Enhancing document modeling by means of open topic models: Crossing the frontier of classification schemes in digital libraries by example of the DDC

Library Hi Tech

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 520-539

  Hoppner M ^a   Horstmann, Rahmsdorf ^a   Mehler, Alexander ^a   Waltinger, Ulli ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Digital libraries; Document management; Modelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 72049116355     PISSN: 07378831     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/07378830911007646     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Biber, D. (1995), Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-linguistic Comparison, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2. Bickhard, M.H. (2008), “Social ontology as convention”, Topoi, Vol. 27 Nos 1-2, pp. 139-149.
3. Cilibrasi, R.L. and Vitanyi, P.M.B. (2007), “The Google similarity distance”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 370-383.
4. Cramer, I. (2008), “How well do semantic relatedness measures perform? A meta-study”, in Ed. Bos, J. and Ed. Delmonte, R. (Eds), Semantics in Text Processing. STEP 2008 Conference Proceedings, Research in Computational Semantics, Vol. 1, College Publications, Pemberton, NJ, pp. 59-70.
5. Cutting, D.R., Karger, D.R., Pedersen, J.O. and Tukey, J.W. (1992), “Scatter/gather: a cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections”, in Ed. Belkin, N. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on SIGIR '92, Vol. 92, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 318-329.
6. Denoyer, L. and Gallinari, P. (2003), “A belief networks-based generative model for structured documents. An application to the XML categorization”, in Ed. Perner, P. (Ed.), Proceedings of Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition, 3rd International Conference, MLDM 2003, Leipzig, Germany, Vol. 2734, LNCS, Springer, Berlin, pp. 328-342.
7. Dillon, A. (2008), “Bringing genre into focus: why information has shape”, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 17-19.
8. Hagedorn, K., Chapman, S. and Newman, D. (2007), “Enhancing search and browse using automated clustering of subject metadata”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 13 No. 7.
9. Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. (1989), Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Hearst, M.A. and Pedersen, J.O. (1996), “Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: scatter/gather on retrieval results”, in Ed. Frei, H.-P. and Ed. Harman, D. (Eds), Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Hartung-Gorre, Konstanz, pp. 76-84.
11. Heyer, G., Quasthoff, U. and Wittig, T. (2006), Text Mining: Wissensrohstoff Text, w3L Verlag, Herdecke.
12. Joachims, T. (2002), Learning to Classify Text Using Support Vector Machines, Kluwer, Boston, MA.
13. Kules, B., Kustanowitz, J. and Shneiderman, B. (2006), “Categorizing web search results into meaningful and stable categories using fast-feature techniques”, '06: Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 210-219.
14. Landauer, T.K. and Dumais, S.T. (1997), “A solution to Plato's problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge”, Psychological Review, Vol. 104 No. 2, pp. 211-240.
15. Lossau, N. (2004), “Search engine technology and digital libraries: libraries need to discover the academic internet”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 10 No. 6.
16. Maarek, Y.S., Fagin, R., Ben-Shaul, I.Z. and Pelleg, D. (2000), “Ephemeral document clustering for web applications”, Technical report RJ 10186, IBM Research, Yorktown Heights, NY.
17. Mehler, A. (2009), “A quantitative graph model of social ontologies by example of Wikipedia”, in Ed. Mehler, A., Ed. Sharoff, S. and Ed. Santini, M. (Eds), Genres on the Web: Computational Models and Empirical Studies, Springer, Berlin/New York, NY, pp. 291-352.
18. Mehler, A., Geibel, P. and Pustylnikov, O. (2007), “Structural classifiers of text types: towards a novel model of text representation”, Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics (JLCL), Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 51-66.
19. Mehler, A., Sharoff, S. and Santini, M. (2009), Genres on the Web: Computational Models and Empirical Studies, Springer, Berlin/New York, NY.
20. Mehler, A., Gleim, R., Ernst, A. and Waltinger, U. (2008), “WikiDB: building interoperable wiki-based knowledge resources for semantic databases”, Sprache und Datenverarbeitung, International Journal for Language Data Processing, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 47-70.
21. Meyer zu Eißen, S. (2007), “On information need and Paderborn, categorizing search”, dissertation, University of Paderborn, Paderborn, February, available at: http://ubdata.uni-paderborn.de/ediss/17/2007/meyer_zu/ (accessed 19 June 2009).
22. Mika, P. and Gangemi, A. (2004), “Descriptions of social relations”, Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Friend of a Friend, Social Networking and the (Semantic) Web.
