Squish and squeeze - the nucleus as a physical barrier during migration in confined environments

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 40, Issue , 2016, Pages 32-40

  McGregor, Alexandra Lynn ^a,c   Hsia, Chieh Ren ^b,c   Lammerding, Jan ^a,c  

^a Cornell University   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c School of Integrative Plant Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAMIN;

CELL MIGRATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL SURVIVAL; CYTOPLASM; CYTOSKELETON; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMICS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; ANIMAL; CELL MOTION; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METASTASIS; NEOPLASM; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL NUCLEUS; CYTOSKELETON; HUMANS; LAMINS; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84958254024     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: 18790410     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.01.011     Document Type: Review

References (101)

1. Munjal A., Lecuit T. Actomyosin networks and tissue morphogenesis. Development 2014, 141:1789-1793.
2. Weninger W., Biro M., Jain R. Leukocyte migration in the interstitial space of non-lymphoid organs. Nat Rev Immunol 2014, 14:232-246.
3. Chaffer C.L., Weinberg R.A. A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science 2011, 331:1559-1564.
4. Gardel M.L., Schneider I.C., Aratyn-Schaus Y., Waterman C.M. Mechanical integration of actin and adhesion dynamics in cell migration. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2010, 26:315-333.
5. Doerschuk C.M., Beyers N., Coxson H.O., Wiggs B., Hogg J.C. Comparison of neutrophil and capillary diameters and their relation to neutrophil sequestration in the lung. J Appl Physiol 1993, 74:3040-3045.
6. Stoitzner P., Pfaller K., Stössel H., Romani N. A close-up view of migrating Langerhans cells in the skin. J Invest Dermatol 2002, 118:117-125.
7. Weigelin B., Bakker G.-J., Friedl P. Intravital third harmonic generation microscopy of collective melanoma cell invasion. IntraVital 2012, 1:32-43.
8. Stetler-Stevenson W.G., Aznavoorian S., Liotta L.A. Tumor cell interactions with the extracellular matrix during invasion and metastasis. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1993, 9:541-573.
9. Wolf K., Mazo I., Leung H., Engelke K., Von Andrian U.H., Deryugina E.I., Strongin A.Y., Bröcker E.B., Friedl P. Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration: mesenchymal-amoeboid transition after blocking of pericellular proteolysis. J Cell Biol 2003, 160:267-277.
10. Wolf K., te Lindert M., Krause M., Alexander S., te Riet J., Willis L.A., Hoffman R.M., Figdor C.G., Weiss S.J., Friedl P. Physical limits of cell migration: control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J Cell Biol 2013, 201:1069-1084.
11. Lammerding J. Mechanics of the nucleus. Comp Physiol 2011, 1:783-807.
12. Martins R.P., Finan J.D., Guilak F., Lee D.A. Mechanical regulation of nuclear structure and function. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2012, 14:431-455.
13. Friedl P., Wolf K., Lammerding J. Nuclear mechanics during cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2011, 23:55-64.
14. Tong Z., Balzer E.M., Dallas M.R., Hung W.C., Stebe K.J., Konstantopoulos K. Chemotaxis of cell populations through confined spaces at single-cell resolution. PLoS One 2012, 7:1-10.
15. Fu Y., Chin L.K., Bourouina T., Liu A.Q., VanDongen A.M.J. Nuclear deformation during breast cancer cell transmigration. Lab Chip 2012, 12:3774-3778.
16. Balzer E.M., Tong Z., Paul C.D., Hung W.C., Stroka K.M., Boggs A.E., Martin S.S., Konstantopoulos K. Physical confinement alters tumor cell adhesion and migration phenotypes. FASEB J 2012, 26:4045-4056.
17. Liu Y.-J., Le Berre M., Lautenschlaeger F., Maiuri P., Callan-Jones A., Heuzé M., Takaki T., Voituriez R., Piel M. Confinement and low adhesion induce fast amoeboid migration of slow mesenchymal cells. Cell 2015, 160:659-672.
