The Cognitive Learning Measure: A Three-Study Examination of Validity

Communication Methods and Measures

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 163-176

  Frisby, Brandi N ^a   Mansson, Daniel H ^b   Kaufmann, Renee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906350305     PISSN: 19312458     EISSN: 19312466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2014.903389     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 543-599). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
2. Anderson, L. W., & Anderson, J. (1982). Affective assessment is necessary and possible. Educational Leadership, 39, 524.
3. Andrew, J., & Taylor, C. (2012). Follow-up evaluation of a course to develop effective communication and relationship skills for palliative care. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 18, 457-463.
4. Aylor, B., & Oppliger, P. (2003). Out-of-class communication and student perceptions of instructor humor orientation and socio-communicative style. Communication Education, 52, 122-134. doi:10.1080/03634520302469
5. Baker, D. W., DeWalt, D. A., Schillinger, D., Hawk, V., Ruo, B., Bibbins-Domingo, K., Pignone, M. (2011). "Teach to goal": Theory and design principles of an intervention to improve heart failure self-management skills of patients with low health literacy. Journal of Health Communication, 16, 73-88. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.604379
6. Baucom, D. H., Atkins, D. C., Hahlweg, K., Engi, J., & Thurrnaier, F. (2006). Long-term prediction of marital quality following a relationship education program: Being positive in a constructive way. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 448-455. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.448
7. Blankenstein, F., Dolmans, D. M., Vleuten, C., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Which cognitive processes support learning during small-group discussion? The role of providing explanations and listening to others. Instructional Science, 39, 189-204. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9124-7
8. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: MaKay.
9. Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2010). Transformational leadership in the classroom: The development and validation of the student intellectual stimulation scale. Communication Reports, 23, 91-105. doi:10.1080/08934215.2010.511399
10. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). The relationship between students' reports of learning and their actual recall of lecture. Communication Education, 49, 297-301. doi:10.1080/03634520009379217
12. Clark, R. A. (2002) Learning outcomes: The bottom line. Communication Education, 51, 396- 404.
13. Collins, S. J., & Bissell, K. L. (2002). Student self-efficacy in a media writing course. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 56, 19-36. doi:10.1177/107769580205600403
14. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1995). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302. doi:10.1037/h0040957
15. DeVellis, R.F. (2011). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Dobransky, N. D., & Frymier, A. B. (2004). Developing teacher-student relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52, 211-223. doi:10.1080/01463370409370193
17. Ellis, K. (2004). The impact of perceived teacher confirmation on receiver apprehension, motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 53, 1-20. doi:10.1080/0363452032000135742
18. Fassinger, P. A. (1995). Understanding classroom interaction: Students' and professors' contributions to student silence. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 82-96.
19. Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M (2010). Instructor-student and student-student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59, 146-164. doi:10.1080/03634520903564362
20. Frisby, B. N., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The relationships among perceived instructor rapport, student participation, and student learning outcomes. Texas Speech Communication Journal, 33, 27-34.
21. Frisby, B. N., Weber, K. D., & Lash, B. (in press). Participation requirements: An instructor strategy to influence student interest and learning. Communication Quarterly.
22. Frymier, A. B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133-144. doi:10.1080/01463379409369922
23. Frymier, A. B. (2005). Students' classroom communication effectiveness. Communication Quarterly, 53, 197-212. doi:10.1080/01463370500089896
24. Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (1999). The revised learning indicators scale. Communication Studies, 50, 1-12. doi:10.1080/10510979909388466
25. Frymier, A., Shulman, G. M., & Houser, M. (1996). The development of a learner empowerment measure. Communication Education, 45, 181-199. doi:10.1080/03634529609379048
26. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: Tutorial and practical example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 91-109.
27. Goodboy, A. K., Martin, M. M., & Bolkan, S. (2009). The development and validation of the student communication satisfaction scale. Communication Education, 58, 372-396. doi:10.1080/03634520902755441
28. Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The effect of teacher communication and students communication on learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57, 153-179. doi:10.1080/03634520701787777
29. Hess, J. A., Smythe, M. J., & Communication 451. (2001). Is teacher immediacy actually related to student cognitive learning? Communication Studies, 52, 197-219.
30. Houser, M. L., & Frymier, A. (2009). The role of student characteristics and teacher behaviors in students' learner empowerment. Communication Education, 58, 35-53. doi:10.1080/03634520802237383
31. Hsu, C-F. (2012). The influence of vocal qualities and conformation on nonnative English speaking teachers on student receiver apprehension, affective learning, and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 61, 4-14. doi:10.1080/0363523.2011.615410
32. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
33. Johnson, D. I. (2009). Connected classroom climate: A validity study. Communication Research Reports, 26, 146-157. doi:10.1080/08824090902861622
34. Johnson, D. I., & Mrowka, K. (2010). Generative learning, quizzing and cognitive learning: An experimental study in the communication classroom. Communication Education, 59, 107-123. doi:10.1080/03634520903524739
