Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 57-67

  Wright, S Paul ^a   Horn, Sandra P ^a   Sanders, William L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002624839     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007999204543     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Berk, R. (1988). Fifty reasons why student achievement gains does not mean teacher effectiveness. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(4) 345-364.
2. Brophy, J. (1968). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist (October), 1069-1077.
3. CTB/McGraw-Hill (1990). Comprehensive test of basic skills (4th ed.). Spring Norms Book. Monterey, CA: CTB/Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.
4. Ellett, C. D. (1990). A new generation of classroom-based assessments of teaching and learning: Concepts, issues and controversies from pilots of the Louisiana STAR. Baton Rouge: Teaching Internship and Statewide Teacher Evaluation Projects, College of Education, Louisiana State University.
5. Kulik, J. A. (1992). An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.
6. O'Neil, J. (1992). On tracking and individual differences: A conversation with Jeannie Oakes. Educational Leadership, 50(2), 18-21.
7. Peterson, D., Kromrey, J., & Smith, D. C. (1990). Research-based teacher evaluation: A response to Scriven. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4(1), 7-18.
8. Porter, A. C., & Brophy, J. (1988). Synthesis of research on good teaching: Insights from the work of the Institute for Research on Teaching. Educational Leadership, 45(8), (May), 74-85.
9. Rogers, K. B., & Kimpston, R. D. (1992). Acceleration: What we do vs. what we know. Educational Leadership, 50(2), 58-61.
10. Rosenthal, R. (2984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11. Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1995a). Educational assessment reassessed: The usefulness of standardized and alternative measures of student achievement as indicators for the assessment of educational outcomes. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 3(6).
12. Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1995b). The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): Mixed model methodology in educational assessment. In A. J. Shinkfield & D. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice (pp. 337-350). Boston: Kluwer.
13. Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Research Progress Report. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
14. Sanders, W. L., Saxton, A. M., & Horn, S. P. (In press). The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment Systems (TVAAS): A quantitative, outcome-based approach to educational assessment. In J. Millman (Ed.), Assuring accountability? Using gains in student learning to evaluate teachers and schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
15. Schalock, H. A., & Schalock, M. D. (1993). Student learning in teacher evaluation and school improvement: An introduction. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(2), 103-104.
16. Scriven, M. (1990). Can research-based teacher evaluation be saved? Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4(1), 19-39.
17. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57(3), 293-336.
18. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 471-499.
19. Travers, R. M. W. (1981). Criteria of good teaching. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 14-22). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base of school learning. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 249-294.