An automated reclassification project at the university of kentucky

Cataloging and Classification Quarterly

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 117-134

  Lewis, Nancy ^a   Seago, Kate ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automation; Classification; Ddc; Lcc; Notis; Reclassification

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013805055     PISSN: 01639374     EISSN: 15444554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J104v28n04_10     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Chressanthis, June D. “The mechanics of a reclassification project (Mississippi State University),” Technical Services Quarterly, 9:4 (1992): 19-28.
2. Chressanthis, JuneD. “The reclassification decision:Dewey or Library of Congress? (experience ofMississippi StateUniversity),” Cataloging&Classification Quarterly, 19:3-4 (1995):169-182.
3. Dean, Barbara C. “Reclassification in an automated environment,” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 5:2 (Winter 1984): 1-11.
4. Library of Congress. Specifications for Polyester or Polypropylene Pressure Sensitive Adhesive Labels for Application to the Covers of Cloth Bound Books, #700-702. Draft version. October, 1997.
5. Massonneau, Suzanne G. “Reclassification and barcoding: A unique opportunity experience of the University of Vermont,” Collection Management, 13:1-2 (1990):15-37.
6. Pattie, Ling-yuh W. “Reclassification revisited: An automated approach (using NOTIS at the University of Kentucky to switch from DDC to LC),” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 19:3-4 (1995):183-193.