18. Davidson P.M., Denais C., Bakshi M.C., Lammerding J. Nuclear deformability constitutes a rate-limiting step during cell migration in 3-D environments. Cell Mol Bioeng 2014, 7:293-306.
19. Davidson P.M., Sliz J., Isermann P., Denais C.M., Lammerding J. Design of a microfluidic device to quantify dynamic intra-nuclear deformation during cell migration through confining environments. Integr Biol 2015, 7:1534-1546.
20. Lautscham L.A., Kämmerer C., Lange J.R., Kolb T., Mark C., Schilling A., Strissel P.L., Strick R., Gluth C., Rowat A.C., et al. Migration in confined 3D environments is determined by a combination of adhesiveness, nuclear volume, contractility, and cell stiffness. Biophys J 2015, 109:900-913.
21. Rowat A.C., Jaalouk D.E., Zwerger M., Ung W.L., Eydelnant I.A., Olins D.E., Olins A.L., Herrmann H., Weitz D.A., Lammerding J. Nuclear envelope composition determines the ability of neutrophil-type cells to passage through micron-scale constrictions. J Biol Chem 2013, 288:8610-8618.
22. Guzman A., Ziperstein M.J., Kaufman L.J. The effect of fibrillar matrix architecture on tumor cell invasion of physically challenging environments. Biomaterials 2014, 35:6954-6963.
23. Mak M., Reinhart-King C., Erickson D.A. Elucidating mechanical transition effects of invading cancer cells with a subnucleus-scaled microfluidic serial dimensional modulation device. Lab Chip 2013, 13:340-348.
24. Malboubi M., Jayo A., Parsons M., Charras G. An open access microfluidic device for the study of the physical limits of cancer cell deformation during migration in confined environments. Microelectron Eng 2015, 144:42-45.
25. Booth-Gauthier E.A., Du V., Ghibaudo M., Rape A.D., Dahl K.N., Ladoux B. Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome alters nuclear shape and reduces cell motility in three dimensional model substrates. Integr Biol 2013, 5:569-577.
26. Greiner A.M., Jäckel M., Scheiwe A.C., Stamow D.R., Autenrieth T.J., Lahann J., Franz C.M., Bastmeyer M. Multifunctional polymer scaffolds with adjustable pore size andchemoattractant gradients for studying cell matrix invasion. Biomaterials 2014, 35:611-619.
27. Dahl K.N., Kahn S.M., Wilson K.L., Discher D.E. The nuclear envelope lamina network has elasticity and a compressibility limit suggestive of a molecular shock absorber. J Cell Sci 2004, 117:4779-4786.
28. Dahl K.N., Engler A.J., Pajerowski J.D., Discher D.E. Power-law rheology of isolated nuclei with deformation mapping of nuclear substructures. Biophys J 2005, 89:2855-2864.
29. Fisher D.Z., Chaudhary N. Blobel G: cDNA sequencing of nuclear lamins A and C reveals primary and secondary structural homology to intermediate filament proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1986, 83:6450-6454.
30. McKeon F.D., Kirschner M.W., Caput D. Homologies in both primary and secondary structure between nuclear envelope and intermediate filament proteins. Nature 1986, 319:463-468.
31. Furukawa K., Inagaki H., Hotta Y. Identification and cloning of an mRNA coding for a germ cell-specific A-type lamin in mice. Exp Cell Res 1994, 212:426-430.
32. Peter M., Kitten G.T., Lehner C.F., Vorburger K., Bailer S.M., Maridor G., Nigg E.A. Cloning and sequencing of cDNA clones encoding chicken lamins A and B1 and comparison of the primary structures of vertebrate A- and B-type lamins. J Mol Biol 1989, 208:393-404.
