Library Classification Trends in the 21st Century

Library Classification Trends in the 21st Century

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1-172

  Kumbhar, Rajendra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PUNE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84957734721     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1533/9781780632988     Document Type: Book

References (487)

1. Abbas J. In the margins: reflections on scribbles, knowledge organization, and access. Knowledge Organization 2007, 34(2):72-77.
2. Abdel Hady M.F., Shaker A.K. Cataloging and classification education in Egypt: stressing the fundamentals while approaching toward automated applications. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2005, 41(3/4).
3. Adams S. Comparing the IPC and the US classification systems for the patent searcher. World Patent Information 2001, 23(1):15-23.
4. Adams S. Using the International Patent Classification in an online environment. World Patent Information 2000, 22(4):291-300.
5. Adhikary M.M., Nandi A. Ranganathan's promulgation of Verbal plane: a linguistic approach. SRELS Journal of Information Management 2004, 41(3):275-281.
6. Ahrberg J.H., Seikel M., Shorten J. Why do you still use Dewey? Academic libraries that continue with Dewey decimal classification. Library Resources & Technical Services 2005, 49(2):123-136.
7. Aitchison J., Clarke S.D. The thesaurus: a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 2004, 37(3/4):5-21.
8. Albertsen K., Van Nuys C. Paradigma: FRBR and digital documents Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2005, 39(3/4):125-149.
9. Albrechtsen H., Pejtersen A.M. Cognitive work analysis and work centered design of classification schemes. Knowledge Organization 2003, 30(3/4):213-227.
10. Anderson J.D., Hofmann M.A. A fully faceted syntax for Library of Congress Subject Headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2006, 43(1).
11. Angus E., Thelwall M., Stuart D. General patterns of tag usage among university groups in Flickr. Online Information Review 2008, 32(1):89-101.
12. Anouncia S.M., Joseph J.G. Approaches for Automated Object Recognition and Extraction from Images - A Study. CIT - Journal of Computing and Information Technology 2009, 17(4):359-370.
13. Antoshkova O.A. Overview of UDC Print Editions. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya 2008, 8:1-4.
14. Appavu S., Rajaram R. Knowledge-based system for text classification using ID6NB algorithm. Knowledge-based systems 2009, 22(1):1-7.
15. Appavu S., et al. Data mining based intelligent analysis of threatening E-Mail. Knowledge-Based Systems 2009, 22(5):392-393.
16. Araghi G.F. A dynamic look toward classification and retrieval. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 2004, 38(1):43-53.
17. Araghi G.F. A new scheme for library classification. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2004, 38(2):75-99.
18. Aranalde M.M. Reflections on the categorical systems of Aristotle, Kant and Ranganathan. Ciencia da Informacao 2009, 38(1):86-108.
19. Ardito S.C. OCLC v. The Library Hotel. Information Today 2003, 20(11):17-20.
20. Arellano F.F.M., Garrido O.A.Y. Classification systems used in Latin American libraries. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 2000, 30(1):123-135.
21. Argamon S., et al. Stylistic text classification using functional lexical features. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58(6):802-822.
22. Asundi A.Y. Reorienting concept classification to electronic information organisation: an exploratory study. International Information Communication and Education 2001, 20(2):179-185.
23. Attar K.E. The practice of Bliss. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 2002, 34(4):47-65.
24. Attar K.E. The application of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification in Cambridge College libraries. New Review of Academic Librarianship 2000, 6:35-49.
25. Babik W. Knowledge representation in map collections for information retrieval systems. Liber Quarterly: the Journal of European Research Libraries 1999, 9(2):172-179.
26. Bang S.L., Yang J.D., Yang H.J. Hierarchical document categorization with k-NN and concept-based thesauri. Information Processing & Management 2006, 42(2):387-406.
27. Basu A., Panigrahi P., Prasad A.R.D. NLP based automatic classification system for analytico synthetic scheme. SRELS Journal of Information Management 2003, 40(4):289-312.
28. Beall J. Racially Mixed People, DDC Table 5 Ethnic and National Groups, and MARC 21 Bibliographic Format Field 083. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2009, 47(7):657-670.
29. Beghtol C. Professional values and ethics in knowledge organization and cataloging. Journal of Information Ethics 2008, 17(1):12-19.
30. Beghtol C. Exploring new approaches to the organization of knowledge: the subject classification of James Duff Brown. Library Trends 2004, 52(4):702-718.
31. Beghtol C. Classification for information retrieval and classification for knowledge discovery: relationships between 'professional' and 'naive' classifications. Knowledge Organization 2003, 30(2):64-73.
32. Benabdeslem K., Bennani Y. Dendogram-based SVM for multi-class classification. CIT - Journal of Computing and Information Technology 2006, 14(4):283-289.
33. Bertolucci K. Happiness is taxonomy: four structures for Snoopy. Information Outlook 2003, 7(3):36-44.
34. Bhojaraju G., Urs S.R. Knowledge organisation systems in digital libraries: a comparative study. Information Studies 2006, 12(4):229-257.
35. Bianco C.E. Medical librarians' uses and perceptions of social tagging. Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) 2009, 97(2):136-139.
36. Bland R.N., Stoffan M.A. Returning classification to the catalog. Information Technology and Libraries 2008, 27(3):55-60.
37. Boettcher J. Challenges and opportunities presented by NAICS. Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship 1999, 5(2):3-13.
38. Bowman J.H. Classification in British public libraries: a historical perspective. Library History 2005, 21(3):143-173.
39. Bowman J.H. Education and training for cataloguing and classification in the British Isles. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2005, 41(3/4):309-333.
40. Bradley C.J. Classifying and cataloguing music in American libraries: a historical overview. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 2003, 35(3/4):467-481.
41. Brenner W., Kolbe L.M., Kremer S. Towards a procedure model in terminology management. Journal of Documentation 2005, 61(2):281-295.
42. Brett R. Classification practice in law libraries: a brief survey. Legal Information Management 2008, 8(1):61-63.
43. Broughton V. Henry Evelyn Bliss - the other immortal, or a prophet without honour?. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 2008, 40(1):45-58.
44. Broughton V. The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval. Aslib Proceedings 2006, 58(1):49-72.
45. Broughton V. Organizing a national humanities portal; a model for the classification and subject management of digital resources. Information Research Watch International 2002, 2-4.
46. Broughton V. Current research on the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition. Information Research Watch International 2001, 2-3.
47. Broughton V. Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment; the Bliss Bibliographic Classification and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 2001, 7:67-102.
48. Broughton V. A new classification for the literature of religion. International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control 2000, 29(4):59-61.
49. Broughton V. Notational expressivity; the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding. Knowledge Organization 1999, 26(3):140-148.
50. Broughton V., Lane L. Classification schemes revisited: applications to Web indexing and searching. Journal of Internet Cataloging 2000, 2(3/4):143-155.
51. Broughton V., Slavic A. Building a faceted classification for the humanities: principles and procedures. Journal of Documentation 2007, 63(5):727-754.
52. Bruce R. Descriptor and Folksonomy Concurrence in Education Related Scholarly Research. Webology 2008, 5(3).
53. Brunt R. Information storage and retrieval in the professional curriculum: spring, 1980. Library Review 2007, 56(7):552-556.
54. Bruun A. Development of the IPC as a search tool. World Patent Information 1999, 21(2):97-100.
55. Buchel O., Coleman A. How can classificatory structures be used to improve science education?. Library Resources and Technical Services 2003, 47(1):4-15.
56. Cai W., et al. An algorithm to remove multi-category noise based on the statistics of frequency. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2004, 23(4):399-403.
57. Calado P., et al. Link-based similarity measures for the classification of web documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57(2):208-221.
58. Calvert J., Makarov M. The reform of the IPC. World Patent Information 2001, 23(2):133-136.
59. Cameron G. Revising government Web content structure: what is IPSV?. Information Management and Technology 2005, 38(4):162-164.
60. Carstens T.B., Vihnanek E.M. Classification of a small collection of music compact discs: a practical approach for the non-musician. Technical Services Quarterly 2000, 18(1):25-32.
