Remodeling of the nuclear envelope and lamina during bovine preimplantation development and its functional implications

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Popken, Jens ^a,b   Graf, Alexander ^b   Krebs, Stefan ^b   Blum, Helmut ^b   Schmid, Volker J ^b   Strauss, Axel ^b   Guengoer, Tuna ^b   Zakhartchenko, Valeri ^b   Wolf, Eckhard ^b   Cremer, Thomas ^a  

^a Biocenter   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; LAMIN B; MESSENGER RNA; NUCLEOPORIN; PROTEIN NUP153; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CHROMATIN; LAMIN; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ARTICLE; BOVINE; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION; MAJOR EMBRYONIC GENOME ACTIVATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR LAMINA; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; NUCLEAR SIZE; NUP153 GENE; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RNA SYNTHESIS; ALTERNATIVE RNA SPLICING; ANIMAL; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MICROSCOPY; MITOSIS; NUCLEAR PORE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BOVINAE;

ALTERNATIVE SPLICING; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CELL NUCLEUS SIZE; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOMES, MAMMALIAN; DNA; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LAMINS; MICROSCOPY; MITOSIS; NUCLEAR LAMINA; NUCLEAR PORE; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84929223784     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124619     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Popken J, Brero A, Koehler D, Schmid VJ, Strauss A, Wuensch A, et al. (2014) Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos. Nucleus 5: 555-589. doi: 10.4161/19491034.2014.979712 PMID: 25482066
2. Popken J, Koehler D, Brero A, Wuensch A, Guengoer T, Thormeyer T et al. (2014) Positional changes of a pluripotency marker gene during structural reorganization of fibroblast nuclei in cloned early bovine embryos. Nucleus 5: 542-554. doi: 10.4161/19491034.2014.970107 PMID: 25495180
3. Kanka J, Kepkova K, Nemcova L (2009) Gene expression during minor genome activation in preimplantation bovine development. Theriogenology 72: 572-583. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.04.014 PMID: 19501393
4. Graf A, Krebs S, Zakhartchenko V, Schwalb B, Blum H, Wolf E (2014) Fine mapping of genome activation in bovine embryos by RNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: 4139-4144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321569111 PMID: 24591639
5. Cremer T, Cremer M (2010) Chromosome territories. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a003889. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003889 PMID: 20300217
6. Markaki Y, Gunkel M, Schermelleh L, Beichmanis S, Neumann J, Heidemann M, et al. (2010) Functional nuclear organization of transcription and DNA replication: a topographical marriage between chromatin domains and the interchromatin compartment. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 75: 475-492. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2010.75.042 PMID: 21467142
7. Markaki Y, Smeets D, Fiedler S, Schmid VJ, Schermelleh L, Cremer T, et al. (2012) The potential of 3D-FISH and super-resolution structured illumination microscopy for studies of 3D nuclear architecture: 3D structured illumination microscopy of defined chromosomal structures visualized by 3D (immuno)-FISH opens new perspectives for studies of nuclear architecture. Bioessays 34: 412-426. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100176 PMID: 22508100
8. Bolzer A, Kreth G, Solovei I, Koehler D, Saracoglu K, Fauth C, et al. (2005) Three-dimensional maps of all chromosomes in human male fibroblast nuclei and prometaphase rosettes. PLoS Biol 3: e157. PMID: 15839726
9. Gruenbaum Y, Margalit A, Goldman RD, Shumaker DK, Wilson KL (2005) The nuclear lamina comes of age. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 21-31. PMID: 15688064
10. Amendola M, van Steensel B (2014) Mechanisms and dynamics of nuclear lamina-genome interactions. Curr Opin Cell Biol 28: 61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.03.003 PMID: 24694724
11. Cronshaw JM, Krutchinsky AN, Zhang W, Chait BT, Matunis MJ (2002) Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 158: 915-927. PMID: 12196509
12. Doucet CM, Hetzer MW (2010) Nuclear pore biogenesis into an intact nuclear envelope. Chromosoma 119: 469-477. doi: 10.1007/s00412-010-0289-2 PMID: 20721671
13. Maimon T, Elad N, Dahan I, Medalia O (2012) The human nuclear pore complex as revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Structure 20: 998-1006. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.03.025 PMID: 22632834
