The development of a learner empowerment measure

Communication Education

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 1996, Pages

  Frymier, Ann Bainbridge ^a   Shulman, Gary M ^a   Houser, Marian ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039056066     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abramson, L., Seligman, M., & Teasdale, J. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critiques and reformations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 19-74.
2. Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teacher effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3, (pp. 543-559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
3. Block, P. (1987). The empowered manager: Positive political skills at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Brophy, J. (1987). On motivating students. In D. C. Berliner & B. V. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers (pp. 201-245). New York: Random House.
5. Chiu, L. H. (1988). Measures of self-esteem for school-age children. Journal of Counseling and Development, 66, 298-301.
6. Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
7. Conger, J., & Kanungo, R. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471-482.
8. Coopersmith, S. (1981). Self-esteem inventories. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
9. Deming, W. E. (1982). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
10. French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases for social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
11. Frymier, A. B. (1993a). The impact of teacher immediacy on students' motivation: Is it the same for all students? Communication Quarterly, 41, 454-464.
12. Frymier, A. B. (1993b). The relationships among communication apprehension, immediacy and motivation to study. Communication Reports, 6, 8-17.
13. Frymier, A. B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133-143.
14. Frymier, A. B., & Shulman, G. M. (1995). "What's in it for me?": Increasing content relevance to enhance students' motivation. Communication Education, 44, 40-50.
15. Frymier, A. B., & Thompson, C. A. (1992). Perceived teacher affinity-seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility. Communication Education, 41, 388-399.
16. Frymier, A. B., & Thompson, C. A. (1995). Using student reports to measure immediacy: Is it a valid methodology? Communication Research Reports, 12, 85-93.
17. Glasser, W. (1990). The quality school: Managing students without coercion. New York: Harper & Row.
18. Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40-53.
19. Hubbard, D. (1993). Editor's preface. In D. Hubbard (Ed.), Continuous quality improvement: Making the transition to education (pp. ix-xiii). Maryville, MO: Prescott Publishing.
20. Kanungo, R. (1982). Work alienation. New York: Praeger.
21. Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories: An overview of the current status (pp. 383-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.
23. Kelley, D. H., & Gorham, J. (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37, 198-207.
24. Liu, X., Kaplan, H. B., & Risser, W. (1992). Decomposing the reciprocal relationship between academic achievement and general self-esteem. Youth and Society, 24, 123-148.
25. Luechauer, D., & Shulman, G. M. (1992a). Moving from bureaucracy to empowerment: Shifting paradigms to practice what we preach in class. In T. Head & T. Keaveny (Eds.), Conference proceedings (pp. 109-115). St. Charles, IL: Midwest Academy of Management.
26. Luechauer, D., & Shulman, G. M. (1992b). Practicing what we teach. At work: Stories of tomorrow's workplace, 1(2), 17-18.
27. Luechauer, D., & Shulman, G. M. (1993). Empowerment at work: Separating folklore from fact. At work: Stories of tomorrow's workplace, 2(6), 13-14.
28. Luechauer, D., & Shulman, G. M. (in press) Training transformational leaders: A call for practicing empowerment in the classroom. International Journal of Public Administration.
29. McClelland, D. (1975). Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington.
30. Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
31. Newby, T. J. (1991). Classroom motivation: Strategies of first-year teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 195-200.
32. Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181-195.
33. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10(pp. 574-590). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34. Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (Eds.). (1992). Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Robinson, R. Y., & Richmond, V. P. (1995). Validity of the verbal immediacy scale. Communication Research Reports, 12, 80-84.
36. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37. Rotter, J. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1-28.
38. Schultz, S., & Shulman, G. (1993, April). The development and assessment of the job empowerment instrument (JEI). Paper presented at the Joint Central States Communication Association and Southern States Communication Association annual convention, Lexington, KY.
39. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.
40. Senge, P., Roberts, C., Ross, R., Smith, B., & Kleiner, A. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.
41. Shulman, G., & Luechauer, D. (1993). The empowering educator: A CQI approach to classroom leadership. In D. Hubbard (Ed.), Continuous quality improvement: Making the transition to education (pp. 424-453). Maryville, MO: Prescott Publishing.
42. Shulman, G., Luechauer, D., & Shulman, C. (1996). Assessment for learner empowerment: The meta-cognitive map. In T. Banta, J. Lund, K. Black, & F. Oblander (Eds.), Assessment in practice: Putting principles to work on college campuses (pp. 288-291). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43. Shulman, G., McCormack, A., Luechauer, D., & Shulman, C. (1993). Using the journal assignment to create empowered learners: An application of writing across the curriculum. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 4, 89-104.
44. Thomas, K., & Velthouse, B. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666-681.
45. Warr, P., Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1979). Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 129-148.