Sucrose and Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A relationship most sweet

FEMS Yeast Research

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Marques, Wesley Leoricy ^a,b   Raghavendran, Vijayendran ^b   Stambuk, Boris Ugarte ^c   Gombert, Andreas Karoly ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Metabolic engineering; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Sucrose; Sugar metabolism; Sugarcane; Yeast biotechnology; Yeast physiology

Indexed keywords

SUCROSE; ALCOHOL;

CARBON SOURCE; CATABOLISM; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; FERMENTATION; FUNGUS GROWTH; HUMAN; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; NONHUMAN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SHORT SURVEY; SUCROSE METABOLISM; SUGAR BEET; SUGAR INTAKE; SUGARCANE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; BRAZIL; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; BRAZIL; ETHANOL; HUMANS; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SUCROSE;

EID: 84959902853     PISSN: 15671356     EISSN: 15671364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/fov107     Document Type: Short Survey

References (225)

1. Abbott D, Suir E, Van Maris AJ et al. Physiological and transcriptional responses to high concentrations of lactic acid in anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microb 2008;74:5759-68.
2. Abbott DA, Zelle RM, Pronk JT et al. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of carboxylic acids: current status and challenges. FEMS Yeast Res 2009;9:1123-36.
3. Achard FK. Procédé d'extraction du sucre de bette. Ann Chim France 1799;32:163-8.
4. Amorim HV, LopesML, De Castro Oliveira JV et al. Scientific challenges of bioethanol production in Brazil. Appl Microbiol Biot 2011;91:1267-75.
5. ARD (Agriculture and Rural Development). Prospects for Agricultural Markets and Income in the EU 2012-2020. European Commission, 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/marketsand- prices/medium-term-outlook/2012/fullrep en.pdf (14 December 2015, date last accessed).
6. ARD (Agriculture and Rural Development). Sugar. European Commission, 2015. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sugar/ (14 December 2015, date last accessed).
7. Ayre BG. Membrane-transport systems for sucrose in relation to whole-plant carbon partitioning. Mol Plant 2011;4:377-94.
8. Babrzadeh F, Jalili R, Wang C et al. Whole-genome sequencing of the efficient industrial fuel-ethanol fermentative Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain CAT-1. Mol Genet Genomics 2012;287:485-94.
9. Badotti F, Batista AS, Stambuk BU. Sucrose active transport and fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Braz Arch Biol Techn 2006;49:115-23.
10. Badotti F, Dário MG, Alves Junior SI et al. Switching the mode of sucrose utilization by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact 2008;7:1-11.
11. Bakker BM, Overkamp KM, van Maris AJ et al. Stoichiometry and compartmentation of NADH metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2001;25:15-37.
12. Bamforth CW. Wort composition and beer quality. In: Smart K (ed.). Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance, Vol. 2, Oxford:Blackwell Science. 2003, 77-85.
13. Basso LC, Basso TO, Rocha SN. Ethanol production in Brazil:the industrial process and its impact on yeast fermentation. Bernardes MAS (ed.). Biofuel Production-Recent Developments and Prospects. Rijeka: Intech. 2011, 85-100.
14. Basso LC, De Amorim HV, De Oliveira AJ et al. Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res 2008; 8:1155-63.
15. Basso TO. Melhoramento da fermentação alcoólica em Saccharomyces cerevisiae por engenharia evolutiva. Ph.D. Thesis. University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2011.
16. Basso TO, Dario MG, Tonso A et al. Insufficient uracil supply in fully aerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae leads to respiro-fermentative metabolism and double nutrient-limitation. Biotechnol Lett 2010;32:973-7.
17. Basso TO, de Kok S, Dario M et al. Engineering topology and kinetics of sucrose metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved ethanol yield. Metab Eng 2011;13:694-703.
18. Batista AS, Miletti LC, Stambuk BU. Sucrose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacking hexose transport. J Mol Microb Biotech 2004;8:26-33.
19. Bekatorou A, Psarianos C, Koutinas AA. Food Grade Yeasts, Food Technol Biotech 2006;44:407-15.
20. Belinchón MM, Gancedo JM. Different signalling pathways mediate glucose induction of SUC2, HXT1 and pyruvate decarboxylase in yeast. FEMS Yeast Res 2007;7:40-47
21. Bendrioua L, SmedhM, Almquist J et al. Yeast AMP-activated protein kinase monitors glucose concentration changes and absolute glucose levels. J Biol Chem 2014;289:12863-75.
22. Berthelot M. Invertase. Compt Rend Acad Sci 1860;50:980-4.
23. Bowles JM, LachanceMA. Patterns of variation in the yeast florae of exudates in an oak community. Can J Bot 1983;61:2984-95.
24. Bozdag GO, Greig D. The gadcasdenetics of a putative social trait in natural populations of yeast. Mol Ecol 2014;23:5061-71.