33. Vorburger K., Lehner C.F., Kitten G.T., Eppenberger H.M., Nigg E.A. A second higher vertebrate B-type lamin. cDNA sequence determination and in vitro processing of chicken lamin B2. J Mol Biol 1989, 208:405-415.
34. Lin F., Worman H.J. Structural organization of the human gene (LMNB1) encoding nuclear lamin B1. Genomics 1995, 27:230-236.
35. Lin F., Worman H.J. Structural organization of the human gene encoding nuclear lamin A and nuclear lamin C. J Biol Chem 1993, 268:16321-16326.
36. Machiels B.M., Zorenc A.H.G., Endert J.M., Kuijpers H.J.H., Van Eys G.J.J.M., Ramaekers F.C.S., Broers J.L.V. An alternative splicing product of the lamin A/C gene lacks exon 10. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:9249-9253.
37. Shimi T., Pfleghaar K., Kojima S., Pack C.-G., Solovei I., Goldman A.E., Adam S.A., Shumaker D.K., Kinjo M., Cremer T., et al. The A- and B-type nuclear lamin networks: microdomains involved in chromatin organization and transcription. Genes Dev 2008, 22:3409-3421.
38. Shimi T., Kittisopikul M., Tran J., Goldman A.E., Adam S.A., Zheng Y., Jaqaman K., Goldman R.D. Structural organization of nuclear lamins A, C, B1, and B2 revealed by superresolution microscopy. Mol Biol Cell 2015, 26:4075-4086.
39. Lammerding J., Schulze P.C., Takahashi T., Kozlov S., Sullivan T., Kamm R.D., Stewart C.L., Lee R.T. Lamin A/C deficiency causes defective nuclear mechanics and mechanotransduction. J Clin Invest 2004, 113:370-378.
40. Lammerding J., Fong L.G., Ji J.Y., Reue K., Stewart C.L., Young S.G., Lee R.T. Lamins a and C but not lamin B1 regulate nuclear mechanics. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:25768-25780.
41. Swift J., Ivanovska I.L., Buxboim A., Harada T., Dingal P.C.D.P., Pinter J., Pajerowski J.D., Spinler K.R., Shin J.-W., Tewari M., et al. Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science 2013, 341:1240104.
42. Schäpe J., Prausse S., Radmacher M., Stick R. Influence of lamin A on the mechanical properties of amphibian oocyte nuclei measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 2009, 96:4319-4325.
43. Ho C.Y., Lammerding J. Lamins at a glance. J Cell Sci 2012, 125:2087-2093.
44. Solovei I., Wang A.S., Thanisch K., Schmidt C.S., Krebs S., Zwerger M., Cohen T.V., Devys D., Foisner R., Peichl L., et al. LBR and lamin A/C sequentially tether peripheral heterochromatin and inversely regulate differentiation. Cell 2013, 152:584-598.
45. Ferrera D., Canale C., Marotta R., Mazzaro N., Gritti M., Mazzanti M., Capellari S., Cortelli P., Gasparini L. Lamin B1 overexpression increases nuclear rigidity in autosomal dominant leukodystrophy fibroblasts. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol 2014, 28:3906-3918.
46. Harada T., Swift J., Irianto J., Shin J.W., Spinler K.R., Athirasala A., Diegmiller R., Dingal P.C.D.P., Ivanovska I.L., Discher D.E. Nuclear lamin stiffness is a barrier to 3D migration, but softness can limit survival. J Cell Biol 2014, 204:669-682.
47. Hutchison C.J. Do lamins influence disease progression in cancer?. Adv Exp Med Biol 2014, 773:593-604.
48. Coffinier C., Chang S.Y., Nobumori C., Tu Y., Farber E.A., Toth J.I., Fong L.G., Young S.G. Abnormal development of the cerebral cortex and cerebellum in the setting of lamin B2 deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:5076-5081.
