The yeast Starmerella bacillaris (synonym Candida zemplinina) shows high genetic diversity in winemaking environments

FEMS Yeast Research

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Masneuf Pomarede, Isabelle ^a,b   Juquin, Elodie ^c   Miot Sertier, Cécile ^a,d   Renault, Philippe ^a,c   Laizet, Yečhan ^e   Salin, Franck ^e   Alexandre, Hervé ^f   Capozzi, Vittorio ^g   Cocolin, Luca ^h   Colonna Ceccaldi, Benoit ⁱ   Englezos, Vasileios ^h   Girard, Patrick ⁱ   Gonzalez, Beatriz ^j   Lucas, Patrick ^a   Mas, Albert ^j   Nisiotou, Aspasia ^k   Sipiczki, Matthias ^l   Spano, Giuseppe ^g   Tassou, Chrysoula ^k   Bely, Marina ^a   Albertin, Warren ^a,m   more..

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^b BORDEAUX SCIENCES AGRO   (France)

^c Biolaffort   (France)

^d EA 4577   (France)

^e UMR 1202 BIOGECO   (France)

^f UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^g UNIVERSITY OF FOGGIA   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

ⁱ Pernod Ricard   (France)

^j UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

^k INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS   (Greece)

^l UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

^m BORDEAUX INP   (France)

more..

Author keywords

Grape; Microsatellite; Must; Oenology; SSR; Starmerella bacillaris

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CANDIDA; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; SPECIES; VINEYARD; YEAST; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUE; GEOGRAPHY; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; VITIS; WINE;

ALCOHOL; FRUCTOSE; FUNGAL DNA; GLYCEROL; MICROSATELLITE DNA;

BASE SEQUENCE; CANDIDA; DNA, FUNGAL; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FRUCTOSE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, FUNGAL; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; GEOGRAPHY; GLYCEROL; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; VITIS; WINE;

