College Students’ Psychological Needs and Intrinsic Motivation to Learn: An Examination of Self-Determination Theory

Communication Quarterly

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 167-191

  Goldman, Zachary W ^a   Goodboy, Alan K ^b   Weber, Keith ^c  

^a ILLINOIS COLLEGE   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Instructional Communication; Intrinsic Motivation; Personalized Education; Self Determination Theory; Student Motivation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983551880     PISSN: 01463373     EISSN: 17464102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2016.1215338     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Beachboard, M. R., Beachboard, J. C., Li, W., & Adkison, S. R., (2011). Cohorts and relatedness:Self-determination theory as an explanation of how learning communities affect educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52, 853–874. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9221-8
2. Beatty, M. J., (1994). Student motivation scale. In R. B. Ruin, P. Palmgreen, & H. E. Sypher (Eds.), Communication research measures:A sourcebook (pp. 343–346). New York, NY:The Guilford Press.
3. Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L., (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry:A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756. doi:10.1002/1098-237X200011
4. Bolkan, S., (2015). Intellectually stimulating students’ intrinsic motivation:The mediating influence of affective learning and student engagement. Communication Research, Ahead of Press, 1–12. doi:10.1080/08934215.2014.962752
5. Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K., (2015). Exploratory theoretical tests of the instructor humor-student learning link. Communication Education, 64, 45–64. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.978793
6. Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Griffin, D. J., (2011). Teacher leadership and intellectual stimulation:Improving students’ approaches to studying through intrinsic motivation. Communication Research Reports, 28, 337–346. doi:10.1080/08824096.2011.615958
7. Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W., (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work:Construction and initial validation of the work-related basic need satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 981–1002. doi:10.1348/096317909X481382
8. Brooks, C. F., & Young, S. L., (2011). Are choice-making opportunities needed in the classroom? Using self-determination theory to consider student motivation and learner empowerment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23, 48–59.
9. Brophy, J., (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 200–215. doi:10.1080/00461528309529274
10. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W., (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–107. doi:10.1037/h0046016
11. Christophel, D. M., (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323–340. doi:10.1080/03634529009378813
12. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D., (1995). Constructing validity:Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
13. Comadena, M. E., Hunt, S. K., & Simonds, C. J., (2007). The effects of teacher clarity, nonverbal immediacy, and caring on student motivation, affective and cognitive learning. Communication Research Reports, 24, 241–248. doi:10.1080/08824090701446617
14. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M., (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education:Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1–27. doi:10.3102/00346543071001001
15. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M., (1985). Self-determination. New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
16. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M., (2002). Self-determination research:Reflections and future directions. In E. L., Deci & R. M., Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 431–442). Rochester, NY:TheUniversity of Rochester Press.
17. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M., (1991). Motivation and education:The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325–346. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
18. DeVellis, R. F., (2017). Scale development:Theory and applications (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
19. Ellis, K., (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation:The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26, 264–291. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00758.x
20. Ellis, K., (2004). The impact of perceived teacher confirmation on receiver apprehension, motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 53, 1–20. doi:10.1080/0363452032000135742
21. Frisby, B. N., Mansson, D. H., & Kaufmann, R., (2014). The cognitive learning measure:A three-study examination of validity. Communication Methods and Measures, 8, 163–176. doi:10.1080/19312458.2014.903389
22. Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M., (2010). Instructor–student and student–student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59, 146–164. doi:10.1080/03634520903564362
23. Frymier, A. B., (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133–144. doi:10.1080/01463379409369922
24. Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L., (1999). The revised learning indicators scale. Communication Studies, 50, 1–12. doi:10.1080/10510979909388466
25. Frymier, A. B., Shulman, G. M., & Houser, M., (1996). The development of a learner empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45, 181–199. doi:10.1080/03634529609379048
26. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L., (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322
27. Goodboy, A. K., (2011). The development and validation of the instructional dissent scale. Communication Education, 60, 422–440. doi:10.1080/03634523.2011.569894
28. Goodboy, A. K., & Bolkan, S., (2009). College teacher misbehaviors:Direct and indirect effects on student communication behavior and traditional learning outcomes. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 204–219. doi:10.1080/10570310902856089
29. Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A., (2008). The effect of teacher confirmation on student communication and learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57, 153–179. doi:10.1080/03634520701787777
30. Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A., (2015). Revisiting instructor misbehaviors:A revised typology and development of a measure. Communication Education, 64, 133–153. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.978798
31. Goodboy, A. K., Myers, S. A., & Bolkan, S., (2012). Personalized education and student motives for communicating with instructors:An examination of Chinese and American classrooms. China Media Research, 8, 94–100.
32. Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C., (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation:The situational motivation scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24, 175–213. doi:10.1023/A:1005614228250
33. Hatcher, L., (1994). Step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC:SAS institute.
34. Hayes, A. F., (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach. New York, NY:Guilford Press.
35. Haynes, S. N., Richard, D., & Kubany, E. S., (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment:A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238–247. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238
36. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M., (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
37. James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M., (1982). Causal analysis:Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
