Potential and prospects of taxonomies for content organization

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 160-169

  Wang, Zhonghong ^a   Chaudhry, Abdus Sattar ^a   Khoo, Christopher ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947660017     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aitchison, J. & Clarke, S. D. 2004. The thesaurus: a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future. Cataloging & classification quarterly 37(3-4): 5-21.
2. Bruno, D. & Richmond, H. 2003. The truth about taxonomies {Electronic version}. The information management journal 37: 44-53.
3. Chaudhry, A. S. 7amp; Goh, L. H. 2005. Building taxonomies using organizational resources: a case of business consulting environment. Knowledge organization 32: 25-40.
4. Chaudhry, A. S. & Saeed, H. 2001. Taxonomies applications for leveraging organizational knowledge resources. Singapore journal of library & information management 30: 45-52.
5. Cheung, C. F., Lee, W. B., & Wang, Y. 2005. A multifacet taxonomy system with applications in unstructured knowledge management. Journal of knowledge management 9(6): 76-91.
6. Cisco, S. L. & Jackson, W. K. 2005. Creating order out of chaos with taxonomies (Electronic version). The information management journal 39: 45-50. Retrieved December 4, 2005 from EBSCO Academic Search Premier database.
7. Conway, S. & Sugar, C. 2002. Chapter 6: building taxonomies. In Conway, S. & Sligar, C., Unlocking knowledge assets. Redmond, Wash.: Microsoft Press, pp. 105-24.
8. Corcoran, M. 2002. Industry insights: taxonomies: hope or hype? Online 26. Retrieved July 6, 2005 from EBSCO Academic Search Premier Database.
9. Côté, J. A. 2005. Knowledge taxonomies: what's the role for information professionals? Information outlook 9: 45-46, 48, 51-52.
10. Delphi Group. 2004. Information intelligence; content classification and the enterprise taxonomy practice. Retrieved December 10, 2005 from http://www.delphigroup.com/research/whitepapers/20040601-taxonomy-WP.pdf.
11. Dodd, D.G. 1996. Grass-roots cataloging and classification: food for thought from World Wide Web subject-oriented hierarchical lists. Library resources & technical services 40: 275-86.
12. Gilchrist, A. & Kibby, P. 2000. Taxonomies for business: access and connectivity in a wired world. London: TFPL
13. Gilchrist, A. 2001. Corporate taxonomies: report on a survey of current practice. Online information review 25. Retrieved July 10, 2005 from ProQuest ABI/INFORM Archive Complete database.
14. Gilchrist, A. 2003. Thesauri, taxonomies and ontologies: an etymological note. Journal of documentation 59: 7-19.
15. Gilchrist, A. 2004. The taxonomy: a mechanism, rather than a tool, that needs a strategy for development and application. In Gilchrist, A. & Mahon, B. eds., Information architecture: designing information environments for purpose. London: Facet Publishing, pp. 192-98.
16. Graef, J. 2001. Managing taxonomies strategically. Montague institute review. Retrieved January 7, 2006 from http://www.montague.com/review/ taxonomy3.html.
17. Hudon, M. 2003. Expanding audiences for education-related information and resources: classificatory structures on the World Wide Web. Cataloging & classification quarterly 37(1/2): 81-96.
18. Hunter, A. 2000. Taxonomies in knowledge management. Retrieved July 10, 2005 from http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/a.hunter/tradepress/tax.html.
19. Knox, R. E. & Logan, D. 2003. What taxonomies do for the enterprise? Retrieved January 3, 2006 from http://www.cw360ms.com/research/gartner/117204. pdf.
20. Koch, T. et al. 1997. The role of classification schemes in Internet resources description and discovery: DESIRE Project. Retrieved January 7, 2006 from http://www.lub.lu.se/desire/radar/reports/D3.2.3/class_v20.html.
21. Mai, J. 2004. Classification of the Web: challenges and inquires. Knowledge organization 31: 92-96.
22. Molholt, P. 1995. Qualities of classification schemes for the information superhighway. Cataloging & classification quarterly 21 (2): 19-22.
23. Peters, T. 2005. Faceted taxonomy: creating a better user experience through information discovery.
24. Retrieved December 20, 2005 from http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/ PrintArticle.aspx?AritcleID=14600.
25. Pahlevi, S. M. & Kitagawa, H. 2005. Conveying taxonomy context for topic-focused web search (Electronic version). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56: 173-88.
26. Ramos, L. & Rasmus, D. W. 2003. Best practice in taxonomy development and management. Retrieved December 12, 2005 from http://stratify.com/ infocenter/download/BestPracticesInTaxDevAndMgmt4.pdf.
27. Rosenfeld, L. & Morville, P 2002. Information architecture for the World Wide Web, 2nd ed. Beijing; Cambridge [Mass]: O'Reilly.
28. Vizine-Goetz, D. 2002. Classification schemes for Internet resources revisited. Journal of internet cataloging 5(4): 5-18.
29. Will, L. 2004. Taxonomy: classification by another name {Electronic version}. Legal information management 4: 125-30. Retrieved December 4, 2005 from Cambridge Journals Online.
30. Woods, E. 2004. The corporate taxonomy: creating a new order. Retrieved December 12, 2005 from http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/PrintArticle.aspx? ArticleID=9566.
31. Wyllie, J. 2005. Taxonomies: frameworks for corporate knowledge, 2nd ed. London: Ark Group, in association with Inside Knowledge.