14. Adam SA (2001) The nuclear pore complex. Genome Biol 2: REVIEWS0007.
15. Hinshaw JE, Carragher BO, Milligan RA (1992) Architecture and design of the nuclear pore complex. Cell 69: 1133-1141. PMID: 1617726
16. Arlucea J, Andrade R, Alonso R, Arechaga J (1998) The nuclear basket of the nuclear pore complex is part of a higher-order filamentous network that is related to chromatin. J Struct Biol 124: 51-58. PMID: 9931273
17. Sukegawa J, Blobel G (1993) A nuclear pore complex protein that contains zinc finger motifs, binds DNA, and faces the nucleoplasm. Cell 72: 29-38. PMID: 8422679
18. Ball JR, Ullman KS (2005) Versatility at the nuclear pore complex: lessons learned from the nucleoporin Nup153. Chromosoma 114: 319-330. PMID: 16133350
19. Fricker M, Hollinshead M, White N, Vaux D (1997) Interphase nuclei of many mammalian cell types contain deep, dynamic, tubular membrane-bound invaginations of the nuclear envelope. J Cell Biol 136: 531-544. PMID: 9024685
20. Malhas A, Goulbourne C, Vaux DJ (2011) The nucleoplasmic reticulum: form and function. Trends Cell Biol 21: 362-373. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.03.008 PMID: 21514163
21. Schermelleh L, Heintzmann R, Leonhardt H (2010) A guide to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. J Cell Biol 190: 165-175. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201002018 PMID: 20643879
22. Cremer C, Masters BR (2013) Resolution enhancement techniques in microscopy. The European Physical Journal H 38: 281-344.
23. Hiendleder S, Wirtz M, Mund C, Klempt M, Reichenbach HD, Stojkovic M, et al. (2006) Tissue-specific effects of in vitro fertilization procedures on genomic cytosine methylation levels in overgrown and normal sized bovine fetuses. Biol Reprod 75: 17-23. PMID: 16554415
24. Bauersachs S, Ulbrich SE, Zakhartchenko V, Minten M, Reichenbach M, Reichenbach HD, et al. (2009) The endometrium responds differently to cloned versus fertilized embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 5681-5686. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811841106 PMID: 19307558
25. Wandke C, Kutay U (2013) Enclosing chromatin: reassembly of the nucleus after open mitosis. Cell 152: 1222-1225. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.046 PMID: 23498932
26. Smeets D, Markaki Y, Schmid VJ, Kraus F, Tattermusch A, Cerase A, et al. (2014) Three-dimensional super-resolution microscopy of the inactive X chromosome territory reveals a collapse of its active nuclear compartment harboring distinct Xist RNA foci. Epigenetics & Chromatin 7: 8.
27. Akhtar A, Gasser SM (2007) The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control. Nat Rev Genet 8: 507-517. PMID: 17549064
28. Shimi T, Butin-Israeli V, Goldman RD (2012) The functions of the nuclear envelope in mediating the molecular crosstalk between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Curr Opin Cell Biol 24: 71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2011.11.007 PMID: 22192274
29. Zuela N, Bar DZ, Gruenbaum Y (2012) Lamins in development, tissue maintenance and stress. EMBO Rep 13: 1070-1078. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.167 PMID: 23146893
30. Beaudouin J, Gerlich D, Daigle N, Eils R, Ellenberg J (2002) Nuclear envelope breakdown proceeds by microtubule-induced tearing of the lamina. Cell 108: 83-96. PMID: 11792323
31. Hase ME, Cordes VC (2003) Direct interaction with nup153 mediates binding of Tpr to the periphery of the nuclear pore complex. Mol Biol Cell 14: 1923-1940. PMID: 12802065
32. Meuleman W, Peric-Hupkes D, Kind J, Beaudry JB, Pagie L, Kellis M, et al. (2013) Constitutive nuclear lamina-genome interactions are highly conserved and associated with A/T-rich sequence. Genome Res 23: 270-280. doi: 10.1101/gr.141028.112 PMID: 23124521
