Answering the question: Student perceptions of personalized education and the construct's relationship to learning outcomes

Communication Education

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 409-432

  Waldeck, Jennifer H ^a  

^a CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affective learning; Cognitive learning; Extra class communication; Mentoring; Personalized education; Teacher immediacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548319227     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: 14795795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520701400090     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Allen, T. H., & Plax, T. G. (2002). Exploring consequences of communication in the classroom: Unraveling relational learning. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), New directions in group communication (pp. 219-234). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Andersen, J. R (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. Communication Yearbook, 3, 543-559.
3. Apple, W. P. F. (2006, November). Integration of multiple ontologies for personalized learning. Paper presented to the International Association of Science and Technology Conference on Web-Based Education, Puerto Vallerta, Mexico.
4. Biddle, B. J., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). Small class size and its effects. Educational Leadership, 59, 12-23.
5. Bippus, A. M., Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., & Brooks, C. F. (2003). Teacher access and mentoring abilities: Predicting the outcome value of extra class communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 260-275.
6. Black, S. (2003). Keeping kids from dropping out. The Education Digest, 68, 37-41.
7. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). A taxonomy of educational objectives: The cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
8. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning.
9. Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). The relationship between students' reports of learning and their actual recall of lecture material: A validity test. Communication Education, 49, 297-301.
10. Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
11. Del Corso, D., Ovcin, E., & Morrone, G. (2005). A teacher-friendly environment to foster learner-centered customization in the development of interactive educational packages. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48, 574-579.
12. Dunn, R., & Griggs, S. A. (Eds.). (2000). Practical approaches to using learning styles in higher education. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
13. Evans, A., Ali, S., Singleton, C., Nolan, P., & Bahrami, J. (2002). The effectiveness of personal education plans in continuing professional development: An evaluation. Medical Teacher, 24, 79-84.
14. Frymier, A. B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133-144.
15. Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (1999). The revised learning indicators scale. Communication Studies, 50, 1-12.
16. Fusani, D. S. (1994). Extra-class" communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student-faculty interaction outside of the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 232-255.
17. Health and Education Research Operative Services. (2003). Class size research. Retrieved February 28, 2007, from http://www.heros-inc.org/ classsizeresearch.htm
18. Jenkins, J. M., & Keefe, J. W. (2002). Two schools: Two approaches to pTwo schools: Two approaches to personalized education. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 449-456.
19. Johnson, J. (2002). Do communities want smaller schools? A public agenda survey. Educational Leadership, 59, 42-45.
20. Katz, J., & Henry, M. (1988). Turning professors into teachers: A new approach to faculty development and student learning. New York: Macmillan.
21. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Hays, E. R., & Ivey, M. J. (1991). College teacher misbehaviors: What students don't like about what teachers say and do. Communication Quarterly, 39, 309-324.
22. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., & Wendt-Wasco, N. J. (1985). Teacher immediacy for affective learning in divergent college classes. Communication Quarterly, 33, 61-74.
23. Keefe, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (2000). Personalized instruction: Changing classroom practice. West Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
24. Kram, K. E. (1988). Mentoring at work Developmental relationships in organizational life. Lanham, MD: University Press.
25. Krathwohl, D. R. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals handbook 2: Affective domain. New York: Longman.
26. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
27. McElroy, E. J. (2007). Where we stand: We have a great opportunity ahead of us. American Teacher, 91, 11.
28. Meyer, G. M. (2002). Encouraging female undergraduate students: What can a science department do? Journal of College Science Teaching, 32, 98-101.
29. Mottet, T. P., & Beebe, S. A. (2006). The relationships between student responsive behaviors, student socio-communicative style, and instructors' subjective and objective assessments of student work. Communication Education, 55, 295-312.
30. Ragins, B. R., & McFarlin, D. B. (1990). Perceptions of mentor roles in cross-gender mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37, 321-339.
31. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. Communication Yearbook, 10, 574-590.
32. Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1987). Power in the classroom VII: Linking behavior alternation techniques to cognitive learning. Communication Education, 36, 1-12.
33. Rodriguez, J. I., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1996). Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator. Communication Education, 45, 293-305.
34. Shore, R. (1995). How one high school improved school climate. Educational Leadership, 52, 76-78.
35. Townley, C. T. (2003). Will the academy learn to manage knowledge? [Electronic version]. Educause Quarterly, 26, 8-11.
36. Tschirhart, M., & Wise, L. R. (2002). Responding to a diverse class: insights from seeing a course as an organization. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 8, 165-177.
37. Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation me: Why today's young Americans are more confident, assertive, and entitled-and more miserable than ever before. New York: Free Press.
38. Waldeck, J. H. (2006). Raising the question #3: What does "personalized education" mean for faculty, and how should it serve our students? Communication Education, 55, 345-352.
39. Waldeck, J. H., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (2001). Instructional and developmental communication theory and research in the 1990s: Extending the agenda for the 21st century. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook 24 (pp. 207-229). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Waldeck, J. H., Orrego, V. O., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1997). Graduate student/faculty mentoring: Who gets mentored, how it happens, and to what end. Communication Quarterly, 45, 93-109.
41. Weaver, R. (2006). A positive agenda for ESEA. Educational Leadership, 64, 32-36.
42. Witt, P. L, & Wheeless, L. R. (2001). An experimental study of teachers' verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students' affective and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50, 327-342.