49. Young S.G., Jung H.-J., Lee J.M., Fong L.G. Nuclear lamins and neurobiology. Mol Cell Biol 2014, 34:2776-2785.
50. Ihalainen T.O., Aires L., Herzog F.A., Schwartlander R., Moeller J., Vogel V. Differential basal-to-apical accessibility of lamin A/C epitopes in the nuclear lamina regulated by changes in cytoskeletal tension. Nat Mater 2015, 14:1252-1261.
51. Buxboim A., Swift J., Irianto J., Spinler K.R., Dingal P.C.D.P., Athirasala A., Kao Y.-R.C., Cho S., Harada T., Shin J.-W., et al. Matrix elasticity regulates lamin-A, C phosphorylation and turnover with feedback to actomyosin. Curr Biol 2014, 24:1909-1917.
52. Pajerowski J.D., Dahl K.N., Zhong F.L., Sammak P.J., Discher D.E. Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:15619-15624.
53. Eissenberg J.C., Elgin S.C.R. Heterochromatin and euchromatin. eLS 2001, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
54. Crisp M., Liu Q., Roux K., Rattner J.B., Shanahan C., Burke B., Stahl P.D., Hodzic D. Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: role of the LINC complex. J Cell Biol 2006, 172:41-53.
55. Gundersen G.G., Worman H.J. Nuclear positioning. Cell 2013, 152:1376-1389.
56. Chang W., Worman H.J., Gundersen G.G. Accessorizing and anchoring the LINC complex for multifunctionality. J Cell Biol 2015, 208:11-22.
57. Dupin I., Sakamoto Y., Etienne-Manneville S. Cytoplasmic intermediate filaments mediate actin-driven positioning of the nucleus. J Cell Sci 2011, 124:865-872.
58. Ketema M., Kreft M., Secades P., Janssen H., Sonnenberg A. Nesprin-3 connects plectin and vimentin to the nuclear envelope of Sertoli cells but is not required for Sertoli cell function in spermatogenesis. Mol Biol Cell 2013, 24:2454-2466.
59. Wu J., Kent I.A., Shekhar N., Chancellor T.J., Mendonca A., Dickinson R.B., Lele T.P. Actomyosin pulls to advance the nucleus in a migrating tissue cell. Biophys J 2014, 106:7-15.
60. Petrie R.J., Koo H., Yamada K.M. Generation of compartmentalized pressure by a nuclear piston governs cell motility in a 3D matrix. Science 2014, 345:1062-1065.
61. Tsai J.-W., Lian W.-N., Kemal S., Kriegstein A.R., Vallee R.B. Kinesin 3 and cytoplasmic dynein mediate interkinetic nuclear migration in neural stem cells. Nat Neurosci 2010, 13:1463-1471.
62. Wilson M.H., Holzbaur E.L.F. Opposing microtubule motors drive robust nuclear dynamics in developing muscle cells. J Cell Sci 2012, 125:4158-4169.
63. Lämmermann T., Bader B.L., Monkley S.J., Worbs T., Wedlich-Söldner R., Hirsch K., Keller M., Förster R., Critchley D.R., Fässler R., et al. Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature 2008, 453:51-55.
64. Thomas D.G., Yenepalli A., Denais C.M., Rape A., Beach J.R., Wang Y.-L., Schiemann W.P., Baskaran H., Lammerding J., Egelhoff T.T. Non-muscle myosin IIB is critical for nuclear translocation during 3D invasion. J Cell Biol 2015, 210:583-594.
65. Ivkovic S., Beadle C., Noticewala S., Massey S.C., Swanson K.R., Toro L.N., Bresnick A.R., Canoll P., Rosenfeld S.S. Direct inhibition of myosin II effectively blocks glioma invasion in the presence of multiple motogens. Mol Biol Cell 2012, 23:533-542.
66. Stroka K.M., Jiang H., Chen S.-H., Tong Z., Wirtz D., Sun S.X., Konstantopoulos K. Water permeation drives tumor cell migration in confined microenvironments. Cell 2014, 157:611-623.
