Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos

Nucleus

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 555-589

  Popken, Jens ^a   Brero, Alessandro ^a   Koehler, Daniela ^a   Schmid, Volker J ^a   Strauss, Axel ^a   Wuensch, Annegret ^a   Guengoer, Tuna ^a   Graf, Alexander ^a   Krebs, Stefan ^a   Blum, Helmut ^a   Zakhartchenko, Valeri ^a   Wolf, Eckhard ^a   Cremer, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bovine preimplantation development; Chromatin domain; Chromosome territory; Embryonic genome activation; H3K4me3; H3K9me3; In vitro fertilization (IVF); Interchromatin compartment; RNA polymerase II; Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT)

Indexed keywords

HISTONE 3 LYSINE 4 TRIMETHYLATION; HISTONE 3 LYSINE 9 TRIMETHYLATION; HISTONE LYSINE METHYLTRANSFERASE; NUCLEOPHOSMIN; RNA POLYMERASE II; TRANSCRIPTOME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CHROMATIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE PHASE; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CHROMATIN; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FIBROBLAST; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE CLUSTER; GENE MAPPING; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MAJOR LACUNA; MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RNA SPLICING; RNA SYNTHESIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRUCTURED ILLUMINATION MICROSCOPY; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; BOVINE; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMOSOME; CLONING; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM;

ANIMALIA; BOVINAE; LACUNA;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOMES; CLONING, ORGANISM; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FIBROBLASTS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HISTONE-LYSINE N-METHYLTRANSFERASE; NUCLEAR TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; RNA POLYMERASE II;

EID: 84921924146     PISSN: 19491034     EISSN: 19491042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/19491034.2014.979712     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Blobel G. Gene gating: a hypothesis. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 1985; 82:8527-9; PMID:3866238; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.24.8527
2. Bickmore WA, van Steensel B. Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes. Cell 2013; 152:1270-84; PMID:23498936; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.001
3. Cardoso MC, Schneider K, Martin RM, Leonhardt H. Structure, function and dynamics of nuclear subcompartments. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2012; 24:79-85; PMID:22227228; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb. 2011.12.009
4. Cavalli G, Misteli T. Functional implications of genome topology. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2013; 20:290-9; PMID:23463314; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2474
5. de Graaf CA, van Steensel B. Chromatin organization: form to function. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013; 23:185-90; PMID:23274160; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2012.11.011
6. Cremer T, Cremer M. Chromosome territories. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010; 2:a003889; PMID:20300217; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshpers pect.a003889
7. Cremer T, Zakhartchenko V. Nuclear architecture in developmental biology and cell specialisation. Reprod, Fert Dev 2011; 23:94-106; PMID:21366985; http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RD10249
8. Ghirlando R, Felsenfeld G. Chromatin structure outside and inside the nucleus. Biopolymers 2013; 99:225-32; PMID:23348669; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bip.22157
9. Gibcus JH, Dekker J. The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Mol Cell 2013; 49:773-82; PMID:23473598; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.011
10. Hubner MR, Spector DL. Chromatin dynamics. Annu Rev Biophys 2010; 39:471-89; PMID:20462379; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. biophys.093008.131348
11. Lanctot C, Cheutin T, Cremer M, Cavalli G, Cremer T. Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8:104-15; PMID:17230197; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2041
12. Meister P, Mango SE, Gasser SM. Locking the genome: nuclear organization and cell fate. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2011; 21:167-74; PMID:21345665; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2011.01.023