61. Carvalho D.R., Freitas A.A. Evaluating six candidate solutions for the small-disjunct problem and choosing the best solution via meta-learning. Artificial Intelligence Review 2005, 24(1):61-98.
62. Castillo L., de la Cueva A. Evolution and use of controlled languages in news documentation. Profesional de la Informacion 2007, 16(6):617-626.
63. Caton B.Q., Hawkins D.T., Larson S.E. Information science abstracts: tracking the literature of information science. II. A new taxonomy for information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(8):771-781.
64. Chan L.M. A guide to the Library of Congress Classification 2004, Englewood, Libraries Unlimited, pp. 14 and 28. 5th.
65. Chan L.M. A guide to the Library of Congress Classification 2004, Englewood, Libraries Unlimited, p. 1. 5th ed.
66. Chan L.M., Zeng M.L. Trends and issues in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2004, 55(5):377-395.
67. Chaojun X., Yi L., Xiaojiang Y. Design and implementation of theme based Resource Gathering System using fuzzy rule reasoning algorithm. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2009, 28(6):815-820.
68. Chatterjee A. Treatment of complex subjects in documentary classification with special reference to CC and BC. A comparative study. Herald of Library Science 2000, 39(1-2):41-49.
69. Chaudhry A.S., Jiun T.P. Enhancing access to digital information resources on heritage: a case of development of a taxonomy at the Integrated Museum and Archives System in Singapore. Journal of Documentation 2005, 61(6):751-776.
70. Chaudhry A.S., Ling G.H. Building taxonomies using organizational resources: a case of business consulting environment. Knowledge Organization 2005, 32(1):25-46.
71. Chen Z., Lu K. A preprocess algorithm of filtering irrelevant information based on the minimum class difference. Knowledge-Based Systems 2006, 19(6):422-429.
72. Chen J., et al. A selective Bayes classifier for classifying incomplete data based on gain ratio. Knowledge-Based Systems 2008, 21(7):530-534.
73. Cheung C.F., Lee W.B., Wang Y. A multi-facet taxonomy system with applications in unstructured knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management 2005, 9(6):76-91.
74. Choi B., Peng X. Dynamic and hierarchical classification of Web pages. Online Information Review 2004, 28(2):139-147.
75. Chrissikopoulos V., Papavlasopoulos S., Poulos M. A text categorization technique based on a numerical conversion of a symbolic expression and an onion layers algorithm. Journal of Digital Information 2005, 6(1). Retrieved on 10 April 2010, from:. http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/63.
76. Chung W., Chen H., Reid E. Business Stakeholder Analyzer: an experiment of classifying stakeholders on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(1):59-74.
77. Cisco S.L., Jackson W.K. Creating order out of chaos with taxonomies. Information Management Journal 2005, 39(3):44-46.
78. Connelly J. Functional taxonomies: myth or magic?. Records Management Bulletin 2008, 142:10-15.
79. Corcocan M. Taxonomies: hope or hype?. Online 2002, 26(5):76-78.
80. Cosh K.J., Burns R., Daniel T. Content clouds: classifying content in Web 2.0. Library Review 2008, 57(9):722-729.
81. Cote J.A. Knowledge taxonomies: what's the role for information professionals?. Information Outlook 2005, 9(6):45-46. 48, 51-52.
82. Coult G.R. Taxonomy. Managing Information 2002, 9(4):28-30.
83. Currier S. Classification schemes in art libraries in the United Kingdom. Art Libraries Journal 2002, 27(1):18-22.
84. Cuvillier J. Indexing grey resources: considering the usual behaviour of library users and the use of Dublin Core Metadata using a database of specialised vocabulary. The Grey Journal 2007, 3(2):169-175.
85. Dal Porto S., Marchitelli A. The functionality and flexibility of traditional classification schemes applied to a Content Management System (CMS): Facets, DDC, JITA. Knowledge Organization 2006, 33(1):35-44.
86. Davis S.P. HILCC: a Hierarchical Interface to Library of Congress Classification. Journal of Internet Cataloging 2002, 5(4):19-49.
87. de Cours I. Choosing a classification scheme for the Inha Library in Paris. Art Libraries Journal 2002, 27(1):23-26.
88. Dehuri S., Mall R. Predictive and comprehensible rule discovery using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Knowledge-Based Systems 2006, 19(6):413-421.
89. Devi M.I., Rajaram R., Selvakuberan K. Generating best features for web page classification. Webology 2008, 5(1). Retrieved on 10 April 2010, from:. http://www.webology.org/2008/v5n1/a52.html.
90. Dextre Clarke S.G. The last 50 years of knowledge organization: a journey through my personal archives. Journal of Information Science 2008, 34(4):427-437.
91. Dhyani P. Library classification in [the] computer age. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology 1999, 19(3):5-14.
92. Diamond L. Library of Congress religious law classification schedules: elegant, flexible and user-friendly. International Journal of Legal Information 2001, 29(2):488-496.
93. Dilevko J., Gottlieb L. The relevance of classification theory to textual analysis. Library & Information Science Research 2009, 31(2):92-100.
94. Dodgson P., Jeffrey-Cook R. Developing the local government classification scheme. Records Management Bulletin 2007, 140:16-18.
95. Dong-Geun O., Ji-Suk Y. Suggesting an option for DDC class Religion (200) for nations in which religious diversity predominates. Knowledge Organization 2001, 28(2):75-84.
96. Dotsika F. Uniting formal and informal descriptive power: reconciling ontologies with folksonomies. International Journal of Information Management 2009, 29(5):407-415.
97. Dow R. Legal intranets: the new law library. Law Librarian 2000, 31(3):147-151.
98. Dutta B., Majumder K., Sen B.K. Classification of key words extracted from research articles published in science journals. Annals of Library and Information Studies 2008, 55(4):317-333.
99. Duwairi R.M. Machine learning for Arabic text categorization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57(8):1005-1010.
100. Duwairi R., et al. Feature reduction techniques for Arabic text categorization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(11):2347-2352.
101. Earley S. To keep KM current, pay attention to context changes. Information Outlook 2006, 10(4):31-32.
102. El-Beltagy S.R., Rafea A. KP-Miner: a keyphrase extraction system for English and Arabic Documents. Information Systems 2009, 34(1):132-144.
103. Ellis D., Vasconcelos A. Ranganathan and the Net: using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web. Aslib Proceedings 1999, 51(1):3-10.
104. Fagiolini A. CDD 22. Italian edition: the evolution of a project, the main innovations Biblioteche Oggi 2009, 27(4):5-12.
105. Falasco L. Bases of the United States Patent Classification. World Patent Information 2002, 24(1):31-33.
106. Falasco L. United States patent classification: system organization. World Patent Information 2002, 24(2):111-117.
107. Farmer L. Automatic categorization: what's it all about?. Serials Librarian 2006, 51(2):91-101.
108. Fennewald J. Same questions, different venue: an analysis of in-person and online questions. Reference Librarian 2006, 46(95/96):21-35.
109. Ferrari R.C. The art of classification: alternate classification systems in art libraries. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 1999, 28(2):73-98.
110. Ferris A.M. They will use it, if you buy it! Results of an expanded survey on the use of classification Web. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2009, 47(5):427-451.
111. Fersini E., Messina E., Archetti F. Enhancing web page classification through image-block importance analysis. Information Processing and Management 2008, 44(4):1431-1447.
112. Field M. The art of classification: making use of an old new business tool. Law Librarian 2000, 31(3):187-189.
113. Field M. Why classification is sexy. Library Association Record 1999, 101(10):580-582.
114. Flood G. Crystal classification shines for big databases. Information World Review 2002, 181:4.
115. Foscarini F. Records classification and functions: an archival perspective. Knowledge Organization 2006, 33(4):188-198.
116. Foster J., et al. When is a thesaurus not a thesaurus: the GCHQ story continues. Catalogue & Index 2001, 140:12.
117. Fox R. Cataloging our information architecture. OCLC Systems and Services 2005, 21(1):23-29.
118. Frank E., Paynter G.W. Predicting Library of Congress classifications from Library of Congress subject headings. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2004, 55(3):214-227.
