Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A nomadic yeast with no niche?

FEMS Yeast Research

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 1-6

  Goddard, Matthew R ^a,b   Greig, Duncan ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Crabtree effect; Fermentation; Fruit; Natural history; Neutral ecology; Niche

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ECOLOGICAL NICHE; ECOLOGY; FRUIT; HUMAN; MICROORGANISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST; ADAPTATION; ECOSYSTEM; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; PHYSIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84938379544     PISSN: 15671356     EISSN: 15671364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/fov009     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aa E, Townsend JP, Adams RI, et al. Population structure and gene evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2006;6:702-15.
2. Angebault C, Djossou F, Abélanet S, et al. Candida albicans is not always the preferential yeast colonizing humans: a study in wayampi amerindians. J Infect Dis 2013;208:1705-16.
3. Baas Becking L. Geobiologie of Inleiding Tot de Milieukunde. The Hague: W.P. Van Stockum&Zoon, 1934.
4. Bell G. Neutral macroecology. Science 2001;293:2413-8.
5. Bell T. Experimental tests of the bacterial distance-decay relationship. ISME J 2010;4:1357-65.
6. Bisson LF, Butzke CE. Diagnosis and rectification of stuck and sluggish fermentations. Am J Enol Viticult 2000;51;168-77.
7. Boone C. Yeast systems biology: our best shot at modeling a cell. Genetics 2014;198:435-7.
8. Buser CC, Newcomb RD, Gaskett AC, et al. Niche construction initiates the evolution of mutualistic interactions. Ecol Lett 2014;17:1257-64.
9. Chambers PJ, Pretorius IS. Fermenting knowledge: the history of winemaking, science and yeast research. EMBO Rep 2010;11:914-20.
10. Cherry JM, Hong EL, Amundsen C, et al. Saccharomyces genome database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;40:D700-5.
11. Ciani M, Comitini F, Mannazzu I, et al. Controlled mixed culture fermentation: a new perspective on the use of non-Saccharomyces yeasts in winemaking. FEMS Yeast Res 2010;10:123-33.
12. Dumbrell AJ, Nelson M, Helgason T, et al. Relative roles of niche and neutral processes in structuring a soilmicrobial community. ISME J 2010;4:337-45.
13. Eriksson K, Nummi H. Alcohol accumulation from ingested berries and alcohol metabolism in passerine birds. Ornis Fennica 1983;60:2-9.
14. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 2002;418:387-91.
15. Giraldo-Perez P, Goddard MR. A parasitic selfish gene that affects host promiscuity. Proc R Soc B 2013;280:20131875.
16. Goddard MR. Quantifying the complexities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae's ecosystem engineering via fermentation. Ecology 2008;89:2077-82.
17. Goddard MR, Anfang N, Tang R, et al. A distinct population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in New Zealand: Evidence for local dispersal by insects and human-aided global dispersal in oak barrels. Env Micro 2010;12:63-73.
18. Gould SJ, Lewontin RC. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. P R Soc Lond B 1979;205:581-98.
19. Gray JC, Goddard MR. Gene-Flow between Niches facilitates local adaptation in Sexual Populations. Ecol Lett 2012;15:955-62.
20. Hagman A, Sall T, Compagno C, et al. Yeast 'Make-Accumulate-Consume' life strategy evolved as a multi-step process that predates the whole genome duplication. PLoS One 2013;8:e68734.
21. Hansen EC. Practical Studies in Fermentation Being Contributions to the Life History of Micro-Organisms. London: E&FN Spon, 1896.
22. Hanson CA, Fuhrman JA, Horner-Devine MC, et al. Beyond biogeographic patterns: processes shaping the microbial landscape. Nat Rev Microbiol 2012;10:497-506.
23. Hardin G. Tragedy of commons. Science 1968;162:1243-8.
24. Hubbell SP. Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Funct Ecol 2005;19;166-72.
25. Jolly NP, Varela C, Pretorius I S. Not your ordinary yeast: non-Saccharomyces yeasts in wine production uncovered. FEMS Yeast Res 2014;14:215-37.
26. Kelly DE, Lamb DC, Kelly SL. Genome-wide generation of yeast gene deletion strains. Comp Funct Genom 2001;2:236-42.
27. Kellis M, Birren BW, Lander ES. Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2004;428:617-24.
28. Knight SJ, Goddard MR. Quantifying separation and similarity in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae metapopulation. ISME J 2015;9:361-70.