13. Pederson T. The spatial organization of the genome in mammalian cells. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2004; 14:203-9; PMID:15196468; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2004.02.008
14. Rapkin LM, Anchel DR, Li R, Bazett-Jones DP. A view of the chromatin landscape. Micron 2012; 43:150-8; PMID:22172345; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2011.11.007
15. Zhang J, Poh HM, Peh SQ, Sia YY, Li G, Mulawadi FH, Goh Y, Fullwood MJ, Sung WK, Ruan X, et al. ChIAPET analysis of transcriptional chromatin interactions. Methods 2012; 58:289-99; PMID:22926262; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.08.009
16. Ahmed K, Dehghani H, Rugg-Gunn P, Fussner E, Rossant J, Bazett-Jones DP. Global chromatin architecture reflects pluripotency and lineage commitment in the early mouse embryo. PloS One 2010; 5: e10531; PMID:20479880; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010531
17. Aguirre-Lavin T, Adenot P, Bonnet-Garnier A, Lehmann G, Fleurot R, Boulesteix C, Debey P, Beaujean N. 3D-FISH analysis of embryonic nuclei in mouse highlights several abrupt changes of nuclear organization during preimplantation development. BMC Dev Biol 2012; 12:30; PMID:23095683; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-12-30
18. Brero A, Hao R, Schieker M, Wierer M, Wolf E, Cremer T, Zakhartchenko V. Reprogramming of active and repressive histone modifications following nuclear transfer with rabbit mesenchymal stem cells and adult fibroblasts. Cloning Stem Cells 2009; 11:319-29; PMID:19508112; http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/clo.2008.0083
19. Koehler D, Zakhartchenko V, Froenicke L, Stone G, Stanyon R, Wolf E, Cremer T, Brero A. Changes of higher order chromatin arrangements during major genome activation in bovine preimplantation embryos. Exp Cell Res 2009; 315:2053-63; PMID:19254712; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr. 2009.02.016
20. Merico V, Barbieri J, Zuccotti M, Joffe B, Cremer T, Redi CA, Solovei I, Garagna S. Epigenomic differentiation in mouse preimplantation nuclei of biparental, parthenote and cloned embryos. Chromosome Res: Int J Mol Supramol Evolut Aspects Chromosome Biol 2007; 15:341-60; PMID:17447149
21. Salvaing J, Aguirre-Lavin T, Boulesteix C, Lehmann G, Debey P, Beaujean N. 5-Methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine spatiotemporal profiles in the mouse zygote. PloS One 2012; 7:e38156; PMID:22693592; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0038156
22. Yang CX, Liu Z, Fleurot R, Adenot P, Duranthon V, Vignon X, Zhou Q, Renard JP, Beaujean N. Heterochromatin reprogramming in rabbit embryos after fertilization, intra-, and inter-species SCNT correlates with preimplantation development. Reproduction 2013; 145:149-59; PMID:23221012; http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-11-0421
23. Harmon B, Sedat J. Cell-by-cell dissection of gene expression and chromosomal interactions reveals consequences of nuclear reorganization. PLoS Biol 2005; 3:e67; PMID:15737020; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030067
24. Kosak ST, Groudine M. Form follows function: The genomic organization of cellular differentiation. Genes Development 2004; 18:1371-84; PMID:15198979; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1209304
25. Wuensch A, Habermann FA, Kurosaka S, Klose R, Zakhartchenko V, Reichenbach HD, Sinowatz F, McLaughlin KJ, Wolf E. Quantitative monitoring of pluripotency gene activation after somatic cloning in cattle. Biol Reprod 2007; 76:983-91; PMID:17314316; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.106.058776
26. Kanka J, Kepkova K, Nemcova L. Gene expression during minor genome activation in preimplantation bovine development. Theriogenology 2009; 72:572-83; PMID:19501393; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. theriogenology.2009.04.014
27. Graf A, Krebs S, Zakhartchenko V, Schwalb B, Blum H, Wolf E. Fine mapping of genome activation in bovine embryos by RNA sequencing. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:4139-44; PMID:24591639
28. Tadros W, Lipshitz HD. The maternal-to-zygotic transition: a play in two acts. Development 2009; 136:3033-42; PMID:19700615; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.033183
29. Li L, Lu X, Dean J. The maternal to zygotic transition in mammals. Mol Aspects Med 2013; 34:919-38; PMID:23352575; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2013.01.003