33. Kind J, Pagie L, Ortabozkoyun H, Boyle S, de Vries SS, Janssen H, et al. (2013) Single-cell dynamics of genome-nuclear lamina interactions. Cell 153: 178-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.028 PMID: 23523135
34. Naumova N, Imakaev M, Fudenberg G, Zhan Y, Lajoie BR, Mirny LA, et al. (2013) Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science 342: 948-953. doi: 10.1126/science.1236083 PMID: 24200812
35. Maul GG, Maul HM, Scogna JE, Lieberman MW, Stein GS, Hsu BY, et al. (1972) Time sequence of nuclear pore formation in phytohemagglutinin-stimulated lymphocytes and in HeLa cells during the cell cycle. J Cell Biol 55: 433-447. PMID: 5076782
36. Rothballer A, Kutay U (2013) Poring over pores: nuclear pore complex insertion into the nuclear envelope. Trends Biochem Sci 38: 292-301. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.04.001 PMID: 23639636
37. Hsu WS (1963) The nuclear envelope in the developing oocytes of the tunicate, boltenia villosa. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 58: 660-678. PMID: 13955324
38. Everingham JW (1968) Attachment of intranuclear annulate lamellae to the nuclear envelope. J Cell Biol 37: 540-550. PMID: 5656403
39. Fakan S, Odartchenko N (1980) Ultrastructural organization of the cell-nucleus in early mouse embryos. Biologie Cellulaire: 211-217.
40. Holm P, Booth PJ, Callesen H (2002) Kinetics of early in vitro development of bovine in vivo- and in vitro-derived zygotes produced and/or cultured in chemically defined or serum-containing media. Reproduction 123: 553-565. PMID: 11914118
41. Rouquette J, Cremer C, Cremer T, Fakan S (2010) Functional nuclear architecture studied by microscopy: present and future. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 282: 1-90. doi: 10.1016/S1937-6448(10)82001-5 PMID: 20630466
42. Chen BC, Legant WR, Wang K, Shao L, Milkie DE, Davidson MW, et al. (2014) Lattice light-sheet microscopy: imaging molecules to embryos at high spatiotemporal resolution. Science 346: 1257998. doi: 10.1126/science.1257998 PMID: 25342811
43. Speese SD, Ashley J, Jokhi V, Nunnari J, Barria R, Li Y, et al. (2012) Nuclear envelope budding enables large ribonucleoprotein particle export during synaptic Wnt signaling. Cell 149: 832-846. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.032 PMID: 22579286
44. Rouquette J, Genoud C, Vazquez-Nin GH, Kraus B, Cremer T, Fakan S (2009) Revealing the high-resolution three-dimensional network of chromatin and interchromatin space: a novel electron-microscopic approach to reconstructing nuclear architecture. Chromosome Res 17: 801-810. doi: 10.1007/s10577-009-9070-x PMID: 19731052
45. Schermelleh L, Carlton PM, Haase S, Shao L, Winoto L, Kner P, et al. (2008) Subdiffraction multicolor imaging of the nuclear periphery with 3D structured illumination microscopy. Science 320: 1332-1336. doi: 10.1126/science.1156947 PMID: 18535242
46. Mor A, Suliman S, Ben-Yishay R, Yunger S, Brody Y, Shav-Tal Y (2010) Dynamics of single mRNP nucleocytoplasmic transport and export through the nuclear pore in living cells. Nat Cell Biol 12: 543-552. doi: 10.1038/ncb2056 PMID: 20453848
47. Daddysman MK, Fecko CJ (2013) Revisiting point FRAP to quantitatively characterize anomalous diffusion in live cells. J Phys Chem B 117: 1241-1251. doi: 10.1021/jp310348s PMID: 23311513
48. Baum M, Erdel F, Wachsmuth M, Rippe K (2014) Retrieving the intracellular topology from multi-scale protein mobility mapping in living cells. Nat Commun 5: 4494. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5494 PMID: 25058002
49. Bacher CP, Reichenzeller M, Athale C, Herrmann H, Eils R (2004) 4-D single particle tracking of synthetic and proteinaceous microspheres reveals preferential movement of nuclear particles along chromatin-poor tracks. BMC Cell Biol 5: 45. PMID: 15560848