Opening ontology design: A study of the implications of knowledge organization for ontology design

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 209-221

  Park, Ok Nam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149240911     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2008-4-209     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adams, Katherine. 2002. The semantic web: differentiating between taxonomies and ontologies. Online 26(4): 20-23.
2. Albrechtsen, Hanne and Jacob, Elin K. 1998. The dynamics of classification systems as boundary objects for cooperation in the electronic library. Library trends 47(2): 293-312.
3. Albrechtsen, Hanne and Pejtersen, Annelise M. 2003. Cognitive work analysis and work centered design of classification schemes. Knowledge organization 30: 213-27.
4. Bowker, Geoffrey C. and Star, Susan L. 1999. Sorting things out: classification and practice. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.
5. Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, John R., and Benjamins, V. Richard. 1999. What are ontologies, and why do we need them? Intelligent systems and their applications 14(1): 20-26.
6. Ding, Ying. 2001. A review of ontologies with the semantic web in view. Journal of information science 27: 377-84.
7. Ding, Ying and Foo, Schubert. 2002. Ontology research and development. Part I-a review of ontology generation. Journal of information science 28: 123-36.
8. Ellis, David and Vasconcelos Ana. 1999. Ranganathan and the Net: using facet analysis to search and organize the world wide web. Aslih proceedings 51: 3-10.
9. Fensel, Dieter. 2002. Ontology-based knowledge management. Computer 35(11): 56-59.
10. Fischer, Dietrich H. 1998. From thesauri towards ontologies? In Mustafa El Hadi, Widad, Maniez, Jacques, & Pollitt, A. Stephen, eds. 1998. Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Fifth International ISKO Conference, Lille, France, August 25-29, 1998. Advances in knowledge organization 6. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, pp. 18-30.
11. Gilchrist, Alan. 2003. Thesauri, taxonomies, and ontologies-an etymological note. Journal of documentation 59: 7-18.
12. Gruber, Thomas R. 1993. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge acquisition 5: 199-220.
13. Gruber, Thomas R. 1994. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International journal of human and computer studies 43: 907-28.
14. Guarino, Nicola. 1997. Understanding, building and using ontologies: a commentary to 'using explicit ontologies in KBS development.' International journal of human and computer studies 46: 293-310.
15. Hjørland, Birger. 2002. Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches-traditional as well as innovative. Journal of documentation 58: 422-62.
16. Hjørland, Birger. 2003. Fundamentals of knowledge organization. Knowledge organization 30: 87-11.
17. Hyvönen, Eero, Saarela, Samppa, and Viljanen, Kim. 2003. Ontogator: combining view- and ontologybased search with semantic browsing. Proceedings of the XML Finland 2003 Conference. Available http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/ eahyvone/publication s/xmlfinland2003/yomXMLFinland2003.pdf
18. Jacob, Elin K. 2003. Ontologies and the semantic web. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 29(4): 19-23.
19. Kim, Henry. 2002. Predicting how ontologies for the semantic web will evolve. Communication of the ACM 45(2): 48-54.
20. Kwasnik, Barbara H. and Rubin, Victoria L. 2003. Stretching conceptual structures in classifications across languages and cultures. Cataloging & classification quarterly 37(1/2): 33-47.
21. Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Mai, Jens-Erik. 2004. The role of domains, documents, and decisions in indexing. In McIlwaine, Ia C. ed. 2004. Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the Eighth International ISKO Conference, London, England, July 13-16, 2004. Advances in knowledge organization 9. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, pp. 207-13.
23. Mai, Jens-Erik. 2005. Analysis in indexing: document and domain centered approaches. Information processing and management 41: 599-611.
24. Mai, Jens-Erik. 2006. Contextual analysis for the design of controlled vocabularies. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. October/November. Available http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Oct-06/ mai.html
25. McIlwaine, I. and Broughton, Vanda. 2000. The classification research group-then and now. Knowledge organization 27: 195-99.
26. Moreira, Alexandra and Alvarenga, Lidia. 2004. 'Thesaurus' and 'ontology.' Knowledge organization 31: 231-44.
27. Noy, Natalya F. and McGuinness, Deborah L.2001. Ontology Development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Available http://www.ksl. standard.edu/people/dlm/papers/ontologytutorial-noymcguinness-abstract.html.
28. Noy, Natalya F. and Hafner, Carole D. 1997. The state of the art in ontology design-a survey and comparative review. AI magazine 18 no. 3: 53-74.
29. Pejtersen, Annelise M. 1989. The BOOK House: modeling user needs and search strategies as a basis for system design. Roskilde, Risø National Laboratory. (Risø report M-2794).
30. Prieto-Díaz, Ruben. 2002. A faceted approach to building ontologies. Available https://users.cs. jmu.edu/prietorx/Public/publications/ BulidOntologiesRPD-ER2002.doc
31. Poli, Roberto. 1996. Ontology for knowledge organization. In Green, Rebecca, ed. Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, Washington, DC, July 15-18, 1996. Advances in knowledge organization 5. Frankfurt/Main: Indeks Verlag, pp. 313-319.
32. rd ed. New York: Asia Publishing House.
33. Rasmussen, Jens, Pejtersen, Annelise M. and Goodstein, L. P. 1994. Cognitive systems engineering. Wiley series in system engineering. New York: Wiley.
34. Smith, Barry. 1995. Formal ontology, common sense and cognitive science. International journal of human-computer studies 43: 641-67.
35. Spiteri, Louise. 1998. A simplified model for facet analysis: Ranganathan 101. Canadian journal of information and library science 23: 1-30. Available http://aifia.org/pg/a-simplified-model-for-facet-analysis.php.
36. Soergel, Dagobert. 1999. The rise of ontologies or the reinvention of classification? Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50: 1119-20.
37. Tzitzikas, Yannis, Spyratos, Nicolas, Constantopoulos, Panos and Analyti, Anastasis. 2002. Extended faceted ontologies. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 778-81.
38. th Annual Conference of the British Computer Society Specialist Group on Expert System. Available http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cache/papers/cs/3667/ftp:zSzzSzftp.aiai.ed.ac. ukzSzpubzSzdocumentszSz1995zSz95-ont-ijcai95-ont-method.pdf/uschold95toward.pdf/
39. Uschold, Mike and Grüninger, Michael. 1996. Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowledge engineering review 11: 93-155. Available http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/uschold96ontologie.html.
40. Van Heijist, G., Schreiber, Guus. and Wielinga, Bon. 1996. Using explicit ontologies in KBS development. International journal of human-computer studies 319-25.
41. Vickery, Brian C. 1997. Ontologies. Journal of information science 23: 277-86.
42. Vicente, Kim J. 1999. Cognitive work analysis toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. nd international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS'01), Ogunquit, ME.