25. Bozell JJ, Petersen GR. Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates - the US Department of Energy's "Top 10" revisited. Green Chem 2010;12:539-54
26. Brazilian Sugarcane Industry Association. 2015a. http://www. unicadata.com.br/historico-de-producao-e-moagem.php? idMn=32&tipoHistorico=4&acao=visualizar&idTabela= 1617&safra=2013%2F2014&estado=RS%2CSC%2CPR% 2CSP%2CRJ%2CMG%2CES%2CMS%2CMT%2CGO%2CDF% 2CBA%2CSE%2CAL%2CPE%2CPB%2CRN%2CCE%2CPI%2CMA %2CTO%2CPA%2CAP%2CRO%2CAM%2CAC%2CRRp. (27 June 2015, date last accessed).
27. Brazilian Sugarcane Industry Association. Moagem no Centro-Sul atinge 39,38 milhões de toneladas de cana na primeira quinzena de junho. 2015b. http://www.unicadata.com.br/listagem.php? idMn=76 (27 July 2015, date last accessed).
28. Bro C, Knudsen S, Regenberg B et al. Improvement of galactose uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through overexpression of phosphoglucomutase: example of transcript analysis as a tool in inverse metabolic engineering. Appl Environ Microb 2005;71:6465-72.
29. Brown AJ. Enzyme action. J Chem Soc Trans 1902;81:373-88.
30. Brown CA, Murray AW, Verstrepen KJ. Rapid expansion and functional divergence of subtelomeric gene families in yeasts. Curr Biol 2010;20:895-903.
31. Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C et al. The carbohydrateactive enZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:D233-8.
32. Carlson M, Botstein D. Two differentially regulated mRNAs with different 5' ends encode secreted and intracellular forms of yeast invertase. Cell 1982;28:145-54.
33. Carlson M, Botstein D. Organization of the SUC Gene Family in Saccharomyces. Mol Cell Biol 1983;3:351-9.
34. CarlsonM, Osmond BC, Botstein D. Mutants of yeast defective in sucrose utilization. Genetics 1981;98:25-40.
35. Cavalieri D, McGovern PE, Hartl DL et al. Evidence for S. cerevisiae fermentation in ancient wine. J Mol Evol 2003;57 (Suppl 1):S226-32.
36. CEFS. CEFS Sugarstatistics2013. Comite Europeen Des Fabricants De Sucre, 2013. http://www.comitesucre.org/site/wp-content/ uploads/2014/04/CEFS-Sugar-Statisitics-Inquiry-2013-FINALDRAFTv4. pdf (16 December 2015).
37. Celenza JL, Carlson M. Cloning and genetic mapping of SNF1, a gene required for expression of glucose-repressible genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1984;4:49-53.
38. Celenza JL, Eng FJ, Carlson M. Molecular analysis of the SNF4 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: evidence for physical association of the SNF4 protein with the SNF1 protein kinase. Mol Cell Biol 1989;9:5045-54.
39. Celiker H, Gore J. Competition between species can stabilize public-goods cooperation within a species. Mol Syst Biol 2012;8:621.
40. Cheng Q, Michels CA. MAL11 and MAL61 encode the inducible high-affinity maltose transporter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 1991;173:1817-20.
41. Chow TH, Sollitti P, Marmur J. Structure of the multigene family of MAL loci in Saccharomyces. Mol Gen Genet 1989; 217:60-69.
42. Codón AC, Benítez T, Korhola M. Chromosomal polymorphism and adaptation to specific industrial environments of Saccharomyces strains. Appl Microbiol Biot 1998;49:154-63
43. Cromie GA, Hyma KE, Ludlow CL, et al. Genomic sequence diversity and population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae assessed by RAD-seq. G3 2013;3:2163-71.
44. Cuskin F, Lowe EC, Temple MJ et al. Human gut Bacteroidetes can utilize yeast mannan through a selfish mechanism. Nature 2015;517:165-86
45. Dai L, Korolev KS, Gore J. Slower recovery in space before collapse of connected populations. Nature 2013;496:355-8.
46. Dai L, Vorselen D, Korolev KS et al. Generic indicators for loss of resilience before a tipping point leading to population collapse. Science 2012;336:1175-7.
47. Damore J, Gore J. Understanding microbial cooperation. J Theor Biol 2012;299:31-41.
48. De Bari I, Cuna D, Di Matteo V, et al. Bioethanol production from steam-pretreated corn stover through an isomerase mediated process. N Biotechnol 2014;31:185-95.
49. De Deken RH. The Crabtree effect: a regulatory system in yeast. J Gen Microbiol 1966;44:149-56.
50. de Kock SH, du Preez JC, Kilian SG. Anomalies in the growth kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in aerobic chemostat cultures. J Ind Microbiol Biot 2000;24:231-6.
51. De Kok S, Yilmaz D, Daran J-M et al. In vivo analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasma membrane ATPase Pma1p isoforms with increased in vitro H(+)/ATP stoichiometry. Anton Leeuw 2012;102:401-6.
52. De Kok S, Yilmaz D, Suir E et al. Increasing free-energy (ATP) conservation in maltose-grown Saccharomyces cerevisiae by expression of a heterologous maltose phosphorylase. Metab Eng 2011;13:518-26.
