An Integrative Model of Social Identification: Self-Stereotyping and Self-Anchoring as Two Cognitive Pathways

Personality and Social Psychology Review

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 3-26

  van Veelen, Ruth ^a   Otten, Sabine ^b   Cadinu, Mara ^c   Hansen, Nina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

self anchoring; self stereotyping; social identification; social inference

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; MODEL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STEREOTYPING; THEORETICAL MODEL; COGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SELF CONCEPT;

COGNITION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; STEREOTYPING;

EID: 84954241742     PISSN: 10888683     EISSN: 15327957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1088868315576642     Document Type: Article

References (172)

1. D.Abrams (2011). Wherein lies children’s intergroup bias? Egocentrism, social understanding, and social projection. Child Development, 82, 1579-1593. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01617.x
2. D.AbramsM.A.Hogg (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317-334. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180403
3. M.AcevedoJ.I.Krueger (2005). Evidential reasoning in the prisoner’s dilemma. The American Journal of Psychology, 118, 431-457.
4. D.R.Ames (2004a). Inside the mind reader’s tool kit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 340-353. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.340
5. D.R.Ames (2004b). Strategies for social inference: A similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 573-585. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.573
6. D.R.AmesE.U.WeberX.Zou (2012). Mind-reading in strategic interaction: The impact of perceived similarity on projection and stereotyping. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 96-110. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.007
7. C.E.AmiotL.delaR.SablonniereD.J.TerryJ.R.Smith (2007). Integration of social identities in the self: Toward a cognitive–developmental model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 364-388. doi:10.1177/1088868307304091
8. R.D.AshmoreK.DeauxT.McLaughlin-Volpe (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80-114. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80
9. E.BalcetisD.A.Dunning (2005). Judging for two: Some connectionist proposals for how the self informs and constrains social judgment. In (Eds.), The self in social judgment (pp. 181-211). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
10. R.F.BaumeisterM.R.Leary (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
11. J.C.BeckerN.Tausch (2014). When group memberships are negative: The concept, measurement, and behavioral implications of psychological disidentification. Self and Identity, 13, 294-321. doi:10.1080/15298868.2013.819991
12. M.BeckerV.L.VignolesE.OweR.BrownP.B.SmithM.EasterbrookN..Yamakoğlu (2012). Culture and the distinctiveness motive: Constructing identity in individualistic and collectivistic contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 833-855. doi:10.1037/a0026853
13. M.BianchiM.MachunskyM.C.SteffensA.Mummendey (2009). Like me or like us: Is ingroup projection just social projection?Experimental Psychology, 56, 198-205. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.198
14. M.BiernatM.ManisD.Kobrynowicz (1997). Simultaneous assimilation and contrast effects in judgments of self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 254-269. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.254
15. M.BiernatT.K.VescioM.L.Green (1996). Selective self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1194-1209. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1194
16. N.R.BranscombeM.T.SchmittR.D.Harvey (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135
17. M.B.Brewer (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001
18. M.B.Brewer (1993). Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. Social Cognition, 11, 150-164. doi:10.1521/soco.1993.11.1.150
19. M.B.BrewerS.Roccas (2001). Individual values, social identity, and optimal distinctiveness. In (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 219-237). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
20. M.CadinuA.Carnaghi (2015). The causal direction of influence from the ingroup to the self: Evidence from the induction-deduction Manuscript submitted for publication.