29. Kowallik M, Miller E, Greig D. The interaction of Saccharomyces paradoxus with its natural competitors on oak bark. Mol Ecol 2015, in press.
30. Legras J-L, Merdinoglu D, Cornuet J-M, et al. Bread, beer andwine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol Ecol 2007;16:2091-102.
31. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM, et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 2009;458:337-41.
32. McGovern PE, Zhang J, Tang J, et al. Fermented beverages of pre-and proto-historic China. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:17593-8.
33. MacLean RC, Gudelj I. Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeast. Nature 2006;441:498-501.
34. Morris S, Humphreys D, Reynolds D. Myth, Marula, and Elephant: an assessment of voluntary ethanol intoxication of the African Elephant (Loxodonta africana) Following feeding on the fruit of the Marula tree (Sclerocarya birrea). Physiol Biochem Zool 2006;79:363-9.
35. Mortimer R, Polsinelli M. On the origins of wine yeast. Res Microbiol 1999;150:199-204.
36. Muller LAH, Lucas JE, Georgianna DR, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of clinical vs. nonclinical origin provides insights into Saccharomyces cerevisiae pathogenesis. Mol Ecol 2011;20:4085-97.
37. Pasteur L. Studies on Fermentation: The Diseases of Beer, Their Causes, and the Means of Preventing Them. London: Macmillan&Co., 1897.
38. Peay KG, Garbelotto M, Bruns TD. Evidence of dispersal limitation in soil microorganisms: Isolation reduces species richness on mycorrhizal tree islands. Ecology 2010;91:3631-40.
39. Petrovska B, Winkelhausen E, Kuzmanova S. Glycerol production by yeasts under osmotic and sulfite stress. Can J Microbiol 1999;45:695-9.
40. Pfeiffer T, Morley A. An evolutionary perspective on the Crabtree effect. Front Mol Biosci 2014;1:17.
41. Pfeiffer T, Schuster S, Bonhoeffer S. Cooperation and competition in the evolution of ATP-producing pathways. Science 2001;292:504-7.
42. Piskur J, Rozpedowska E, Polakova S, et al. How did Saccharomyces evolve to become a good brewer? Trends Genet 2006;22:183-6.
43. Pronk JT, Steensma HY, Van Dijken JP. Pyruvate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1996;12:1607-33.
44. Reuter M, Bell G, Greig D. Increased outbreeding in yeast in response to dispersal by an insect vector. Curr Biol 2007;17:R81-3.
45. Salvado Z, Arroyo-López FN, Guillamón JM, et al. Temperature adaptation markedly determines evolution within the genus Saccharomyces. Appl Environ Microb 2011;77:2292-302.
46. Sampaio JP, Gonçalves P. Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in portugal are associated with Oak Bark and Are Sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl Environ Microb 2008;74:2144-52.
47. Serrano R, Martín H, Casamayor A, et al. Signaling alkaline pH stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae through the Wsc1 cell surface sensor and the Slt2 MAPK pathway. J Biol Chem 2006;281:39785-95.
48. Sniegowski PD, Dombrowski PG, Fingerman E. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus coexist in a natural woodland site in North America and display different levels of reproductive isolation from European conspecifics. FEMS Yeast Res 2002;1:299-306.
49. Stefanini I, Dapporto L, Legras JL, et al. Role of social wasps in Saccharomyces cerevisiae ecology and evolution. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;109:13398-403.
50. Stern DL. Identification of loci that cause phenotypic variation in diverse species with the reciprocal hemizygosity test. Trends Genet 2014;30:547-54.
51. Sweeney JY, Kuehne HA, Sniegowski PD. Sympatric natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. paradoxus populations have different thermal growth profiles. FEMS Yeast Res 2004;4:521-5.
52. Taylor MW, Tsai P, Anfang N, et al. Pyrosequencing reveals regional differences in fruit-associated fungal communities. Environ Microbiol 2014;16:2848-58.
53. Thomson JM, Gaucher EA, Burgan MF, et al. Resurrecting ancestral alcohol dehydrogenases from yeast. Nat Genet 2005;37:630-5.
54. Vandermeer JH. Niche theory. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1972;3:107-32.
55. Wang Q-M, Liu W-Q, Liti G, et al. Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity. Mol Ecol 2012;21:5404-17.
56. Wenger JW, Piotrowski J, Nagarajan S, et al. Hunger artists: yeast adapted to carbon limitation show trade-offs under carbon sufficiency. PLoS Genet 2011;7:e1002202.
57. Wiens F, Zitzmann A, Lachance M, et al. Chronic intake of fermented floral nectar by wild treeshrews. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:10426-31.