In the margins: reflections on scribbles, knowledge organization, and access

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 72-77

  Abbas, June ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36148944783     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2007-2-72     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Abbas, June. 2002. Smoothing the information seeking path: Removing representational obstacles in the middle school digital library environment. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Texas, Demon.
2. Abbas, June. 2005a. Out of the mouths of middle school children: I. developing user-defined controlled vocabularies for subject access in a digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56: 1512-24.
3. Abbas, June. 2005b. Creating metadata for children's resources: issues, research, and current developments. Library trends 54(2): 303-17.
4. th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Austin, TX, November3-8, 2006. Medford, N.J.: Information Today.
5. Arch, Xan. 2007. Creating the academic library folksonomy: put social tagging to work at your institution. College & research libraries news 68(2): 80-81.
6. Bates, Marcia J. 1998. Indexing and access for digital libraries and the Internet: human, database, and domain factors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49: 1185-1205.
7. Bates, Mary Ellen. 2006. Tag - you're it! Online 30(1): 64.
8. Blair, David. 1990. Language and representation in information retrieval. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
9. Blair, David. 2006. Wittgenstein, language, and information: back to the rough ground! Dordrecht: Springer.
10. Boston Public Library. 2006. The John Adams Library at the Boston Public Library. (http://www. johnadamslibrary.org/, accessed June 27, 2007).
11. Carlyle, Alyson. 1989. Matching LCSH and user vocabulary in the library catalog. Cataloging & classification quarterly 10(1/2): 37-63.
12. nd ed. New York: Elsevier Science, pp. 226-31.
13. Drabenstott, Karen and Vizine-Goetz, Diane. 1990. Search trees for subject searching in online catalogs. Library hi tech 8(3): 7-20.
14. Dye, Jessica. 2006. Folksonomy: a game of high-tech (and high-stakes) tag. EContent 29(3): 38-43.
15. Dye, Jessica. 2007. Collaboration 2.0. EContent 30(1): 32-36.
16. Fichter, Darlene. 2006. Intranet applications for tagging and folksonomies. Online 30(3): 43-45.
17. Fox, Robert. 2006. Cataloging for the masses. OCLC Systems & Services 22: 166-72.
18. Fu, Xin, Ciszek, Tom, Marchionini, Gary and Solomon, Paul. 2005. Annotating the Web: an exploratory study of Web users' needs for personal annotation tools. In Sparking synergies: bringing research and practice together; proceedings of the 68th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, October 28-November 2, Charlotte, NC. Medford, N.J.: Information Today.
19. Gingerich, Owen. 2004. The book nobody read: chasing the revolutions of Nicolaus Copernicus. NewYork: Penguin Books.
20. Golder, Scott and Huberman, Bernardo. 2006. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems Journal of information science 32: 198-208.
21. Gordon-Murnane, Laura. 2006. Social bookmarking, folksonomies, and Web 2.0 tools. Searcher 14(6): 26-38.
22. Guy, Marieke and Tonkin, Emma. 2006. Folksonomies: tidying up tags? DLib magazine 12(1). Retrieved June 27, 2007 from http://www.dlib.org/ dlib/january06/guy/01guy.html.
23. Hastings, Samantha K. 1995. Query Categories in a Study of Intellectual Access to Digitized Art Images. In Kinney, Tom, ed. Converging technologies, forging partnerships in information, proceedings of the 58th ASIS Annual Meeting: Chicago, October 9-12, 1995. Medford, NJ: Information Today, pp.3-8.
24. Kim, Hanhwe and Korfhage, Robert. 1994. BIRD: Browsing interface for the retrieval of documents. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 176-177.
25. th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM Press, pp. 134-41.
26. Lester, Marilyn Ann. 1989. Coincidence of user vocabulary and Library of Congress Subject Headings: experiments to improve subject access. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
27. Macgregor, George and McCulloch, Emma. 2006. Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource. Library review 55: 291-300.
28. Markey, Karen. 1984. Subject searching in library catalogs: before and after the introduction of online catalogs. Dublin, OH: Online Computer Library Center.
29. Matusiak, Krystyna. 2006. Towards user-centered indexing in digital imaging collections. OCLC Systems & Services 22. 283-98.
30. Nuchprayoon, Assadaporn and Korfhage, Robert. 1994. GUIDO, a visual tool for retrieving documents. In Proceedings IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages 1994, pp. 64-71.
31. O'Connor, Brian C. 1996. Explorations in indexing and abstracting: pointing, virtue and power. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
32. O'Connor, Brian., O'Connor, Mary K. and Abbas, June. 1999. User reactions as access mechanism: an exploration based on captions for images. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50: 681-97.
33. Olson, Hope. 2002. The power to name: locating the limits of subject representation in libraries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
34. Ovsiannikov, Ilia. A., Arbib, Michael A. and McNeil, Thomas H. 1999. Annotation technology. International journal of human-computer studies 50: 329-62.
35. Peterson, Elaine. 2006. Beneath the metadata. D-Lib magazine 12(11).
36. Rainie, Lee. 2007. 28% of online Americans have used the internet to tag content: forget Dewey and his decimals, internet users are revolutionizing the way we classify information-and make sense of it. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved June 27, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/ PIP_Tagging.pdf.
37. Reuter, Kara and Druin, Alison. 2004. Bringing together children and books: an initial descriptive study of children's book searching and selection behavior in a digital library. In Managing and enhancing information: cultures and conflicts, proceedings of the 67th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Medford, NJ: Information Today, pp. 339-48.
38. Skiba, Diane J. 2006. Web 2.0: next great thing or just marketing hype? Nursing education perspectives 27: 212-14.
39. Spiteri, Louise F. 2006a. The use of folksonomies in public library catalogs. The serials librarian 51: 75-89.
40. Spiteri, Louise. 2006b. The use of collaborative tagging in public library catalogues. Available online: http://www.oclc.org/research/grants/ presentations/2006/spiteri.ppt.
41. Suster, Mark. 2006. Folksonomy. AIIM e-doc magazine 20(6): 20-21.
42. Sweda, Jennifer E. 2006. Using social bookmarks in an academic setting: PennTags. Poster presented at the 17th Annual ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop Saturday, November 4, 2006, Austin, TX.
43. Taylor, Arlene G. 1984. Authority files in online catalogs: An investigation of their value. Cataloging & classification quarterly 4(3): 1-17.
44. Trant, Jennifer. 2006. Social classification in art museums: steve.museum. Panel paper presented at the 17th Annual ASIS&T SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop Saturday, November 4, 2006, Austin, TX.
45. Vander Wal, Thomas. 2006. Folksonomy to improve IA. Presented at the OZ IA, Sydney,Australia. Retrieved May 14, 2007, from http://s3.amazonaws.com/ 2006presentations/OZIA/Folksonomy_for_IA.pdf.
46. Wilson, Patrick. [1968] 1978. Two kinds of power: an essay in bibliographical control. California library reprint series ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.