Records classification and functions: An archival perspective

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 188-198

  Foscarini, Fiorella ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547279456     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bailey, C. 1997. From the top down: the practice of macro-appraisal. Arckivaria 43: 89-128.
2. Bearman, D. & Lytle R. H. 1985-86. The power of the principle of provenance. Archivaria 21: (Winter). 14-27.
3. Bearman, D. 1992. Diplomatics, Weberian bureaucracy, and the management of electronic records in Europe and America. The American archivist 55: 168-81.
4. Bearman, D. 1996. Item level control and electronic recordkeeping. Archives and museum informatics 10: 195-245.
5. Brooks, P. 1940. The selection of records for preservation. The American archivist 3: 221-34.
6. Cencetti, G. 1970. Scritti archivistici. Roma.
7. Cook, T. 1992. Mind over matter: towards a new theory of archival appraisal. In Craig B. L. (ed.), The archival imagination: essays in honour of Hugh A. Taylor. Ottawa: Association of Canadian Archivists, pp. 38-70.
8. De Felice, R. 1967. Per la formazione dei titolari di archivio. Rassegna degli archivi di stato anno XXVII:. 59-86.
9. De Felice, R. 1971. In margine ad alcune questioni di archivistica. Rassegna degli archivi di stato anno XXXI: 123-42.
10. De Felice, R. 1988. L'archivio contemporaneo. Titolario e classificazione sistematica di competenza nei moderni archivi correnti pubblici e privati. Roma: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.
11. DIRKS. 2000. http://www.naa.gov.au/recordkeeping/dirks/dirksman/part1. html#bg1. Accessed May 14, 2007.
12. Douglas, M. 1986. How institutions think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
13. Duranti, L. 1997. I documenti archivistici. La gestione dell'archivio da parte dell'ente produttore. Roma: Pubblicazione degli Archivi di Stato, Quaderni della Rassegna degli Archivi di Stato no. 82 - Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali, Ufficio Centrale per i Beni Archivistici.
14. Duranti, L. 1998. Diplomatics: new uses for an old science. Lanham: Society of American Archivists and Association of Canadian Archivists in association with the Scarecrow Press, Inc.
15. Duranti, L., Eastwood, T. & MacNeil, H. 2003. Preservation of the integrity of electronic records. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. European Commission. 2001. Model requirements for the management of electronic records. MoReq specification. Prepared for the IDA Programme of the European Commission by Cornwell Management Consultants pic.
17. Guercio, M. 2001. Principles, methods, and instruments for the creation, preservation, and use of archival records in the digital environment. The American archivist 64: 238-69.
18. Guercio, M. 2002. Records classification and content management: old functions and new requirements in the legislation and standards for electronic record-keeping systems. In Proceedings of the DLM-Forum, Barcelona 2002, pp. 432-42.
19. Guercio M. 2005. Modelli efficienti di gestione documentaria nella societa' dell'informazione. Il ruolo della classificazione d'archivio. Archivi & computer 2: 3-12.
20. Hurley, C. 1993. What, if anything, is a function? Archives and manuscripts 21: 208-18.
21. Hurley, C. 1995. Ambient functions - abandoned children to zoos. Archivaria 40: 21-39.
22. Jenkinson, H. 1965. A manual of archive administration. London: Percy Lund, Humphries & Co.
23. International Standards Organization. 2001. ISO 15489: Information and documentation - records management. Part 1: General; Part 2: Guidelines.
24. Lodolini, E. 1992. Archivistica: principi e problemi. Roma: Franco Angeli.
25. Lutzker, M. 1982. Max Weber and the analysis of modern bureaucratic organizations. The American archivist 45: 119-30.
26. Maclean, I. 1959. Australian experience in records and archives management. The American archivist 22: 378-418.
27. Morgan, G. 1986. Images of organization. Beverly Hills: Sage.
28. National Archives of Australia. 2001 (rev. 2003). Designing and implementing record-keeping systems: The DIRKS manual: a strategic approach to managing business information.
29. Province of British Columbia. Administrative Records Classification System (ARCS) and Operational Records Classification Systems (ORCS).
30. Province of Nova Scotia. Standard for Administrative Records (STAR) and Standard for Operational Records (STOR).
31. Romiti, A. 1995. Le principali sentenze sul protocollo delle pubbliche amministrazioni. Viareggio.
32. Rossi, E. A. & Guercio M. 2005. La metodologia per la definizione dipiani di classificazione in ambiente digitale. Roma: Scuola Superiore della Pubblica Amministrazione.
33. Sabourin, P. 2001. Constructing a function-based classification system: business activity structure classification system. Archivaria 51: 137-54.
34. Schellenberg, T. R. 1956. Modern archives: principles and techniques. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Shepherd, E. & Yeo G. 2003. Managing records: a handbook of principles and practice. London: Facet.
36. Sigmond, J. P. 1991-92. Form, function and archival value. Archivaria 33: 141-47.
37. Tamble', D. 1993. La teoria archivistica italiana contemporanea. Profilo storico-critico (1950-1990). Roma: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.
38. Valenti, F. 1981. Riflessioni sulla natura e sulla struttura degli archivi. Rassegna degli archivi di stato 15: 20-24.