Experiments in discourse analysis impact on information classification and retrieval algorithms

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 825-851

  Morato, J ^a   Llorens, J ^a   Genova, G ^a   Moreiro, J A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Co wording; Computational linguistics; Context analysis; Discourse model; Filtering; K means; N grams; Text analysis me thods

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; DATABASE SYSTEMS;

DISCOURSE ANALYSIS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 0042202234     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4573(02)00081-X     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Amitay, E. (1998). Using common hypertext links to identify the best phrasal description of target web documents. SIGIR'98 Post-Conference Workshop on Hypertext IR for the Web, Melbourne, Australia.
2. Bates M. Subject access in online catalogs: a design model. JASIS. 11:1986;357-376.
3. Beghtol C. The concept of genre and its characteristics. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 27(2):2001;17-19.
4. British National Corpus ( http://info.ox.ac.uk/bnc/, last check 1/11/01).
5. Bruce, N. J. (1983). Rhetorical constraints on information structure in medical research report writing. ESP in the Arab world conference. UK: Univ. Aston.
6. Callon M., Courtial J.-P., Penan H. La scientométrie. 1993;PUF, Paris.
7. Callon M., Courtial J.-P., Turner W.A., Bauin S. From translation to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Society Science Information. 22:1983;191-235.
8. Chen H., Lynch K.J. Automatic construction of networks of concepts characterizing document databases. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 22:1992;885-902.
9. Cohen J. Highlights: Language and domain-independent automatic indexing terms for abstracting. JASIS. 46(3):1995;162-174.
10. Díaz I., Llorens J., Morato J. An algorithm for term conflation based on tree structures. JASIS. 53(3):2002;199-208.
11. Díaz I., Velasco M., Llorens J., Martinez V. Semi-automatic construction of thesaurus applying domain analysis techniques International. Forum on Information and Documentation. 23(2):1998;11-19.
12. Dijk T.A.V. News as Discourse. 1988;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
13. Egghe L., Roussau R. Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science. 1990;Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
14. Frakes W.B., Baeza-Yates R. Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms. 1992;Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
15. Garfield E. The relationship between mechanical indexing structural linguistics and information retrieval. Journal of Information Science. 18:1953;343-354. (1992, sent to the First Symposium on Machine Methods for Scientific Documentation (Johns Hopkins University, March 1953), the paper was rejected, but in 1992 the paper was published).
16. Gilyarevsky R., Uzilevsky G., Moudrov E. An automatic statistical classification of different types of journals. International Forum on Information and Documentation. 22(3):1997;24-35.
17. Haas S.W., Sugarman J., Tibbo H. A text filter for the automatic identification of empirical articles. JASIS. 47(2):1996;167-169.
18. Halliday M.A.K. Introduction to functional grammar. 1985;Arnold, London.
19. Hearst M., Plaunt C. Subtopic structuring for full-length document access. Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. 1993;ACM, NY.
20. Kando, N. (1997). Text-level structure of research papers: Implications for text-based information processing systems. Aberdeen: British Computer Society IR SG Annual Colloquium; 1997.
21. Karlgren J. Stylistic experiments for information retrieval. Strzalkowski T. Natural language information retrieval. 1998;Kluwer, Tomek.
22. Karlgren, J., & Cutting, D. (1994). Recognizing text genres with simple metrics using discriminant analysis. In Proceedings of COLING 94, Kyoto.
23. Lavid J. Towards a text type taxonomy: a functional framework for text analysis and generation. Revista Procesamiento Lenguaje Natural. 16:1995;29-43.
24. Lelu, C. (1993). Modéles neuronaux pour l'analyse de données documentaires et textuelles. Ph.D., Université de Paris, Paris.
25. Leydesdorff L. Why words and cowords cannot map the development of the sciences. JASIS. 48(5):1997;418-427.
26. Llorens, J., Velasco, M., & Martínez Orga, V. (1997). Generación automática de representaciones de dominios. II Jornadas en Ingeniería de Software, JIS97, San Sebastián (Spain).
27. Llorens J., Velasco M., Morato J., Moreiro J.A. Características textuales como medida cualitativa de la información en la generación semiautomática de tesauros. Revista de Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural. 23:1998;61-68.
28. de Looze M.A., LeMarié J. Corpus relevance through Co-word analysis: an application to plant proteins. Scientometrics. 39(3):1997;267-280.
29. Losee R.M. Text windows and phrases differing by discipline, location in document, and sysntactic structure. Information Processing and Management. 32(6):1996;747-767.
30. Lowe, H. J., & Barnett G. O. (1994). Understanding and using the medical subject headings vocabulary to perform literature searches. JAMA. 13, 271, No. 14, pp. 1103-1108.
31. Mitkov R. The latest in anaphora resolution: going multilingual. Revista Procesamiento Lenguaje Natural. 23:1998;1-7.
32. Morato, J. (1999). Análisis de las relaciones cienciométricas y lingüisticas en un entorno automatizado. Ph.D. thesis. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés, Madrid (Spain).
33. Neighbors, J. (1981). Software construction using components. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Information and Computer Science. Irvine: University California.
34. Nwogu K.N. The medical research paper: structure and functions. English Specific Purposes. 16(2):1997;119-138.
35. Pêcheux M. Analyse automatique du discours. 1969;Dunod, Paris.
36. Polanco, X., Grivel, L., & Royauté, J. (1995). How to do things with terms in informetrics: Terminological variation and stabilisation as science watch indicators. In Proceedings fifth international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (pp. 435-444). Learned Information, Medford (NJ).
37. Posterguillo, S. (1996). Is byte popular science? Lenguas para fines especificos (V). Alcalá de Henares: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alcalá, pp. 425-432.
38. Prieto-Díaz R. Domain analysis for reusability. Tracz W. Software reuse: emerging technology. 1988;347-353 IEEE Computer Society Press.
39. Romesburg H.C. Cluster analysis for researchers. 1984;Lifetime Learning Publications, CA.
40. Schriffrin D. Approaches to discourse. 1994;Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
41. Skelton J. Analysis of the structure of original research papers: An aid to writing original papers for publication. British Journal General Practice. 44:1994;455-459.
42. SMART project ( ftp://ftp.cs.cornell.edu/pub/smart/, last check 1/11/01).
43. Spark Jones K. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation. 28:1972;11-21.
44. Swales J.M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. 1990;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
45. Warner A. The role of linguistic analysis in full-text retrieval. Challenges in indexing electr. text and images. 1994;247-264 Learned Information, Medford.
46. Wormell, I. (1985). Subject Access Project (SAP). Improved Subject Retrieval for Monographic Publications. Ph.D. thesis, Lund: Lund University.