Medical librarians' uses and perceptions of social tagging

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 136-139

  Bianco, Cecile E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SERVICE; INTERNET; LIBRARIAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NORMAL HUMAN;

CANADA; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LIBRARIANS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; UNITED STATES; VOCABULARY;

EID: 66249098527     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: 15589439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.2.012     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. West J. Subject headings 2.0: folksonomies and tags. Lib Media Connect. 2007 Apr/May;25(7):58-9.
2. Raine L. 28% of online Americans have used the Internet to tag content [Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 31 Jan 2007 [cited 28 Aug 2008]. .
3. Barsky E, Cho A. Introducing Web 2.0: social search for health librarians. J Can Health Libraries Assoc [Internet]. 2007 Summer;28(2):59-61 [cited 8 Jan 2008]. .
4. Boulos, Maged N, Kamel, Wheeler S. The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Info Libr J [Internet]. 2007 Mar;24(1):2-23 [cited 28 Feb 2008]. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00701.x.
5. Macgregor G, McCulloch E. Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool. Libr Rev [Internet]. 2006;55(5):291-300 [cited 12 Aug 2007]. DOI:10.1108/00242530610667558.
6. Fichter D. Intranet applications for tagging and folksonomies. Online [Internet]. 2006 May/Jun;30(3):43-5 [subscription only, cited 5 Aug 2007]. .
7. Bates ME. Tag-you're it! Online [Internet]. 2006 Jan/Feb;30(1):64 [subscription only, cited 12 Aug 2007]. .
8. Peterson E. Beneath the metadata: some philosophical problems with folksonomy. D-Lib Mag [Internet]. 2006 Nov;12(11) [cited 12 Aug 2007]. .
9. AADL image gallery-Ann Arbor District Library [Internet]. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor District Library [cited 21 Sep 2008]. .
10. Connor E.Medical librarian 2.0.Med Ref ServQ[Internet]. 2007 Spring;26(1):1-15 [cited 2 Feb 2008]. DOI: 10.1300/J115v26n01-01.
11. Task Force on Social Networking Software. MLA's spring webcast is all about 2.0 [Internet]. Chicago, IL: Medical Library Association; 2007 [cited 14 Jul 2008]. .
12. Task Force on Social Networking Software. Announcing a free CE course on Web 2.0 for MLA members [Internet]. Chicago, IL: Medical Library Association; 2007 [cited 14 Jul 2008]. .
13. Snipes PR. Folksonomy vs. Minnie Earl and Melville. Lib Media Connect. 2007 Apr/May;25(7):54-6.
14. Dye J. Folksonomy: a game of high-tech (and highstakes) tag. EContent. 2006 Apr;29(3):38-43.
15. Spiteri LF. The use of folksonomies in public library catalogues. Ser Libr [Internet]. 2006;51(2):75-89 [cited 12 Aug 2007]. DOI: 10.1300/J123v51n02- 06.
16. Dillman D. Mail and Internet surveys: the tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 2007.
17. Stephens M. Tagging & social bookmarking. In: Web 2.0 & libraries, part 2: trends and technologies. Libr Technol Rep [Internet]. 2007 Sep/Oct;43(5):58-61 [subscription only, cited 4 Dec 2007]. .
18. Del.icio.us. Everything else to know about del.icio.us [Internet]. Del.icio.us [cited 15 Jul 2008]. .