21. M.CadinuL.De Amicis (1999). The relationship between the self and the ingroup: When having a common conception helps. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Revue Suisse De Psychologie, 58, 226-232. doi:10.1024//1421-0185.58.4.226
22. M.CadinuS.Galdi (2012). Gender differences in implicit gender self-categorization lead to stronger gender self-stereotyping by women than by men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 546-551. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1881
23. M.CadinuS.GaldiA.Maass (2013). Chameleonic social identities: Context induces shifts in homosexuals’ self-categorization and self-stereotyping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 471-481. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1957
24. M.CadinuM.LatrofaA.Carnaghi (2013). Comparing self-stereotyping with ingroup stereotyping and outgroup stereotyping in unequal group contexts: The case of gender. Self and Identity, 12, 582-596. doi:10.1080/15298868.2012.712753
25. M.CadinuM.Rothbart (1996). Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 661-677. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.661
26. J.E.Cameron (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3, 239-262. doi:10.1080/13576500444000047
27. J.C.ChoE.D.Knowles (2013). I’m like you and you’re like me: Social projection and self-stereotyping both help explain self–other correspondence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 444-456. doi:10.1037/a0031017
28. I.ChoiR.E.NisbettA.Norenzayan (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 47-63. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.47
29. R.W.ClementJ.Krueger (2000). The primacy of self-referent information in perceptions of social consensus. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 279-299. doi:10.1348/014466600164471
30. R.W.ClementJ.Krueger (2002). Social categorization moderates social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 219-231. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1503
31. S.CoatsE.R.SmithH.M.ClaypoolM.J.Banner (2000). Overlapping mental representations of self and in-group: Reaction time evidence and its relationship with explicit measures of group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 304-315. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1416
32. R.J.CrispM.Hewstone (2007). Multiple social categorization. In (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 163-254). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39004-1
33. R.J.CrispR.Meleady (2012). Adapting to a multicultural future. Science, 336, 853-855. doi:10.1126/science.1219009
34. R.M.Dawes (1990). The potential non-falsity of the false consensus effect. In (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 179-199). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35. K.Deaux (1993). Reconstructing social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 4-12. doi:10.1177/0146167293191001
36. A.De la Haye (2000). A methodological note about the measurement of the false-consensus effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 569-581. doi:10.1002/1099-0992(200007/08)30:4<569::AID-EJSP8>3.0.CO;2-V
37. J.DeschampsT.Devos (1998). Regarding the relationship between social identity and personal identity. In (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 1-12). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
38. T.E.DiDonatoJ.UllrichJ.I.Krueger (2011). Social perception as induction and inference: An integrative model of intergroup differentiation, ingroup favoritism, and differential accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 66-83. doi:10.1037/a0021051
39. E.DienerC.Diener (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181-185. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00354.x
40. W.DoiseH.Dann (1976). New theoretical perspectives in the experimental study of intergroup relations. Italian Journal of Psychology, 3, 285-303.
41. M.EasterbrookV.L.Vignoles (2012). Different groups, different motives: Identity motives underlying changes in identification with novel groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1066-1080. doi:10.1177/0146167212444614
42. S.EidelmanP.J.Silvia (2010). Self-focus and stereotyping of the self. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 263-273. doi:10.1177/1368430209353631
43. N.EllemersR.SpearsB.Doosje (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228
44. N.EpleyB.KeysarL.Van BovenT.Gilovich (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327-339. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327
45. N.H.FrijdaP.KuipersE.ter Schure (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212-228. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212
46. L.GaertnerJ.IuzziniM.WittM.Oriña (2006). Us without them: Evidence for an intragroup origin of positive in-group regard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 426-439. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.426
47. W.L.GardnerS.GabrielA.Y.Lee (1999). “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321-326. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00162
48. R.H.GramzowL.Gaertner (2005). Self-esteem and favoritism toward novel in-groups: The self as an evaluative base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 801-815. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.801
49. R.H.GramzowL.GaertnerC.Sedikides (2001). Memory for in-group and out-group information in a minimal group context: The self as an informational base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 188-205. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.188
50. S.GuimondA.ChatardD.MartinotR.J.CrispS.Redersdorff (2006). Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 221-242. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.221
51. S.A.HaslamP.J.OakesK.J.ReynoldsJ.C.Turner (1999). Social identity salience and the emergence of stereotype consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 809-818. doi:10.1177/0146167299025507004
52. S.A.HaslamD.van KnippenbergM.J.PlatowN.Ellemers (2003). Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
