes. J Cell Biol 179:583–584. doi:10.1083/jcb.200710156
64. Hübner B, Lomiento M, Mammoli F, et al. (2015) Remodeling of nuclear landscapes during human myelopoietic cell differentiation maintains co-aligned active and inactive nuclear compartments. Epigenetics Chromatin. doi: 10.1186/s13072-015-0038-0
65. Illner D, Zinner R, Handtke V et al (2010) Remodeling of nuclear architecture by the thiodioxoxpiperazine metabolite chaetocin. Exp Cell Res 316:1662–1680. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.03.008
66. Imbalzano KM, Cohet N, Wu Q et al (2013) Nuclear shape changes are induced by knockdown of the SWI/SNF ATPase BRG1 and are independent of cytoskeletal connections. PLoS One 8:e55628. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055628
67. Immler S, Moore HDM, Breed WG, Birkhead TR (2007) By hook or by crook? Morphometry, competition and cooperation in rodent sperm. PLoS One 2:e170. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000170
68. Jacobelli J, Matthews ME, Chen S, Krummel MF (2013) Activated T cell trans-endothelial migration relies on Myosin-IIA contractility for squeezing the cell nucleus through endothelial cell barriers. PLoS One 8:e75151. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075151
69. Jain N, Iyer KV, Kumar A, Shivashankar GV (2013) Cell geometric constraints induce modular gene-expression patterns via redistribution of HDAC3 regulated by actomyosin contractility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:11349–11354. doi:10.1073/pnas.1300801110
70. Jamieson BGM, Leung LK-P (1991) Fish Evolution and Systematics: Evidence from Spermatozoa: With a Survey of Lophophorate, Echinoderm and Protochordate Sperm and an Account of Gamete Cryopreservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
71. Jung H-J, Seo I, Casciello F et al (2016) The anticancer effect of chaetocin is enhanced by inhibition of autophagy. Cell Death Dis 7:e2098. doi:10.1038/cddis.2016.15
72. Karni RJ, Wangh LJ, Sanchez AJ (2001) Nonrandom location and orientation of the inactive X chromosome in human neutrophil nuclei. Chromosoma 110:267–274. doi:10.1007/s004120100145
73. Katz DF, Diel L, Overstreet JW (1982) Differences in the movement of morphologically normal and abnormal human seminal spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 26:566–570. doi:10.1095/biolreprod26.4.566
74. Khatau SB, Hale CM, Stewart-Hutchinson PJ et al (2009) A perinuclear actin cap regulates nuclear shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:19017–19022. doi:10.1073/pnas.0908686106
75. King MC, Lusk CP (2016) A model for coordinating nuclear mechanics and membrane remodeling to support nuclear integrity. Curr Opin Cell Biol 41:9–17. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2016.03.009
76. Koehler D, Zakhartchenko V, Froenicke L et al (2009) Changes of higher order chromatin arrangements during major genome activation in bovine preimplantation embryos. Exp Cell Res 315(12):2053–63. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.02.016
77. Koh K, Kobayashi F, Miwa M et al (2015) Novel mutations in the PNPLA6 gene in Boucher-Neuhäuser syndrome. J Hum Genet 60:217–220. doi:10.1038/jhg.2015.3
78. Kotelnikov VM, Pogorelov VM, Berger J, Kozinets GI (1988) Cyclophosphamide induced generation of giant hypersegmented granulocytes in rat bone marrow: cell cycle distribution and silver nucleolar staining. Folia Haematol Leipz Ger 115:737–745
79. Lai Y-S, Chen J-Y, Tsai H-J et al (2015) The SUV39H1 inhibitor chaetocin induces differentiation and shows synergistic cytotoxicity with other epigenetic drugs in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Blood Cancer J 5:e313. doi:10.1038/bcj.2015.37
80. Lammerding J (2011) Mechanics of the Nucleus. Compr Physiol 1:783–807. doi:10.1002/cphy.c100038
81. Lämmermann T, Bader BL, Monkley SJ et al (2008) Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature 453:51–55. doi:10.1038/nature06887
82. Langevin HM, Storch KN, Snapp RR et al (2010) Tissue stretch induces nuclear remodeling in connective tissue fibroblasts. Histochem Cell Biol 133:405–415. doi:10.1007/s00418-010-0680-3
83. Li Y, Kilian KA (2015) Bridging the Gap: from 2D cell culture to 3D microengineered extracellular matrices. Adv Healthc Mater 4:2780–2796. doi:10.1002/adhm.201500427
84. Lui-Roberts WWY, Stinchcombe JC, Ritter AT et al (2012) Cytotoxic T lymphocyte effector function is independent of nucleus–centrosome dissociation. Eur J Immunol 42:2132–2141. doi:10.1002/eji.201242525
