UDC in subject gateways: Experiment or opportunity?

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 67-85

  Slavic, Aida ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947253442     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ardö, A.; Koch, T. 1999. Creation and automatic classification of a robot generated subject index. Digital Libraries '99, The Fourth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, August 11-14, 1999 in Berkeley, California. http://www.lub.lu.se/desire/poster.htm.
2. Ardö, A; Koch, T. 1999a. Automatic classification applied to full text Internet documents in a robot-generated subject index. 23rd International Online Information Meeting, London, 7-9 December 1999, ed. B. McKenna. Oxford : Learned Information Europe Ltd., 1999, pp. 239-46.
3. Ardö, A. et al. 1994. Improving resource discovery and retrieval on the Internet : the Nordic WAIS/World Wide Web Project : summary report. NORDINFO project, 1994. http://www.lib.lu.se/W4/summary.html.
4. Ardö, A. et al. 2000. Browsing engineering resources on the Web : a general knowledge organization scheme (Dewey) vs. a special scheme (El). In Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: proceedings of the Sixth International ISKO Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada, ed. C. Beghtol, L. C. Howarth, N. J. Williamson. Advances in knowledge organization 7. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, pp. 385-90.
5. Ashton, S.; Robertson, S. 2000. Re-casting our net: broadening information access at the National Maritime Museum, Museums and the Web 2000, April 16-19, 2000, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. http://www.archimuse. com/mw2000/papers/robertson/robertson.html.
6. Batley, S. 2005. Classification in theory and practice. Oxford: Chandos.
7. Broughton, V 2002. Facet analytical theory as a basis for a knowledge organization tool in a subject portal. Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: integration of knowledge across boundaries: proceedings of the Seventh International ISKO Conference, 10-13 July 2002, Granada, Spain, ed. María J. López-Huertas with the assistance of Francisco J. Muñoz-Fernández. Advances in knowledge organization v. 8. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, pp. 135-42.
8. Broughton, V.; Lane, H. 2000. Classification schemes revisited : application to web indexing and searching. Internet searching and indexing: the subject approach, ed. A.R. Thomas, J.R. Shearer. New York: The Haworth Information Press, pp. 143-55.
9. Caless, T. W and Kirk, D.B. 1967. An application of UDC to machine searching. Journal of documentation 23: 208-15.
10. Currier, S. and Wake, S. 2001. Negotiating subject access: resource discovery on the Web. Library & information briefings 97: 2-14.
11. Dempsey, L. 2000. The subject gateway: experiences and issues based on the emergence of the Resource Discovery Network. Online information review 24: 8-23.
12. Dempsey, L. et al. 2004. Metadata switch: thinking about some metadata management and knowledge organization issues in the changing research and learning landscape. Forthcoming in LITA guide to e-scholarship (working title), ed. Debra Shapiro. http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/archive/ 2004/ dempsey-mslitaguide.pdf
13. DESIRE Information Gateways Handbook. 2000. http://www.carnet.hr/ CUC/cuc2000/handbook/welcome.html
14. Devadason, F. J. 2003. Faceted indexing application for organizing accessing Internet resources. Subject retrieval in a networked environment : proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001, ed.. I. C. McIlwaine. UBCIM Publications - New Series 25. München: K. G. Saur, pp. 147-59.
15. Ellis, D. and Vasconcelos, A. 1999. Ranganathan and the Net : using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web. Aslib proceedings 51: 3-10.
16. Ellis, D. and Vasconcelos, A. 2000. The relevance of facet analysis for World Wide Web subject organization and searching. Internet searching and indexing: the subject approach, ed. A.R. Thomas, J.R.
17. Shearer. New York: The Haworth Information Press, pp. 97-114.
18. Hiom, D. 1998. The Social Science Information Gateway: putting theory into practice. Information research 4n1. http://informationr.net/ir/4-1/ paper48.html.
19. Hiom, D. 1998a Mapping classification schemes. SOSIG, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.sosig.ac.uk/desire/class/mapping.html.
20. Hodge, G. 2000. Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries: beyond traditional authority files. Council of Library and Information Resources (CLIR). http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub91/contents. html.
21. Huxley, L. 2000. New features of The Social Science Information Gateway. Proceedings of the JANET User Support Workshop, 4th-6th July 2000. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, pp. 99-107; also available: http://www.sosig.ac.uk/about_us/docs/sosig_paper.pdf.
22. Huxley, L. and Joyce, A. 2004. A social science gateway in a shifting digital world: shaping SOSIG for users' needs of the future. Online information review 28: 328-37; also available: http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ publications/conf/DigLib2003/abstract.pdf
23. Kirriemuir, J. 1999. A brief survey of quality resource discovery systems: commissioned by the JlSC-funded Resource Discovery Network Centre: final report. JISC RDN; http://www.rdn.ac.uk/publications/studies/survey/.
24. Koch, T. 2000. Quality-controlled subject gateways: definitions, typologies, empirical overview. Online information review 24n1: 23-34.
25. th International Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, Ottawa, 3-6 October 2000; http://www.lub.lu.se/metadata/dc8-report.html.
26. Koch, T. 2006. Electronic thesis and dissertation services: semantic interoperability, subject access, multilinguality. E-Thesis Workshop, Amsterdam 2006-01-19/20; http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/t.koch/publ/e-thesis-200601. html.
27. Koch, T., Golub, K. and Ardö, A. 2006. Users browsing behaviour in a DDC-based Web service: a log analysis. Cataloging & classification quarterly 42n3-4: Forthcoming..
28. Koch, T., Neuroth, H., and Day, M. 2003. Renardus: cross-browsing European subject gateways via a common classification system (DDC). In Subject retrieval in a networked environment : proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001, ed. I. C. McIlwaine. UBCIM Publications - New Series 25. München: K. G. Saur, pp. 25-33.