53. M.HewstoneM.RubinH.Willis (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109
54. M.A.Hogg (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. In (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 69-126). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39002-8
55. M.A.HoggD.Abrams (1990). Social motivation, self-esteem and social identity. In (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 28-47). New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
56. M.A.HoggJ.C.Turner (1987). Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping, and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325-340. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1987.tb00795.x
57. M.J.HornseyJ.Jetten (2005). Loyalty without conformity: Tailoring self-perception as a means of balancing belonging and differentiation. Self and Identity, 4, 81-95. doi:10.1080/13576500444000236
58. T.HundhammerT.Mussweiler (2012). How sex puts you in gendered shoes: Sexuality-priming leads to gender-based self-perception and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 176-193. doi:10.1037/a0028121
59. L.JansT.PostmesK.I.Van der Zee (2011). The induction of shared identity: The positive role of individual distinctiveness for groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1130-1141. doi:10.1177/0146167211407342
60. J.JettenC.HaslamS.A.Haslam (2012). The social cure: Identity, health and well-being. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
61. J.JettenT.Postmes (2006). “I did it my way”: Collective expressions of individualism. In (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 116-136). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
62. J.T.JostM.R.Banaji (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
63. C.M.JuddC.S.RyanB.Park (1991). Accuracy in the judgment of in-group and out-group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 366-379. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.366
64. R.Karniol (2003). Egocentrism versus protocentrism: The status of self in social prediction. Psychological Review, 110, 564-580. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.564
65. M.H.KernisB.M.Goldman (2005). Stability and variability in self-concept and self-esteem. In (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 106-127). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
66. J.I.Krueger (1998a). Enhancement bias in descriptions of self and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 505-516. doi:10.1177/0146167298245006
67. J.I.Krueger (1998b). What can individual differences in reasoning tell us? Retrieved from http://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?9.77
68. J.I.Krueger (2003). Return of the ego—Self-referent information as a filter for social prediction: Comment on Karniol (2003). Psychological Review, 110, 585-590. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.585
69. J.I.Krueger (2007). From social projection to social behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 1-35. doi:10.1080/10463280701284645
70. J.I.KruegerM.AcevedoJ.M.Robbins (2006). Self as sample. In (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 353-377). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
71. J.I.KruegerR.W.Clement (1994). The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 596-610. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.596
72. J.I.KruegerR.W.Clement (1996). Inferring category characteristics from sample characteristics: Inductive reasoning and social projection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 52-68. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.52
73. J.I.KruegerT.E.DiDonato (2008). Social categorization and the perception of groups and group differences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 733-750. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00083.x
74. J.I.KruegerD.Stanke (2001). The role of self-referent and other-referent knowledge in perceptions of group characteristics. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 878-888. doi:10.1177/0146167201277010
75. J.I.KruegerJ.S.Zeiger (1993). Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 670-680. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.670
76. M.LatrofaJ.VaesM.Cadinu (2012). Self-stereotyping: The central role of an ingroup threatening identity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 92-111. doi:10.1080/00224545.2011.565382
77. M.LatrofaJ.VaesM.CadinuA.Carnaghi (2010). The cognitive representation of self-stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 911-922. doi:10.1177/0146167210373907
78. M.LatrofaJ.VaesM.PastoreM.Cadinu (2009). “United we stand, divided we fall”! the protective function of self-stereotyping for stigmatised members’ psychological well-being. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58, 84-104. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00383.x
79. K.LaurinA.C.KayS.Shepherd (2011). Self-stereotyping as a route to system justification. Social Cognition, 29, 360-375. doi:10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.360
80. C.LeachM.van ZomerenS.ZebelM.W.VliekS.F.PennekampB.DoosjeR..Spears (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
81. G.J.LeonardelliC.L.PickettM.B.Brewer (2010). Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations. In (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 63-113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43002-6
82. J.M.LevineR.L.MorelandC.S.Ryan (1998). Group socialization and intergroup relations. In (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 283-308). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
83. K.D.LockeT.CraigK.BaikK.Gohil (2012). Binds and bounds of communion: Effects of interpersonal values on assumed similarity of self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 879-897. doi:10.1037/a0029422
84. F.Lorenzi-Cioldi (1991). Self-stereotyping and self-enhancement in gender groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 403-417. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420210504
85. J.LunS.SinclairC.Cogburn (2009). Cultural stereotypes and the self: A closer examination of implicit self-stereotyping. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31, 117-127. doi:10.1080/01973530902880340