119. Fujino A., Ueda N., Saito K. A hybrid generative/discriminative approach to text classification with additional information. Information Processing & Management 2007, 43(2):379-392.
120. Furner J. Dewey deracialized: a critical race-theoretic perspective. Knowledge Organization 2007, 34(3):144-168.
121. Gaikaiwari M. An interactive application for faceted classification systems. Information Studies 2002, 8(1):43-56.
122. Gama J. Combining classification algorithms. AI Communications 2000, 13(2):135-136.
123. Garshol L.M. Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic maps! Making sense of it all. Journal of Information Science 2004, 30(4):378-391.
124. Gauch S., Chandramouli A., Ranganathan Shankar Training a hierarchical classifier using interdocument relationships. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(1):47-58.
125. Gauder B. Team efforts keep the DDC nimble. OCLC Newsletter 2003, 261:15.
126. Geneva G., et al. Experiments in discourse analysis impact on information classification and retrieval algorithms. Information Processing and Management 2003, 39(6):825-851.
127. Giess M.D., Wild P.J., McMahon C.A. The generation of faceted classification schemes for use in the Organisation of Engineering Design Documents. International Journal of Information Management 2008, 28(5):379-390.
128. Gilchrist A. Thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies: an etymological note. Journal of Documentation 2003, 59(1):7-18.
129. Gilchrist A. From Aristotle to the 'semantic web'. Library Association Record 2002, 104(1):40-42.
130. Gilchrist A. Corporate taxonomies: report on a survey of current practice. Online Information Review 2001, 25(2):94-102.
131. Glanzel Schubert A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics 2003, 56(3):357-367.
132. Glaser R. To classify or alphabetize: the arrangement of print periodicals in academic libraries. Serials Review 2007, 33(2):91-96.
133. Gnoli C. Phylogenetic classification. Knowledge Organization 2006, 33(3):138-152.
134. Gnoli C., Poli R. Levels of reality and levels of representation. Knowledge Organization 2004, 31(3):151-160.
135. Goh D.H., et al. Resource discovery through social tagging: a classification and content analytic approach. Online Information Review 2009, 33(3):568-583.
136. Gokhale P. Ontology: a tool for organization of knowledge. Information Studies 2009, 15(4):233-242.
137. Goldberg J.E. Development of a Universal Law Classification: a retrospective on Library of Congress Class K. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 2003, 35(3/4):355-436.
138. Golub K. Automated subject classification of textual web documents. Journal of Documentation 2006, 62(3):350-371.
139. Golub K., Lykke M. Automated classification of Web pages in hierarchical browsing. Journal of Documentation 2009, 65(6):901-925.
140. Gonzalez L. WebDewey change streamlines workflow. Action for Libraries 2005, 31(11).
141. Gopinath M.A. Study of causal factors for problems in the recognition of manifestations of fundamental categories. SRELS Journal of Information Management 2002, 39(3):235-244.
142. Gopinath M.A. Lexicographic approach to classification and thesaurus construction. International Information Communication and Education 2001, 20(1):13-24.
143. Gopinath M.A. Universal classification system for knowledge fields. Information Studies 2001, 7(2):71-73.
144. Gopinath M.A. Curricula in teaching classification and indexing in advanced courses in library and information science: a case study. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation and Information Studies 1999, 36(1):3-9.
145. Gopinath M.A., Mangai A. Postulational approach to classifying subjects embodied in documents in any medium. Information Studies 2003, 9(1/2):31-42.
146. Gurbuz F., Ozbaki L., Yapici H. Classification rule discovery for the aviation incidents resulted in fatality. Knowledge-Based Systems 2009, 22(8):622-632.
147. Haider S.J. Teaching of cataloging and classification in Pakistan. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2006, 43(1).
148. Hammami M., et al. Automatic violent content Web filtering approach based on the KDD process. International Journal of Web Information Systems 2008, 4(4):441-464.
149. Hammond T., et al. Social bookmarking tools (1): a general review. D-Lib Magazine 2005, 11(4). Retrieved on 10 April 2010, from:. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html.
150. Han H., Ko Y., Seo J. Using the revised EM algorithm to remove noisy data for improving the one-against-the-rest method in binary text classification. Information Processing & Management 2007, 43(5):1281-1293.
151. Harbo O. Melvil Dewey, rationalitetens apostel. Melvil Dewey, apostle of rationalism. Synopsis 2002, 33(6):311-316.
152. Harinarayana N.S., Raju N.V. Citation analysis of SRR's works: a look through the window of Google Scholar. Information Studies 2009, 15(3):165-178.
153. Harvey R., Reynolds S. MARCup to markup: education for cataloguing and classification in Australia. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2005, 41(3/4).
154. Hayati Z., Tajer P. The comparison of hierarchical structure of subject directories Yahoo, The Open Directory & Looksmart with Dewey Decimal Classification in 10 selective subjects. Iranian Journal of Information Science and Technology 2006, 4(2).
155. Hedden H. Taxonomy tool roundup. EContent 2008, 31(3):40-44.
156. Heiner-Freiling M. DDC German - the project, the aims, the methods: new ideas for a well-established traditional classification system. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2006, 42(3/4):147-162.
157. Henry D.B., Neville T.M. Testing classification systems for reference questions. Reference & User Services Quarterly 2008, 47(4):364-373.
158. Hickey T.B., Vizine-Goetz D. The role of classification in CORC. Journal of Library Administration 2001, 34(3/4):421-430.
159. Hider P. A Comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2009, 47(6):544-560.
160. Hider P. Learning to classify: online versus printed Dewey. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science 2004, 9(1):15-25.
161. Hiebert J.T. Beyond Mark and Park: classification mapping as a collection development tool for psychiatry/psychology. Collection Management 2009, 34(3):182-193.
162. Himmel W., Reincke U., Michelmann H.W. Text mining and natural language processing approaches for automatic categorization of lay requests to Web-based expert forums. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2009, 11(3).
163. Hjorland B. Concept theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(8):1519-1536.
164. Hjorland B. Core classification theory: a reply to Szostak. Journal of Documentation 2008, 64(3):333-342.
165. Hjorland B. What is Knowledge Organization (KO)?. Knowledge Organization 2008, 35(2-3):86-101.
166. Hjorland B., Albrechtsen H. An analysis of some trends in classification research. Knowledge Organization 1999, 26(3):131-139.
167. Hjorland B., Nicolaisen J. Scientific and scholarly classifications are not 'naive': a comment. Knowledge Organization 2004, 31(1):55-61.
168. Hjorland B., Pedersen K.N. A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval. Journal of Documentation 2005, 61(5):582-597.
169. Holley R.P. Subject access tools in English for Canadian topics: Canadian extensions to U.S. subject access tools. Library Resources & Technical Services 2008, 52(2):29-43.
170. Hopkins S. Decimating Dewey: introducing a bookshop arrangement for shelving the nonfiction collection. Australasian Public Libraries and Information Services 2007, 20(1):8-13.
171. Howley T., Madden M.G. The genetic kernel support vector machine: description and evaluation. Artificial Intelligence Review 2005, 24(3-4):379-395.
172. Hu Y., Chen Y. Differences between the DDC and the CLC in classifying works of literature. Illinois Libraries 2007, 86(4):5-10.
173. Humphrey S.M., et al. Comparing a rule-based versus statistical system for automatic categorization of MEDLINE documents according to biomedical specialty. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(12):2530-2539.
174. Hung C., Chien L. Web-based text classification in the absence of manually labeled training documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58(1):88-96.
175. Interview with Ingetraut Dahlberg. Knowledge Organization, 35(2-3), 82-85.
176. Ishida E. An overview of text categorization. Journal of Information Science and Technology Association (Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu) 2006, 56(10):469-474.
177. Jacob E.K. Classification and categorization: a difference that makes a difference. Library Trends 2004, 52(3):515-540.
178. Jaiswal B. Automatic document classification. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology 1999, 19(3):23-28.
179. Jamain A., Hand D.J. Mining supervised classification performance studies: a meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Classification 2008, 25(1):87-112.
