The revised learning indicators scale

Communication Studies

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 1-12

  Frymier, Ann Bainbridge ^a   Houser, Marian L ^b  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85066217077     PISSN: 10510974     EISSN: 17451035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10510979909388466     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alvermann, D. E., Hynd, C. E., and Qian, G., 1995. Effects of interactive discussion and text type on learning counterintuitive science concepts. The Journal of Educational Research, 88: 146-154.
2. Andersen, J. F., 1979. “ Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teacher effectiveness ”. In Communication yearbook 3, Edited by: Nimmo, D., 543-559. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
3. Bloom, B. S., ed. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain, New York: David McKay.
4. Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., and Madaus, G. F., 1971. Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning, New York: McGraw Hill.
5. Brophy, J., 1987. “ On motivating students ”. In Talks to teachers, Edited by: Berliner, D. C., and Rosenshine, B. V., 201-245. New York: Random House.
6. Carrell, L.J., and Menzel, K. E., 1997. The impact of preparation and motivation on learning performance. Communication Education, 46: 262-272.
7. Carroll, J. B., 1963. A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64: 723-733.
8. Christensen, L. J., and Menzel, K. E., 1998. The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning. Communication Education, 47: 82-90.
9. Christophel, D. M., 1990. The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39: 323-340.
10. Comstock, J., Rowell, E., and Bowers, J. W., 1995. Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity. Communication Education, 44: 251-266.
11. Conger, J., and Kanungo, R., 1988. The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13: 471-482.
12. Frymier, A. B., 1994. A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42: 133-143.
13. Frymier, A. B., Shulman, G. M., and Houser, M., 1996. The development of a learning empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45: 181-199.
14. Gorham, J., 1988. The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37: 40-53.
15. Greenwood, C. R., 1991. Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57: 521-534.
16. Hill, W. F., 1997. Learning: A survey of psychological interpretations, 6th ed., New York: Longman.
17. Kelley, D. H., and Gorham, J., 1988. Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37: 198-207.
18. Keller, J. M., 1983. “ Motivational design of instruction ”. In Instructional design theories: An overview of their current status, Edited by: Reigeluth, C. M., 383-434. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Kraft, R. G., 1985. Group-inquiry turns passive students active. College Teaching, 33 (4): 149-154.
20. McCroskey, J. C., 1977. Classroom consequences of communication apprehension. Communication Education, 26: 27-33.
21. McCroskey, J. C., 1982. “ Oral communication apprehension: A reconceptualization ”. In Communication yearbook 6, Edited by: Burgoon, M., 136-170. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22. McCroskey, J. C., and Andersen, J. F., 1976. The relationship between communication apprehension and academic achievement among college students. Human Communication Research, 3: 73-81.
23. McCroskey, J. C., Booth-Butterfield, S., and Payne, S. K., 1989. The impact of communication apprehension on college student retention and success. Communication Quarterly, 37: 100-107.
24. McCroskey, J. C., Daly, J. A., and Sorensen, G., 1976. Personality correlates of communication apprehension. Human Communication Research, 2: 376-380.
25. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Plax, T. G., and Kearney, P., 1985. Power in the classroom V: Behavior alternation techniques, communication training and learning. Communication Education, 34: 214-226.
26. McGarity, J. R., Jr. and Butts, D. P., 1984. The relationship among teacher classroom management behavior, student engagement, and student achievement of middle and high school science students of varying aptitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21: 55-61.
27. Mottet, T. P., and Richmond, V. P., 1998. Newer is not necessarily better: A reexamination of affective learning measurement. Communication Research Reports, 15: 370-378.
28. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., and Richmond, V. P., 1986. Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35: 43-55.
29. Richmond, V. P., 1990. Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39: 181-195.
30. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J., and McCroskey, J. C., 1987. “ The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning ”. In Communication yearbook 10, Edited by: McLaughlin, M., 574-590. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31. Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 1998. Communication: Apprehension, avoidance, and effectiveness, 5th ed, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
32. Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., Kearney, P., and Plax, T. G., 1987. Power in the classroom VII: Linking behavior alternation techniques to cognitive learning. Communication Education, 36: 1-12.
33. Rosenshine, B. V., 1979. “ Content, time and direct instruction ”. In Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications, Edited by: Peterson, P., and Walberg, H., Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
34. Samuels, S. J., and Tenure, J. E., 1974. Attention and reading achievement in first grade boys and girls. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66: 29-32.
35. Scott, M. D., and Wheeless, L. R., 1977. Communication apprehension, students attitudes, and levels of satisfaction. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 41: 188-198.
36. Senge, P., 1990. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization, New York: Currency Doubleday.
37. Senge, P., Roberts, C., Ross, R., Smith, B., and Kleiner, A., 1994. The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and took for building a learning organization, New York: Currency Doubleday.
38. Thomas, K., and Velthouse, B., 1990. Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive”; model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy Of Management Review, 15: 666-681.
39. Wlodkowski, R. J., 1978. Motivating and teaching: A practical guide, Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.
40. Woolfolk, A. E., and McCune-Nicolich, L., 1984. Educational psychology for teachers, 2nd ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.