86. M.MachunskyT.Meiser (2009). Ingroup projection as a means to define the superordinate category efficiently: Response time evidence. Social Cognition, 27, 57-75. doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.1.57
87. M.MachunskyT.MeiserA.Mummendey (2009). On the crucial role of mental ingroup representation for ingroup bias and the ingroup prototypicality–ingroup bias link. Experimental Psychology, 56, 156-164. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.156
88. M.MachunskyC.TomaV.YzerbytO.Corneille (2014). Social projection increases for positive targets: Ascertaining the effect and exploring its antecedents. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1373-1388. doi:10.1177/0146167214545039
89. G.MarksN.Miller (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72-90. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.72
90. H.R.MarkusS.Kitayama (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
91. W.J.McGuireC.V.McGuire (1988). Content and process in the experience of the self. In (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 97-144). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
92. B.Mullen (1985). The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 262-283. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(85)90020-4
93. B.MullenJ.F.DovidioC.JohnsonC.Copper (1992). In-group-out-group differences in social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 422-440. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(92)90040-Q
94. B.MullenM.J.MigdalD.Rozell (2003). Self-awareness, deindividuation, and social identity: Unraveling theoretical paradoxes by filling empirical lacunae. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1071-1081. doi:10.1177/0146167203252747
95. A.MummendeyM.Wenzel (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0302_4
96. T.Mussweiler (2003). When egocentrism breeds distinctness—Comparison processes in social prediction: Comment on Karniol (2003). Psychological Review, 110, 581-584. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.581
97. T.MussweilerK.EpstudeK.Rüter (2005). The knife that cuts both ways: Comparison processes in social perception. In (Eds.), The self in social judgment (pp. 109-130). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
98. B.A.Nosek (2007). Implicit–explicit relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 65-69. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8721.2007.00477
99. B.NosekM.BanajiA.Greenwald (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44-59. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.44
100. R.S.OnoratoJ.C.Turner (2004). Fluidity in the self-concept: The shift from personal to social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 257-278. doi:10.1002/ejsp.195
101. S.Otten (2002). “Me and us” or “us and them”? The self as a heuristic for defining minimal ingroups. In (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 1-33). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
102. S.Otten (2004). Self-anchoring as predictor of in-group favoritism: Is it applicable to real group contexts?Cahiers De Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 22, 427-443.
103. S.Otten (2005). The ingroup as part of the self: Reconsidering the link between social categorization, ingroup favoritism, and the self-concept. In (Eds.), The self in social judgment (pp. 241-265). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
104. S.OttenY.Bar-Tal (2002). Self-anchoring in the minimal group paradigm: The impact of need and ability to achieve cognitive structure. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 267-284. doi:10.1177/1368430202005004001
105. S.OttenK.Epstude (2006). Overlapping mental representations of self, ingroup, and outgroup: Unraveling self-stereotyping and self-anchoring. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 957-969. doi:10.1177/0146167206287254
106. S.OttenG.B.Moskowitz (2000). Evidence for implicit evaluative in-group bias: Affect-biased spontaneous trait inference in a minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 77-89. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1399
107. S.OttenD.Wentura (1999). About the impact of automaticity in the minimal group paradigm: Evidence from affective priming tasks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1049-1071. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199912)29:8<1049::AID-EJSP985>3.0.CO;2-Q
108. S.OttenD.Wentura (2001). Self-anchoring and in-group favoritism: An individual profiles analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 525-532. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1479
109. D.OysermanS.W.S.Lee (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311-342. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311; 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311.supp
110. D.J.Packer (2008). On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 50-72. doi:10.1177/1088868307309606
111. C.L.PickettB.L.BonnerJ.M.Coleman (2002). Motivated self-stereotyping: Heightened assimilation and differentiation needs result in increased levels of positive and negative self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 543-562. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.543
112. T.PostmesS.A.HaslamL.Jans (2013). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 597-617. doi:10.1111/bjso.12006
113. T.PostmesR.SpearsA.T.LeeR.J.Novak (2005). Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 747-763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.747
114. J.M.RabbieM.Horwitz (1969). Arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 13, 269-277. doi:10.1037/h0028284
115. A.ReidK.Deaux (1996). Relationship between social and personal identities: Segregation or integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1084-1091. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1084
116. S.ReysenI.Katzarska-MillerS.M.NesbitL.Pierce (2013). Further validation of a single-item measure of social identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 463-470.
