Knowledge organization trends in library and information studies: A preliminary comparison of the pre- and post-web eras

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 651-666

  Saumure, Kristie ^a   Shiri, Ali ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Information organization; Knowledge organization; World wide web

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SCIENCE; METADATA;

DESCRIPTORS; INFORMATION ORGANIZATION; INFORMATION ORGANIZATIONS; KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION; LIBRARY AND INFORMATION STUDIES; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 51849086484     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: 17416485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165551507084300     Document Type: Article

References (135)

1. E. Svenonius, The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization ( MIT Press, Cambridge, 2000 ).
2. H. Olson, codes, costs, and critiques: the organization of information in Library Quarterly, 1931-2004, Library Quarterly 76 (1) (2000) 19-35.
3. I.C. McIlwaine, Trends in knowledge organization research, Knowledge Organization 30 (2) (2003) 75-86.
4. University of British Columbia Libraries, Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts (LISTA) (2006). Available at: http://toby.library.ubc. ca/resources/infopage.cfm?id=1035 (accessed 30 October 2006).
5. D.T. Hawkins, S.E. Larson and B.Q. Caton, Information science abstracts: tracking the literature of information science. Part 2: A new taxonomy for information science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 (8) (2003) 771-81.
6. Wikipedia, Mosaic (Web Browser) (2006). Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosaic_%28web_browser%29 (accessed 10 October 2006).
7. K. Jrvelin and P. Vakkari, Content analysis of research articles in library and information science, Library and Information Science Research 12 (4) (1990) 395-421.
8. K. Charmaz, Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2 nd Edition (Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2000) 509-35.
9. A. Kenning and J. Jonsson, Aggregating distributed digital collections in the Mountain West Digital Library with the CONTENTdm multi-site server, Library Hi Tech 23 (2) (2005) 220-32.
10. M. Cilia, C. Bornhvd and A. Buchmann, Event handling for the universal enterprise, Information Technology and Management 6 (1) (2005) 123-48.
11. M.L. Mackenzie, The personal organization of electronic mail messages in a business environment: an exploratory study, Library and Information Science Research 22 (4) (2000) 405-26.
12. N. Swartz, E-mails waste businesses' archive space, Information Management Journal 38 (6) (2004) 11.
13. M. Broadbent. and H. Lofgren, Information delivery: identifying priorities, performance, and value, Information Processing and Management 29 (6) (1993) 683-701.
14. R. Medina and J. Fenner, Controlling your documents, Information Management Journal 39 (1) (2005) 20-22.
15. M. Dillon and A.S. Gray, FASIT: a fully automatic syntactically based indexing system, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 34 (2) (1983) 99-108.
16. J.E. Rush, R. Salvador, and A. Zamora, Automatic abstracting and indexing, II: production of indicative abstracts by application of contextual inference and syntactic coherence criteria, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 22 (4) (1971) 260-74.
17. L.S. Maruyama, Format recognition: a report of a project at the Library of Congress, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 22 (4) (1971) 283-7.
18. S. Artandi, Machine indexing: linguistic and semiotic implications, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27 (4) (1976) 235-9.
19. L.P. Jones, E.W. Gassie Jr and S. Radhakrishnan, INDEX: the statistical basis for an automatic conceptual phrase-indexing system, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41 (2) (1990) 87-97.
20. L.F. Rau, Knowledge organization and access in a conceptual information system, Information Processing and Management 23 (4) (1987) 269-84.
21. J. Allan, Detection as multi-topic tracking, Information Retrieval 5 (2 / 3) (2002) 139-57.
22. A. Finn and N. Kushmerick, Learning to classify documents according to genre, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (11) (2006) 1506-18.
23. S.M. Humphrey, W.J. Rogers, H. Kilicoglu, D. Demner-Fushman and T.C. Rindflesch, Word sense disambiguation by selecting the best semantic type based on journal descriptor indexing: preliminary experiment, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (1) (2006) 96-113.
24. J.W. Schneider and N. Borlund, Introduction to bibliometrics for construction and maintenance of thesauri: methodical considerations, Journal of Documentation 60 (5) (2004) 524-49.
25. J. Wang, Automatic thesaurus development: term extraction from title metadata, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (7) (2006) 907-20.