67. Revach O.-Y., Weiner A., Rechav K., Sabanay I., Livne A., Geiger B. Mechanical interplay between invadopodia and the nucleus in cultured cancer cells. Sci Rep 2015, 5:9466.
68. Dote H., Burgan W.E., Camphausen K., Tofilon P.J. Inhibition of hsp90 compromises the DNA damage response to radiation. Cancer Res 2006, 66:9211-9220.
69. Mayr M., Hu Y.H., Hainaut P., Xu Q.B. Mechanical stress-induced DNA damage and rac-p38MAPK signal pathways mediate p53-dependent apoptosis in vascular smooth muscle cells. FASEB J 2002, 16:1423-1425.
70. Guilluy C., Osborne L.D., Van L.L., Sharek L., Superfine R., Garcia-Mata R., Burridge K. Isolated nuclei adapt to force and reveal a mechanotransduction pathway in the nucleus. Nat Cell Biol 2014, 16:376-381.
71. Li Y., Chu J.S., Kurpinski K., Li X., Bautista D.M., Yang L., Paul Sung K.L., Li S. Biophysical regulation of histone acetylation in mesenchymal stem cells. Biophys J 2011, 100:1902-1909.
72. Iyer K.V., Pulford S., Mogilner A., Shivashankar G.V. Mechanical activation of cells induces chromatin remodeling preceding MKL nuclear transport. Biophys J 2012, 103:1416-1428.
73. Poh Y.-C., Shevtsov S.P., Chowdhury F., Wu D.C., Na S., Dundr M., Wang N. Dynamic force-induced direct dissociation of protein complexes in a nuclear body in living cells. Nat Commun 2012, 3:866.
74. Kaminski A., Fedorchak G.R., Lammerding J. The cellular mastermind(?.) - mechanotransduction and the nucleus. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2014, 126:157-203.
75. Guilluy C., Burridge K. Nuclear mechanotransduction: forcing the nucleus to respond. Nucleus 2015, 6:19-22.
76. Cost A.-L., Ringer P., Chrostek-Grashoff A., Grashoff C. How to measure molecular forces in cells: a guide to evaluating genetically-encoded FRET-based tension sensors cell. Mol Bioeng 2015, 8:96-105.
77. Wolf K., Alexander S., Schacht V., Coussens L.M., von Andrian U.H., van Rheenen J., Deryugina E., Friedl P. Collagen-based cell migration models in vitro and in vivo. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009, 20:931-941.
78. Haeger A., Krause M., Wolf K., Friedl P. Cell jamming: collective invasion of mesenchymal tumor cells imposed by tissue confinement. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2014, 1840:2386-2395.
79. Meehan S., Nain A.S. Role of suspended fiber structural stiffness and curvature on single-cell migration, nucleus shape, and focal-adhesion-cluster length. Biophys J 2014, 107:2604-2611.
80. Qin S., Ricotta V., Simon M., Clark R.A.F., Rafailovich M.H. Continual cell deformation induced via attachment to oriented fibers enhances fibroblast cell migration. PLOS ONE 2015, 10:e0119094.
81. Duncombe T.A., Tentori A.M., Herr A.E. Microfluidics: reframing biological enquiry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2015, 16:554-567.
82. Lautenschläger F., Piel M. Microfabricated devices for cell biology: all for one and one for all. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2013, 25:116-124.
83. Lange J.R., Steinwachs J., Kolb T., Lautscham L.A., Harder I., Whyte G., Fabry B. Microconstriction arrays for high-throughput quantitative measurements of cell mechanical properties. Biophys J 2015, 109:26-34.
84. Schreiber K.H., Kennedy B.K. When lamins go bad: nuclear structure and disease. Cell 2013, 152:1365-1375.
85. Davidson P.M., Lammerding J. Broken nuclei - lamins, nuclear mechanics, and disease. Trends Cell Biol 2014, 24:247-256.