29. Koch, T. and Vizine-Goetz, D. 1998. Automatic classification and content navigation support for web services: DESIRE II cooperates with OCLC. Dublin, OH; OCLC; NetLab, Lund University Library Development Department, Sweden; http://digitalarchive.oclc.org/da/ViewObject.jsp?objid=0000003489.
30. Koch, T. et al. 1997. The role of classification schemes in Internet resource description and discovery : project final report. DESIRE project. http://www.lub.lu.se/desire/radar/reports/D3.2.3/.
31. La Barre, K. 2004. Adventures in faceted classification: a brave new world or a world of confusion. Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th ISKO Conference, London 13-16 July 2004, ed. I. C. McIlwaine. Advances in knowledge organization 9. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, pp. 79-84.
32. Lafford, A. and Stone, O. 1997. NISS - National Information Services and Systems. Ariadne 10; http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue10/niss/.
33. Lonsdale, M. 2003. Global gateways: a guide to online knowledge networks. Australian Council for Educational Research; http://www.educationau.edu.au/ jahia/webdav/site/myjahiasite/users/root/ public/papers/global_gateways_v3.pdf.
34. Mcguinness, D. L. 2002. Ontologies come of age. Spinning the semantic web: bringing the World Wide Web to its full potential, ed. D. Fensel et al. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 171-94; also available: http://www.ksl.stanford. edu/people/dlm/papers/ontologies-come-of-age-mit-press-(with-citation).htm.
35. Merholz, P. 2001. Innovation in classification. [Personal blog archive]; http://peterme.com/archives/00000063.html.
36. Möller, G. et al. 1999. Navigating the Web with GERHARD. Presented at The Third European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, Paris, France, 22-24 September 1999. http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/CL/ carstens/ecdlarticle.pdf.
37. Möller, G. et al. 1999a. Automatic classification of the World Wide Web using Universal Decimal Classification. 23rd International Online Information Meeting, London, 7-9 December 1999: proceedings, ed. B. McKenna. Oxford : Learned Information Europe, pp. 231-37. http://www-is.offis.uni oldenburg.de/~gemoe/veroeffentlichungen/online_99/article.pdf.
38. Neuroth, H.; Koch, T. 2001. Cross-browsing and cross-searching in a distributed network of subject gateways : architecture, data model and classification. ELAG 2001, Integrating Heterogeneous Resources, 25 Library Systems Seminar, Prague, 6-8 June 2001. http://www.stk.cz/elag2001/Papers/ HeikeNeuroth/HeikeNeuroth.ppt.
39. Pika, J. 2002. Anwendung der UDK in NEBIS in der Schweiz : ein Ausblick. [Talk given at the seminar] Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl), Universität Mannheim, 23. Juli 2002. http://www.ethbib.ethz.ch/pub/nebisUDK.pdf.
40. Ramshirish, R. 2004. Faceted classification & its advantages in current perspective, [presentation]. http://drtc.isibang.ac.in/~ram/ classification.pdf.
41. Serres, A. 2004. Recherche d'information sur Internet: où en sommes-nous, où allons-nous? Paris: CNDP, Savoirs CDI. http://savoirscdi.cndp.fr/culturepro/actualisation/Serres/Serres.htm.
42. Slavic, A. 2004. UDC translations: a 2004 survey report and bibliography. Extensions & corrections to the UDC 26: 58-80. Also available: http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/649/.
43. Slavic, A. 2006. Use of the Universal Decimal Classification: a worldwide survey. Accepted for publication in Journal of Documentation.
44. Soergel, D. 1999. The rise of ontologies or the reinvention of classification. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50: 1119-20.
45. SOSIG Guidelines for assigning keywords: section editors workshop. 2004. SOSIG, ILRT, University of Bristol, June 2004 [internal document].
46. Sparck Jones, K. 2005. Revisiting classification for retrieval. Journal of documentation 61: 598-601.
47. Stevens, A. 2005. UDC licences-their value and purpose. Extensions & corrections to the UDC 27: 127-130.
48. Stojanovski, J. 2006. Wissenschaftliche Informationen aus einer Hand-Erfahrungen aus Kroatien. GMS Medizin-Bibliothek-Information 6: Doc08. http://www.egms.de/pdf/journals/mbi/2006-6/ - mbi000026.pdf.
49. Stoklasová, B. 2003. Short survey of subject gateways (SG) activity. IFLA [paper presented at] 69th IFLA General Conference and Council, World Library and Information Congress, 1-9 August 2003, Berlin. http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla69/papers/152e-Stoklasova.pdf.
50. Stoklasová, B., Baliková, M., and Celbová, L. 2003. The relationship between subject gateways and national bibliographies in international context. IFLA [paper presented at] 69th IFLA General Conference and Council, World Library and Information Congress, 1-9 August 2003, Berlin. http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla69/papers/054e-Stoklasova_Balikova_Celbova.pdf.
51. Tzitzikas, Y. et al. 2002. Extended faceted taxonomies for Web catalogs. ERCIM news 51: http://www.ercim.org/publication/Ercim_News/enw51/ tzitzikas.html.
52. Van Dijk, R 2003. eXchangeable Faceted Metadata Language-XFML Core. [Last changed in 2003]: http://www.xfml.org/spec/1.0.html.
53. Vizine-Goetz, D. 1998. OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data. Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: [proceedings of 34th Annual Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, Champaign, 1997], ed. P. Atherton Cochrane and E. H. Johnson. Champaign, IL: Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, pp. 93-105.
54. Wätjen, H.-J. 1998. GERHARD-automatisches Sammeln, Klassifizieren und Indexieren von wissenschaftlich relevanten Informationsressourcen im deutschen World Wide Web. B.I.T. online: 279-290.