30. Badr H, Bongioni G, Abdoon AS, Kandil O, Puglisi R. Gene expression in the in vitro-produced preimplantation bovine embryos. Zygote 2007; 15:355-67; PMID:17967215; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0967199407004315
31. Camous S, Kopecny V, Flechon JE. Autoradiographic detection of the earliest stage of [3H]-uridine incorporation into the cow embryo. Biol Cell 1986; 58:195-200; PMID:2436695; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1768-322X.1986.tb00506.x
32. Memili E, First NL. Zygotic and embryonic gene expression in cow: a review of timing and mechanisms of early gene expression as compared with other species. Zygote 2000; 8:87-96; PMID:10840878; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0967199400000861
33. Misirlioglu M, Page GP, Sagirkaya H, Kaya A, Parrish JJ, First NL, Memili E. Dynamics of global transcriptome in bovine matured oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:18905-10; PMID:17142320; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608247103
34. Vigneault C, Gravel C, Vallee M, McGraw S, Sirard MA. Unveiling the bovine embryo transcriptome during the maternal-to-embryonic transition. Reproduction 2009; 137:245-57; PMID:18987256; http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-08-0079
35. Popken J, Koehler D, Brero A, Wuensch A, Guengoer T, Thormeyer T, Wolf E, Cremer T, Zakhartchenko V. Positional changes of a pluripotency marker gene during structural reorganization of fibroblast nuclei in cloned early bovine embryos. Nucleus 2014 5: 6.; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/19491034.2014.979712 (Under Review)
36. Markaki Y, Gunkel M, Schermelleh L, Beichmanis S, Neumann J, Heidemann M, Leonhardt H, Eick D, Cremer C, Cremer T. Functional nuclear organization of transcription and DNA replication: a topographical marriage between chromatin domains and the interchromatin compartment. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia Quant Biol 2010; 75:475-92; PMID:21467142; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2010.75.042
37. Markaki Y, Smeets D, Fiedler S, Schmid VJ, Schermelleh L, Cremer T, Cremer M. The potential of 3DFISH and super-resolution structured illumination microscopy for studies of 3D nuclear architecture: 3D structured illumination microscopy of defined chromosomal structures visualized by 3D (immuno)-FISH opens new perspectives for studies of nuclear architecture. BioEssays: News Reviews Mol Cell Dev Biology 2012; 34:412-26; PMID:22508100; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.201100176
38. Rouquette J, Genoud C, Vazquez-Nin GH, Kraus B, Cremer T, Fakan S. Revealing the high-resolution threedimensional network of chromatin and interchromatin space: a novel electron-microscopic approach to reconstructing nuclear architecture. Chromosome Res: Int J Mol Supramol Evol Aspects Chromosome Biol 2009; 17:801-10; PMID:19731052; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-009-9070-x
39. Huebner B, Cremer T, Neumann J. Correlative microscopy of individual cells: sequential application of microscopic systems with increasing resolution to study the nuclear landscape. Methods Mol Biol 2013; 1042:299-336; PMID:23980016; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-526-2_21
40. Smeets D, Markaki Y, Schmid VJ, Kraus F, Tattermusch A, Cerase A, Sterr M, Fiedler S, Demmerle J, Popken J, et al. Three-dimensional super-resolution microscopy of the inactive X chromosome territory reveals a collapse of its active nuclear compartment harboring distinct Xist RNA foci. Epigenetics Chromatin 2014; 7:8; PMID:25057298; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-8935-7-8
41. Rouquette J, Cremer C, Cremer T, Fakan S. Functional nuclear architecture studied by microscopy: present and future. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 2010; 282:1-90; PMID:20630466; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1937-6448(10)82001-5
42. Cremer T, Kreth G, Koester H, Fink RH, Heintzmann R, Cremer M, Solovei I, Zink D, Cremer C. Chromosome territories, interchromatin domain compartment, and nuclearmatrix: an integrated view of the functional nuclear architecture. Crit Rev Eukaryotic Gene Exp 2000; 10:179-212; PMID:11186332; http://dx.doi.org/10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v10.i2.60
43. Cremer T, Cremer C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2:292-301; PMID:11283701; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35066075