26. J. Evans, S. McKemmish and K. Bhoday, Create once, use many times: the clever use of recordkeeping metadata for multiple archival purposes, Archival Science 5 (1) (2005) 17-42.
27. S. Mitchell, Machine-assisted metadata generation and new resource discovery: software and services, First Monday 11 (8) (2006) 4.
28. F. Ibekwe-sanJuan, Constructing and maintaining knowledge organization tools: a symbolic approach, Journal of Documentation 62 (2) (2006) 229-50.
29. A. Leuski and J. Allan, Strategy-based interactive cluster visualization for information retrieval, International Journal on Digital Libraries 3 (2) (2000) 170-84.
30. F.A. Hanson, From classification to indexing: how automation transforms the way we think, Social Epistemology 18 (4) (2004) 333-56.
31. L. Zhou and D. Zhang, NLPIR: a theoretical framework for applying natural language processing to information retrieval, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 (2) (2003) 115-23.
32. D.L. Bosseau and S.K. Martin, The formerly virtually neutral library, Journal of Academic Librarianship 21 (2) (1995) 121-2.
33. P. Ingwersen, The role of libraries and librarians in organising digital information, Libri: International Journal of Libraries and Information Services 49 (1) (1999) 11-15.
34. F. Rowland and E.F. Duranceau, The need for information organizations and information professionals in the internet era, Serials Review 21 (1) (1995) 84-5.
35. S. Downer, S. Medina, B. Nicol and A. Trehub, Alabama Mosaic: sharing Alabama history online, Library Hi Tech 23 (2) (2005) 233-51.
36. L. Cantara, Encoding controlled vocabularies for the semantic web using SKOS core, OCLC Systems and Services 22 (2) (2006) 111-14.
37. G. Hodge, Metadata for electronic information resources: from variety to interoperability, Information Services and Use 25 (1) (2005) 35-45.
38. G. Hodge, C. Templeton and R. Allen, A metadata element set for project documentation, Science and Technology Libraries 25 (4) (2005) 5-23.
39. L.C. Howarth, Metadata and bibliographic control: soul-mates or two solitudes ? Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 40 (3 / 4) (2005) 37-56.
40. D.M. Mackay and S. Hardy, Learning and teaching resource discovery in the health and life sciences - partnership and interoperability, Health Information and Libraries Journal 22 (Suppl. 2) (2005) 70-74.
41. R. Seth, A.R.D. Prasad and D.P. Madalli, Issues in metadata crosswalks: a case study of qualified Dublin Core and Onix, SRELS Journal of Information Management 42 (4) (2005) 523-32.
42. S.L. Shreeves, J. Riley and L. Milewicz, Moving towards shareable metadata, First Monday 11 (8) (2006) 6.
43. L. Wykoff, L. Mercier, T. Bond and A. Cornish, The Columbia River Basin ethnic history archive: a tristate online history database and learning center, Library Hi Tech 23 (2) (2005) 252-64.
44. C. Hodgson and J. Walker, NISO metasearch initiative issues first set of recommendations, Against the Grain 18 (3) (2006) 74-6.
45. K.P. Jones, The environment of classification: the concept of mutual exclusivity, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24 (2) (1973) 157-63.
46. C.T. Yu, The stability of two common matching functions in classification with respect to a proposed measure, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27 (4) (1976) 248-55.
47. S.D. Hall-Ellis, Cataloging electronic resources and metadata: employers' expectations as reflected in American libraries and AutoCAT, 2000-2005, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 47 (1) (2006) 38-51.
48. B.L. Caraway, Library of Congress (LC), Serials Librarian 49 (1 / 2) (2005) 4-5.
49. A. Copeland, S. Hamburger, J. Hamilton and K.J. Robinson, Cataloging and digitizing ephemera: one team's experience with Pennsylvania German broadsides and Fraktur, Library Resources and Technical Services 50 (3) (2006) 186-98.
50. J. Hopkins and S.K. Roe, Cataloging news, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 40 (1) (2005) 133-46.
51. L. O'English, J.G. Matthews and E.B. Lindsay, Graphic novels in academic libraries: from Maus to Manga and beyond, Journal of Academic Librarianship 32 (2) (2006) 173-82.