23. Newman, D., Hagedorn, K., Chemudugunta, C. and Smyth, P. (2007), “Subject metadata enrichment using statistical topic models”, JCDL '07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, ACM, New York, NY, pp. 366-375.
24. OCLC (2008), “Dewey decimal classification summaries. A brief introduction to the Dewey Decimal Classification”, available at: www.oclc.org/dewey/resources/summaries/default.htm (accessed 15 February 2009).
25. Osinski, S. and Weiss, D. (2005), “Carrot2: design of a flexible and efficient web information retrieval framework”, in Ed. Szczepaniak, P.S., Ed. Kacprzyk, J. and Ed. Niewiadomski, A. (Eds), AWIC, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3528, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 439-444.
26. Pieper, D. and Summann, F. (2006), “Bielefeld academic search engine (BASE): an end-user oriented institutional repository search service”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 614-619.
27. Rehm, G., Santini, M., Mehler, A., Braslavski, P., Gleim, R., Stubbe, A., Symonenko, S., Tavosanis, M. and Vidulin, V. (2008), “Towards a reference corpus of web genres for the evaluation of genre identification systems”, Proceedings of the 6th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2008), Marrakech, ELRA, Paris (CD-ROM).
28. Rosenberg, J.B. and Borgman, C.L. (1992), “Extending the Dewey Decimal Classification via keyword clustering: the science library catalog project”, ASIS '92: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting on Celebrating Change: Information Management on the Move, American Society for Information Science, Silver Springs, MD, pp. 171-184.
29. Rosso, M.A. (2008), “Bringing genre into focus: stalking the wild web genre (with apologies to Euell Gibbons)”, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 20-22.
30. Salton, G. (1989), Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
31. Salton, G. and Buckley, C. (1988), “Term weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval”, Information Processing Management, Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 513-523.
32. Santini, M. (2009), “Cross-testing a genre classification model for the web”, in Ed. Mehler, A., Ed. Sharoff, S. and Ed. Santini, M. (Eds), Genres on the Web: Computational Models and Empirical Studies, Springer, Berlin/New York, NY.
33. Sebastiani, F. (2002), “Machine learning in automated text categorization”, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 1-47.
34. Sowa, J.F. (2000), Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA.
35. Stefanowski, J. and Weiss, D. (2003), “Carrot2 and language properties in web search results clusterings”, in Menasalvas, E., Sergovia, J. and Szczepaniak, P.S. (Eds), Advances in Web Intelligence. Proceedings of the 1st International Atlantic Web Intelligence Conference, Madrid, Spain, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 2663, pp. 240-9.
36. Stein, B. and Meyer zu Eißen, S. (2003), “Automatic document categorization: interpreting the performance of clustering algorithms“, in Günter, A., Kruse, R. and Neumann, B. (Eds), KI 2003: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2821, LNAI of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, NY, pp. 254-266.
37. Stein, B., Meyer zu Eiß, S. and Lipka, N. (2009), “Web genre analysis: use cases, retrieval models, and implementation issues”, in Ed. Mehler, A., Ed. Sharoff, S. and Ed. Santini, M. (Eds), Genres on the Web: Computational Models and Empirical Studies, Springer, Berlin/New York, NY.
38. Valdes-Perez, R., Pesenti, J. and Palmer, C. (2000), “Vivísimo, inc. – enterprise search, federated search and clustering”, available at: http://vivisimo.com/ (accessed 19 June 2009).
39. van Rijsbergen, C.J. (1975), Information Retrieval, Butterworths, London, Boston, MA.
40. von Ahn, L. and Dabbish, L. (2008), “Designing games with a purpose”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 51 No. 8, pp. 58-67.
41. Waltinger, U. and Mehler, A. (2008), “Who is it? Context sensitive named entity and instance recognition by means of Wikipedia”, Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI-2008), IEEE Computer Society, pp. 381-4.
42. Waltinger, U. and Mehler, A. (2009), “Social semantics and its evaluation by means of semantic relatedness and open topic models”, Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, Milano, September 15-18.
43. Waltinger, U., Mehler, A. and Heyer, G. (2008), “Towards automatic content tagging: enhanced web services in digital libraries using lexical chaining”, 4th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST '08), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 231-6.
44. Zamir, O. and Etzioni, O. (1999), “Grouper: a dynamic clustering interface to web search results”, Proceedings of the 8th International WWW Conference, Toronto, pp. 283-296.
45. Zhang, D. and Dong, Y. (2004), “Semantic, hierarchical, online clustering of web search results”, Advanced Web Technologies and Applications, Proceedings of the 6th Asia Pacific Web Conference (APWEB), Hangzhou, China, Springer, Berlin, pp. 69-78.