An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains

Enzyme and Microbial Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 9-10, 2000, Pages 706-714

  Van Dijken, J P ^a   Bauer, J ^b   Brambilla, L ^c   Duboc, P ^d   Francois, J M ^e   Gancedo, C ^f   Giuseppin, M L F ^g   Heijnen, J J ^a   Hoare, M ^h   Lange, H C ⁱ   Madden, E A ^j   Niederberger, P ^b   Nielsen, J ^d   Parrou, J L ^e   Petit, T ^f   Porro, D ^c   Reuss, M ⁱ   Van Riel, N ^g   Rizzi, M ⁱ   Steensma, H Y ^a,j   Verrips, C T ^g   Vindelov J ^d   Pronk, J T ^a   more..

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b NESTLÉ RESEARCH CENTER   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^e Dept Genie Biochimique Alimentaire   (France)

^f INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES BIOMÉDICAS ALBERTO SOLS   (Spain)

^g UNILEVER RESEARCH VLAARDINGEN   (Netherlands)

^h UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^j LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

Engineering; Genetics; Physiology; Strain choice; Yeast

Indexed keywords

BATCH CELL CULTURE; BIOMASS; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; GROWTH KINETICS; OXYGEN; PH;

DISSOLVED OXYGEN CONCENTRATION; GENETICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAL;

YEAST;

BIOMASS; CHEMOSTAT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; ELECTROPORATION; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL GENETICS; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC TRANSFORMATION; NONHUMAN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPOROGENESIS; STRAIN DIFFERENCE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0034214335     PISSN: 01410229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00162-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Postma E., Verduyn C., Scheffers W.A., van Dijken J.P. Enzymic analysis of the Crabtree effect in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 53:1989;468-477.
2. Verduyn C., Postma E., Scheffers W.A., van Dijken J.P. Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. J Gen Microbiol. 136:1990;395-403.
3. Verduyn C., Postma E., Scheffers W.A., van Dijken J.P. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeast a continuous culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation . Yeast. 8:1992;501-517.
4. Schulze U. Anaerobic physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark, 1992, PhD Thesis.
5. Nissen T.L., Schulze U., Nielsen J., Villadsen J. Flux distributions in anaerobic, glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology. 143:1997;203-218.
6. Pronk J.T., Steensma H.Y., van Dijken J.P. Pyruvate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 12:1996;1607-1633.
7. Wenzel T.J., van den Berg M.A., Visser W., van den Berg J.A., Steensma H.Y. Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants lacking the E1α subunit of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. Eur J Biochem. 209:1992;697-705.
8. Thomas D., Cherest H., Surdin-Kerjan Y. Identification of the structural gene for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in yeast. Inactivation leads to a nutritional requirement for organic sulphur. EMBO J. 10:1992;547-553.
9. Oehlen L.W.J.M., van Doorn J., Scholte M.E., Postma P.W., van Dam K. Changes in the incorporation of carbon derived from glucose into cellular pools during the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Gen Microbiol. 136:1990;413-418.
10. De Mesquita D.S.G., ten Hoopen R., Woldringh C.L. Vacuolar segregation to the bud of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: an analysis of morphology and timing in the cell cycle. J Gen Microbiol. 137:1991;2447-2454.
11. Chindamporn A., Iwaguchi S.I., Nakagawa Y., Homma M., Tanaka K. Clonal size variation of rDNA cluster region on chromosome XII of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Gen Microbiol. 139:1993;1409-1415.
12. Weusthuis R.A., Luttik M.A.H., Scheffers W.A., van Dijken J.P., Pronk J.T. Is the Kluyver effect in yeasts caused by product inhibition? Microbiology. 140:1994;1723-1729.
13. Noorman HJ, Baksteen J, Heijnen JJ, Luyben K. Ch. AM. The bioreactor overflow device: an undesired selective separator in continuous cultures? J Gen Microbiol 1991;137:2171-7.
14. van Urk H., Mak P.R., Scheffers W.A., van Dijken J.P. Metabolic responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS8066 and Candida utilis CBS621 upon transition from glucose limitation to glucose excess. Yeast. 4:1988;283-291.
15. Christensen L.H., Schulze U., Nielsen J., Villadsen J. Acoustic off-gas analyser for bioreactors precision, accuracy and dynamics of detection . Chem Eng Sci. 50:1995;2601-2610.
16. Paalme T., Vilu R. A new method of continuous cultivation with computer-controlled change of dilution rate. Karim M.N., Stephanopoulos G. Modelling and control of biotechnical processes. 1992;229-301 Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK.
17. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 153:1983;163-168.
18. Klebe R.J., Harriss J.V., Sharp Z.D., Douglas M.G. A general method for polyethylene-glycol-induced genetic transformation of bacteria and yeast. Gene. 25:1983;2-3.
19. Gysler C., Kneuss P., Niederberger P. Transformation of commercial bakers' yeast strains by electroporation. Biotechnol Techniques. 4:1990;285-290.
20. Barford J.P., Hall R.J. An examination of the Crabtree effect in Saccharomyces cerevisiae the role of respiratory adaptation . J Gen Microbiol. 114:1979;267-275.
21. Fiechter A., Fuhrmann G.F., Käppeli O. Regulation of glucose metabolism in growing yeast cells. Adv Microb Physiol. 22:1981;123-183.
22. Evers M.E., Hoehfeld J., Kunau W.H., Harder W., Veenhuis M. Physiological studies on the utilization of oleic acid by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in relation to microbody development. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 90:1991;73-78.
23. Large P.J. Degradation of organic nitrogen compounds by yeasts. Yeast. 2:1986;1-34.
24. Beudeker R.F., van Dam H.W., van der Plaat J.B., Vellenga K. Developments in bakers' yeast production. Verachtert H., De Mot R. Yeast biotechnology and biocatalysis. 1990;103-146 Marcel Dekker, New York.
25. Hensing M., Rouwenhorst R., Heijnen J.J., van Dijken J.P., Pronk J.T. Physiological and technological aspects of large-scale heterologous-protein production with yeasts. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 67:1995;261-279.
26. Andreasen A.A., Stier T.J.B. Anaerobic nutrition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Ergosterol requirement for growth in a defined medium. J Cell Comp Physiol. 41:1953;23-26.
27. Andreasen A.A., Stier T.J.B. Anaerobic nutrition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. II. Unsaturated fatty acid requirement for growth in a defined medium. J Cell Comp Physiol. 43:1954;271-281.
28. Visser W., Batenburg-van der Vegte W.M., Scheffers W.A., van Dijken J.P. Oxygen requirements of yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 56:1990;3785-3792.
29. Kiers J., Zeeman A.M., Luttik M.A.H., et al. Regulation of alcoholic fermentation in batch and chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 14:1998;459-469.
30. van Hoek WPM, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Regulation of fermentative capacity and levels of glycolytic enzymes in chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb Technol 2000;27 (in press).
31. Wésolowski-Louvel M, Breunig KD, Fukuhara H. Kluyveromyces lactis. In Wof K, editor. Non-conventional yeasts in biotechnology. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1996. p.139-202.
32. Wach A., Brachat A., Pohlmann R., Philippsen P. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 10:1994;1793-1808.
33. Entian KD, Koetter P. Yeast mutant and plasmid collections. In: Brown AJP, Tuite MF, editors. Yeast gene analysis. Meth Microbiol 1998;26:431-49. Academic Press, San Diego.