Dynamic and hierarchical classification of web pages

Online Information Review

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 139-147

  Choi, Ben ^a   Peng, Xiaogang ^a  

^a Louisiana Tech University   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Data handling; Information retrieval; Internet; Learning

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DATA HANDLING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LEARNING SYSTEMS; ONLINE SEARCHING; ONLINE SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION;

CLASSIFICATION; LEARNING; PARAMETER SELECTION;

WEBSITES;

EID: 2442495233     PISSN: 14684527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14684520410531673     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chan, P.K. (1999), "A non-invasive learning approach to building Web user profiles", KDD-99 Workshop on Web Usage Analysis and User Profiling, 5th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Diego, CA, pp. 7-12.
2. Chekuri, C., Goldwasser, M.H., Raghavan, P. and Upfal, E. (1997), "WebSearch using automatic classification", Proceedings of the 6th International World Wide Web Conference, Santa Clara, CA, April.
3. Choi, B. and Guo, Q. (2003), "Applying semantic links for classifying Web pages", Developments in Applied Artificial Intelligence, IEA/AIE 2003, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2718, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 148-53.
4. Dumais, S. and Chen, H. (2000), "Hierarchical classification of Web content", in Belkin, N.J., Ingwersen, P. and Leong, M.-K. (Eds), Proceedings of SIGIR-00, 23rd ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Athens, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 256-63.
5. Fuhr, N., Hartmanna, S., Lustig, G., Schwantner, M. and Tzeras, K. (1991), "A rule-based multi-stage indexing system for large subject fields", in Lichnerowicz, A. (Ed.), Proceedings of RIAO-91, 3rd International Conference "Recherche d'Information Assistee par Ordinateur", Barcelona, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 606-23.
6. Joachims, T. (1997), "A probabilistic analysis of the Rocchio algorithm with TFIDF for text categorisation", in Fisher, D.H. (Ed.), Proceedings of 101 ICML-97, 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, Nashville, TN, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, pp. 143-51.
7. Joachims, T. (1998), "Text categorisation with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features", Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Number 1398, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 137-42.
8. Koller, D. and Sahami, M. (1998), "Hierarchically classifying documents using very few words", in Fisher, D.H. (Ed.), Proceedings of 101 ICML-97, 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, Nashville, TN, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, pp. 170-8.
9. Labrou, Y. and Finin, T. (1999), "Yahoo! as an ontology - using Yahoo! categories to describe documents", CIKM "99, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Knowledge and Information Management, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 180-7.
10. Lang, K. (1995), "Newsweeder: learning to filter news", in Prieditis, A. and Russell, S. (Eds), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning (ML-95), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, pp. 331-9.
11. Lewis, D.D. and Ringuette, M. (1994), "A comparison of two learning algorithms for text categorisation", 3rd Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval (SDAIR"94), pp. 81-93.
12. Mladenic, D. (1998a), "Feature subset selection in text-learning", Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Machine Learning ECML98.
13. Mladenic, D. (1998b), "Machine Learning on non-homogeneous, distributed text data", PhD thesis, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana.
14. Mladenic, D. (1998c), "Turning Yahoo! into an automatic Webpage classifier", Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence ECAI"98, pp. 473-4.
15. Mladenic, D. and Grobelnik, M. (1998a), "Feature selection for classification based on text hierarchy", Working Notes of Learning from Text and the Web, Conference on Automated Learning and Discovery.
16. Mladenic, D. and Grobelnik, M. (1998b), "Word sequences as features in text-learning", Proceedings of ERK-98, the 7th Electro-technical and Computer Science Conference, pp. 145-8.
17. Paice, C.D. (1990), "Constructing literature abstracts by computer: techniques and prospects", Information Processing & Management, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 171-86.
18. Peng, X. and Choi, B. (2003), "Automatic Web page classification in a dynamic and hierarchical way", IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 386-93.
19. Salton, G. and Buckley, C. (1987), "Term weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval", Technical Report, COR-87-881, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, November.
20. Schutze, H., Hull, D. and Pedersen, O.J. (1995), "A comparison of classifiers and document representations for the routing problem", in Fox, E.A., Ingwersen, P. and Fidel, R. (Eds), Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 229-37.
21. Weiss, S.M., Apte, C., Damerau, F., Johnson, D.E., Oles, F.J., Goets, T. and Hamp, T. (1999), "Maximising text-mining performance", IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 63-9.
22. Yahoo! (2003), available at: www.yahoo.com.
23. Yang, Y. and Pedersen, O.J. (1997), "A comparative study of feature selection in text categorisation", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Machine Learning ICML97, Morgan Kauffman, San Mateo, CA, pp. 412-20.