The induction of shared identity: The positive role of individual distinctiveness for groups

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1130-1141

  Jans, Lise ^a   Postmes, Tom ^a   Van der Zee, Karen I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

entitativity; identification; individual distinctiveness; social identity formation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PEER GROUP; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PEER GROUP; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959430481     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167211407342     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Brewer, M. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
2. Brewer, M., Hong, Y., & Li, Q. (2004). Dynamic entitativity: Perceiving groups as actors. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 25-38). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
3. Brewer, M.B., & Harasty, A.S. (1996). Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3: The interpersonal context (pp. 347-370). New York, NY: Guilford.
4. Brooke, D., Postmes, T., Jetten, J., & Dyson, S. (2009). Can we put "I" in "team"? How the group dynamics of social identity formation influence team performance. Unpublished manuscript, University of Exeter, Exeter, England.
5. Campbell, D.T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons and social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
6. Castano, E. (2004). On the advantages of reifying the ingroup. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 381-400). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
7. Codol, J. (1975). On the so-called "superior conformity of the self" behavior: Twenty experimental investigations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 457-501.
8. Crump, A.C., Hamilton, D.L., Sherman, S.J., Lickel, B., & Thakkar, V. (2009). Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1212-1230.
9. Durkheim, É. (1984). The division of labor in society. London, England: Macmillan. (Original work published 1893).
10. Gaertner, L., Iuzzini, J., Witt, M., & Oriña, M. (2006). Us without them: Evidence for an intragroup origin of positive in-group regard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 426-439.
11. Hamilton, D.L., Sherman, S.J., & Rodgers, J.S. (2004). Perceiving the groupness of groups: Entitativity, homogeneity, essentialism, and stereotypes. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 39-60). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
12. Haslam, S.A., Eggins, R.A., & Reynolds, K.J. (2003). The ASPIRe model: Actualizing social and personal identity resources to enhance organizational outcomes. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 76, 83-113.
13. Haslam, S.A., Reicher, S.D., & Platow, M.J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence, and power. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
14. Hornsey, M., & Jetten, J. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 248-264.
15. Ip, G.W.M., Chiu, C.Y., & Wan, C. (2006). Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: Physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait- versus goal-based group perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 368-381.
16. Jans, L., Postmes, T., & van der Zee, K.I. (2011). Sharing differences: The inductive route to social identity. Manuscript submitted for publication.
17. Jetten, J., McAuliffe, B., Hornsey, M., & Hogg, M. (2006). Differentiation between and within groups: The influence of individualist and collectivist group norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 825-843.
18. Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & McAuliffe, B. (2002). "We're all individuals": Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 189-207.
19. Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
20. Krull, J., & MacKinnon, D. (1999). Multilevel mediation modeling in group-based intervention studies. Evaluation Review, 23, 418-444.
21. Leach, C., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M., Pennekamp, S., Doosje, B.,Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165.
22. Lickel, B., Hamilton, D., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S., & Uhles, A. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223-246.
23. McGarty, C. (2002). Stereotype formation as category formation. In C. McGarty, V. Yzerbyt, & R. Spears (Eds.), Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups (pp. 16-37). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24. McGarty, C., Haslam, S.A., Hutchinson, K.J., & Grace, D.M. (1995). Determinants of perceived consistency: The relationship between group entitativity and the meaningfulness of categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 237-256.
25. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2007). Mplus (Version 5) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
26. Packer, D. (2008). On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 50-72.
27. Postmes, T., Haslam, S., & Swaab, R. (2005). Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 1-42.
28. Postmes, T., & Jetten, J. (2006). Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lee, A., & Novak, R. (2005). Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 747-763.
30. Preacher, K., & Hayes, A. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
31. Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2007). Diversity as a basis for shared organizational identity: The norm congruity principle. British Journal of Management, 18, S17-S27.
32. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R., & Rubin, D. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34. Rutchick, A., Hamilton, D., & Sack, J. (2008). Antecedents of entitativity in categorically and dynamically construed groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 905-921.
35. Smith, L.G.E., & Postmes, T. (in press-a). The power of talk: Developing discriminatory group norms through discussion. British Journal of Social Psychology.
36. Smith, L.G.E., & Postmes, T. (in press-b). Shaping stereotypical behaviour through the discussion of social stereotypes. British Journal of Social Psychology.
37. Swaab, R., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Identity formation in multiparty negotiations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 167-187.
38. Swann, W.B.J., Milton, L.P., & Polzer, J.T. (2000). Should we create a niche or fall in line? Identity negotiation and small group effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 238-250.
39. Swann, W., Polzer, J., Seyle, D., & Ko, S. (2004). Finding value in diversity: Verification of personal and social self-views in diverse groups. Academy of Management Review, 29, 9-27.
40. Turner, J.C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
41. Wiesenfeld, B.M., Swann, W.B.J., Brockner, J., & Bartel, C.A. (2007). Is more fairness always preferred? Self-esteem moderates reactions to procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1235-1253.