180. Jansen B.J., Booth D.L., Spink A. Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries. Information Processing and Management 2008, 44(3):1251-1266.
181. Janssens F., et al. Hybrid clustering for validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes. Information Processing and Management 2009, 45(6):683-702.
182. Jeffrey-Cook R. Developing a fileplan for local government. Records Management Bulletin 2005, 125:3-5.
183. Jianbo D., Hanqing H. Principle of the automatic mapping system of library classifications, taking CLC and DDC as the example. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2005, 24(3):299-303.
184. Jiang S.Y. Lost in translation: the treatment of Chinese Classics in the Library of Congress Classification. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2007, 45(1):3-14.
185. Jing L., Hanqing H. Design and construction of intelligent search engine based on subject portal: the Experiment of Agricultural History portal's search engine. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2009, 28(1):114-120.
186. Jones K.S. Revisiting classification for retrieval. Journal of Documentation 2005, 61(5):598-601.
187. Jones S. Classification: are we overdoing it? Library+Information. Update 2002, 1(1):24.
188. Joorabchi A., Mahdi A.E. An automated syllabus digital library system for higher education in Ireland. The Electronic Library 2009, 27(4):640-658.
189. Jouin S. We need to talk about problem novels. A new way of classifying novels for a young adult readership. Bulletin des Bibliotheques de France 2008, 6:76-80.
190. Jun W., Yuhua C. An automatic approach to ontology building by integrating traditional knowledge organization resources. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2009, 28(5):651-657.
191. Junion-Metz G. Dewey made fun. School Library Journal 2002, 48(8):31.
192. Kabir A.M.F. Ranganathan: a universal librarian. Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences 2003, 40(4):453-459.
193. Kanaan G., et al. A comparison of text-classification techniques applied to Arabic text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(9):1836-1844.
194. Kanaris I., Stamatatos E. Learning to recognize webpage genres. Information Processing and Management 2009, 45(5):499-512.
195. Kashyap M.M. Likeness between Ranganathan's postulations based approach to knowledge classification and entity relationship data modeling approach. Knowledge Organization 2003, 30(1):1-19.
196. Kashyap M.M. Similarity between ranganathan's postulates for designing a scheme for library classification and Peter Pin-Sen Chen's entity relationship approach to data modelling and analysis. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology 2001, 21(3):3-16.
197. Kato Y., et al. Classifying information sender of web documents. Internet Research 2008, 18(2):191-203.
198. Keikha M., Khonsari A., Oroumchian R. Rich document representation and classification. Knowledge-Based Systems 2009, 22(1):67-71.
199. Kepner L.T. Workable solutions with Dewey classification. Technicalities 2002, 22(4):12-13. 9.
200. Khan A. Dewey Decimal Classification 22 and beyond. A study of the new edition of Dewey Decimal Classification. Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal 2004, 35(3):9-17.
201. Khan S.N. Expansion of DDC 21st edition number 297.63 for Sirah. Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal 2004, 35(4):16-25.
202. Kim K. Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002. Library Resources and Technical Services 2003, 47(3):96-108.
203. Kim J., Choi K. Patent document categorization based on semantic structural information. Information Processing & Management 2007, 43(5):1200-1215.
204. Kim J., Lee K. Designing a knowledge base for automatic book classification. Electronic Library 2002, 20(6):488-495.
205. Kim G.C., Lee K.J., Lim C.S. Multiple sets of features for automatic genre classification of web documents. Information Processing & Management 2005, 41(5):1263-1276.
206. Kinney D.W. The classification of music moving image materials: historical perspectives, problems, and practical solutions. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2009, 47(1):2-22.
207. Klavans R., Boyack K.W. Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(3):455-476.
208. Ko Y., Seo J. Text classification from unlabeled documents with bootstrapping and feature projection techniques. Information Processing and Management 2009, 45(1):70-83.
209. Ko Y., Seo J. Using the feature projection technique based on a normalized voting method for text classification. Information Processing and Management 2004, 40(2):191-208.
210. Kokabi M. An account of cataloging and classification education in Iranian universities. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2005, 41(3/4):431-441.
211. Kotter W.R. Improving subject access in anthropology. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian 2002, 20(2):1-15.
212. Kua E. Non-Western languages and literatures in the Dewey decimal classification scheme. Libri 2004, 54(4):256-265.
213. Kuhn T.J. Notes on operations: classifying newspapers using Dewey Decimal Classification. Library Resources and Technical Services 1999, 43(2):106-113.
214. Kumar T.V.R., Parameswaran M. Chain indexing and UDC. Annals of Library Science and Documentation 1999, 46(2):53-58.
215. Kumar S., Shah L. Expansion of schedules of time isolates in colon classification edition 6 and edition 7. SRELS Journal of Information Management 2003, 40(2):105-122.
216. Kumbhar R. Speciator based faceted depth classification's application in thesaurus construction. Annals of Library and Information Studies 2005, 52(1):15-24.
217. Kunin IPC and the new millennium: challenge and opportunity. World Patent Information 1999, 21(2):101-108.
218. Kwak C. A study on the job training and self-training of the cataloging and classification librarians working in academic libraries (Korea). Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2005, 41(2):135-147.
219. Kwasnik B.H. The role of classification in knowledge representation and discovery. Library Trends 1999, 48(1):22-47.
220. Kwasnik B.H., Rubin V.L. Stretching conceptual structures in classifications across languages and cultures. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 2004, 37(1/2):33-47.
221. Kwon O.W., Lee J.H. Text categorization based on k-nearest neighbor approach for Web site classification. Information Processing and Management 2003, 39(1):25-44.
222. La Barre K. The heritage of early FC in document reference retrieval systems, 1920-1969. Library History 2007, 23(2):129-149.
223. Laguia M., Castro J.L. Local distance-based classification. Knowledge-Based Systems 2008, 21(7):692-703.
224. Lai K., Wu S. Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system. Information Processing and Management 2005, 41(2):313-330.
225. Landry P. The use of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) for the Organisation of National Bibliographies: Switzerland, Germany and Austria. International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control 2006, 35(3):59-61.
226. Landry P. Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) at the Swiss National Library. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2006, 42(3/4).
227. Larsen J.L. The Longhouse Proposal for objects classified by mediums. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(9):1907-1914.
228. Latzer M., et al. Institutional variety in communications regulation. Classification scheme and empirical evidence from Austria. Telecommunications Policy 2006, 30(3-4):152-170.
229. Lau Whelan D. Arizona Library ditches Dewey: while librarians debate the pros and cons, patrons don't seem to notice. School Library Journal 2007, 53(7):14.
230. Lawson D. You've come a long way, Dewey!. OCLC Newsletter 2001, 254:34-35.
231. Lee C. Improving classification performance using unlabeled data: naïve Bayesian case. Knowledge-Based Systems 2007, 20(3):220-224.
232. Lee C., Lee G.G. Information gain and divergence-based feature selection for machine learning-based text categorization. Information Processing & Management 2006, 42(1):155-165.
233. Lee L., Luh C. Generation of Pornographic Blacklist and its incremental update using an inverse chi-square based method. Information Processing and Management 2008, 44(5):1698-1706.
234. Levinson D. Anthropology, taxonomies, and publishing. Online 2006, 30(4):28-30.
235. Lewis N., Seago K. An automated reclassification project at the University of Kentucky. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 1999, 28(4):117-134.
236. Li Y., Belkin N.J. A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking. Information Processing and Management 2008, 44(6):1822-1837.
237. Li J., Jones J. Using multiple and negative target rules to make classifiers more understandable. Knowledge-Based Systems 2006, 19(6):438-444.
238. Liang G. A history and backgrounds of the integration of classification and subject headings in China Library. Information and Media Studies 2007, 5(2):1-8.
239. Liang C., et al. Dictionary-based text categorization of chemical web pages. Information Processing & Management 2006, 42(4):1017-1029.
240. Liao S., et al. PORE: A Personal Ontology Recommender system for digital libraries. The Electronic Library 2009, 27(3):496-508.
241. Lim E. Southeast Asian subject gateways: an examination of their classification practices. International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control 2000, 29(3):45-48.
