Self as sample

Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 353-378

  Krueger, Joachim I ^a   Acevedo, Melissa ^a   Robbins, Jordan M ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926120396     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614576.015     Document Type: Chapter

References (92)

1. Acevedo, M., & Krueger, J. I. (unpublished). Differential social projection accounts for ingroup bias in the minimal group paradigm. Brown University.
2. Acevedo, M., & Krueger, J. I. (2004). Two egocentric sources of the decision to vote: The voter's illusion and the belief in personal relevance. Political Psychology, 25, 115–134.
3. Agostinelli, G., Sherman, S. J., Presson, C. C., & Chassin, L. (1992). Self-protection and self-enhancement biases in estimates of population prevalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 631–642.
4. Alicke, M. D., & Largo, E. (1995). The role of the self in the false consensus effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 28–47.
5. Allport, F. H. (1924). The group fallacy in relation to social science. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 19, 60–73.
6. Allport, F. H. (1962). A structuronomic conception of behavior: Individual and collective. I. Structural theory and the master problem of social psychology. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 3–30.
7. Allport, G. W. (1950). The nature of personality. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Ames, D. R. (2004). Inside the Mind Reader's Tool Kit: Projection and Stereotyping in Mental State Inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87,340–353.
9. Asendorpf, J. B., & Ostendorf, F. (1998). Is self-enhancement healthy? Conceptual, psychometric, and empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 955–966.
10. Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. New York: Prentice–Hall.
11. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs 70.
12. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
13. Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., & Green, M. L. (1996). Selective self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1194–1209.
14. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.
15. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or out–group hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444.
16. Brewer, M. B., & Weber, J. G. (1994). Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 268–275.
17. Brown, R. J., & Turner, J. C. (1981). Interpersonal and intergroup behaviour. In J. C. Turner & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 33–65). Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Cadinu, M. R., & De Amicis, L. (1999). The relationship between the self and the ingroup: When having a common conception helps. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 58, 226–232.
19. Cadinu, M. R., & Rothbart, M. (1996). Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 661–677.
20. Chen, F. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Repulsion or attraction? Group membership and assumed attitude similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 111–125.
21. Clement, R. W., & Krueger, J. (2000). The primacy of self-referent information in perceptions of social consensus. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 279–299.
22. Clement, R. W., & Krueger, J. (2002). Social categorization moderates social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 219–231.
23. Coats, S., Smith, E. E., Claypool, H. M., & Banner, M. J. (2000). Overlapping mental representations of self and in–group: Reaction time evidence and its relationship with explicit measures of group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 304–315.
24. Dawes, R. M. (1989). Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–17.
25. Dawes, R. M. (1990). The potential nonfalsity of the false consensus effect. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights indecision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 179–199). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1–11.
27. de Tarde, G. (1895). Les lois de l'imitation; étude sociologique. Paris: Alcan.
28. Dunning, D., & Hayes, A. F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 862–871.
29. Durkheim, E. (1901). Lesrégles de la méthode sociologique. Paris: Alcan.
30. Elwood, C. A. (1920). An introduction to social psychology. New York: Appleton.
31. Engelmann, D., & Strobel, M. (2000). The false consensus effect disappears when representative information and monetary incentives are given. Experimental Economics, 3, 241–260.
32. Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive–ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review, 107, 659–676.
33. Forer, B. R. (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 118–123.
34. Freud, S. (1921). Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse. Vienna: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag.
35. Gaertner, L., & Insko, C. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or both? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 77–94.
36. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2001). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. In M. A. Hogg & Abrams, D. (Eds.), Intergroup relations: Essential readings (pp. 356–369). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
37. Gilovich, T., & Savitsky, K. (1999). The spotlight effect and the illusion of transparency: Egocentric assessments of how we are seen by others. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 165–168.
38. Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., & Turner, J. C. (1996). Social identity, self–categorization, and the perceived homogeneity of ingroups and out–groups: The interaction between social motivation and cognition. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3: The interpersonal context (pp. 182–222). New York: Guilford.
39. Hayek, F. A. V. (1952). The counter revolution in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604.
41. Hofstӓtter, P. R. (1957). Gruppendynamik. Die KritikderMassenpsychologie. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
42. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology ofinter– group relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
43. Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behaviour, self–stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325–340.
44. Kenny, D. A., & Winquist, L. (2001). The measurement of interpersonal sensitivity: Consideration of design, components, and unit of analysis. In J. Hall & F. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 265–302). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Krueger, J. (1998). Enhancement bias in the description of self and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 505–516.
46. Krueger, J. I. (2003). Return of the ego – self–referent information as a filter for social prediction: Comment on Karniol (2003). Psychological Review, 110, 585–590.
47. Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1994). The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 596–610.
48. Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1996). Inferring category characteristics from sample characteristics: Inductive reasoning and social projection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 52–68.
49. Krueger, J., & Rothbart, M. (1988). Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55,187–195.
50. Krueger, J., & Stanke, D. (2001). The role of self–referent and other–referent knowledge in perceptions of group characteristics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 878–888.
51. Kulig, J. W. (2000). Effects of forced exposure to a hypothetical population on false consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 629–636.
52. Le Bon, G. (1895). Psychologie des foules. Paris: Alcan.
53. Leonardelli, G. J., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Minority and majority discrimination: When and why? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 468–485.
54. Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in–group and out–group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165–188.
55. Locksley, A., Borgida, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821–831.
56. McDougall, W. (1920). The group mind, a sketch of the principles of collective psychology, with some attempt to apply them to the interpretation of national life and character. New York: Putnam.
57. Migdal, M., Hewstone, M., & Mullen, B. (1998). The effects of crossed categorization on intergroup evaluations: A meta–analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 303–324.
58. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122.
59. Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472–489.
60. Mussweiler, T., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2002). I know you are, but what am I? Self– evaluative consequences of judging in–group and out–group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 19–32.
61. Onorato, R. S., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Challenging the primacy of the personal self: The case for depersonalized self–conception. In Y. Kashima, M. Foddy, & M. J. Platow (Eds.), Self and identity: Personal, social, and symbolic (pp. 145–178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62. Onorato, R. S., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Fluidity of the self–concept: the shift from personal to social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 257–278.
63. Otten, S. (2002a). –Me— and –us— or –us— and –them—? – The self as heuristic for defining novel ingroups. In: W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 1–33). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
64. Otten, S. (2002b). I am positive and so are we: The self as a determinant of favoritism toward novel ingroups. In J. P. Forgas & K. D. Williams (Eds.), The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal, and intergroup perspectives (pp. 273–291). New York: Psychology Press.
65. Otten, S., & Wentura, D. (2001). Self–anchoring and in–group favoritism: An individual profiles analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 525–532.
66. Pickett, C. L., Bonner, B. L., & Coleman, J. M. (2002). Motivated self–stereotyping: Heightened assimilation and differentiation needs result in increased levels of positive and negative self–stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 543–562.
67. Popper, K. R. (1957). The poverty of historicism. New York: Harper & Row.
68. Rabbie, J. M., & Horwitz, M. (1969). Arousal of ingroup–out–group bias by a chance win or loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 269–277.
69. Rabbie, J. M., Schot, J. C., Visser, L. (1989). Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioral interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 171–202.
70. Reich, W. (1933). Massenpsychologie des Faschismus. Copenhagen: Verlag für Sexualpolitik.
71. Reichenbach, H. (1951). The rise of scientific philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
72. Robbins, J. M., & Krueger, J. I. (unpublished). Social projection among ethnic majorities and minorities. Brown University.
73. Robbins, J. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta–analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32–47.
74. Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta–analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59–82.
75. Russell, B. (1955). Nightmares of eminent persons. New York: Simon & Schuster.
76. Schimel, J., Greenberg, J., & Martens, A. (2003). Evidence that projection of a feared trait can serve a defensive function. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 969–979.
77. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper.
78. Sighele, S. (1892). Lafoule criminelle: Essai de psychologie collective. Paris: Alcan.
79. Simon, B., Glӓssner-Bayerl, B., & Stratenwerth, I. (1991). Stereotyping and self– stereotyping in a natural intergroup context: The case of heterosexual and homosexual men. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 252–266.
80. Simon, B., Pantaleo, G., & Mummendey, A. (1995). Unique individual or interchangeable group member? The accentuation of intragroup differences versus similarities as an indicator of the individual self versus the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,106–119.
81. Smith, E. R., Coats, S., & Walling, D. (1999). Overlapping mental representations of self, in–group, and partner: Further response time evidence and a connectionist model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 873–882.
82. Smith, E. R., & Henry, S. (1996). An in–group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635–642.
83. Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self–stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538–553.
84. Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways. Boston: Ginn.
85. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1,1–39.
86. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson–Hall.
87. Tropp, L. R., & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600.
88. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self–categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
89. Turner, J. C., & Onorato, R. S. (1999). Social identity, personality, and the self-concept: A self–categorization perspective. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 11–46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
90. Watkins, J. W. N. (1952). Ideal types and historical explanation. British Journal for the Philosphy of Science, 3, 22–43.
91. Wundt, W. M. (1920). 1929 Völkerpsychologie. Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. Leipzig: Engelmann.
92. Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (2000). The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 116–132.