44. Mor A, Suliman S, Ben-Yishay R, Yunger S, Brody Y, Shav-Tal Y. Dynamics of single mRNP nucleocytoplasmic transport and export through the nuclear pore in living cells. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:543-52; PMID:20453848; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2056
45. Cmarko D, Verschure PJ, Martin TE, Dahmus ME, Krause S, Fu XD, van Driel R, Fakan S. Ultrastructural analysis of transcription and splicing in the cell nucleus after bromo-UTP microinjection. Mol Biol Cell 1999; 10:211-23; PMID:9880337; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.10.1.211
46. Maharana S, Sharma D, Shi X, Shivashankar GV. Dynamic organization of transcription compartments is dependent on functional nuclear architecture. Biophys J 2012; 103:851-9; PMID:23009834; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2012.06.036
47. Niedojadlo J, Perret-Vivancos C, Kalland KH, Cmarko D, Cremer T, van Driel R, Fakan S. Transcribed DNA is preferentially located in the perichromatin region of mammalian cell nuclei. Exp Cell Res 2011; 317:433-44; PMID:21056558; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.10.026
48. Jaunin F, Visser AE, Cmarko D, Aten JA, Fakan S. Fine structural in situ analysis of nascent DNA movement following DNA replication. Exp Cell Res 2000; 260:313-23; PMID:11035926; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/excr.2000.4999
49. Zhou VW, Goren A, Bernstein BE. Charting histone modifications and the functional organization of mammalian genomes. Nat Rev Genet 2011; 12:7-18; PMID:21116306; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2905
50. Schnedl W, Breitenbach M, Stranzinger G. Mithramycin and DIPI: a pair of fluorochromes specific for GC-and AT-rich DNA respectively. Hum Genet 1977; 36:299-305; PMID:67077; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00446280
51. Kapuscinski J. DAPI: a DNA-specific fluorescent probe. Biotechnic Histochem: Off Pub Biol Stain Comm 1995; 70:220-33; http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10520299509108199
52. Bink K, Walch A, Feuchtinger A, Eisenmann H, Hutzler P, Hofler H, Werner M. TO-PRO-3 is an optimal fluorescent dye for nuclear counterstaining in dual-colour FISH on paraffin sections. Histochem Cell Biol 2001; 115:293-9; PMID:11405057
53. Prigent C, Dimitrov S. Phosphorylation of serine 10 in histone H3, what for? J Cell Sci 2003; 116:3677-85; PMID:12917355; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00735
54. Chan PK, Liu QR, Durban E. The major phosphorylation site of nucleophosmin (B23) is phosphorylated by a nuclear kinase II. Biochem J 1990; 270:549-52; PMID:2400401
55. Cremer C. Optics far beyond the diffraction limit. In: Traeger F, ed. Springer Handbook of Lasers and Optics, Berlin,: Springer, 2012:1359-97.
56. Schermelleh L, Heintzmann R, Leonhardt H. A guide to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. J Cell Biol 2010; 190:165-75; PMID:20643879; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201002018
57. Guetg C, Santoro R. Formation of nuclear heterochromatin: the nucleolar point of view. Epigenetics: Off J DNA Methylation Soc 2012; 7:811-4; PMID:22735386; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/epi.21072
58. Nemeth A, Conesa A, Santoyo-Lopez J, Medina I, Montaner D, Peterfia B, Solovei I, Cremer T, Dopazo J, Langst G. Initial genomics of the human nucleolus. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:e1000889; PMID:20361057; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000889
59. Zinner R, Albiez H, Walter J, Peters AH, Cremer T, Cremer M. Histone lysine methylation patterns in human cell types are arranged in distinct three-dimensional nuclear zones. Histochem Cell Biol 2006; 125:3-19; PMID:16215742; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00418-005-0049-1
60. Mitchell JA, Fraser P. Transcription factories are nuclear subcompartments that remain in the absence of transcription. Genes Dev 2008; 22:20-5; PMID:18172162; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.454008
61. Probst AV, Almouzni G. Heterochromatin establishment in the context of genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming. Trends Genet: TIG 2011; 27:177-85; PMID:21497937; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. tig.2011.02.002
62. Kopecny V, Fakan S, Pavlok A, Pivko J, Grafenau P, Biggiogera M, Leser G, Martin TE. Immunoelectron microscopic localization of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins during bovine early embryogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev 1991; 29:209-19; PMID:1834097; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080290302