38. Kerssen-Griep, J., Hess, J. A., & Trees, A. R., (2003). Sustaining the desire to learn:Dimensions of perceived instructional facework related to student involvement and motivation to learn. Western Journal of Communication, 67, 357–381. doi:10.1080/1057031030937477
39. Kerssen-Griep, J., & Witt, P. L., (2012). Instructional feedback II:How do instructor immediacy cues and facework tactics interact to predict student motivation and fairness perceptions? Communication Studies, 63, 498–517. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.632660
40. Kline, R. B., (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY:Guilford Press.
41. Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S., (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance:Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148–161. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.148
42. Lin, Y. G., McKeachie, W. J., & Kim, Y. C., (2001). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learning and individual differences, 13, 251–258. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00092-4
43. Mazer, J. P., (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 6, 99–125. doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.679244
44. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P., (1985). Power in the classroom V:Behavior alteration techniques, communication training and learning. Communication Education, 34, 214–226. doi:10.1080/03634528509378609
45. McCroskey, J. C., & Young, T. J., (1979). The use and abuse of factor analysis in communication research. Human Communication Research, 5, 375–382. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00651.x
46. McCroskey, L., Richmond, V., & McCroskey, J., (2002). The scholarship of teaching and learning:Contributions from the discipline of communication. Communication Education, 51, 383–391. doi:10.1080/03634520216521
47. Miserandino, M., (1996). Children who do well in school:Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 203–214. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.203
48. Moller, A. C., Deci, E. L., & Elliot, A. J., (2010). Person-level relatedness and the incremental value of relating. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 754–767. doi:10.1177/0146167210371622
49. Myers, S. A., & Rocca, K. A., (2001). Perceived instructor argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness in the college classroom:Effects on student perceptions of climate, apprehension, and state motivation. Western Journal of Communication, 65, 113–137. doi:10.1080/10570310109374696
50. Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M., (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom:Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133–144. doi:10.1177/1477878509104318
51. Nussbaum, J. F., (1992). Effective teacher behaviors. Communication Education, 41, 167–180. doi:10.1080/03634529209378878
52. Pintrich, P. R., (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
53. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J., (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024
54. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P., (1986). Power in the classroom VI:Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43–55. doi:10.1080/03634528609388318
55. Reeve, J., (2002). Self-determination theory applied to education settings. In E. L., Deci & R. M., Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–203). Rochester, NY:University of Rochester Press.
56. Reeve, J., & Jang, H., (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209–218. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209
57. Reeve, J., & Sickenius, B., (1994). Development and validation of a brief measure of the three psychological needs underlying intrinsic motivation:The AFS scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 506–515. doi:10.1177/0013164494054002025
58. Richmond, V. P., (1990). Communication in the classroom:Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181–195. doi:10.1080/03634529009378801
59. Rodríguez, J. I., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P., (1996). Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning:Affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education, 45, 293–305. doi:10.1080/03634529609379059
60. Ryan, R. M., (2012). The Oxford handbook of human motivation. New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
61. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P., (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization:Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
62. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L., (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
63. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L., (2000b). When rewards compete with nature:The undermining of intrinsic motivation and self-regulation. In C., Sansone & J. M., Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation:The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 14–54). San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
64. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L., (2002). An overview of self-determination theory:An organismic-dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–36). Rochester, NY:The University of Rochester Press.
65. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L., (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement. In K. R., Wentzel & A., Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation school (pp. 171–196). New York, NY:Routledge.
66. Trepanier, S. G., Fernet, C., & Austin, S., (2013). Workplace bullying and psychological health at work:The mediating role of satisfaction of needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Work & Stress, 27, 123–140. doi:10.1080/02678373.2013.782158
67. Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F., (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting:Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161–1176. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161
68. Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F., (1992). The academic motivation scale:A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017. doi:10.1177/0013164492052004025
69. Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L., (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory:Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41, 19–31. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
70. Waldeck, J. H., (2006). What does “personalized education” mean for faculty, and how should it serve our students? Communication Education, 55, 345–352. doi:10.1080/03634520600748649
71. Waldeck, J. H., (2007). Answering the question:Student perceptions of personalized education and the construct’s relationship to learning outcomes. Communication Education, 56, 409–432. doi:10.1080/03634520701400090
72. Waldeck, J. H., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G., (2001). Instructional and developmental communication theory and research in the 1990s:Extending the agenda for the 21st century. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 24 (pp. 207–230). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
73. Wanzer, M. B., & Frymier, A. B., (1999). The relationship between student perceptions of instructor humor and students’ reports of learning. Communication Education, 48, 48–62. doi:10.1080/03634529909379152
74. Weber, K., (2003). The relationship of interest to internal and external motivation. Communication Research Reports, 20, 376–383. doi:10.1080/08824090309388837
75. Wolf, M. M., (1978). Social validity:The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214. doi:10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203