242. Lim E., Ng W., Sun A. Performance measurement framework for hierarchical text classification. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(11):1014-1028.
243. Lin K.R., Murphy E. Reflections on a JX reclassification project. Law Library Journal 2000, 92(4):459-466.
244. Liu R. Context recognition for hierarchical text classification. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(4):803-813.
245. Liu R. Interactive high-quality text classification. Information Processing and Management 2008, 44(3):1062-1075.
246. Liu Y., et al. Visualizing document classification: a search aid for the digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2000, 51(3):216-227.
247. Longstaff R., Henry E.C. To B or not to B: deliberation on the classification of religious books. Catholic Library World 2009, 79(3):209-212.
248. Lubbes R.K. Automatic categorization: how it works, related issues, and impacts on records management. Information Management Journal 2001, 35(4):38-43.
249. Ma Z. The education of cataloging and classification in China. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2005, 41(2).
250. Macfarlane A., Richter G. The impact of metadata on the accuracy of automated patent classification. World Patent Information 2005, 27(1):13-26.
251. Macgregor G., McCulloch E. Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool. Library Review 2006, 55(5):291-300.
252. Mai J. Actors, domains, and constraints in the design and construction of controlled vocabularies. Knowledge Organization 2008, 35(1):16-29.
253. Mai J. Classification in context: relativity, reality, and representation. Knowledge Organization 2004, 31(1):39-48.
254. Mai J. Classification of the web: challenges and inquiries. Knowledge Organization 2004, 31(2):92-97.
255. Mai J. The future of general classification. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 2004, 37(1/2):3-12.
256. Makarov M. The eighth edition of the IPC. World Patent Information 2006, 28(2):122-126.
257. Makarov M. The process of reforming the International Patent Classification. World Patent Information 2004, 26(2):137-141.
258. Makarov M. The seventh edition of the IPC. World Patent Information 2000, 22(1-2):53-58.
259. Maker R. Reader centered classification of adult fiction in public libraries. Australasian Public Libraries and Information Services (APLIS) 2008, 21(4):168-171.
260. Mandal A., Sain C. A critical observation of DDC-21 over DDC-20. Herald of Library Science 1999, 38(3-4):171-175.
261. Mann T. Will Google's keyword searching eliminate the need for LC cataloging and classification?. Journal of Library Metadata 2008, 8(2):159-168.
262. Marcella R. The role and future of subject classification: the exploitation of resources. Legal Information Management 2002, 2(2):3-6.
263. Marcio Pajeu H., et al. A new proposal of classification for comics. Biblionline 2007, 3(2). http://http.www.ies.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/biblio/article/viewFile/1920/1689.
264. Markey K. Forty years of classification online: final chapter or future unlimited?. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2006, 42(3/4):1-63.
265. Marsh C. The 'ANSCR' to CD classification at Leeds College of Music. Brio 2002, 39(1):33-48.
266. Marsh E. Improving communication and classification in the next century. OCLC Newsletter 1999, 237:29-31.
267. Marsono M.N., et al. Targeting spam control on middleboxes: spam detection based on layer-3 e-mail content classification. Computer Networks 2009, 53(6):835-848.
268. Martin C., Daniels W. Dewey applications for the simple arrangement of a link library: a case of Science Net. Journal of Internet Cataloging 2000, 3(1):67-77.
269. Martinez Arellano F.F. Education for cataloging and classification in Mexico. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2005, 41(3/4):353-388.
270. Matusiak K.K. Towards user-centered indexing in digital image collections. OCLC Systems and Services 2006, 22(4):283-298.
271. Matveyeva S.J. A role for classification: the organization of resources on the Internet, MLA Forum 2002, 1(2). Retrieved from 10 April 2010, from:. http://www.mlaforum.org/volumeJ/issue2/roleClassification.html.
272. McCulloch E. Multiple terminologies: an obstacle to information retrieval. Library Review 2004, 53(6):297-300.
273. McCulloch E., Shiri A., Nicholson D. Challenges and issues in terminology mapping: a digital library perspective. Electronic Library 2005, 23(6):671-677.
274. McIlwaine I.C. Indexing and the Classification Research Group. Indexer 2003, 23(4):204-208.
275. McKenna F. Do you really need a taxonomy/classification scheme with a records management system? Why are we still doing it the old way?. Records Management Bulletin 2009, 152:12-17.
276. Mehler A., Waltinger U. Enhancing document modeling by means of open topic models. Library Hi Tech 2009, 27(4):520-539.
277. Melenica M., et al. Language morphology offset: text classification on a Croatian-English parallel corpus. Information Processing and Management 2008, 44(1):325-339.
278. Mengle S., Goharian N. Ambiguity measure feature-selection algorithm. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(5):1037-1050.
279. Mengle S., Goharian N. Passage detection using text classification. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(4):814-825.
280. Meserve H.C., et al. Developing a model for reference research statistics: applying the 'Warner Model' of reference question classification to streamline research services. Reference & User Services Quarterly 2009, 48(3):247-258.
281. Miksa F. The DDC relative index. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2006, 42(3/4):65-95.
282. Mills J. Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval. Library Trends 2004, 52(3):541-570.
283. Milne C. Taxonomy development: assessing the merits of contextual classification. Records Management Journal 2007, 17(1):7-16.
284. Miskin C. Taxonomies. Legal Information Management 2002, 2(1):16-23.
285. Mitchell J.S. DDC 22: an introduction. International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control 2004, 33(2):27-31.
286. Mitchell J.S. DDC 22 offers many updates to Dewey users worldwide. OCLC Newsletter 2003, 261:16-19.
287. Mitchell J.S. Dewey Decimal Classification: 125 and still growing. OCLC Newsletter 2001, 254:27-29.
288. Mitchell J.S., Vizine-Goetz D. The DDC and OCLC. Journal of Library Administration 2009, 49(6):657-667.
289. Mondoux J., Shiri A. Institutional repositories in Canadian post-secondary institutions: user interface features and knowledge organization systems. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives 2009, 61(5):436-458.
290. Montesi M. Web genres: research trends. Profesional de la Informacion 2008, 17(5):551-557.
291. Moore S. Navigating the G schedule. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 1999, 27(3/4):375-384.
292. Morelli J. Don't build your house on sand!. Records Management Bulletin 2007, 140:10-12.
293. Morelli J. Business classification schemes: issues and options. Records Management Bulletin 2005, 15(124):17-21.
294. Mosley G. To classify or not to classify, that is the question?. Legal Information Management 2002, 2(2):8-10.
295. Munk T.B., Mork K. Folksonomies, tagging communities, and tagging strategies - an empirical study. Knowledge Organization 2007, 34(3):115-127.
296. Mutula S.M., Tsvakai M. Historical perspectives of cataloguing and classification in Africa. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 2002, 35(1/2):61-77.
297. Nasir Uddin M., Janecek P. Faceted classification in web information architecture: a framework for using semantic web tools. Electronic Library 2007, 25(2):219-233.
298. Nasir Uddin M., et al. Information description and discovery method using classification structures in web. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 2006, 11(2):1-20.
299. Ndakotsu T.M. Classifying Africa. African Research and Documentation 2006, 101:39-42.
300. Neelameghan A. Tamil figures of speech: categorization. Information Studies 2009, 15(3):141-164.
301. Neelameghan A. Online integrated use of bilingual thesaurus+Colon Classification+lexicon: a case study in the domain of Tamil classics. Information Studies 2007, 13(4):207-218.
302. Neelameghan A. Subject architecture model and building construction model: a system perspective. Information Studies 2005, 11(4):207-212.
303. Neelameghan A. Classification in the digital environment. Information Studies 2002, 8(1):1-8.
304. Neelameghan A. Hierarchy, hierarchical relation and hierarchical arrangement. Information Studies 2002, 8(1):9-23.
305. Neelameghan A. WINISIS based information handling tools from SRELS (1). Information Studies 2002, 8(2):71-82.
306. Neelameghan A., Raghavan K.S. Seminal mnemonics in knowledge organization: ancient traditions and modern practices. Information Studies 2006, 12(1):5-26.