63. Chandra T, Kirschner K, Thuret JY, Pope BD, Ryba T, Newman S, Ahmed K, Samarajiwa SA, Salama R, Carroll T, et al. Independence of repressive histone marks and chromatin compaction during senescent heterochromatic layer formation. Mol Cell 2012; 47:203-14; PMID:22795131; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.06.010
64. Illner D, Zinner R, Handtke V, Rouquette J, Strickfaden H, Lanctot C, Conrad M, Seiler A, Imhof A, Cremer T, et al. Remodeling of nuclear architecture by the thiodioxoxpiperazine metabolite chaetocin. Exp Cell Res 2010; 316:1662-80; PMID:20302859; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.03.008
65. Memili E, Dominko T, First NL. Onset of transcription in bovine oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 1998; 51:36-41; PMID:9712315; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199809)51:1%3c36::AID-MRD4%3e3.0.CO;2-X
66. Papantonis A, Cook PR. Transcription factories: genome organization and gene regulation. Chem Rev 2013; 113:8683-705; PMID:23597155; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr300513p
67. Eick D, Geyer M. The RNA polymerase II carboxyterminal domain (CTD) code. Chem Rev 2013; 113:8456-90; PMID:23952966; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr400071f
68. Heidemann M, Hintermair C, Voss K, Eick D. Dynamic phosphorylation patterns of RNA polymerase II CTD during transcription. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 2013; 1829:55-62; PMID:22982363; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.08.013
69. Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Jaroudi S, Sarasa J, Enciso M, Wells D. The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy. Hum Genet 2013; 132:1001-13; PMID:23620267; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00439-013-1309-0
70. Demyda-Peyras S, Dorado J, Hidalgo M, Anter J, De Luca L, Genero E, Moreno-Millan M. Effects of oocyte quality, incubation time and maturation environment on the number of chromosomal abnormalities in IVF-derived early bovine embryos. Reprod Fertility Dev 2013; 25:1077-84; PMID:23182337; http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RD12140
71. Viuff D, Rickords L, Offenberg H, Hyttel P, Avery B, Greve T, Olsaker I, Williams JL, Callesen H, Thomsen PD. A high proportion of bovine blastocysts produced in vitro are mixoploid. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:1273-8; PMID:10330080; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod60.6.1273
72. Leidenfrost S, Boelhauve M, Reichenbach M, Gungor T, Reichenbach HD, Sinowatz F, Wolf E, Habermann FA. Cell arrest and cell death in mammalian preimplantation development: lessons from the bovine model. PloS One 2011; 6:e22121; PMID:21811561; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022121
73. Leidenfrost S. Zellentwicklung, Zelltod und die Expression Apoptose-assoziierter Gene in der frühen Embryogenese beim Rind. Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine Anatomie, Histologie und Embryologie. Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians-University, http://edoc.ub.unimuenchen.de/11663/, 2009.
74. Solovei I, Kreysing M, Lanctot C, Kosem S, Peichl L, Cremer T, Guck J, Joffe B. Nuclear architecture of rod photoreceptor cells adapts to vision in mammalian evolution. Cell 2009; 137:356-68; PMID:19379699; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.052
75. Chuang CH, Carpenter AE, Fuchsova B, Johnson T, de Lanerolle P, Belmont AS. Long-range directional movement of an interphase chromosome site. Curr Biol 2006; 16:825-31; PMID:16631592; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.059
76. Osborne CS, Chakalova L, Mitchell JA, Horton A, Wood AL, Bolland DJ, Corcoran AE, Fraser P. Myc dynamically and preferentially relocates to a transcription factory occupied by Igh. PLoS Biol 2007; 5:e192; PMID:17622196; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pbio.0050192
77. Roukos V, Voss TC, Schmidt CK, Lee S, Wangsa D, Misteli T. Spatial dynamics of chromosome translocations in living cells. Science 2013; 341:660-4; PMID:23929981; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1237150
78. Bridger JM, Arican-Gotkas H, Foster H, Godwin L, Harvey A, Kill IR, Knight M, Mehta IS, Ahmed M. The non-random repositioning of whole chromosomes and individual gene loci in interphase nuclei and its relevance in disease, infection, aging, and aancer. In: Schirmer EC, de las Heras JI, eds. Cancer Biology and the Nuclear Envelope, New York: Springer, 2014, 263-79.