53. Demain AL, Phaff HJ, Kurtzman CP. The industrial and agricultural significance of yeasts. In: Kurtzman C, Fell JW, Boekhout T (eds) The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study, Vol. 1. London, UK:Elsevier, 2011, 21-44.
54. Deng X, Petitjean M, Teste MA et al. Similarities and differences in the biochemical and enzymological properties of the four isomaltases from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Open Biol 2014;4:200-12
55. Deryabin AN, Berdichevets IN, Burakhanova EA et al. Characteristics of extracellular invertase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in heterologous expression of the suc2 gene in Solanum tuberosum plants. Biol Bull 2014;41:24-30
56. Diderich JA, Schepper M, van Hoek P et al. Glucose uptake kinetics and transcription of HXT genes in chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 1999;274:15350-9.
57. Duval EH, Alves Junior SL, Dunn B et al. Microarray karyotyping of maltose fermenting Saccharomyces yeasts with differing maltotriose utilization profiles reveals copy number variation in genes involved in maltose and maltotriose utilization. J Appl Microbiol 2010;109:248-59.
58. Dynesen J, Smits HP, Olsson L et al. Carbon catabolite repression of invertase during batch cultivations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae:the role of glucose, fructose, and mannose. Appl Microbiol Biot 1998;50:579-82.
59. Egger B, Einig W, Schlereth A et al. Carbohydrate metabolism in one- and two-year-old spruce needles, and stem carbohydrates from three months before until three months after bud break. Physiol Plant 1996;96:91-100.
60. Elbing K, Ståhlberg A, Hohmann S et al. Transcriptional responses to glucose at different glycolytic rates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur J Biochem 2004;271:4855-64.
61. Esmon PC, Esmon BE, Schauer IE et al. Structure, assembly, and secretion of octameric invertase. J Biol Chem 1987;262:4387-94
62. FAO. Statistical Data. 2015a. http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E. Search for: item "sugar beet" area "world" from year to year "2013". (27 July 2015, date last accessed).
63. FAO. Statistical Data. 2015b. http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E. Search for: item"sugar cane" area"world" from year to year "2013". (27 July 2015, date last accessed).
64. Fay JC, Benavides JA. Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2005;1:e5.
65. Fiechter A, Gmünder FK. Metabolic control of glucose degradation in yeast and tumor cells. Adv Biochem Eng Biot 1989;39:1-28.
66. Fleet GH, Heard GM. Yeasts-growth during fermentation. In:Fleet GH (ed.). Wine Microbiology and Biotechnology. Chur:Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH, 1993, 27-54.
67. Förster J, Famili I, Fu P et al. Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Genome Res 2003;13:244-53
68. Frey PA. The Leloir pathway: a mechanistic imperative for three enzymes to change the stereochemical configuration of a single carbon in galactose. FASEB J 1996;10:461-70.
69. Gancedo JM. Carbon catabolite repression in yeast. Eur J Biochem 1992;206:297-313.
70. Gancedo JM. Yeast carbon catabolite repression. Microbiol Mol Biol R 1998;62:334-61.
71. Gancedo JM. The early steps of glucose signalling in yeast. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2008;32:673-704.
72. Gascón S, Lampen JO. Purification of the internal invertase of yeast. J Biol Chem 1968;243:1567-72.
73. Gascón S, Neumann NP, Lampen JO. Comparative study of the properties of the purified internal and external invertases from yeast. J Biol Chem 1968;243:1573-7.
74. Geigenberger P, Stitt M. Sucrose synthase catalyses a readily reversible reaction in vivo in developing potato tubers and other plant tissues. Planta 1993;189:329-39.
75. Geng F, Laurent BC. Roles of SWI/SNF and HATs throughout the dynamic transcription of a yeast glucose-repressible gene. EMBO J 2004;23:127-37.
76. Gerke JP, Chen CTL, Cohen BA. Natural isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae display complex genetic variation in sporulation efficiency. Genetics 2006;174:985-97.
77. Goddard MR, Greig D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a nomadic yeast with no niche? FEMS Yeast Res 2015;15:fov009.
78. Goedl C, Sawangwan T, Wildberger P et al. Sucrose phosphorylase:a powerful transglucosylation catalyst for synthesis of α-D-glucosides as industrial fine chemicals. Biocatal Biotransfor 2010;28:10-21.
79. Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science 1996;274:563-7.
80. Gombert AK, van Maris AJ. Improving conversion yield of fermentable sugars into fuel ethanol in 1st generation yeastbased production processes. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2015;33:81-86.
81. Gómez-Pastor R, Pérez-Torrado R, Garre E, et al. Recent advances in yeast biomass production. In: Matovic D (ed.). Biomass-Detection, Production and Usage. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 2011, 201-22.
82. Gore J, Youk H, van Oudenaarden A. Snowdrift game dynamics and facultative cheating in yeast. Nature 2009;459:253-6.
83. Greig D, Travisano M. The Prisoner's Dilemma and polymorphism in yeast SUC genes. Proc Biol Sci 2004;271 (Suppl):S25-6.