307. Negrini G. Organizing the literary work of art - a common aim for Finland and Italy. Signum 2003, 36(4):91-95.
308. Nero L.M. Classifying the popular music of Trinidad and Tobago. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2006, 42(3/4).
309. Neville T.M., Henry D.B. Reference classification - is it time to make some changes?. Reference & User Services Quarterly 2009, 48(4):372-383.
310. Ngoepe M. Organising public records to achieve service delivery: the role of the National Archives and Records Service of South Africa's Functional Subject File Plan in Government departments 2009, Journal of the Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Branch of the International Council on Archives. Vol, ESARBICA Journal, 28.
311. Nicholson D.M., Dawson A., Shiri A. HILT: a pilot terminology mapping service with a DDC spine. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2006, 42(3/4).
312. Niculescu Z. Dewey Decimal Classification Editions. Studii de Biblioteconomie si Siinta Informarii/Library and Information Science Research 2009, 13:33-50.
313. Nielsen M.L. Networked Knowledge Organization Systems/Services (NKOS): ECDL 2008 Conference Report. D-Lib Magazine 2008, 14(11-12).
314. Noruzi A. Folksonomies: (un)controlled vocabulary?. Knowledge Organization 2006, 33(4):199-203.
315. Obajemu A.S., Ibegwam A. A survey of librarians' attitudes to training programmes on ICT application to cataloguing and classification workshops in Nigeria. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science 2006, 16(1):19-27.
316. O'Connor L. Approaching the challenges and costs of the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS). Bottom Line 2000, 13(2):83-89.
317. Olson H.A. The ubiquitous hierarchy: an army to overcome the threat of a mob. Library Trends 2004, 52(3):604-616.
318. Olson H.A. Sameness and difference: a cultural foundation of classification. Library Resources and Technical Services 2001, 45(3):115-122.
319. Onohwakpor J.E. Annual Conference of the Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing Section of the Nigerian Library Association. Library Hi Tech News 2006, 23(9):6-8.
320. Orr S. Functions-based classification of records: is it functional?. Archives & Manuscripts 2006, 34(1):44-96.
321. Oyler P.G. Teaching classification in the 21st century. International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control 2002, 31(1):16-17.
322. Panigrahi P. Facet analysis techniques for automatic classification systems: a study for colon classification. SRELS Journal of Information Management 2007, 44(4):309-332.
323. Panigrahi P. Implementation of the Anteriorising Common Isolates in automatic classification system. SRELS Journal of Information Management 2007, 44(3):225-236.
324. Panigrahi P.K. An artificial intelligence approach towards automatic classification (Part 1). IASLIC Bulletin 2000, 45(2):73-81.
325. Panigrahi P.K. An artificial intelligence approach towards automatic classification (Part 2). IASLIC Bulletin 2000, 45(3):104-118.
326. Panigrahi P., Prasad A.R.D. Facet sequence in analytico synthetic scheme: a study for developing an AI based automatic classification system. Annals of Library and Information Studies 2007, 54(1):37-43.
327. Panigrahi P., Prasad A.R.D. Inference engine for devices of Colon Classification in AI based automated classification system. Annals of Library and Information Studies 2005, 52(4):124-134.
328. Panigrahi P., Prasad A.R.D. Inference engine for space isolates of colon classification for AI based automated classification system. SRELS Journal of Information Management 2005, 42(4):383-406.
329. Paradis F., Nie J. Contextual feature selection for text classification. Information Processing & Management 2007, 43(2):344-352.
330. Park O. Opening ontology design: a study of the implications of knowledge organization for ontology design. Knowledge Organization 2008, 35(4):209-221.
331. Park S., Zhang B. Co-trained support vector machines for large scale unstructured document classification using unlabeled data and syntactic information. Information Processing and Management 2004, 40(3):421-439.
332. Parkkola H., Saariluoma P., Berki E. Action-oriented classification of families' information and communication actions: exploring mothers' viewpoints. Behavior & Information Technology 2009, 28(6):525-536.
333. Pauwels H. Pillars of the IPC reform. World Patent Information 2004, 26(3):205-208.
334. Peterson E. Beneath the metadata: some philosophical problems with folksonomy. D-Lib Magazine 2006, 12(10).
335. Pickering B. Collaborative taxonomy tool unveiled by Verity. Information World Review 2004, 204:7.
336. Plater B. Records management for the masses?. Records Management Bulletin 2005, 124:27-29.
337. Pogorelec A., Sauperl A. The alternative model of classification of belles-lettres in libraries. Knowledge Organization 2006, 33(4):204-214.
338. Pons-Porrata A., Berlanga-Llavori R., Ruiz-Schulcloper J. Topic discovery based on text mining techniques. Information Processing & Management 2007, 43(3):752-768.
339. Poulter A., Brunt R. On reading 'Information storage and retrieval in the professional curriculum' by Rodney Brunt. Library Review 2007, 56(7):557-562.
340. Prasad K.N. Classification in the digital environment. Information Studies 2001, 7(3-4):137-138.
341. Prescott S. If you knew Dewey. School Library Journal 2001, 47(8):50-53.
342. Pu H., Yang C. Enriching user-oriented class associations for library classification schemes. Electronic Library 2003, 21(2):130-141.
343. Qingfeng W., et al. Study on classification and coding for Web agricultural information based on China Library Classification. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2009, 28(1):28-33.
344. Rademaker C.A. The classification of ornamental designs in the United States Patent Classification Scheme. World Patent Information 2000, 22(3):123-133.
345. Rademaker C.A. The classification of plants in the United States Patent Classification system. World Patent Information 2000, 22(4):301-307.
346. Rafferty P. The representation of knowledge in library classification schemes. Knowledge Organization 2001, 28(4):180-191.
347. Raghavan K.S. Education for knowledge organization: the Indian scene. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2005, 41(2).
348. Rajashekara N. Information/knowledge organization in a folk museum. Information Studies 2005, 11(4):265-277.
349. Raschen B. A resilient, evolving resource: how to create a taxonomy. Business Information Review 2005, 22(3):199-204.
350. Rekha G., Parameswaran M. 'Knowledge Organization', 1988-1999: a bibliometric analysis. SRELS Journal of Information Management 2002, 39(4):355-362.
351. Richardson J.V., et al. Millennium project research agenda: cataloging and classification. Library Quarterly 2000, 70(2):ix-xx.
352. Robbin A. Classifying racial and ethnic group data in the United States: the politics of negotiation and accommodation. Journal of Government Information 2000, 27(2):129-156.
353. Robbins F. An exploration of the application of classification systems as a method of resource delivery on the World Wide Web. Cataloguing Australia 1999, 25(1/4):60-65.
354. Robertson M.M. Customizing the organization of local planning documents. Technicalities 1999, 19(7):6-7.
355. Robinson G. Abridging the UDC: the compiling of the pocket edition. Knowledge Organization 1999, 26(3):149-156.
356. Rooney E.M. Classification development: a continuing problem. Catholic Library World 2009, 79(3):204-208.
357. Ruderman E. Library of Congress Classification for Judaica: recent changes (1995-1996). Judaica Librarianship 2000, 10(1-2):31-40.
358. Sabroski NAICS Codes: a new classification system for a new economy. Searcher 2000, 8(10):18. 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30.
359. Saeed H., Chaudhry A.S. Using Dewey Decimal Classification scheme (DDC) for building taxonomies for knowledge organisation. Journal of Documentation 2002, 58(5):575-583.
360. Saeed H., Chaudhry A.S. Potential of bibliographic tools to organize knowledge on the Internet: the use of Dewey Decimal Classification Scheme for organizing Web based information resources. Knowledge Organization 2001, 28(1):17-26.
361. Sanchez-Alonso S. Enhancing availability of learning resources on organic agriculture and agroecology. The Electronic Library 2009, 27(5):792-813.
362. Sanders D. Tag - you're it! User tagging lets patrons set their own terms. American Libraries 2008, 39(11):52-54.
363. Sands G. Cat and class: what use are these skills to the new legal information professional?. Legal Information Management 2002, 2(2):19-22.