117. M.Riketta (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358-384. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005
118. M.RikettaC.A.Sacramento (2008). “They cooperate with us, so they are like me”: Perceived intergroup relationship moderates projection from self to outgroups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 115-131. doi:10.1177/1368430207084849
119. J.M.RobbinsJ.I.Krueger (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32-47. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3
120. S.RoccasL.SagivS.SchwartzN.HalevyR.Eidelson (2008). Toward a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 280-306. doi:10.1177/1088868308319225
121. K.W.RockmannM.G.PrattG.B.Northcraft (2007). Divided loyalties: Determinants of identification in interorganizational teams. Small Group Research, 38, 727-751. doi:10.1177/1046496407304924
122. L.RossD.GreeneP.House (1977). The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
123. J.RothM.C.Steffens (2014). When I becomes we: Associative self-anchoring drives implicit intergroup bias in minimal groups. Social Psychology, 45, 253-264. doi:10.1027/1864–9335/a000169
124. M.RubinM.Hewstone (1998). Social identity theory’s self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 40-62. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_3
125. C.S.RyanL.M.Bogart (2001). Longitudinal changes in the accuracy of new group members’ in-group and out-group stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 118-133. doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.1439
126. F.SaniS.Reicher (2000). Contested identities and schisms in groups: Opposing the ordination of women as priests in the Church of England. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 95-112. doi:10.1348/014466600164354
127. T.W.SchubertS.Otten (2002). Overlap of self, ingroup, and outgroup: Pictorial measures of self-categorization. Self and Identity, 1, 353-376. doi:10.1080/152988602760328012
128. C.SedikidesM.B.Brewer (2001). Individual self, relational self, collective self. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
129. C.SedikidesM.J.Strube (1997). Self evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. In (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 209-269). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60018-0
130. R.L.Selman (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding. New York, NY: Academic Press.
131. D.K.ShermanH.S.Kim (2005). Is there an “I” in “team”? The role of the self in group-serving judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 108-120. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.108
132. B.SimonB.Glässner-BayerlI.Stratenwerth (1991). Stereotyping and self-stereotyping in a natural intergroup context: The case of heterosexual and homosexual men. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 252-266. doi:10.2307/2786654
133. B.SimonD.L.Hamilton (1994). Self-stereotyping and social context: The effects of relative in-group size and in-group status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 699-711. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.699
134. B.SimonC.Hastedt (1997). When misery loves categorical company: Accessibility of the individual self as a moderator in category-based representation of attractive and unattractive in-groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1254-1264. doi:10.1177/01461672972312003
135. B.SimonC.HastedtB.Aufderheide (1997). When self-categorization makes sense: The role of meaningful social categorization in minority and majority members’ self-perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 310-320. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.310
136. B.SimonG.PantaleoA.Mummendey (1995). Unique individual or interchangeable group member? The accentuation of intragroup differences versus similarities as an indicator of the individual self versus the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 106-119. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.106
137. T.M.Singelis (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591. doi:10.1177/0146167294205014
138. E.R.SmithS.CoatsD.Walling (1999). Overlapping mental representations of self, in-group, and partner: Further response time evidence and a connectionist model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 873-882. doi:10.1177/0146167299025007009
139. E.R.SmithS.Henry (1996). An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635-642. doi:10.1177/0146167296226008
140. H.J.SmithT.R.Tyler (1997). Choosing the right pond: The impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 146-170. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.1318
141. L.G.E.SmithT.Postmes (2011). The power of talk: Developing discriminatory group norms through discussion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 193-215. doi:10.1348/014466610X504805
142. L.G.E.SmithE.F.ThomasC.McGarty (2014). “We must be the change we want to see in the world”: Integrating norms and identities through social interaction. Political Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.111/pops.12180
143. R.SpearsB.DoosjeN.Ellemers (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553. doi:10.1177/0146167297235009
144. R.SpearsJ.JettenD.ScheepersS.Cihangir (2009). Creative distinctiveness: Explaining in-group bias in minimal groups. In (Eds.), Intergroup relations: The role of motivation and emotion (pp. 23-40). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
145. R.SpearsA.S.R.Manstead (1990). Consensus estimation in social context. In (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 81-110). New York, NY: Wiley.