84. Grossmann MK, Zimmermann FK. The structural genes of internal invertases on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 1979;175:223-9.
85. Hagman A, Säll T, Compagno C et al. Yeast 'make-accumulateconsume' life strategy evolved as a multi-step process that predates the whole genome duplication. PLoS One 2013;8:e68734.
86. Han EK, Cotty F, Sottas C et al. Characterization of AGT1 encoding a general α-glucoside transporter from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 1995;17:1093-107.
87. Hawker JS, Smith GM. Occurrence of sucrose phosphatase in vascular and non-vascular plants. Phytochemistry 1984;23:245-9.
88. Hawthorne DC. Chromosome mapping in Saccharomyces. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Washington, Seattle, EUA. 1955.
89. Hensing MC, Rouwenhorst RJ, Heijnen JJ et al. Physiological and technological aspects of large-scale heterologous-protein production with yeasts. Anton Leeuw 1995;67:261-79.
90. Hoffmann CM. Sucrose accumulation in sugar beet under drought stress. J Agron Crop Sci 2010;196:243-52.
91. Hohmann S, Gozalbo D. Structural analysis of the 5' regions of yeast SUC genes revealed analogous palindromes in SUC, MAL and GALMol Genet Genomics 1988;211:446-54.
92. Hohmann S, Zimmermann FK. Cloning and expression on amulticopy vector of five invertase genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 1986;11:217-25.
93. Jansen M, Van De Graaf MJ, Verwaal R. Dicarboxylic acid production process. US Patent 20120040422. 2012.
94. Johnson KA, Goody RS. The original Michaelis constant: translation of the 1913 Michaelis-Menten paper. Biochemistry-US 2011;50:8264-9.
95. Khmelenina VN, Sakharovskii VG, Reshetnikov AS et al. Synthesis of osmoprotectors by halophilic and alkalophilic methanotrophs. Mikrobiologia 2000;69:465-70.
96. Kim JH, Roy A, Jouandot D et al. The glucose signaling network in yeast. Biochim Biophys Acta 2013;11:5204-10.
97. Kolman MA, Nishi CN, Perez-Cenci M et al. Sucrose in cyanobacteria:from a salt-response molecule to play a key role in nitrogen fixation. Life 2015;5:102-26
98. Korshunova IV, Naumova ES, Naumov GI. Comparative molecular genetic analysis of the beta-fructosidases in yeast Saccharomyces. Mol Biol 2005;39:413-9.
99. Koschwanez JH, Foster KR, Murray AW. Sucrose utilization in budding yeast as a model for the origin of undifferentiated multicellularity. PLoS Biol 2011;9:e1001122.
100. Koschwanez JH, Foster KR, Murray AW. Improved use of a public good selects for the evolution of undifferentiatedmulticellularity. Elife 2013;2013:1-27.
101. Kowallik M, Miller E, Greig D. The interaction of Saccharomyces paradoxus with its natural competitors on oak bark. Mol Ecol 2015;24:1596-610.
102. Kühn C, Barker L, Bürkle L et al. Update on sucrose transport in higher plants. J Exp Bot 1999;50:935-53.
103. Lafraya Á, Sanz-Aparicio J, Polaina J et al. Fructo-oligosaccharide synthesis by mutant versions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae invertase. Appl Environ Microb 2011;77:6148-57.
104. Lang A. A model of mass flow in the phloem. Aust J Plant Physiol 1978;5:535-46.
105. Laurent BC, Treitel MA, Carlson M. Functional interdependence of the yeast SNF2, SNF5, and SNF6 proteins in transcriptional activation. P Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:2687-91.
106. Leducq J. Ecological genomics of adaptation and speciation in fungi. In: Landry CR, Aubin-Horth N (eds). Ecological Genomics:Ecology and the Evolution of Genes and Genomes. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Vol. 781. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer Science and BusinessMedia, 2014, 49-72.
107. Lemaire K, Van de Velde S, Van Dijck P et al. Glucose and sucrose act as agonist and mannose as antagonist ligands of the G protein-coupled receptor Gpr1 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell 2004;16:293-9.
108. Libkind D, Hittinger CT, Valério E et al. Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lagerbrewing yeast. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:14539-44.
109. Linglea SE, Viator RP, Johnson RM et al. Recurrent selection for sucrose content has altered growth and sugar accumulation in sugarcane. Field Crop Res 2009;113:306-11.
110. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 2009;458:337-41.
111. McGovern PE, Zhang J, Tang J et al. Fermented beverages of pre- and proto-historic China. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:17593-8.
112. MacLean CR, Brandon C. Stable public goods cooperation and dynamic social interactions in yeast. J Evol Biol 2008;21:1836-43.
113. MaClean RC, Fuentes-Hernandez A, Greig D, et al. A mixture of "cheats" and "co-operators" can enable maximal group benefit. PLoS Biol 2010;8:e1000486.