364. Sangeetha M.A., et al. Tools for retrieving patents, Part 1: the International Patent Classification. IASLIC Bulletin 1999, 44(2):67-70.
365. Santini M. Zero, single, or multi? Genre of web pages through the users' perspective. Information Processing and Management 2008, 44(2):702-737.
366. Satija M.P. Mapping of Social Sciences in the Colon Classification. Annals of Library and Information Studies 2008, 55(3):204-211.
367. Satija M.P. Book numbers in India with special reference to the author table for Indian names designed and used by the National Library of India. Knowledge Organization 2007, 34(1):34-40.
368. Satija M.P. Use of classification and indexing in the Internet organization and search. SRELS Journal of Information Management 2006, 43(2):123-136.
369. Satija M.P. Salient features of the DDC 22 (2003). SRELS Journal of Information Management 2004, 41(4):309-316.
370. Satija M.P. Library classification: an essay in terminology. Knowledge Organization 2000, 27(4):221-229.
371. Satyanarayana N.R. Role of classification and cataloguing in the information age. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology 1999, 19(3):3-4.
372. Saumure K., Shiri A. Knowledge organization trends in library and information studies: a preliminary comparison of the pre-and post-Web eras. Journal of Information Science 2008, 34(5):651-666.
373. Schellner I. Japanese File Index classification and F-terms. World Patent Information 2002, 24(3):197-201.
374. Schewe D.B. Classifying electronic documents: a new paradigm. Information Management Journal 2002, 36(2):56-59. 54.
375. Schwartz E. Library of Congress Islamic and Jewish law classification schedule. International Journal of Legal Information 2001, 29(2):497-500.
376. Sen B.K. UDC as it could be made. Annals of Library and Information Studies 2007, 54(1):44-63.
377. Sen P., et al. Collective Classification in Network Data. AI Magazine 2008, 29(3):93-106.
378. Shafer K.E. Evaluating Scorpion results. Journal of Library Administration 2001, 34(3/4):237-244.
379. Shah L., Kumar S. Expansion of schedules of common isolates in CC6 and CC7. SRELS Journal of Information Management 2002, 39(4):387-394.
380. Sharma R.S., Foo S., Morales-Arroyo M. Developing corporate taxonomies for knowledge auditability: a framework for good practices. Knowledge Organization 2008, 35(1):30-46.
381. Shelton J.M. Library of Congress' Class L: Education, Table L7: an expansion for local use. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 2000, 31(1):31-42.
382. Shen D., Yang Q., Chen Z. Noise reduction through summarization for Web-page classification. Information Processing and Management 2007, 43(6):1735-1747.
383. Shenton A.K. The role of 'reactive classification' in relation to fiction collections in school libraries. New Review of Children's Literature and Librarianship 2006, 12(2):127-146.
384. Shiri A., Chase-Kruszewski S. Knowledge organisation systems in North American digital library collections. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 2009, 43(2):121-139.
385. Shiri A., Molberg K. Interfaces to knowledge organization systems in Canadian digital library collections. Online Information Review 2004, 28(5):604-620.
386. Si L. The status quo and future development of cataloging and classification education in China. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2005, 41(2).
387. Singh S. Development of terminology in Colon Classification: a researcher's viewpoint. Herald of Library Science 2000, 39(3-4):177-184.
388. Singh S. Potentialities, limitations and the future of the Colon Classification. Herald of Library Science 1999, 38(3-4):186-194.
389. Sitas A. The classification of Byzantine literature in the Library of Congress Classification. Knowledge Organization 2001, 28(2):85-94.
390. Sitas A. Greek folk literature, poetry, folk songs and the Library of Congress PA (Supplement) Schedule. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 1999, 28(1):53-68.
391. Siva S., et al. Document identification and classification using transform coding of gray scale projections and neural tree network. Information Studies 2000, 6(2):101-109.
392. Skinner G., Han S., Chang E. An information privacy taxonomy for collaborative environments. Information Management and Computer Security 2006, 14(4):382-394.
393. Slavic A. Use of the Universal Decimal Classification: a world-wide survey. Journal of Documentation 2008, 64(2):211-228.
394. Slavic A. UDC in subject gateways: experiment or opportunity?. Knowledge Organization 2006, 33(2):67-85.
395. Slavic A. UDC implementation: from library shelves to a structured indexing language. International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control 2004, 33(3):60-65.
396. Slavic A. Teaching classification to fit a modern and sustainable LIS curriculum: the case of Croatia. International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control 2002, 31(1):13-15.
397. Slavic A., Cordeiro M.I., Riesthuis G. Prepared and carried out changes in the management of the universal decimal classification. Kniznica 2008, 9(10):17-22.
398. Smith H. Automation of patent classification. World Patent Information 2002, 24(4):269-271.
399. Smyth Z.A. Adopting a functional classification of business processes in Northern Ireland. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2005, 26(2):233-242.
400. Soergel D. The rise of ontologies or the reinvention of classification. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1999, 50(12):1119-1120.
401. Song R., et al. Identification of ambiguous queries in Web search. Information Processing and Management 2009, 45(2):216-229.
402. Spila M. George W. Bordner and Pennsylvania documents: a Remembrance. DttP: Documents to the People 2008, 36(4):34-35.
403. Spiteri L.F. The structure and form of folksonomy tags: the road to the public library catalog. Information Technology and Libraries 2007, 26(3):13-25.
404. Spiteri L.F. The use of folksonomies in public library catalogues. Serials Librarian 2006, 51(2):75-89.
405. Spiteri L.F. The essential elements of faceted thesauri. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 1999, 28(4):31-52.
406. Stickley L. Karen Drabenstott envisions a multimedia Dewey Decimal Classification. OCLC Newsletter 1999, 240:37.
407. Subrahmanyam B. Library of Congress classification numbers: issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs. Library Resources & Technical Services 2006, 50(2):110-119.
408. Sukiasyan E.R. The (BBK) Library-Bibliographical Classification. The Social Characteristics. Basic Functions and Long-Term Development. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya 2008, 2:25-30.
409. Sukiasyan E.R. The Organization of Work of a Classifier. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya 2008, 8:14-22.
410. Sulistyo-Basuki L., Mulyani A.S. Indonesian Librarians' Efforts to Adapt and Revise the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC)'s Notation 297 on Islam. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science 2008, 13(2):89-101.
411. Szostak R. Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science. Journal of Documentation 2008, 64(3):319-332.
412. Szunejko M. Literature classification schemes at two west Australian university libraries: Murdoch University and the University of Western Australia. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 2003, 36(2):45-57.
413. Tabb W. The Library of Congress and the DDC. OCLC Newsletter 2001, 254:32-33.
414. Tadasad P.G., Maheswarappa B.S. Classification practices among college libraries in Karnataka State. SRELS Journal of Information Management 2002, 39(2):211-218.
415. Takamasa M. International patent classification from the eighth edition onward. Journal of Information Processing and Management 2006, 49(7):359-370.
416. Tan S. Binary k-nearest neighbor for text categorization. Online Information Review 2005, 29(4):391-399.
417. Tan J., et al. An improved mutual information algorithm for feature selection. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2006, 25(6):651-656.
418. Taniguchi S. Current status of cataloging and classification education in Japan. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2005, 41(2).
419. Taylor A.G. Teaching the Dewey Decimal Classification system. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2006, 42(3/4).
420. Taylor W. The Hot Debates in Cataloguing 2009, Library+Information, Update, 27.
421. Tebbutt D. Categorisers are second guessing future trends. Information World Review 2005, 214:17.
422. Teng Y., Ke H. Social tagging on digital archives: a case study of Yuyu Yang Digital Art Museum. Journal of Librarianship and Information Studies 2009, 1(68):80-107.
423. Thijs B., Glanzela W. A structural analysis of benchmarks on different bibliometrical indicators for european research institutes based on their research profile. Scientometrics 2009, 79(2):377-388.
424. Thomas A.R. Teach yourself thesaurus: exercises, readings, resources. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 2004, 37(3/4):23-34.