52. S.J. Miller, and W.C. Robertson, Integrating resources cataloging workshop, Serials Librarian 48 (1 / 2) (2005) 7-15.
53. D. Reser and L. Hawkins, Defining an 'access level' catalog record using MARC 21 and AACR2, Serials Review 31 (3) (2005) 218-19.
54. K. Winzer, ALA/ALCTS Cataloging and Classification Section/Committee on Cataloging: description and access, Law Library Journal 96 (4) (2004) 861-2.
55. D.N. Griffiths, The United Nations Classification Scheme: a critique and recommendations, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 40 (1) (2005) 19-41.
56. E. Currs, Vertical integration of sciences: an approach to a different view of knowledge organization, Journal of Information Science 28 (5) (2002) 397-406.
57. A. Gilliland, N. Rouche, L. Lindberg and J. Evans, Towards a 21st century metadata infrastructure supporting the creation, preservation and use of trustworthy records: developing the InterPARES 2 metadata schema registry, Archival Science 5 (1) (2005) 43-78.
58. L. Kuei-Kuei and W. Shiao-Jun, Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system, Information Processing and Management 41 (2) (2005) 313-30.
59. A. Neelameghan and K.S. Raghavan, Seminal mnemonics in knowledge organization: ancient traditions and modern practices, Information Studies 12 (1) (2006) 5-26.
60. B. Reeb and S. Gibbons, Students, librarians, and subject guides: improving a poor rate of return, Portal: Libraries and the Academy 4 (1) (2004) 123-30.
61. N.J. Williamson, Classification in the millennium, Online and CD-Rom Review 21 (5) (1997) 298-301.
62. M.J. Bates, Fundamental forms of information, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (8) (2006) 1033-45.
63. F.M. Shipman III and R. Furuta, Guided paths through web-based collections: design, experiences, and adaptations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51 (3) (2000) 260-72.
64. F. Meschini, Topic maps: how I learned to stop worrying and love metadata [in English], Bollettino AIB 45 (1) (2005) 59-72.
65. I. Schmidt and C. Muller, Planning a new type of literary edition: the Thomas Mann project, Markup Languages: Theory and Practice 2 (4) (2000) 353-65.
66. P. van den Besselaar, The cognitive and the social structure of STS, Scientometrics 51 (2) (2001) 441-60.
67. D. Alimohammadi, Meta-tags: still a matter of opinion, Electronic Library 23 (6) (2005) 625-31.
68. M.A. Chopey, Planning and implementing a metadata-driven digital repository, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 40 (3 / 4) (2005) 255-87.
69. A. Coleman, Interdisciplinarity, interactivity, and interoperability for educating the digerati, Education for Information 23 (4) (2005) 233-43.
70. R. Chandrakar, An approach to mapping CCF to Dublin Core, Electronic Library 23 (5) (2005) 577-90.
71. J. Plodzien, E. Stemposz and A. Stasiecka, An approach to the quality and reusability of metadata specifications for e-learning objects, Online Information Review 30 (3) (2006) 238-251.
72. F. Yu, Metadata schema used in OCLC sampled web pages, Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences 43 (2) (2005) 129.
73. V. Broughton, Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment: the Bliss bibliographic classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multidimensional knowledge structures, New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 7 (2001) 67-102.
74. V. Broughton and H. Lane, Classification schemes revisited: applications to web indexing and searching, Journal of Internet Cataloging 2 (3 / 4) (2000) 143-55.
75. V. Broughton, The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval, Aslib Proceedings 58 (1 / 2) (2006) 49-72.
76. L.J. Haravu and A. Neelameghan, Text mining and data mining in knowledge organization and discovery: the making of knowledge-based products, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 37 (1 / 2) (2003) 97-113.
77. H. Frank, Cataloging the wide world of web: organizing the internet for distance learners, Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship 7 (2 / 3) (2002) 31-45.
78. D. Vizine-Goetz, Classification schemes for internet resources revisited, Journal of Internet Cataloging 5 (4) (2002) 5-18.
79. K.V. Fast and D.G. Campbell, The ontological perspectives of the semantic web and the metadata harvesting protocol: applications of metadata for improving web search, Canadian Journal of Information and Library Sciences 26 (4) (2001) 5-19.
