Folksonomies, tagging communities, and tagging strategies - An empirical study

Knowledge Organization

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 115-127

  Munk, Timme Bisgaard ^a   Mørk, Kristian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b Danish Broadcasting Corporation   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38349082255     PISSN: 09437444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5771/0943-7444-2007-3-115     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Benzécri, Jean-Paul. 1980. L'analyse des données tome 2:l'analyse des correspondances. Paris. Bordas.
2. Benzécri, Jean-Paul. 1992. Correspondence analysis handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.
3. Bikchandani, S., D. Hirshleifer, et al. 1992. A theory of fads, fashion and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of political economy 100:992-1026.
4. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D. and Welch, I. 1998. Learning from the behavior of others:conformity, fads and informational cascades. The journal of economic perspectives 12: 151-70.
5. Blasius, Jörg and Greenacre, Michael. 1998. Visualization of categorical data. San Diego: Academic Press.
6. Chater, Nick. 1999. The search for simplicity: a fundamental cognitive principle? The quarterly journal of experimental psychology 52: 273-302.
7. Chater, Nick and Hurley, Susan. 2005. Perspectives on imitation - from neuroscience to social science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8. Chater, Nick and Pothos, Emmanuel M. 2002. A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorization. Cognitive science 26: 303-43.
9. Cozy, M. 2005. Power laws in single websites in del.icio.us from http://www.cozy.org/d/.
10. Golder, Scott and Huberman, Bernardo. 2005. The structure of collaborative tagging systems. Retrieved 10-08, 2007, from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0508082.
11. Greenacre, Michael. 1993. Correspondence analysis in practice. San Diego: Academic Press.
12. Hill, M. O. 1974. Correspondence analysis: a neglected multivariate method. Applied statistics 3: 340-54.
13. Jolicocur, P. G., M.A. and S. M. Kosslyn. 1984. Picture and names: making the connection. Psychology 16: 243-75.
14. Mervis, Carolyn B. and Crisafi, Maria A. 1982. Order of acquisition of subordinate-, basic-, and superordinate-level categories Child development 53: 258-66.
15. Munk, Timme Bisgaard and Mørk, Kristian. 2007. Folksonomy, the power law & the significance of the least effort. Knowledge organization 34: 16-33.
16. Rosch, Eleanor and Caroly, Mervis B. 1975. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive psychology 7: 573-605.
17. Rosch, Eleanor et al. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive psychology 8: 382-439.
18. Shen, Kaikai and Wu, Lide. 2005. Folksonomy as a complex network. Retrieved 10-08, 2007, from http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/cs/pdf/0509/0509072.pdf.
19. Shirky, Clay. 2003. Power laws, weblogs, and inequality networks, economics, and culture. Retrieved 24-08, 2007, from http://www.shirky.com/ writings/powerlaw_weblog.html.
20. Tabachnik, Barbara G. 1989. Using multivariate statistics. New York. HarperCollins.
21. Tanaka, J. and Taylor M. 1991. Object categories and expertise: is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive psychology 23: 457-82.
22. Vogt, Paul. 2000. Minimum cost and the emergence of the Zipf-Mandelbrot law. introduction to linguistic knowledge/computational linguistics. Retrieved 10-08, 2007, from http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk/ ∼paulv/publications/alife9.pdf.
23. Zipf, George Kingsley. 1949. Human behaviour and the principle of least effort: an introduction to human ecology. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.