146. K.E.Stanovich (1998). Individual differences in cognitive biases. Retrieved from http://www.cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?9.75
147. W.B.J.SwannJ.JettenÁ.GómezH.WhitehouseB.Bastian (2012). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119, 441-456. doi:10.1037/a0028589
148. H.TajfelM.G.BilligR.P.BundyC.Flament (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
149. H.TajfelJ.C.Turner (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks.
150. H.TajfelA.L.Wilkes (1963). Salience of attributes and commitment to extreme judgments in the perception of people. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 3, 40-49. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1964.tb00403.x
151. L.R.TroppS.C.Wright (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585-600. doi:10.1177/0146167201275007
152. L.R.TroppS.C.Wright (2003). Evaluations and perceptions of self, ingroup, and outgroup: Comparisons between Mexican-American and European-American children. Self and Identity, 2, 203-221. doi:10.1080/15298860309028
153. B.W.Tuckman (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399. doi:10.1037/h0022100
154. J.C.TurnerM.A.HoggP.J.OakesS.D.ReicherM.S.Wetherell (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
155. J.C.TurnerP.J.OakesS.A.HaslamC.McGarty (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463. doi:10.1177/0146167294205002
156. T.van HoomissenF.van Overwalle (2010). Me or not me as source of ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation: A connectionist perspective. Social Cognition, 28, 84-109. doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.1.84
157. D.van KnippenbergC.W.De DreuA.C.Homan (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
158. E.van LeeuwenD.van KnippenbergN.Ellemers (2003). Continuing and changing group identities: The effects of merging on social identification and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 679-690. doi:10.1177/0146167203029006001
159. R.Van Veelen (2008). Individual differences in cognitive projection processes: The impact of individualism and collectivism on the relationship between self-anchoring, self-stereotyping and social identification (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
160. R.Van VeelenN.HansenS.Otten (2014). Newcomers’ cognitive development of social identification: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of self-anchoring and self-stereotyping. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 281-298. doi:10.1111/bjso.12038
161. R.Van VeelenN.HansenS.Otten (2015). Belongingness needs in relation to self-anchoring and self-stereotyping among psychology students. Unpublished raw data.
162. R.Van VeelenS.OttenN.Hansen (2010). Is de groep zoals ik? Hoe verschillen in zelfconcept van invloed zijn op de cognitieve route naar groepsidentificatie [Is the group like me? How differences in self-concept affect cognitive routes to social identificaiton]. In (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale psychologie 2009 (pp. 437-446). Groningen, The Netherlands: ASPO pers.
163. R.Van VeelenS.OttenN.Hansen (2011). Linking self and ingroup: Self-anchoring as distinctive cognitive route to social identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 628-637. doi:10.1002/ejsp.792
164. R.Van VeelenS.OttenN.Hansen (2013a). A personal touch to diversity: Self-anchoring increases minority members’ identification in a diverse group. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 671-683. doi:10.1177/1368430212473167
165. R.Van VeelenS.OttenN.Hansen (2013b). Social identification when an ingroup identity is unclear: The role of self-anchoring and self-stereotyping. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 543-562. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02110.x
166. R.Van VeelenS.OttenN.Hansen (2014). Enhancing majority members’ pro-diversity beliefs in small teams: The facilitating effect of self-anchoring. Experimental Psychology, 61, 3-11. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000220
167. M.van ZomerenC.LeachR.Spears (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 180-199. doi:10.1177/1088868311430835
168. M.Verkuyten (2005). Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 121-138. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.121
169. M.VerkuytenS.Nekuee (1999). Ingroup bias: The effect of self-stereotyping, identification, and group threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 411-418. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<411::AID-EJSP952>3.0.CO;2-8
170. A.Voci (2006). Relevance of social categories, depersonalization, and group processes: Two field tests of self-categorization theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 73-90. doi:10.1002/ejsp.259
171. S.WaldzusA.MummendeyM.WenzelU.Weber (2003). Towards tolerance: Representations of superordinate categories and perceived ingroup prototypicality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 31-47. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00507-3
172. V.Y.YzerbytG.SchadronJ.LeyensS.Rocher (1994). Social judgeability: The impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 48-55. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.48