79. Mehta IS, Eskiw CH, Arican HD, Kill IR, Bridger JM. Farnesyltransferase inhibitor treatment restores chromosome territory positions and active chromosome dynamics in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome cells. Genome Biol 2011; 12:R74; PMID:21838864; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-8-r74
80. Strickfaden H, Zunhammer A, van Koningsbruggen S, Kohler D, Cremer T. 4D chromatin dynamics in cycling cells: theodor boveri’s hypotheses revisited. Nucleus 2010; 1:284-97; PMID:21327076; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/nucl.1.3.11969
81. Walter J, Schermelleh L, Cremer M, Tashiro S, Cremer T. Chromosome order in HeLa cells changes during mitosis and early G1, but is stably maintained during subsequent interphase stages. J Cell Biol 2003; 160:685-97; PMID:12604593; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200211103
82. Hihara S, Pack CG, Kaizu K, Tani T, Hanafusa T, Nozaki T, Takemoto S, Yoshimi T, Yokota H, Imamoto N, et al. Local nucleosome dynamics facilitate chromatin accessibility in living mammalian cells. Cell Rep 2012; 2:1645-56; PMID:23246002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2012.11.008
83. Bornfleth H, Edelmann P, Zink D, Cremer T, Cremer C. Quantitative motion analysis of subchromosomal foci in living cells using four-dimensional microscopy. Biophys J 1999; 77:2871-86; PMID:10545385; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77119-5
84. Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, Li Y, Shen Y, Hu M, Liu JS, Ren B. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 2012; 485:376-80; PMID:22495300; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11082
85. Bernardi G. The genome: an isochore ensemble and its evolution. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012; 1267:31-4; PMID:22954213; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06591.x
86. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, Amit I, Lajoie BR, Sabo PJ, Dorschner MO, et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 2009; 326:289-93; PMID:19815776; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1181369
87. Baddeley D, Chagin VO, Schermelleh L, Martin S, Pombo A, Carlton PM, Gahl A, Domaing P, Birk U, Leonhardt H, et al. Measurement of replication structures at the nanometer scale using super-resolution light microscopy. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:e8; PMID:19864256; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp901
88. Albiez H, Cremer M, Tiberi C, Vecchio L, Schermelleh L, Dittrich S, Kupper K, Joffe B, Thormeyer T, von Hase J, et al. Chromatin domains and the interchromatin compartment form structurally defined and functionally interacting nuclear networks. Chromosome Res: Int J Mol Supramol Evol Aspects Chromosome Biol 2006; 14:707-33; PMID:17115328; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-006-1086-x
89. Joti Y, Hikima T, Nishino Y, Kamada F, Hihara S, Takata H, Ishikawa T, Maeshima K. Chromosomes without a 30-nm chromatin fiber. Nucleus 2012; 3:404-10; PMID:22825571; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/nucl.21222
90. Eltsov M, Maclellan KM, Maeshima K, Frangakis AS, Dubochet J. Analysis of cryo-electron microscopy images does not support the existence of 30-nm chromatin fibers in mitotic chromosomes in situ. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:19732-7; PMID:19064912; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810057105
91. Munkel C, Eils R, Dietzel S, Zink D, Mehring C, Wedemann G, Cremer T, Langowski J. Compartmentalization of interphase chromosomes observed in simulation and experiment. J Mol Biol 1999; 285:1053-65; PMID:9887267; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1998.2361
92. Kreth G, Finsterle J, von Hase J, Cremer M, Cremer C. Radial arrangement of chromosome territories in human cell nuclei: a computer model approach based on gene density indicates a probabilistic global positioning code. Biophys J 2004; 86:2803-12; PMID:15111398; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74333-7
93. Dehghani H, Dellaire G, Bazett-Jones DP. Organization of chromatin in the interphase mammalian cell. Micron 2005; 36:95-108; PMID:15629642; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2004.10.003