425. Tim W.L. LCC from UDC: managing the conversion. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services 2009, 33(2-3):73-79.
426. Tinker A.J., et al. The Dewey Decimal Classification and the transition from physical to electronic knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization 1999, 26(2):80-96.
427. Toth E. Innovative solutions in automatic classification: a brief summary. Libri 2002, 52(1):48-53.
428. Tseng Y., Lin C., Lin Y. Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information Processing & Management 2007, 43(5):1216-1247.
429. Tsuneda K. Changing classification systems at Toho University's Narashino Media Center - aiming at user-oriented service. Yakugaku Toshokan/Pharmaceutical Library Bulletin 2009, 54(1):14-19.
430. Tudor J.D. Nearer to NAICS?. EContent 2000, 23(2):68-72.
431. Tyckoson D.A. Top ten innovations in library history. Against the Grain 2007, 18(6):42-43.
432. Tzouveli P., et al. Semantic classification of Byzantine icons. IEEE Intelligent Systems 2009, 24(2):35-43.
433. van der Walt M.S. A classification scheme for the organization of electronic documents in small, medium and micro enterprises (SMMEs). Knowledge Organization 2004, 31(1):26-38.
434. van Laer C.J.P. A comparative lawyer's review of the LC Classification System. Law Library Journal 1999, 91(2):305-311.
435. Varendorff L. Misconceptions in the records management fraternity. Records Management Bulletin 2005, 129:6-7.
436. Vernitski A. Developing an intertextuality-oriented fiction classification. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 2007, 39(1):41-52.
437. Vizine-Goetz D. DeweyBrowser. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2006, 42(3/4).
438. Vizine-Goetz D. Classification schemes for Internet resources revisited. Journal of Internet Cataloging 2002, 5(4):5-18.
439. Vizine-Goetz D. Dewey research: new uses for the DDC. OCLC Newsletter 2001, 254:24-26.
440. Vizine-Goetz D., Hickey T. Getting visual with DeweyBrowser. NextSpace 2006, 1:18-19.
441. Vizine-Goetz D., Mitchell J.S. Dewey 2000. Journal of Library Administration 2001, 34(1/2):103-109.
442. Walker C.H., Copeland A. The eye prophetic: Julia Pettee. Libraries & the Cultural Record 2009, 44(2):162-182.
443. Wang J. An extensive study on automated Dewey Decimal Classification. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, 60(11):2269-2286.
444. Wang J. Automatic thesaurus development: term extraction from title metadata. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57(7):907-920.
445. Wang T., Chiang H. Fuzzy support vector machine for multi-class text categorization. Information Processing & Management 2007, 43(4):914-929.
446. Wang Y., Yang J. Application of iterative-KNN based on KNN and automatic retrieval in automatic categorization. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2004, 23(2):137-141.
447. Wang L., et al. Combining decision tree and Naive Bayes for classification. Knowledge-Based Systems 2006, 19(7):511-515.
448. Wang Z., et al. Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for Organizing Content and Aiding Navigation. Journal of Documentation 2008, 64(6):842-876.
449. Wang Z., et al. Potential and prospects of taxonomies for content organization. Knowledge Organization 2006, 33(3):160-169.
450. Ward M. A taxaurus of engineering terms. Managing Information 2006, 13(2):42-47.
451. Wartzok S., Hernandez M. Reclassifying the official records of the United Nations: a library's united effort. Technical Services Quarterly 2005, 23(1):53-69.
452. Waters J. Classification versus search - which is more important?. Records Management Bulletin 2007, 140:14-15.
453. Weaver M., et al. Centralised classification of library materials - a benchmarking study. Library and Information Research News 1999, 23(74):23-32.
454. Weber L., Schomberg J. Access plus security: compact disc classification and packaging at Minnesota State University, Mankato. Music Reference Services Quarterly 2007, 9(2):49-54.
455. Wheatley A. Subject trees on the Internet: a new role for bibliographic classification?. Journal of Internet Cataloging 2000, 2(3/4):115-141.
456. Wild P.J., Giess M.D., McMahon C.A. Describing engineering documents with faceted approaches: observations and reflections. Journal of Documentation 2009, 65(3):420-445.
457. Williamson N.J. Classification issues in 2007. Knowledge Organization 2009, 36(1):66-74.
458. Williamson N. Classification research issues. Knowledge Organization 2004, 31(4):252-254.
459. Wilson M.D. Flying first class or economy? Classification of electronic titles in ARL libraries. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 2001, 1(3):225-240.
460. Winke R.C. The contracting world of Cutter's Expansive Classification. Library Resources and Technical Services 2004, 48(2):122-129.
461. Womack K.R. Conformity for conformity's sake? - The choice of a classification system and a subject heading system in academic health sciences libraries. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2006, 42(1).
462. Wright S., Blasé N. Using spreadsheets to map a library reclassification, reorganization, and merger. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, no. 2006, 45.
463. Wu Y.B., et al. Finding nuggets in documents: a machine learning approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57(6):740-752.
464. Xiaoge P. A literature review on Web automated text categorization technology. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2009, 28(2):233-241.
465. Xiaopeng Y., Feicheng M. An unsupervised text classification algorithm based on k-nearest neighbors. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2008, 27(4):550-555.
466. Xiaoyue W., Rujiang B. A hybrid classifier based on the rough sets and neural networks. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2006, 25(4):475-480.
467. Xin L., Renren L. A fast text categorization technology for Chinese based on subject terms list. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2008, 27(3):323-327.
468. Yi K. Automated text classification using library classification schemes: trends, issues, and challenges. International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control 2007, 36(4):78-82.
469. Yi K., Beheshti J. A hidden Markov model-based text classification of medical documents. Journal of Information Science 2009, 35(1):67-81.
470. Yoon Y., Lee G.G. Efficient implementation of associative classifiers for document classification. Information Processing & Management 2007, 43(2):393-405.
471. Yoon Y., Lee C., Lee G. An effective procedure for constructing a hierarchical text classification system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2006, 57(3):431-442.
472. Yu B., Xu Z. A comparative study for content-based dynamic spam classification using four machine learning algorithms. Knowledge-Based Systems 2008, 21(4):355-362.
473. Yu W., Zheng'ou W., Mingchun W. WEB text categorization rule extraction based on rough set and decision tree. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2005, 24(6):674-678.
474. Yu B., Zhu D. Combining neural networks and semantic feature space for email classification. Knowledge-Based Systems 2009, 22(5):376-381.
475. Zeeman D., Turner G. Resource discovery in the Government of Canada using the Dewey Decimal Classification. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2006, 42(3/4).
476. Zeng M.L. Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS). Knowledge Organization 2008, 35(2-3):160-182.
477. Zeng X. Research on representation of Chinese classified thesaurus in OWL and its implied semantic reveal. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2005, 24(2):151-160.
478. Zhang Z. Mining relational data from text: from strictly supervised to weakly supervised learning. Information Systems 2008, 33(3):300-314.
479. Zhang W. Classification for Chinese Libraries (CCL): histories, accomplishments, problems and its comparisons. Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences 2003, 41(1):1-22.
480. Zhang W. The development and the nature of the Chinese Archive Classification. Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences 2002, 39(3):235-250.
481. Zhang W., Yoshida T., Tang X. Text classification based on Multi-Word with Support Vector Machine. Knowledge-Based Systems 2008, 21(8):879-886.
482. Zhao L. Save space for 'newcomers' - analyzing problems in book number assignment under the LCC system. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 2004, 38(1):105-119.
483. Zhiguo Z., Guishi D., Liping K. Algorithm research on classifying Web users navigation patterns based on N-Gram. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information 2009, 28(3):389-394.
484. Zins C. Classification schemes of Information Science: twenty-eight scholars map the field. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58(5):645-672.
485. Zins C. Knowledge organization: an epistemological perspective. Knowledge Organization 2004, 31(1):49-63.
486. Zins C. Models for classifying Internet resources. Knowledge Organization 2002, 29(1):20-28.
487. Zins C., Guttmann D. Structuring Web bibliographic resources: an exemplary subject classification scheme. Knowledge Organization 2000, 27(3):143-159.