86. Krause M., Wolf K. Cancer cell migration in 3D tissue: negotiating space by proteolysis and nuclear deformability. Cell Adhes Migr 2015, 9:357-366.
87. Denais C., Lammerding J. Nuclear mechanics in cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 2014, 773:435-470.
88. Capo-chichi C.D., Cai K.Q., Smedberg J., Azar P.G.-A., Godwin A.K., Xu X.-X. Original article materials and methods tumor specimens, human primary small interfering RNA transfection (shRNA and siRNA) flow cytometry analysis probes for northern blot and antibodies for. Chin J Cancer 2011, 30:415-425.
89. Wazir U., Ahmed M.H., Bridger J.M., Harvey A., Jiang W.G., Sharma A.K., Mokbel K. The clinicopathological significance of lamin A/C, lamin B1 and lamin B receptor mRNA expression in human breast cancer. Cell Mol Biol Lett 2013, 18:595-611.
90. Capo-chichi C.D., Aguida B., Chabi N.W., Cai Q.K., Offrin G., Agossou V.K., Sanni A., Xu X.-X. Lamin A/C deficiency is an independent risk factor for cervical cancer. Cell Oncol 2015, 10.1007/s13402-015-0252-6.
91. Belt E.J.T., Fijneman R.J.A., van den Berg E.G., Bril H., Delis-van Diemen P.M., Tijssen M., van Essen H.F., de Lange-de Klerk E.S.M., Beliën J.A.M., Stockmann H.B.A.C., et al. Loss of lamin A/C expression in stage II and III colon cancer is associated with disease recurrence. Eur J Cancer 2011, 47:1837-1845.
92. Willis N.D., Cox T.R., Rahman-Casañs S.F., Smits K., Przyborski S.A., van den Brandt P., van Engeland M., Weijenberg M., Wilson R.G., de Bruïne A., et al. Lamin A/C is a risk biomarker in colorectal cancer. PLoS One 2008, 3:e2988.
93. Chow K.-H., Factor R.E., Ullman K.S. The nuclear envelope environment and its cancer connections. Nat Rev Cancer 2012, 12:196-209.
94. Mitchell M.J., Denais C., Chan M.F., Wang Z., Lammerding J., King M.R. Lamin A/C deficiency reduces circulating tumor cell resistance to fluid shear stress Am. J Physiol Cell Physiol 2015, 309:C736-C746.
95. Chiotaki R., Polioudaki H., Theodoropoulos P.A. Differential nuclear shape dynamics of invasive and non-invasive breast cancer cells are associated with actin cytoskeleton organization and stability. Biochem Cell Biol 2014, 295:287-295.
96. Jain N., Iyer K.V., Kumar A., Shivashankar G.V. Cell geometric constraints induce modular gene-expression patterns via redistribution of HDAC3 regulated by actomyosin contractility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:11349-11354.
97. Meuleman W., Peric-Hupkes D., Kind J., Beaudry J.B., Pagie L., Kellis M., Reinders M., Wessels L., Van Steensel B. Constitutive nuclear lamina-genome interactions are highly conserved and associated with A/T-rich sequence. Genome Res 2013, 23:270-280.
98. Petrie R.J., Yamada K.M. Fibroblasts lead the way: a unified view of 3D cell motility. Trends Cell Biol 2015, 25:666-674.
99. Petrie R.J., Gavara N., Chadwick R.S., Yamada K.M. Nonpolarized signaling reveals two distinct modes of 3D cell migration. J Cell Biol 2012, 197:439-455.
100. Levy J.R., Holzbaur E.L.F. Dynein drives nuclear rotation during forward progression of motile fibroblasts. J Cell Sci 2008, 121:3187-3195.
101. Sosa B.A., Rothballer A., Kutay U., Schwartz T.U. LINC complexes form by binding of three KASH peptides to domain interfaces of trimeric SUN proteins. Cell 2012, 149:1035-1047.