Connecting feedback, classroom research and Didaktik perspectives

Journal of Curriculum Studies

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 334-351

  Svanes, Ingvill Krogstad ^a,b   Skagen, Kaare ^a  

^a OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

classroom research; Didaktik; Feedback; guided reading; subject matter

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958039794     PISSN: 00220272     EISSN: 13665839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220272.2016.1140810     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Askew, S., & Lodge, C., (2000). Gifts, ping-pong and loops-linking feedback and learning. In S., Askew (Ed.), Feedback for learning (pp. 1–17). London:Routledge Falmer.
2. Bennett, R. E., (2011). Formative assessment:A critical review. Assessment in Education:Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 5–25.
3. Biesta, G., (2007). Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice:The need for critical distance, educational research and evaluation. International Journal on Theory and Practice, 13, 295–301. doi:10.1080/13803610701640227
4. Biesta, G., (2010). Why ‘what works’ still won’t work:From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29, 491–503.10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x
5. Black, P., & Harrison, C., (2001). Feedback in questioning and marking:The science teacher’s role in formative assessment. School Science Review, 82, 55–61.
6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D., (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education:Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D., (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31.10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
8. Brophy, J., (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41, 1069–1077.10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1069
9. Chin, C., (2006). Classroom Interaction in Science:Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1315–1346.10.1080/09500690600621100
10. Clay, M. M., (1993). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Heinemann:Auckland.
11. Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T., (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1109–1136.10.1002/tea.20440
12. Cole, A. D., (2006). Scaffolding beginning readers:Micro and macro cues teachers use during student oral reading. The Reading Teacher, 59, 450–459.10.1598/RT.59.5.4
13. Crevola, C. A., & Hill, P. W., (1998). Evaluation of a Whole-school approach to prevention and intervention in early literacy. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 3, 133–157.10.1207/s15327671espr0302_4
14. Darling-Hammond, L., (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement:A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44.
15. Duijnhouwer, H., Prins, F. J., & Stokking, K. M., (2010). Progress feedback effects on students’ writing mastery goal, self-efficacy beliefs, and performance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16, 53–74.10.1080/13803611003711393
16. Dweck, C. S., (2007). The perils and promises of praise. Educational Leadership, 65, 34–39.
17. Engelsen, K. S., Eide, T., & Meling, B., (2009). Er ‘kjempebra’ godt nok? [Is "excellent" good enough?] Spesialpedagogikk (3), 4–11.
18. Evans, C., (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83, 70–120.10.3102/0034654312474350
19. Fisher, A., (2008). Teaching comprehension and critical literacy:Investigating guided reading in three primary classrooms. Literacy, 42, 19–28.10.1111/j.1467-9345.2008.00477.x
20. Ford, M. P., & Opitz, M. F., (2008). A national survey of guided reading practices:What We can learn from primary teachers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47, 309–331.10.1080/19388070802332895
21. Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S., (2013). Guided reading:The romance and the reality. Reading Teacher, 66, 268–284.
22. Gage, N. L., & Needels, M. C., (1989). Process-product research on teaching:A review of criticisms. The Elementary School Journal, 3, 253–300.10.1086/461577
23. Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K., (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education:Principles, Policy & Practice, 20, 150–169. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212
24. Graf, S. T., & Skovmand, K., (2004). Indledning [Introduction]. In S. T., Graf & K., Skovmand (Eds.), Fylde og form:Wolfgang Klafki i teori og praksis [Substance and shape. Wolfgang Klafki in theory and practice]. (pp. 15–57). Århus:Klim.
25. Grythe, J., (2011). Forskningsbasert undervisning som evidensbasert praksis? [Research based teaching as research based practice?]. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 95, 386–397.
26. Gundem, B. B., & Hopmann, S., (1998). Introduction:Didaktik meets curriculum. In B. B., Gundem & S., Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or Curriculum:an international dialogue. New York, NY:Peter Lang.
27. Hamilton, D., (1999). The pedagogic paradox (or why no didactics in England?). Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 7, 135–152.10.1080/14681369900200048
28. Hattie, J., (2008). Visible learning:A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London:Routledge.
29. Hattie, J., & Gan, M., (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In R. E., Mayer & P. A., Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 249–271). New York:Routledge.
30. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H., (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
31. Havnes, A., & McDowell, L., (2012). Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education. Routledge Research in Education. Routledge:Taylor & Francis.
32. Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K., (2012). Formative assessment and feedback:Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38, 21–27.10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
33. Hawe, E., Dixon, H., & Watson, E., (2008). Oral feedback in the context of written language. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31, 43–58.
34. Hempenstall, K., (2014). What works? Evidence-based practice in education is complex. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 19, 113–127. doi:10.1080/19404158.2014.921631
35. Hertzberg, F., (2003). Arbeid med muntlige ferdigheter [Work with oral skills]. In K., Klette (Ed.), Klasserommets praksisformer etter Reform 97 (pp. 137–173). Oslo:Pedagogisk forskningsinstitutt.
36. Hopmann, S., (1997). Wolfgang Klafki och den tyska didaktiken [Wolfgang Klafki and the German Didaktik]. In M., Uljens (Ed.), Didaktik:teori, reflektion och praktik [Didaktik:theory, reflection and practice] (pp. 198–214). Lund:Studenterlitteratur.
37. Hopmann, S., (2007). Restrained teaching:The common core of Didaktik. European Educational Research Journal, 6, 109–124.10.2304/eerj
38. Iaquinta, A., (2006). Guided reading:A research-based response to the challenges of early reading instruction. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33, 413–418.10.1007/s10643-006-0074-2
39. Kim, J.-H., (2013). Teacher action research as Bildung:An application of Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics to teacher professional development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45, 379–393.10.1080/00220272.2012.702224
40. Klafki, W., (2001). Kategorial dannelse [Bildung by way of concepts]. In E. L., Dale (Ed.), Om utdanning. Klassiske tekster [About education. Classical texts] (pp. 167–204). Oslo:Gyldendal akademisk.
41. Klette, K., (2007). Trends in research on teaching and learning in schools:Didactics meets classroom studies. European Educational Research Journal, 6, 147–160.10.2304/eerj
42. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A., (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance:A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
43. Künzli, R., (2002). The common frame and the places of Didaktik. In B. B., Gundem & S., Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum (pp. 29–45). New York, NY:Peter Lang.
44. Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D., (2005). Classroom assessment:Minute by minute. Day by Day. Educational Leadership, 63, 18–24.
45. Lindberg, V., & Hirsh, Å., (2015). Formativ bedömning på 2000-talet:En översikt av svensk och internationell forskning i Forskning och skola i samverkan–Kartläggningar av forskningsresultat med relevans för praktiskt arbete i skolväsendet [Formative evaluation 2000–2010:An outline of Swedish and international research in research and schools in interaction–A mapping of research findings with relevance for schools]. Stockholm:Vetenskapsrådet [The National Research Council].
46. Lyster, R., & Saito, K., (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302.10.1017/S0272263109990520
47. Mausethagen, S., & Mølstad, C. E., (2015). Shifts in curriculum control:Contesting ideas of teacher autonomy. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(2).
48. Menck, P., (2000). Looking into classrooms:Papers on didactics. Issues in curriculum theory, policy, and research. Ablex publishing:Stamford.
49. Neubert, M. J., (1998). The value of feedback and goal setting over goal setting alone and potential moderators of this effect:A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 11, 321–335.10.1207/s15327043hup1104_2
50. New Zealand, M. O. E., (1997). Reading for life. The learner as a reader. Learning Media.
51. Nordenbo, S. E., Larsen, M. S., Tiftikci, N., Eline Wendt, R., & Østergaard, S., (2008). Lærerkompetanser og elevers læring i barnehage og skole:et systematisk review utført for Kunnskapsdepartementet [Teacher competences and pupil achievement in pre-school and school - A systematic review carried out for The Ministry of Education and Research, Oslo]. Oslo:Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsforlag.
52. Nuthall, G., (2007). The hidden lives of learners. Wellington:NZCER Press.
53. OECD. (2005). Teachers matter:Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris:OECD.
54. Palm, K., & Stokke, R. S., (2013). Early Years Literacy Program-en modell for grunnleggende lese-og skriveopplæring i flerspråklige klasserom? [Early Years Literacy Program - a model for basic reading and writing instruction in multilinguistic classrooms?] Norsklæreren 4, 54–67.
55. Purdy, J., (2008). Inviting conversation:Meaningful talk about texts for English language learners. Literacy, 42, 44–51.10.1111/j.1467-9345.2008.00479.x
56. Ramaprasad, A., (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4–13.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1743
57. Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S., (2012). 'It’s ok–Not everyone can be good at math’:Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 731–737.10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012
58. Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J., (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement:Insights from the prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104, 1525–1567.10.1111/tcre.2002.104.issue-8
59. Sadler, D. R., (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.10.1007/BF00117714
60. Sadler, D. R., (2010). Beyond feedback:Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 535–550.
61. Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., & Horn, S. P., (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement:Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57–67.10.1023/A:1007999204543
62. Schwartz, R. M., (2005). Decisions, decisions:Responding to primary students during guided reading. The Reading Teacher, 58, 436–443.10.1598/RT.58.5.3
63. Shavelson, R. J., Yin, Y., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Ayala, C. C., Young, D. B., … Pottenger III, F. M., (2008). On the role and impact of formative assessment on science inquiry teaching and learning. In J. E., Coffey, R., Douglas & C., Stearns (Eds.), Assessing science learning:Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 21–36). Arlington:NSTA press.
64. Shulman, L. S., (2004). Research on teaching. A historical and personal perspective. In L. S., Shulman (Ed.), The wisdom of practice. Essays on teaching, learning, and Learning to Teach (pp. 14–29). San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
65. Shute, V. J., (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.10.3102/0034654307313795
66. Skidmore, D., Perez-Parent, M., & Arnfield, S., (2003). Teacher-Pupil Dialogue in the Guided Reading Session. Reading:Literacy and Language, 37, 47–53.
67. Smith, K., (2007). Vurdering som et motivasjonsfremmende redskap for læring [Assessment as a motivational tool for learning]. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift (2), 100–105.
68. Smith, K., (2008). Samspillet mellom vurdering og motivasjon [The interaction between assessment and motivation]. In S., Dobson, A., Eggen & K., Smith (Eds.), Vurdering, prinsipper og praksis. Nye perspektiver på elev- og læringsvurdering. [Assessment, principles and practice. New perspectives on the assessment of students and apprentices.] (pp. 23–38). Oslo:Gyldendal Akademisk.
69. Solheim, R., & Aasen, A. J., (2011). Rettleidd lesing - ei ramme for den første leseopplæringa [Guided reading–A framework for the first reading instruction]. Norsklæreren (4), 64–73.
70. Terhart, E., (2003). Constructivism and teaching:A new paradigm in general didactics? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35, 25–44.10.1080/00220270210163653
71. Throndsen, I., (2011). Lærerens tilbakemeldinger og elevenes motivasjon. [The teacher’s feedback and the students’ motivation]. Nordic Studies in Education (3), 165–176.
72. Timperley, H. S., & Parr, J. M., (2009). What is this lesson about? Instructional processes and student understandings in writing classrooms. Curriculum Journal, 20, 43–60.10.1080/09585170902763999
73. Torrance, H., & Pryor, J., (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom:Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 615–631.10.1080/01411920120095780
74. Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C., (1996). ‘How does your teacher help you to make your work better?’ Children’s understanding of formative assessment. Curriculum Journal, 7, 185–203.10.1080/0958517960070205
75. Tveit, A., (2009). Roser vi barn for mye? [Are we praising children too much?]. Spesialpedagogikk (10).
76. Uljens, M., (1997). Grunddrag till en reflektiv skoldidaktisk teori [Basic features of a school didactic theory]. In M., Uljens (Ed.), Didaktik:teori, reflektion och praktik [Didaktik:theory, reflection and practice] (pp. 19–29). Lund:Studentlitteratur.
77. van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D., (2013). Teacher feedback during active learning:Current practices in primary schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 341–362.10.1111/bjep.2013.83.issue-2
78. Vásquez-Levy, D., (2002). Bildung-centred Didaktik:A framework for examining the educational potential of subject matter. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, 117–128.10.1080/00220270110056581
79. Voerman, L., Korthagen, F. A., Meijer, P. C., & Simons, R. J., (2014). Feedback revisited:Adding perspectives based on positive psychology. Implications for theory and classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 91–98.10.1016/j.tate.2014.06.005
80. Voerman, L., Meijer, P. C., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Simons, R. J., (2012). Types and frequencies of feedback interventions in classroom interaction in secondary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 1107–1115.10.1016/j.tate.2012.06.006
81. Volante, L., & Beckett, D., (2011). Formative assessment and the contemporary classroom:Synergies and tensions between research and practice. Canadian Journal of Education, 34, 239–255.
82. Westbury, I., Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K., (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice:The German Didaktik tradition. Studies in curriculum theory series. Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
83. Willbergh, I., (2015). The problems of ‘competence’ and alternatives from the Scandinavian perspective of Bildung. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47, 334–354.10.1080/00220272.2014.1002112