114. MacRae E, Lunn J Control of sucrose biosynthesis. Annual Plant Reviews. In: Plaxton WC, McManusMT (eds). Control of Primary Metabolism in Plants, Vol. 22. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2008, 234-57.
115. MacRae E, Lunn JE. Photosynthetic sucrose biosynthesis: an evolutionary perspective. In: Eaton-Rye JJ, Tripathy BC, Sharkey TD (eds). Photosynthesis: Plastid Biology, Energy Conversion and Carbon Assimilation, Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration, Vol. 34. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 2012, 675-702.
116. Maiorella BL, Blanch HW,Wilke CR et al. Economic evaluation of alternative ethanol fermentation processes. Biotechnol Bioeng 2009;104:419-43.
117. Manzatto CV, Assad ED, Bacca JFM et al. Zoneamento Agroecológico da Cana de Açúcar; Expandir a produçã o, preservar a vida, garantir o futuro. Embrapa Solos, Brazil, RJ, 2009, 1-55.
118. Marggraf A. Experiences chimiques faites dans le dessein de tirer un veritable sucre de diverses plantes, qui croissent dans nos contrées.In: Haude A (ed.). Histoire de L'académie Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres de Berlin, Vol. 3. Berlin: Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1747, 79-90.
119. Mattanovich D, Branduardi P, Dato L et al. Recombinant protein production in yeasts. In: Lorence A (ed.). Recombinant Gene Expression: Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 824, 3rd edn. Philadelphia, USA: Springer, 2012, 329-58.
120. Meijer MMC, Boonstra J, Verkleij AJ et al. Glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is related to the glucose concentration rather than the glucose flux. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:24102-7.
121. Michaelis L, Menten ML. Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung. Biochem Z 1913;49:333-69.
122. Mintz S. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York, EUA: Penguin Books, 1986.
123. Mortimer RK. Evolution and variation of the yeast (Saccharomyces) genome. Genome Res. 2000;10:403-9.
124. Muller LAH, Lucas JE, Georgianna DR et al. Genome-wide association analysis of clinical vs. nonclinical origin provides insights into Saccharomyces cerevisiae pathogenesis. Mol Ecol 2011;20:4085-97.
125. MYRIANT. Corporate Fact Sheet. 2012. http://www.myriant.com/ media/press-kit-files/Myriant-CorpFactSheet-10-2012.pdf (16 December 2015).
126. Naumov GI, Naumova ES. Polygenic control for fermentation of β-fructosides in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: newgenes SUC9 and SUC10. Mikrobiologiya 2010;79:160-6.
127. Naumov GI, Naumova ES. Comparative genetics of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chromosomal translocations carrying the SUC2 marker. Russ J Genet 2011;47:147-52.
128. Naumov GI, Naumova ES, Michels CA. Genetic variation of the repeated MAL loci in natural populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus. Genetics 1994;136:803-12.
129. Naumov GI, Naumova ES, Sancho ED et al. Polymeric SUC genes in natural populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1996;135:31-5.
130. Naumova ES, Sadykova AZ, Martynenko NN et al. Molecular genetic characteristics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae distillers' yeasts. Mikrobiologiya 2013;82:176-86.
131. Naumova ES, Sadykova AZ, MartynenkoNNet al. Molecular polymorphism of β-fructosidase SUC genes in the Saccharomyces yeasts. Mol Biol 2014;48:573-82.
132. Needleman R. Control of maltase synthesis in yeast. Mol Microbiol 1991;5:2079-84.
133. Neigeborn L, Carlson M. Genes affecting the regulation of SUC2 gene expression by glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1984;108:845-58.
134. Neiman AM. Sporulation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2011;189:737-65.
135. Nersesian RL. Biomass. In: Sharpe ME (ed.). Energy for the 21st Century: A Comprehensive Guide to Conventional and Alternative Sources, 2nd edn. Armonk, NY: Routledge. 2010, 72. http:// www.amazon.com/Energy-21st-Century-Comprehensive-Conventional/dp/0765624133/ref=dp ob title bk (5 January 2016, date last accessed).
136. Nevoigt E. Progress in metabolic engineering of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol R 2008;72:379-412.
137. Nielsen J. Production of biopharmaceutical proteins by yeast. Advances through metabolic engineering. Bioengineered 2013;4:207-11.
138. Nielsen S. SugarMakers Bunge to Sã o Martinho Try Biotech: Corporate Brazil. Bloomberg Sustainability. 2012. http://www.bloomberg. com/news/2012-10-09/sugar-makers-bunge-to-sao-martinhotry- biotech-corporate-brazil.html (16 December 2015, date last accessed).
139. Oda Y, Mikumo D, Leo F et al. Discrimination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus strains by the SUC2 gene sequences. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2010;358:355-8.
140. Oda Y, Ouchi K. Discrimination of SUC gene from MAL constitutive gene by the fermentability of fructooligosaccharide in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Microbiol 1991a;22:237-9.
141. Oda Y, Ouchi K. Construction of a sucrose-fermenting baker's yeast incapable of hydrolysing fructooligosaccharides. Enzyme Microb Technol 1991b;13:495-8.