80. S. Sanchez-Alonso and E. Garcia-Barriocanal, Making use of upper ontologies to foster interoperability between SKOS concept schemes, Online Information Review 30 (3) (2006) 263-77.
81. W.C. Blando, The internet as a source of business information: an essay about the Brazilian internet reality [in English], Perspectivas Em Ciencia Da Informacao 9 (1) (2004) 88-99.
82. A. Callery and D. Tracy-Proulx, Yahoo! cataloging the web, Journal of Internet Cataloging 1 (1) (1997) 57-64.
83. A.S. Chaudhry and T.P. Jiun, Enhancing access to digital information resources on heritage: a case of development of a taxonomy at the integrated museum and archives system in Singapore, Journal of Documentation 61 (6) (2005) 751-76.
84. H. Saeed and A.S. Chaudhry, Using Dewey Decimal Classification scheme (DDC) for building taxonomies for knowledge organization, Journal of Documentation 58 (5) (2002) 575-83.
85. C. Shuttleworth, Indexes reviewed, Indexer 25 (1) (2006) 53-9.
86. Z. Ercegovac, Multiple-version resources in digital libraries: towards user-centered displays, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (8) (2006) 1023-32.
87. N. Meyyappan, S. Foo, and G.G. Chowdhury, Design and evaluation of a task-based digital library for the academic community, Journal of Documentation 60 (4) (2004) 449-75.
88. J. Jeng, Usability assessment of academic digital libraries: effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and learnability, Libri: International Journal of Libraries and Information Studies 55 (2 / 3) (2005) 96-121.
89. A. Shiri, Digital library research: current developments and trends, Library Review 52 (5 / 6) (2003) 198-202.
90. United States Government Printing Office, The report on the meeting of experts on digital preservation: metadata specifications, Microform and Imaging Review 34 (2) (2005) 74.
91. A. Shiri and K. Molberg, Interfaces to knowledge organization systems in Canadian digital library collections, Online Information Review 29 (6) (2005) 604-20.
92. L. Cantara, METS: the metadata encoding and transmission standard, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 40 (3 / 4) (2005) 237-53.
93. A. Chapman, Collection descriptions state of play. Library and Information Update 4 (4) (2005) 35-7.
94. A.S. Coleman, From cataloging to metadata: Dublin Core records for the library catalog, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 40 (3 / 4) (2005) 153-81.
95. A.C. Thurman, Metadata standards for archival control: an introduction to EAD and EAC, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 40 (3 / 4) (2005) 183-212.
96. P. Polydoratou, Using web logs transactions to assess a metadata registry system's use, OCLC Systems and Services 22 (1) (2006). 67-79.
97. V. Srinivas, G. Fatih, N. Saravanakumar and D. Hasan, Gathering meta-data and instances from object referral lists on the web, Online Information Review 30 (3) (2006) 278-96.
98. J. Greenberg, Understanding metadata and metadata schemes, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 40 (3 / 4) (2005) 17-36.
99. R.M. Losee, Browsing mixed structured and unstructured data, Information Processing and Management 42 (2) (2006) 440-52.
100. D. Nicholson, Interpretive journeys and METS, Journal of Documentation 62 (2) (2006) 271-90.
101. L. Ferraioli, An exploratory study of metadata creation in a health care agency, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 40 (3 / 4) (2005) 75-102.
102. R.P. Smiraglia, Introducing metadata, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 40 (3 / 4) (2005) 1-15.
103. B. Allen, Knowledge organization in an information retrieval task, Information Processing and Management 26 (4) (1990) 535-42.
104. S. Allen and J. Matheson, Development of a semantic differential to access users' attitudes towards a batch mode information retrieval system (ERIC), Journal of the American Society for Information Science 28 (5) (1977) 268-72.
105. W.S. Cooper, The potential usefulness of catalog access points other than author, title, and subject, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 21 (2) (1970) 112-27.
106. D. Davidson, The effect of individual differences of cognitive style on judgments of document relevance, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 28 (5) (1977) 273-84.
107. S. Benferhat, S. Lagrue and O. Papini, Belief change and pre-orders: a brief overview, International Journal of Geographical Information Science 18 (4) (2004) 353-88.
108. L.Z. Cooper, Methodology for a project examining cognitive categories for library information in young children, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 (14) (2002) 1223-31.