85. Machlus KR, Italiano JE (2013) The incredible journey: from megakaryocyte development to platelet formation. J Cell Biol 201:785–796. doi:10.1083/jcb.201304054
86. Maeno T, Maeno Y, Sando Y et al (2000) Nuclear hypersegmentation precedes the increase in blood eosinophils in acute eosinophilic pneumonia. Intern Med Tokyo Jpn 39:157–159
87. Martini FJ, Valdeolmillos M (2010) Actomyosin contraction at the cell rear drives nuclear translocation in migrating cortical interneurons. J Neurosci 30:8660–8670. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1962-10.2010
88. Mazumder A, Shivashankar GV (2007) Gold-nanoparticle-assisted laser perturbation of chromatin assembly reveals unusual aspects of nuclear architecture within living cells. Biophys J 93:2209–2216. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.102202
89. McBride SH, Knothe Tate ML (2008) Modulation of stem cell shape and fate a: the role of density and seeding protocol on nucleus shape and gene expression. Tissue Eng Part A 14:1561–1572. doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0112
90. McGregor AL, Hsia C-R, Lammerding J (2016) Squish and squeeze—the nucleus as a physical barrier during migration in confined environments. Curr Opin Cell Biol 40:32–40. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2016.01.011
91. McNally AK, Anderson JM (2011) Macrophage fusion and multinucleated giant cells of inflammation. In: Dittmar DT, Zänker DKS (eds) Cell Fusion in Health and Disease. Springer, Netherlands, pp 97–111
92. Meaburn KJ, Misteli T (2008) Locus-specific and activity-independent gene repositioning during early tumorigenesis. J Cell Biol 180:39–50. doi:10.1083/jcb.200708204
93. Metz CN (2003) Fibrocytes: a unique cell population implicated in wound healing. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS 60:1342–1350. doi:10.1007/s00018-003-2328-0
94. Miller DL, Styer EL, Decker SJ, Robeck T (2002) Ultrastructure of the Spermatozoa from Three Odontocetes: a Killer Whale (Orcinus orca), a Pacific White-Sided Dolphin (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens) and a Beluga (Delphinapterus leucas). Anat Histol Embryol 31:158–168. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0264.2002.00385.x
95. Mompart F, Robelin D, Delcros C, Yerle-Bouissou M (2013) 3D organization of telomeres in porcine neutrophils and analysis of LPS-activation effect. BMC Cell Biol 14:30. doi:10.1186/1471-2121-14-30
96. Monier K, Armas JCG, Etteldorf S et al (2000) Annexation of the interchromosomal space during viral infection. Nat Cell Biol 2:661–665. doi:10.1038/35023615
97. Moore HD, Taggart DA (1995) Sperm pairing in the opossum increases the efficiency of sperm movement in a viscous environment. Biol Reprod 52:947–953
98. Mosser DM, Edwards JP (2008) Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat Rev Immunol 8:958. doi:10.1038/nri2448
99. Münch C, May AM, Hauschke D et al (2011) Internuclear chromosome distribution of dysplastic megakaryocytes in myelodysplastic syndromes is dependent on the level of ploidy. Chromosoma 120:265–273. doi:10.1007/s00412-011-0309-x
100. Nagayama K, Yahiro Y, Matsumoto T (2011) Stress fibers stabilize the position of intranuclear DNA through mechanical connection with the nucleus in vascular smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett 585:3992–3997. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.11.006
101. Narita M, Nuñez S, Heard E et al (2003) Rb-mediated heterochromatin formation and silencing of E2F target genes during cellular senescence. Cell 113:703–716. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00401-X
102. Naumova N, Imakaev M, Fudenberg G et al (2013) Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science 342:948–953. doi:10.1126/science.1236083
103. Nelson CM, Khauv D, Bissell MJ, Radisky DC (2008) Change in cell shape is required for matrix metalloproteinase-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of mammary epithelial cells. J Cell Biochem 105:25–33. doi:10.1002/jcb.21821
104. Nguyen H, Brown RC, Lemmon BE (2001) Patterns of cytoskeletal organization reflect distinct developmental domains in endosperm of Coronopus didymus (Brassicaceae). Int J Plant Sci 162:1–14. doi:10.1086/317898
105. O’Donnell L, O’Bryan MK (2014) Microtubules and spermatogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol 30:45–54. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.01.003