142. OECD. Consensus Document on Compositional Considerations for New Varieties of Sugarcane (Saccharum ssp. hybrids): Key Food and Feed Nutrients, Anti-Nutrients and Toxicants. Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds. No. 23. OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications, 2011 http://www.oecd.org/ science/biotrack/48962816.pdf (16 December 2015).
143. Ogbonna JC, Mashima H, Tanaka H. Scale up of fuel ethanol production from sugar beet juice using loofa sponge immobilized bioreactor. Bioresource Technol 2001;76:1-8.
144. Opulente DA, Morales CM, Carey LB et al. Coevolution trumps pleiotropy: carbon assimilation traits are independent of metabolic network structure in budding yeast. PLoS One 2013;8:e54403.
145. Ostergaard S, Roca C, Rønnow B et al. Physiological studies in aerobic batch cultivations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains harboring the MEL1 gene. Biotechnol Bioeng 2000;68:252-9.
146. Özcan S, Dover J, Rosenwald AG et al. Two glucose transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are glucose sensors that generate a signal for induction of gene expression. P Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:12428-32.
147. Özcan S, Vallier LG, Flick JS et al. Expression of the SUC2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is induced by low levels of glucose. Yeast 1997;13:127-37.
148. Pasteur L. Mémoire sur la fermentation alcoolique. Compt Rend 1857;45;1032-6.
149. Perlman D, Halvorson HO, Cannon LE. Presecretory and cytoplasmic invertase polypeptides encoded by distinct mRNAs derived from the same structural gene differ by a signal sequence. P Natl Acad Sci USA 1982;79:781-5.
150. Peters S, Rose T, Moser M. Sucrose: a prospering and sustainable organic raw material. In: Rauter AP, Pierre V, Yves Q (eds). Carbohydrates in Sustainable Development I. Top Curr Chem, Vol. 294. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010, 1-24.
151. Petrovska B, Winkelhausen E, Kuzmanova S. Glycerol production by yeasts under osmotic and sulfite stress. Can J Microbiol 1999;45:695-9.
152. Pfeiffer T, Schuster S, Bonhoeffer S. Cooperation and competition in the evolution of ATP-producing pathways. Science 2001;292:504-7.
153. Piškur J, Rozpedowska E, Polakova S et al. How did Saccharomyces evolve to become a good brewer? Trends Genet 2006;22:183-6.
154. PlechM, De Visser JAGM, Korona R. Heterosis is prevalent among domesticated but not wild strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 2014;4:315-23.
155. Porchia AC, Salerno GL. Sucrose biosynthesis in a prokaryotic organism: presence of two sucrose-phosphate synthases in Anabaena with remarkable differences compared with the plant enzymes. P Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:13600-4.
156. Raamsdonk LM, Diderich JA, Kuiper A et al. Co-consumption of sugars or ethanol and glucose in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain deleted in the HXK2 gene. Yeast 2001;18:1023-33.
157. Randez-Gil F, Córcoles-Sáez I, Prieto JA. Genetic and phenotypic characteristics of baker's yeast: relevance to baking. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 2013;4:191-214.
158. Reddy A, Johnson RS, Biemann K et al. Characterization of the glycosylation sites in yeast external invertase. J Biol Chem 1988;263:6978-85.
159. Reddy A, Maley F. Studies on identifying the catalytic role of Glu-204 in the active site of yeast invertase. J Biol Chem 1996;271:13953-7.
160. Reed RH, Stewart WDP. Osmotic adjustment and organic solute accumulation in unicellular cyanobacteria from freshwater and marine habitats. Mar Biol 1985;88:1-9.
161. REVERDIA. Reverdia: Reliable BiosucciniumTM Supply: Building on the Innovative Strengths and Experience of Our Parents, 2012. http://www.reverdia.com/wp-ntent/uploads/120724 Reve rdia Reliable Biosuc cinium Supply -Bio-World-Presentation -2012 FINAL.pdf (15 December 2015, date last accessed).
162. Ro DK, Paradise EM, Ouellet M et al. Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast. Nature 2006;440:940-3.
163. Roach BT, Daniels J. A review of the origin and improvement of sugarcane.In: Copersucar International Sugarcane breeding Workshop, Vol. 1. São Paulo-SP, Brasil : Cooperativa de Produtores de Cana, Açúcar e Á lcool do Estado de São Paulo, 1987:1-31.
164. Ruan Y-L. Sucrose metabolism: gateway to diverse carbon use and sugar signaling. Annu Rev Plan Biol 2014;65:33-67.
165. Sainz-Polo MA, Lafraya A, Polo A et al. Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the invertase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Acta Crystallogr F 2012;68:1538-41.
166. Sainz-Polo MA, Ramírez-Escudero M, Lafraya A et al. Threedimensional structure of Saccharomyces invertase: role of a non-catalytic domain in oligomerization and substrate specificity. J Biol Chem 2013;288:9755-66.