109. S. Brier, Cybersemiotics: a new interdisciplinary development applied to the problems of knowledge organization and document retrieval in information science, Journal of Documentation 52 (3) (1996) 296-344.
110. G. Salton, Information science in a PhD computer science program, Communications of the ACM 12 (2) (1969) 111-17.
111. C. Glaviano, Teaching an information organization course with Nordic DC metadata creator, OCLC Systems and Services 16 (1) (2000) 33-40.
112. I. Hsieh-Yee, Cataloging and metadata education: asserting a central role in information organization, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 34 (1 / 2) (2002) 203-22.
113. R. Harvey and S. Reynolds, MARCup to markup: education for cataloguing and classification in Australia, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 41 (3 / 4) (2006) 173-92.
114. P. Hider and R. Mohammed, Ensuring cataloging students meet the mark: testing the validity of a cataloging worksheet marking scheme, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 46 (1) (2005) 3-20.
115. K.M. Letarte, M.R. Turvey, D. Borneman and D.L. Adams, Practitioner perspectives on cataloging education for entry-level academic librarians, Library Resources and Technical Services 46 (1) (2002) 11-22.
116. K.S. Raghavan, Education for knowledge organization: the Indian scene, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 41 (2) (2005) 105-19.
117. M.R. Turvey and K.M. Letarte, Cataloging or knowledge management: perspectives of library educators on cataloging education for entry-level academic librarians, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 34 (1 / 2) (2002) 165-87.
118. N. Neelameghan, Knowledge and skills for content organization in web-based products, Information Studies 11 (3) (2005) 139-44.
119. V. Rosenberg, Comparative evaluation of two indexing methods using judges, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 22 (4) (1971) 251-9.
120. L.M. Gomez, C.C. Lochbaum and T.K. Landauer, All the right words: finding what you want as a function of richness of indexing vocabulary, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41 (8) (1990) 547-59.
121. P.A. Richmond, Classification from PRECIS: some possibilities, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27 (4) (1976) 240-47.
122. G. Qian, Q. Zhu, Q. Xue and S. Pramanik, A space-partitioning-based indexing method for multidimensional non-ordered discrete data spaces, ACM Transactions on Information Systems 24 (1) (2006) 79-110.
123. G. Retti and B. Stehno, The Laurin Thesaurus: a large, multilingual, electronic thesaurus for newspaper clipping archives, Journal of Documentation 60 (3) (2004) 289-301.
124. D..Soergel, A universal source thesaurus as a classification generator, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 23 (5) (1972) 299-305.
125. W. Zhang, The development and structure of the Chinese thesaurus for subject indexing, International Information and Library Review 36 (1) (2004) 47-54.
126. A.A. Shiri and C. Revie, Thesauri on the web: current developments and trends, Online Information Review 24 (4) (2000) 273-9.
127. H.H. Neville, Feasibility study of a scheme for reconciling thesauri covering a common subject, Journal of Documentation 26 (4) (1970) 313-36.
128. R.T. Niehoff, Development of an integrated energy vocabulary and the possibilities for on-line subject switching, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27 (1) (1976). 3-17.
129. I. Dahlberg, The Broad System of Ordering (BSO) as a basis for an integrated social science thesaurus ? International Classification 7 (2) (1982) 66-72.
130. F.W. Lancaster and L.C. Smith, Compatibility Issues Affecting Information Systems and Services, PGI-33/WS/23 ( Unesco General Information Programme, Paris, 1983 ).
131. A.Y. Chamis, Vocabulary Control and Search Strategies in Online Searching ( Greenwood Press, Westport, CO, 1991 ).
132. H. Milli and R. Rada, Merging thesauri: principles and evaluation, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 10 (2) (1988) 204-220.
133. J.P. Silvester, An operational system for subject switching between controlled vocabularies, Information Processing and Management 29 (1) (1993) 47-59.
134. C. Whitehead, Mapping LCSH into thesauri: the AAT Model. In: T. Petersen and P. Molholt (eds), Beyond the Book: Extending MARC for Subject Access (Hall, Boston, MA, 1990) 81-96.
135. M.A. Chaplan, Mapping Laborline thesaurus terms to Library of Congress subject headings: implications for vocabulary switching, Library Quarterly 65 (1) (1995) 39-61.