35. Jones, A. C. (2008). The effects of out-of-class support on student satisfaction and motivation to learn. Communication Education, 57, 373-388. doi:10.1080/03634520801968830
36. King, P., & Witt, P. (2009). Teacher immediacy, confidence testing, and the measurement of cognitive learning. Communication Education, 58, 110-123. doi:10.1080/03634520802511233
37. Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38. Knapp, J. L., & Martin, M. M. (2002, April). Out-of-class communication: The development and testing of a measure. Paper presented at the Eastern Communication Association Convention, New York, NY.
39. Konetes, G. D. (2011). Distance education's impact during economic hardship: How distance learning impacts educational institutions and businesses in times of economic hardship. International Journal of Instructional Media, 38, 7-15.
40. Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 135-148.
41. Levine, T. R. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis and scale validation in communication research. Communication Research Reports, 22, 335-338. doi:10.1080/00036810500317730
42. Levine, T., Hullett, C. R., Turner, M., & Lapinski, M. (2006). The desirability of using confirmatory factor analysis on published scales. Communication Research Reports, 23, 309-314. doi:10.1080/08824090600962698
43. Mansson, D. H., & Myers, S. A. (2009). A reexamination of Swedish and American college students' communicative attributes. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 3(8), 9-22. doi:10.1080=17475750903381622
44. Martin, M. M., Mottet, T. P., & Myers, S. A. (2000). Students' motives for communicating with their instructors and affective and cognitive learning. Psychological Reports, 87, 830-834. doi:PMid:11191397
45. Martin, M. M., & Myers, S. A. (2006). Students' communication traits and their out-of-class communication with their instructors. Communication Research Reports, 23, 283-289. doi:10.1080/08824090600962599
46. Martin, M. M., Myers, S. A., & Mottet, T. P. (1999). Students' motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 48, 155-164. doi:10.1080/03634529909379163
47. McCroskey, J. C. (1994). Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication. In S. Morreale & M. Brooks (Eds.), 1994 SCA summer conference proceedings and prepared remarks: Assessing college student competence in speech communication. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
48. McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1992). Increasing teacher influence through immediacy. In V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Mcdougall, D., & Granby, C. (1996). How expectation of questioning method affects undergraduates' preparation for class. Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 43-54. doi:10.1080/00220973.1996.9943462
50. Menzel, K. E., & Carrell, L. J. (1999). The impact of gender and immediacy on willingness to talk and perceived learning. Communication Education, 48, 32-40. doi:10.1080/2F03634529909379150
51. Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30-38. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30
52. Myers, S. A. (2004). The relationship between perceived instructor credibility and college student in-class and out-of-class communication. Communication Reports, 17, 129- 137. doi:10.1080/08934210409389382
53. Myers, S. A., Martin, M. M., & Knapp, J. L. (2005). Perceived instructor in-class communicative behaviors as a predictor of student participation in out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 53, 437-450. doi:10.1080/01463370500102046
54. Myers, S. A., & Rocca, K. A. (2007). The relationship between college student class participation and perceived instructor communicator style. Journal of the Speech and Theatre Association of Missouri, 37, 114-127.
55. Nunn, C. E. (1996). Discussion in the college classroom: Triangulating observational and survey results. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 243-266. doi:10.2307/2F2943844
56. Peterson, R. (2001). Course participation: An active learning approach employing student documentation. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 187-195. doi:10.1177/2F0273475301233004
57. Petress, K. (2006). An operational definition of class participation. College Student Journal, 40, 821-823.
58. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-55. doi:10.1080/03634528609388318
59. Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1987). Power in the classroom VII: linking behavior alteration techniques to cognitive learning. Communication Education, 36, 1-12.
60. Rodriguez, J. I., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1996). Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education, 45, 293-305.
61. Sellnow, T. L., & Sellnow, D. D. (2010). The instructional dynamic of risk and crisis communication: Distinguishing instructional messages from dialogue. Review of Communication, 10, 112-126.
62. Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1996). Students' out-of-class experiences and the influence of learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Students Development, 37, 149-161.
63. Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59, 1-18. doi:10.1080/03634520903367238
64. Weber, K. (2003). The relationship of interest to internal and external motivation. Communication Research Reports, 20, 376-383. doi:10.1080/08824090309388837
65. Weber, K., Corrigan, M., Fornash, B., & Neupauer, N. C. (2003). The effect of interest on recall: An experiment. Communication Research Reports, 20, 116-123. doi:10.1080/08824090309388807
66. Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Cayanus, J. L. (2005). Student interest: A two-study re- examination of the concept. Communication Quarterly, 53, 71-86. doi:10.1080/01463370500055996
67. Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Myers, S. A. (2011). The development and testing of the Instructional Beliefs Model. Communication Education, 60, 51-74. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.491122
68. Weber, K., Martin, M. M., & Patterson, B. R. (2001). Teacher behavior, student interest, and affective learning: Putting theory to practice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 71-90. doi:10.1080/00909880128101
69. Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71, 184- 207. doi:10.1080/036452042000228054
70. Zhang, Q., & Oetzel, J. G. (2006). A cross-cultural test of immediacy-learning models in the Chinese classroom. Communication Education, 55, 313-330. doi:10.1080/03634520600748599