Invertase Suc2-mediated inulin catabolism is regulated at the transcript level in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Microbial Cell Factories

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Yang, Fan ^a   Liu, Zhi Cheng ^a   Wang, Xue ^a   Li, Li Li ^a   Yang, Lan ^a   Tang, Wen Zhu ^a   Yu, Zhi Min ^a   Li, Xianzhen ^a  

^a DALIAN POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Inulin; Invertase; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Transcript level

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; BETA FRUCTOFURANOSIDASE; INULIN; INULINASE; INVERTASE SUC2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CATABOLISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGRADATION; ENZYME REGULATION; HYDROLYSIS; METABOLIC REGULATION; NONHUMAN; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; METABOLISM;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BETA-FRUCTOFURANOSIDASE; INULIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84928005828     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14752859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12934-015-0243-3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Chi ZM, Zhang T, Cao TS, Liu XY, Cui W, Zhao CH. Biotechnological potential of inulin for bioprocesses. Bioresoure Technol. 2011;102:4295-303.
2. Bajpai PK, Bajpai P. Cultivation and utilization of Jerusalem artichoke for ethanol, single cell protein, and high-fructose syrup production. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1991;13:359-62.
3. Negro MJ, Ballesteros I, Manzanares P, Oliva JM, Sáez F, Ballesteros M. Inulin-containing biomass for ethanol production: carbohydrate extraction and ethanol fermentation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2006;129-132:922-32.
4. Yuan W, Zhao X, Ge X, Bai F. Ethanol fermentation with Kluyveromyces marxianus from Jerusalem artichoke grown in salina and irrigated with a mixture of seawater and freshwater. J Appl Microbiol. 2008;105:2076-83.
5. Lane MM, Morrissey JP. Kluyveromyces marxianus: A yeast emerging from its sister's shadow. Fungal Biol Rev. 2010;24:17-26.
6. Ohta K, Hamada S, Nakamura T. Production of high concentrations of ethanol from inulin by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:729-33.
7. Lim S-H, Ryu J-M, Lee H, Jeon JH, Sok D-E, Choi E-S. Ethanol fermentation from Jerusalem artichoke powder using Saccharomyces cerevisiae KCCM50549 without pretreatment for inulin hydrolysis. Bioresoure Technol. 2011;102:2109-11.
8. Schorr-Galindo S, Ghommidh C, Guiraud J. Influence of yeast flocculation on the rate of Jerusalem artichoke extract fermentation. Curr Microbiol. 2000;41:89-95.
9. Yuan B, Wang SA, Li FL. Improved ethanol fermentation by heterologous endoinulinase and inherent invertase from inulin by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresoure Technol. 2013;139:402-5.
10. Wang SA, Li FL. Invertase Suc2 Is the key hydrolase for inulin degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:403-6.
11. Madsen KM, Udatha GD, Semba S, Otero JM, Koetter P, Nielsen J, et al. Linking genotype and phenotype of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains reveals metabolic engineering targets and leads to triterpene hyper-producers. PLoS One. 2011;6:e14763.
12. Alper H, Fischer C, Nevoigt E, Stephanopoulos G. Tuning genetic control through promoter engineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:12678-83.
13. Reddy V, Johnson R, Biemann K, Williams R, Ziegler F, Trimble R, et al. Characterization of the glycosylation sites in yeast external invertase. I. N-linked oligosaccharide content of the individual sequons. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:6978-85.
14. Ohta K, Akimoto H, Matsuda S, Toshimitsu D, Nakamura T. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of two endoinulinase genes from Aspergillus niger. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1998;62:1731-8.
15. Lafraya Á, Sanz-Aparicio J, Polaina J, Marín-Navarro J. Fructo-oligosaccharide synthesis by mutant versions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae invertase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:6148-57.
16. Yuji Oda DM, Leo F, Urashima T. Discrimination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus strains by the SUC2 gene sequences. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2010;56:355-8.
17. Gascón S, Neumann NP, Lampen JO. Comparative study of the properties of the purified internal and external invertases from yeast. J Biol Chem. 1968;243:1573-7.
18. Trimble RB, Maley F. Subunit structure of external invertase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1977;252:4409-12.
19. Taussig R, Carlson M. Nucleotide sequence of the yeast SUC2 gene for invertase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983;11:1943-54.
20. Sainz-Polo MA, Ramírez-Escudero M, Lafraya A, González B, Marín-Navarro J, Polaina J, et al. Three-dimensional structure of Saccharomyces invertase: role of a non-catalytic domain in oligomerization and substrate specificity. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:9755-66.
21. Park J, Kim MI, Park YD, Shin I, Cha J, Kim CH, et al. Structural and functional basis for substrate specificity and catalysis of levan fructotransferase. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:31233-41.
22. Pons T, Olmea O, Chinea G, Beldarraín A, Márquez G, Acosta N, et al. Structural model for family 32 of glycosyl-hydrolase enzymes. Proteins. 1998;33:383-95.
23. Wu L, Winston F. Evidence that Snf-Swi controls chromatin structure over both the TATA and UAS regions of the SUC2 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4230-4.
24. Martinez-Pastor M, Marchler G, Schüller C, Marchler-Bauer A, Ruis H, Estruch F. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae zinc finger proteins Msn2p and Msn4p are required for transcriptional induction through the stress response element (STRE). EMBO J. 1996;15:2227-35.
25. Bu Y, Schmidt MC. Identification of cis-acting elements in the SUC2 promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae required for activation of transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:1002-9.
26. Weinhandl K, Winkler M, Glieder A, Camattari A. Carbon source dependent promoters in yeasts. Microb Cell Fact. 2014; 13: doi:10.1186/1475-2859-13-5.
27. Lutfiyya LL, Johnston M. Two zinc-finger-containing repressors are responsible for glucose repression of SUC2 expression. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:4790-7.
28. Yang F, Liu Z, Dong W, Zhu L, Chen X, Li X. Ethanol production using a newly isolated Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain directly assimilating intact inulin with high degree of polymerization. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2013;61:418-25.
29. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. J Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673-80.
30. Van Den Ent F, Löwe J. RF cloning: a restriction-free method for inserting target genes into plasmids. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2006;67:67-74.
31. Thompson JR, Register E, Curotto J, Kurtz M, Kelly R. An improved protocol for the preparation of yeast cells for transformation by electroporation. Yeast. 1998;14:565-71.
32. Stahlberg A, Elbing K, Andrade-Garda JM, Sjogreen B, Forootan A, Kubista M. Multiway real-time PCR gene expression profiling in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals altered transcriptional response of ADH-genes to glucose stimuli. BMC Genomics. 2008; 9: doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-170.
33. Adams A, Gottschling D-E, Kaiser C-A, Stearns T. Methods in yeast genetics - a cold spring harbor laboratory course manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1997.
34. Hu N, Yuan B, Sun J, Wang S-A, Li F-L. Thermotolerant Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains representing potentials for bioethanol production from Jerusalem artichoke by consolidated bioprocessing. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;95:1359-68.
35. Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959;31:426-8.