94. Branco MR, Pombo A. Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations. PLoS Biol 2006; 4:e138; PMID:16623600; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040138
95. Mirny LA. The fractal globule as a model of chromatin architecture in the cell. Chromosome Res: Int J Mol Supramol Evol Aspects Chromosome Biol 2011; 19:37-51; PMID:21274616; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-010-9177-0
96. Halverson JD, Smrek J, Kremer K, Grosberg AY. From a melt of rings to chromosome territories: the role of topological constraints in genome folding. Rep Prog Phys Phys Soc 2014; 77:022601; PMID:24472896; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/2/022601
97. Jerabek H, Heermann D. How chromatin looping and nuclear envelope attachment affect genome organization in eukaryotic cell nuclei. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 2014; 307:351-81; PMID:24380599; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800046-5.00010-2
98. Maeshima K, Imai R, Tamura S, Nozaki T. Chromatin as dynamic 10-nm fibers. Chromosoma 2014; 123:225-37; PMID:24737122; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-014-0460-2
99. Barbieri M, Fraser J, Lavitas LM, Chotalia M, Dostie J, Pombo A, Nicodemi M. A polymer model explains the complexity of large-scale chromatin folding. Nucleus 2013; 4:267-73; PMID:23823730; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/nucl.25432
100. Pederson T. Chapter one-the nuclear physique. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2014; 307:1-13. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800046-5.00001-1
101. Hancock R, Jeon KW. Preface. New models of the cell nucleus: crowding, entropic forces, phase separation, and fractals. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 2014; 307:13; PMID:24380603
102. Woringer M, Darzacq X, Izeddin I. Geometry of the nucleus: a perspective on gene expression regulation. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2014; 20C:112-9; PMID:24981829; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.05.009
103. Cremer C, Masters BR. Resolution enhancement techniques in microscopy. EPJ H 2013; 38:281-344; http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2012-20060-1
104. Renz M. Fluorescence microscopy-a historical and technical perspective. Cytometry A 2013; 83:767-79; PMID:23585290; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22295
105. Chen B, Gilbert LA, Cimini BA, Schnitzbauer J, Zhang W, Li GW, Park J, Blackburn EH, Weissman JS, Qi LS, et al. Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell 2013; 155:1479-91; PMID:24360272; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.001
106. Ma H, Reyes-Gutierrez P, Pederson T. Visualization of repetitive DNA sequences in human chromosomes with transcription activator-like effectors. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110:21048-53; PMID:24324157; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319097110
107. Szczurek AT, Prakash K, Lee HK, Zurek-Biesiada DJ, Best G, Hagmann M, Dobrucki JW, Cremer C, Birk U. Single molecule localization microscopy of the distribution of chromatin using Hoechst and DAPI fluorescent probes. Nucleus 2014; 5:331-340; PMID:24945151; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/nucl.29564
108. Hu YS, Zimmerley M, Li Y, Watters R, Cang H. Single-molecule super-resolution light-sheet microscopy. Chemphyschem: Eur J Chem Phys Phys Chem 2014; 15:577-86; PMID:24615819; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201300732
109. Kruhlak MJ. Correlative fluorescence and EFTEM imaging of the organized components of the mammalian nucleus. Methods Mol Biol 2013; 950:397-416; PMID:23086887
110. Nagano T, Lubling Y, Stevens TJ, Schoenfelder S, Yaffe E, Dean W, Laue ED, Tanay A, Fraser P. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 2013; 502:59-64; PMID:24067610; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12593
111. Kageyama S, Nagata M, Aoki F. Isolation of nascent messenger RNA from mouse preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod 2004; 71:1948-55; PMID:15286032; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.104.031906
112. Waksmundzka M, Debey P. Electric field-mediated BrUTP uptake by mouse oocytes, eggs, and embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 2001; 58:173-9; PMID:11139229; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-2795(200102)58:2%3c173::AID-MRD6%3e3.0.CO;2-2