167. Salerno GL, Curatti L. Origin of sucrose metabolism in higher plants: when, how and why? Trends Plant Sci 2003;8:63-9.
168. Salerno GL. Measurement of enzymes related to sucrose metabolism in permeabilized Chlorella vulgaris cells. Physiol Plant 1985a;64:259-64.
169. Salerno GL. Occurrence of sucrose and sucrose metabolizing enzymes in a chlorophyllous algae. Plant Sci 1985b;42:5-8.
170. Salvado Z, Arroyo-López FN, Guillamón JM et al. Temperature adaptation markedly determines evolution within the genus Saccharomyces. Appl Environ Microb 2011;77:2292-302.
171. Samani P, Low-decarie E, Mckelvey K et al. Metabolic variation in natural populations of wild yeast. Ecol Evol 2015;5:722-32.
172. Sampaio JP, Gonçalves P. Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and are sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl Environ Microb 2008;74:2144-52.
173. Sanchez A, Gore J. Feedback between population and evolutionary dynamics determines the fate of social microbial populations. PLoS Biol 2013;11:e1001547.
174. Sanjay G, Sugunan S. Enhanced pH and thermal stabilities of invertase immobilized on montmorillonite K-10. Food Chem 2005;94:573-9.
175. Santos E, Rodriguez L, Elorza MV et al. Uptake of sucrose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch Biochem Biophys 1982;216:652-60.
176. Sasano Y, Haitani Y, Ohtsu I et al. Proline accumulation in baker's yeast enhances high-sucrose stress tolerance and fermentation ability in sweet dough. Int J Food Microbiol 2012;152:40-3.
177. Schneiter R What are yeasts? In: Genetics, Molecular and Cell Biology of Yeast. Universit é de Fribourg Suisse, 2004. http://www.unifr.ch/biochem/assets/files/schneiter/cours/ Yeast/YeastGenetics.pdf (15 December 2015, date last accessed).
178. Serrano R, Martín H, Casamayor A et al. Signaling alkaline pH stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae through the Wsc1 cell surface sensor and the Slt2 MAPK pathway. J Biol Chem 2006;281:39785-95.
179. Shaffer LN. Southernization. In: Adas M (ed.). Agricultural and Pastoral Societies in Ancient and Classical History. Philadelphia, EUA: Temple University Press, 2001, 308-22.
180. Schmidt L, Schurr U, Röse US. Local and systemic effects of two herbivores with different feeding mechanisms on primary metabolism of cotton leaves. Plant Cell Environ 2009;32:893-903.
181. Siso MIG. The biotechnological utilization of cheese whey: a review. Bioresource Technol 1996;57:1-11.
182. Smirnoff N. The carbohydrates of bryophytes in relation to desiccation tolerance. J Bryol 1992;17:185-91.
183. Sniegowski PD, Dombrowski PG, Fingerman E. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus coexist in a natural woodland site in North America and display different levels of reproductive isolation from European conspecifics. FEMS Yeast Res 2002;1:299-306.
184. Stambuk BU, Batista AS, de Araujo OS. Kinetics of active sucrose transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng 2000;89:212-4.
185. Stambuk BU, da Silva MA, Panek AD et al. Active α-glucoside transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999;170:105-10.
186. Stambuk BU, De Araujo OS, Basso LC et al. Processo para modificar geneticamente leveduras Saccharomyces, e seu uso em processos fermentativos de produção de metabólitos. BR Patent PI0901254-0 A2. Revista da Propriedade Industrial 2011;2087:47.
187. Stambuk BU, Dunn B, Alves SL et al. Industrial fuel ethanol yeasts contain adaptive copy number changes in genes involved in vitamin B1 and B6 biosynthesis. Genome Res 2009;19:2271-8.
188. Stefanini I, Dapporto L, Legras J-L et al. Role of social wasps in Saccharomyces cerevisiae ecology and evolution. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:13398-403.
189. Sugarcane Technology Center. Censo Varietal de Produtividade em 2011. 2011. http://www.ctcanavieira.com.br/downloads/ CTC Censo2011-12baixa.pdf (27 June 2015, 16 December 2015).
190. Sugihara TF. Microbiology of bread making. In: Wood BJB (ed.). Microbiology of Fermented Foods, Vol. 1. London, UK: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, 1985, 249-61.
191. Swanson KS, Fahey GC. The role of yeasts in companion animal nutrition. In: Lyons TP, Jacques KA (eds). Nutritional Biotechnology in the Feed and Food Industries. Proceedings of Alltech's 20th Annual Symposium: Re-imagining the Feed Industry, pp. 475-84. Lexington, Kentucky, USA, 2004.
192. Tamaki H. Glucose-stimulated cAMP-protein kinase A pathway in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng 2007;104:245-50.
193. Tammi M, Ballou L, Taylor A et al. Effect of glycosylation on yeast invertase oligomer stability. J Biol Chem 1987;262:4395-401.
194. Taylor MW, Tsai P, Anfang N et al. Pyrosequencing reveals regional differences in fruit-associated fungal communities. Environ Microbiol 2014;16:2848-58.