106. Obino D, Farina F, Malbec O et al (2016) Actin nucleation at the centrosome controls lymphocyte polarity. Nat Commun 7:10969. doi:10.1038/ncomms10969
107. Ogura M, Yamamoto Y, Miyashita H et al (2015) Quantitative analysis of nuclear shape in oral squamous cell carcinoma is useful for predicting the chemotherapeutic response. Med Mol Morphol 49:76–82. doi:10.1007/s00795-015-0121-4
108. Olmos Y, Hodgson L, Mantell J et al (2015) ESCRT-III controls nuclear envelope reformation. Nature 522:236–239. doi:10.1038/nature14503
109. Ostermeier GC, Sargeant GA, Yandell BS et al (2001) Relationship of bull fertility to sperm nuclear shape. J Androl 22:595–603. doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.2001.tb02219.x
110. Pagliara S, Franze K, McClain CR et al (2014) Auxetic nuclei in embryonic stem cells exiting pluripotency. Nat Mater 13:638–644. doi:10.1038/nmat3943
111. Pajerowski JD, Dahl KN, Zhong FL et al (2007) Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:15619–15624. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702576104
112. Papadantonakis N, Makitalo M, McCrann DJ et al (2008) Direct visualization of the endomitotic cell cycle in living megakaryocytes: Differential patterns in low and high ploidy cells. Cell Cycle Georget Tex 7:2352–2356
113. Patel SR, Hartwig JH, Italiano JE Jr (2005) The biogenesis of platelets from megakaryocyte proplatelets. J Clin Invest 115:3348. doi:10.1172/JCI26891
114. Phillips DM, Rasweiler JJ IV, Muradali F (1997) Giant, accordioned sperm acrosomes of the greater bulldog bat, Noctilio leporinus. Mol Reprod Dev 48:90–94. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199709)48:1<90::AID-MRD11>3.0.CO;2-#
115. Pilsczek FH, Salina D, Poon KKH et al (2010) A novel mechanism of rapid nuclear neutrophil extracellular trap formation in response to Staphylococcus aureus. J Immunol 185:7413–7425. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1000675
116. Polychronidou M, Großhans J (2011) Determining nuclear shape. Nucleus 2:17–23. doi:10.4161/nucl.2.1.13992
117. Popken J, Brero A, Koehler D et al (2014) Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos. Nucleus 5:555–589. doi:10.4161/19491034.2014.979712
118. Popken J, Graf A, Krebs S, et al. (2015) Remodeling of the Nuclear Envelope and Lamina during Bovine Preimplantation Development and Its Functional Implications. PLoS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124619
119. Poropatich K, Yang JC, Goyal R et al (2016) Nuclear size measurement for distinguishing urothelial carcinomas from reactive urothelium on tissue sections. Diagn Pathol 11:57. doi:10.1186/s13000-016-0501-7
120. Pueschel R, Coraggio F, Meister P (2016) From single genes to entire genomes: the search for a function of nuclear organization. Development 143:910–923. doi:10.1242/dev.129007
121. Quan TE, Cowper S, Wu S-P et al (2004) Circulating fibrocytes: collagen-secreting cells of the peripheral blood. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36:598–606. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2003.10.005
122. Raab M, Gentili M, de Belly H et al (2016) ESCRT III repairs nuclear envelope ruptures during cell migration to limit DNA damage and cell death. Science 352:359–362. doi:10.1126/science.aad7611
123. Rahman MB, Vandaele L, Rijsselaere T et al (2011) Scrotal insulation and its relationship to abnormal morphology, chromatin protamination and nuclear shape of spermatozoa in Holstein-Friesian and Belgian Blue bulls. Theriogenology 76:1246–1257. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.05.031
124. Rajgor D, Shanahan CM (2013) Nesprins: from the nuclear envelope and beyond. Expert Rev Mol Med 15:e5. doi:10.1017/erm.2013.6
125. Ramdas NM, Shivashankar GV (2015) Cytoskeletal control of nuclear morphology and chromatin organization. J Mol Biol 427:695–706. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2014.09.008
126. Rathke C, Baarends WM, Awe S, Renkawitz-Pohl R (2014) Chromatin dynamics during spermiogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1839:155–168. doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2013.08.004
127. Rowe M, Griffith SC, Hofgaard A, Lifjeld JT (2015) Subspecific variation in sperm morphology and performance in the long-tailed Finch (Poephila acuticauda). Avian Res 6:23. doi:10.1186/s40657-015-0032-z
128. Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Hikim APS, Clegg ED (1993) Histological and histopathological evaluation of the testis. Int J Androl 16:83–83. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.1993.tb01156.x
129. Sakaue-Sawano A, Kurokawa H, Morimura T et al (2008) Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression. Cell 132:487–498. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.033
130. Santos‐Rosa H, Leung J, Grimsey N et al (2005) The yeast lipin Smp2 couples phospholipid biosynthesis to nuclear membrane growth. EMBO J 24:1931–1941. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600672
131. Sato-Nishiwaki M, Aida Y, Abe S, et al. (2013) Reduced Number and Morphofunctional Change of Alveolar Macrophages in MafB Gene-Targeted Mice. PLoS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073963
132. Scaffidi P, Gordon L, Misteli T (2005) The cell nucleus and aging: tantalizing clues and hopeful promises. PLoS Biol 3:e395. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030395
133. Schreiner SM, Koo PK, Zhao Y et al (2015) The tethering of chromatin to the nuclear envelope supports nuclear mechanics. Nat Commun 6:7159. doi:10.1038/ncomms8159
134. Shin J-W, Spinler KR, Swift J et al (2013) Lamins regulate cell trafficking and lineage maturation of adult human hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:18892–18897. doi:10.1073/pnas.1304996110
135. Shumaker DK, Dechat T, Kohlmaier A et al (2006) Mutant nuclear lamin A leads to progressive alterations of epigenetic control in premature aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:8703–8708. doi:10.1073/pnas.0602569103
136. Simmons LW, Fitzpatrick JL (2012) Sperm wars and the evolution of male fertility. Reproduction 144:519–534. doi:10.1530/REP-12-0285
137. Simpson-Holley M, Colgrove RC, Nalepa G et al (2005) Identification and functional evaluation of cellular and viral factors involved in the alteration of nuclear architecture during herpes simplex virus 1 infection. J Virol 79:12840–12851. doi:10.1128/JVI.79.20.12840-12851.2005
138. Smith JD, Gregory TR (2009) The genome sizes of megabats (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) are remarkably constrained
139. Solovei I, Kreysing M, Lanctôt C et al (2009) Nuclear architecture of rod photoreceptor cells adapts to vision in mammalian evolution. Cell 137:356–368. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.052
140. Stadler S, Schnapp V, Mayer R et al (2004) The architecture of chicken chromosome territories changes during differentiation. BMC Cell Biol 5:44
141. Suga H, Rennert RC, Rodrigues M et al (2014) Tracking the elusive fibrocyte: identification and characterization of collagen producing hematopoietic lineage cells during murine wound healing. Stem Cells Dayt Ohio 32:1347–1360. doi:10.1002/stem.1648
142. Summers C, Rankin SM, Condliffe AM et al (2010) Neutrophil kinetics in health and disease. Trends Immunol 31:318–324. doi:10.1016/j.it.2010.05.006
143. Sutton JS, Weiss L (1966) Transformation of monocytes in tissue culture into macrophages, epithelioid cells, and multinucleated giant cells an electron microscope study. J Cell Biol 28:303–332. doi:10.1083/jcb.28.2.303
144. Swift J, Ivanovska IL, Buxboim A et al (2013) Nuclear lamin-a scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science 341:1240104. doi:10.1126/science.1240104
145. Synofzik M, Gonzalez MA, Lourenco CM et al (2014) PNPLA6 mutations cause Boucher-Neuhäuser and Gordon Holmes syndromes as part of a broad neurodegenerative spectrum. Brain 137:69–77. doi:10.1093/brain/awt326
146. Thomas CH, Collier JH, Sfeir CS, Healy KE (2002) Engineering gene expression and protein synthesis by modulation of nuclear shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:1972–1977. doi:10.1073/pnas.032668799
147. Trapnell C (2015) Defining cell types and states with single-cell genomics. Genome Res 25:1491–1498. doi:10.1101/gr.190595.115
148. Trescos Y, Tessier E, Rougeaux C et al (2015) Micropatterned macrophage analysis reveals global cytoskeleton constraints induced by Bacillus anthracis edema toxin. Infect Immun 83:3114–3125. doi:10.1128/IAI.00479-15
149. Tsai J-W, Bremner KH, Vallee RB (2007) Dual subcellular roles for LIS1 and dynein in radial neuronal migration in live brain tissue. Nat Neurosci 10:970–979. doi:10.1038/nn1934
150. Twining SS, Schulte DP, Wilson PM et al (1996) Retinol is sequestered in the bone marrow of vitamin A-deficient rats. J Nutr 126:1618–26
