Auxetic nuclei in embryonic stem cells exiting pluripotency

Nature Materials

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 638-644

  Pagliara, Stefano ^a   Franze, Kristian ^b   McClain, Crystal R ^a,b   Wylde, George W ^a   Fisher, Cynthia L ^b   Franklin, Robin J M ^b   Kabla, Alexandre J ^b   Keyser, Ulrich F ^a   Chalut, Kevin J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES;

DECONDENSATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; EXTERNAL FORCE; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; NUCLEAR STRUCTURE; SOMATIC CELLS; STIFFNESS INCREASE; TRANSITION STATE;

CELLS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; MICE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS;

EID: 84901245409     PISSN: 14761122     EISSN: 14764660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmat3943     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Betschinger, J. et al. Exit from pluripotency is gated by intracellular redistribution of the bHLH transcription factor Tfe3. Cell 153, 335-347 (2013).
2. Silva, J. & Smith, A. Capturing pluripotency. Cell 132, 532-536 (2008).
3. Smith, A. Pluripotent stem cells: Private obsession and public expectation. EMBO Mol. Med. 2, 113-116 (2010).
4. Nichols, J. & Smith, A. Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 4, 487-492 (2009).
5. Young, R. A. Control of the embryonic stem cell state. Cell 144, 940-954 (2011).
6. Marks, H. et al. The transcriptional and epigenomic foundations of ground state pluripotency. Cell 149, 590-604 (2012).
7. Loh, K. M. & Lim, B. A precarious balance: Pluripotency factors as lineage specifiers. Cell Stem Cell 8, 363-369 (2011).
8. Fisher, C. L. & Fisher, A. G. Chromatin states in pluripotent, di-erentiated, and reprogrammed cells. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 21, 140-146 (2011).
9. Hanna, J. et al. Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9222-9227 (2010).
10. Wray, J. et al. Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 alleviates Tcf3 repression of the pluripotency network and increases embryonic stem cell resistance to di-erentiation. Nature Cell Biol. 13, 838-845 (2011).
11. Toyooka, Y., Shimosato, D., Murakami, K., Takahashi, K. & Niwa, H. Identification and characterization of subpopulations in undi-erentiated ES cell culture. Development 135, 909-918 (2008).
12. Ying, Q. L. et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453, 519-523 (2008).
13. Franze, K. Atomic force microscopy and its contribution to understanding the development of the nervous system. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 21, 530-537 (2011).
14. Lu, Y. B. et al. Viscoelastic properties of individual glial cells and neurons in the CNS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17759-17764 (2006).
15. Maha-y, R. E., Park, S., Gerde, E., Kas, J. & Shih, C. K. Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 86, 1777-1793 (2004).
16. Evans, K. E. & Alderson, A. Auxetic materials: Functional materials and structures from lateral thinking!. Adv Mater 12, 617 (2000).
17. Trickey,W. R., Baaijens, F. P., Laursen, T. A., Alexopoulos, L. G. & Guilak, F. Determination of the Poisson's ratio of the cell: Recovery properties of chondrocytes after release from complete micropipette aspiration. J. Biomech. 39, 78-87 (2006).
18. Moeendarbary, E. et al. The cytoplasm of living cells behaves as a poroelastic material. Nature Mater. 12, 253-261 (2013).
19. Swift, J. et al. Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue sti-ness and enhances matrix-directed di-erentiation. Science 341, 1240104 (2013).
20. Rowat, A. C. et al. Nuclear envelope composition determines the ability of neutrophil-type cells to passage through micron-scale constrictions. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 8610-8618 (2013).
21. Booth-Gauthier, E. A., Alcoser, T. A., Yang, G. & Dahl, K. N. Force-induced changes in subnuclear movement and rheology. Biophys. J. 103, 2423-2431 (2012).
22. Chowdhury, F. et al. Material properties of the cell dictate stress-induced spreading and di-erentiation in embryonic stem cells. Nature Mater. 9, 82-88 (2010).
23. Dahl, K. N., Ribeiro, A. J. S. & Lammerding, J. Nuclear shape, mechanics, and mechanotransduction. Circ. Res. 102, 1307-1318 (2008).
24. Mazumder, A., Roopa, T., Basu, A., Mahadevan, L. & Shivashankar, G. V. Dynamics of chromatin decondensation reveals the structural integrity of a mechanically prestressed nucleus. Biophys. J. 95, 3028-3035 (2008).
25. Pajerowski, J. D., Dahl, K. N., Zhong, F. L., Sammak, P. J. & Discher, D. E. Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell di-erentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15619-15624 (2007).
26. Meshorer, E. et al. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev. Cell. 10, 105-116 (2006).
27. Chalut, K. J. et al. Chromatin decondensation and nuclear softening accompany Nanog downregulation in embryonic stem cells. Biophys. J. 103, 2060-2070 (2012).
28. Masui, O. et al. Live-Cell Chromosome Dynamics and Outcome of X Chromosome Pairing Events during ES Cell Di-erentiation. Cell. 145, 447-458 (2011).
29. Blumenfeld, R. & Edwards, S. F. Theory of strains in auxetic materials. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 25, 565-571 (2012).
30. Nichols, J., Silva, J., Roode, M. & Smith, A. Suppression of Erk signalling promotes ground state pluripotency in the mouse embryo. Development 136, 3215-3222 (2009).
31. Evans, M. J. & Kaufman, M. H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154-156 (1981).
32. Plusa, B., Piliszek, A., Frankenberg, S., Artus, J. & Hadjantonakis, A. K. Distinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst. Development 135, 3081-3091 (2008).