195. Teste M-A, François JM, Parrou J-L. Characterization of a new multigene family encoding isomaltases in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the IMA family. J Biol Chem 2010;285:26815-24.
196. Trimble RB, Maley F. Subunit structure of external invertase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.J Biol Chem 1977;252:4409-12.
197. Trumbly RJ. Glucose repression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Microbiol 1992;6:15-21.
198. UCLA. History and Special Collections, Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library. Regents of the University of California Los Angeles, 2002. http://unitproj.library.ucla.edu/biomed/spice/index.cfm? displayID=23 (6 January 2016, date last accessed).
199. van Bell AJE. Interaction between sieve element and companion cell and the consequences for photoassimilate distribution. Two structural hardware frames with associated physiological software packages in dicotyledons? J Exp Bot 1999;50:935-53.
200. van Dam NM, Oomen MWAT. Root and shoot jasmonic acid applications differentially affect leaf chemistry and herbivore growth. Plant Signal Behav 2008;3:91-8.
201. Van de Velde S, Thevelein JM. Cyclic AMP-protein kinase A and Snf1 signaling mechanisms underlie the superior potency of sucrose for induction of filamentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 2008;7:286-93.
202. van Dijken J, Scheffers WA. Redox balances in the metabolism of sugars by yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1986;32:199-224.
203. van Dijken JP, Bauer J, Brambilla L et al. An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Enzyme Microb Technol 2000;26:706-14.
204. Van Dyken JD, Müller MJI, MacK KML et al. Spatial population expansion promotes the evolution of cooperation in an experimental prisoner's dilemma. Curr Biol 2013;23:919-23.
205. van Hoek P, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Regulation of fermentative capacity and levels of glycolytic enzymes in chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EnzymeMicrob Technol 2000;26:724-36.
206. van Maris AJ, Konings WN, van Dijken JP et al. Microbial export of lactic and 3-hydroxypropanoic acid: implications for industrial fermentation processes. Metab Eng 2004;6:245-55.
207. van Putten RJ, Dias AS, de Jong E. Furan-based building blocks from carbohydrates. In: Imhof P, van der Waal JC (eds). Catalytic Process Development for Renewable Materials. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, 2013, 81-117.
208. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA et al. Energetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. J Gen Microbiol 1990;136:405-12.
209. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA et al. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts-a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 1992;8:501-17.
210. Verstrepen KJ, Iserentant D, Malcorps P et al. Glucose and sucrose: hazardous fast-food for industrial yeast? Trends Biotechnol 2004;22:531-7.
211. Voordeckers K, Brown CA, Vanneste K et al. Reconstruction of ancestral metabolic enzymes revealsmolecular mechanisms underlying evolutionary innovation through gene duplication. PLoS Biol 2012;10:e1001446.
212. Wang Q-M, Liu W-Q, Liti G et al. Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity. Mol Ecol 2012;21:5404-17.
213. Wang SA, Li FL. Invertase SUC2 is the key hydrolase for inulin degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microb 2013;79:403-6.
214. Watson AM. The Arab Agricultural Revolution and Its Diffusion, 700-1100, J Economic History 1974;34:8-35.
215. Weimberg R, Doudoroff M. Studies with three bacterial sucrose phosphorylases. J Bacteriol 1954;68:381-8.
216. Weinhandl K, Winkler M, Glieder A et al. Carbon source dependent promoters in yeasts. Microb Cell Fact 2014;13:1-17.
217. Weusthuis RA, Adams H, Scheffers WA et al. Energetics and kinetics of maltose transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae:a continuous culture study. Appl Environ Microb 1993;59:3102-9.
218. Wheals AE, Basso LC, Alves DM et al. Fuel ethanol after 25 years. Trends Biotechnol 1999;17:482-7.
219. Wheeler RT, Kupiec M, Magnelli P et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant with increased virulence. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:2766-70.
220. Williams TC, Espinosa MI, Nielsen LK et al. Dynamic regulation of gene expression using sucrose responsive promoters and RNA interference in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact 2015;14:43.
221. Winge O, Roberts C. The relation between the polymeric genes for maltose, raffinose, and sucrose fermentation in yeasts. CRT Lab Carls 1952;25:141-71.
222. Winkenbach F, Grant BR, Bidwell RGS. The effects of nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia on photosynthetic carbon metabolism of Acetabularia chloroplast preparations compared with spinach chloroplasts and whole cells of Acetabularia and Dunaliella. Can J Bot 1972;50:2545-51.
223. Wolff G. Franz Karl Achard, 1753-1821; a contribution of the cultural history of sugar. Med Monatsschr 1953;7:253-4.
224. Yang F, Liu ZC, Wang X et al. InvertaseSuc2- mediatedinulincatabolism is regulated at the transcript level in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact 2015; 14:59.
225. Zimmermann FK, Khan N, Eaton NR. Identification of new genes involved in disaccharide fermentation in yeast. Mol Gen Genet 1973;123:29-41.