151. Tzur YB, Wilson KL, Gruenbaum Y (2006) SUN-domain proteins: “Velcro” that links the nucleoskeleton to the cytoskeleton. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:782–788. doi:10.1038/nrm2003
152. Ugrankar R, Liu Y, Provaznik J et al (2011) Lipin is a central regulator of adipose tissue development and function in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol 31:1646–1656. doi:10.1128/MCB.01335-10
153. Umehara T, Yaguchi H, Suzuki M et al (2010) Are hypersegmented neutrophils a characteristic of Boucher–Neuhäuser syndrome? J Neurol Sci 295:128–130. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2010.05.005
154. Valouev A, Johnson SM, Boyd SD et al (2011) Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells. Nature 474:516–520. doi:10.1038/nature10002
155. van der Horst G, Maree L, Kotzé SH, O’Riain MJ (2011) Sperm structure and motility in the eusocial naked mole-rat, Heterocephalus glaber: a case of degenerative orthogenesis in the absence of sperm competition? BMC Evol Biol 11:351. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-351
156. Veda P (2011) Why are neutrophils polymorphonuclear? Eur J Inflamm 9:85–93. doi:10.1177/1721727X1100900201
157. Versaevel M, Grevesse T, Gabriele S (2012) Spatial coordination between cell and nuclear shape within micropatterned endothelial cells. Nat Commun 3:671. doi:10.1038/ncomms1668
158. Versaevel M, Riaz M, Grevesse T, Gabriele S (2013) Cell confinement: putting the squeeze on the nucleus. Soft Matter 9:6665–6676. doi:10.1039/C3SM00147D
159. Vidak S, Foisner R (2016) Molecular insights into the premature aging disease progeria. Histochem Cell Biol 145:401–417. doi:10.1007/s00418-016-1411-1
160. Voisin M-B, Woodfin A, Nourshargh S (2009) Monocytes and neutrophils exhibit both distinct and common mechanisms in penetrating the vascular basement membrane in vivo. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 29:1193–1199. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.187450
161. Wang S, Volk T (2015) Composite biopolymer scaffolds shape muscle nucleus: Insights and perspectives from Drosophila. BioArchitecture 5:35–43. doi:10.1080/19490992.2015.1106061
162. Ward MA, Burgoyne PS (2006) The effects of deletions of the mouse y chromosome long arm on sperm function—intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)-based analysis. Biol Reprod 74:652–658. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.105.048090
163. Webster M, Witkin KL, Cohen-Fix O (2009) Sizing up the nucleus: nuclear shape, size and nuclear-envelope assembly. J Cell Sci 122:1477–1486. doi:10.1242/jcs.037333
164. Westerman DA, Evans D, Metz J (1999) Neutrophil hypersegmentation in iron deficiency anaemia: a case–control study. Br J Haematol 107:512–515. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01756.x
165. Woringer M, Darzacq X, Izeddin I (2014) Geometry of the nucleus: a perspective on gene expression regulation. Curr Opin Chem Biol 20:112–119. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.05.009
166. Worman HJ, Courvalin J-C (2005) Nuclear envelope, nuclear lamina, and inherited disease. Int Rev Cytol 246:231–279. doi:10.1016/S0074-7696(05)46006-4
167. Xiao X, Yang W (2007) Actin-based dynamics during spermatogenesis and its significance. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 8:498–506. doi:10.1631/jzus.2007.B0498
168. Xu X (2014) Nuclear hypersegmentation of neutrophils, eosinophils, and basophils due to hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea). Blood 124:1392. doi:10.1182/blood-2014-06-583807
169. Yerle-Bouissou M, Mompart F, Iannuccelli E et al (2009) Nuclear architecture of resting and LPS-stimulated porcine neutrophils by 3D FISH. Chromosome Res 17:847–862. doi:10.1007/s10577-009-9074-6
170. Yoo SK, Lam P, Eichelberg MR et al (2012) The role of microtubules in neutrophil polarity and migration in live zebrafish. J Cell Sci 125:5702–5710. doi:10.1242/jcs.108324
171. Zhang J, Lian Q, Zhu G et al (2011) A Human iPSC model of Hutchinson gilford progeria reveals vascular smooth muscle and mesenchymal stem cell defects. Cell Stem Cell 8:31–45. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.002
172. Zuccotti M, Garagna S, Merico V et al (2005) Chromatin organisation and nuclear architecture in growing mouse oocytes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 234:11–17. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2004.08.014