EID: 84949020019     PISSN: 15671356     EISSN: 15671364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/fov045     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Albertin W, Chasseriaud L, Comte G, et al. Winemaking and bioprocesses strongly shaped the genetic diversity of the ubiquitous yeast Torulaspora delbrueckii. PLoS One 2014a;9:e94246.
2. Albertin W, Miot-Sertier C, Bely M, et al. Oenological prefermentation practices strongly impact yeast population dynamics and alcoholic fermentation kinetics in Chardonnay grape must. Int J Food Microbiol 2014b;178:87-97.
3. Albertin W, Panfili A, Miot-Sertier C, et al. Development of microsatellite markers for the rapid and reliable genotyping of Brettanomyces bruxellensis at strain level. Food Microbiol 2014c;42:188-95.
4. Andorrà I, Berradre M, Mas A, et al. Effect of mixed culture fermentations on yeast populations and aroma profile. LWTFood Sci Technol 2012;49:8-13.
5. Andorrà I, Landi S, Mas A, et al. Effect of oenological practices on microbial populations using culture-independent techniques. Food Microbiol 2008;25:849-56.
6. Andorra I, Landi S, Mas A, et al. Effect of fermentation temperature on microbial population evolution using cultureindependent and dependent techniques. Food Res Int 2010;43:773-9.
7. Barquet M, Martin V, Medina K, et al. Tandem repeat-tRNA (TRtRNA) PCR method for the molecular typing of non- Saccharomyces subspecies. Appl Microbiol Biot 2012;93:807-14.
8. Bely M, Renault P, da Silva T, et al. Non-Conventional Yeasts and Alcohol Level Reduction. Bordeaux: Ed. Vigne et Vin Publications Internationales, 2013, 33-7.
9. Bokulich NA, Ohta M, Richardson PM, et al. Monitoring seasonal changes in winery-resident microbiota. PLoS One 2013;8:e66437.
10. Bruvo R, Michiels NK, D'Souza TG, et al. A simple method for the calculation of microsatellite genotype distances irrespective of ploidy level. Mol Ecol 2004;13:2101-6.
11. Chen W-C. Overlapping codon model, phylogenetic clustering, and alternative partial expectation conditional maximization algorithm. Thesis Diss., Iowa State University 2011.
12. Chessel D, Dufour AB, Thioulouse J. The ade4 package-I- onetable methods. R News 2004;4:5-10.
13. Ciani M, Comitini F. Yeast interactions in multi-starter wine fermentation. Curr Opin Food Sci 2015;1:1-6.
14. Cordero-Bueso G, Esteve-Zarzoso B, Cabellos J, et al. Biotechnological potential of non-Saccharomyces yeasts isolated during spontaneous fermentations ofMalvar (Vitis vinifera cv. L.). Eur Food Res Technol 2013;236:193-207.
15. Csoma H, Sipiczki M. Taxonomic reclassification of Candida stellata strains reveals frequent occurrence of Candida zemplinina in wine fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res 2008;8:328-36.
16. Di Maio S, Genna G, Gandolfo V, et al. Presence of Candida zemplinina in Sicilian musts and selection of a strain for wine mixed fermentations. S Afr J Enol Vitic 2012;33:80-7.
17. Domizio P, Liu Y, Bisson LF, et al. Use of non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts as novel sources of mannoproteins in wine. Food Microbiol 2014;43:5-15.
18. Duarte FL, Pimentel NH, Teixeira A, et al. Saccharomyces bacillaris is not a synonym of Candida stellata: reinstatement as Starmerella bacillaris comb. nov. Anton Leeuw 2012;102:653-8.
19. Englezos V, Rantsiou K, Torchio F, et al. Exploitation of the non-Saccharomyces yeast Starmerella bacillaris (synonym Candida zemplinina) in wine fermentation: physiological and molecular characterizations. Int J Food Microbiol 2015;199: 33-40.
20. Gao H, Williamson S, Bustamante CD. A Markov chain Monte Carlo approach for joint inference of population structure and inbreeding rates frommultilocus genotype data. Genetics 2007;176:1635-51.
21. Giaramida P, Ponticello G, Di Maio S, et al. Candida zemplinina for production of wines with less alcohol and more glycerol. S Afr J Enol Vitic 2013;34:204-11.
22. Jolly NP, Varela C, Pretorius IS. Not your ordinary yeast: non- Saccharomyces yeasts in wine production uncovered. FEMS Yeast Res 2014;14:215-37.
23. Legras JL, Merdinoglu D, Cornuet JM, et al. Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol Ecol 2007;16:2091-102.
24. Legras JL, Ruh O, Merdinoglu D, et al. Selection of hypervariable microsatellite loci for the characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Int J Food Microbiol 2005;102:73-83.
25. Magyar I, Nyitrai-Sardy D, Lesko A, et al. Anaerobic organic acid metabolism of Candida zemplinina in comparison with Saccharomyces wine yeasts. Int J Food Microbiol 2014; 178:1-6.
26. Magyar I, Toth T. Comparative evaluation of some oenological properties in wine strains of Candida stellata, Candida zemplinina, Saccharomyces uvarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Microbiol 2011;28:94-100.
27. Mangani S, Buscioni G, Collina L, et al. Effects of microbial populations on anthocyanin profile of Sangiovese wines produced in Tuscany, Italy. Am J Enol Vitic 2011;62:487-94.
28. Mantel N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 1967;27:209-20.
29. Martins G, Vallance J, Mercier A, et al. Influence of the farming system on the epiphytic yeasts and yeast-like fungi colonizing grape berries during the ripening process. Int J Food Microbiol 2014;177:21-8.
30. Masneuf-Pomarede I, Le Jeune C, Durrens P, et al. Molecular typing of wine yeast strains Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum using microsatellite markers. Syst Appl Microbiol 2007;30:75-82.
31. Milanovic V, Comitini F, Ciani M. Grape berry yeast communities: influence of fungicide treatments. Int J Food Microbiol 2013;161:240-6.
32. Nielsen DS, Honholt S, Tano-Debrah K, et al. Yeast populations associated with Ghanaian cocoa fermentations analysed using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Yeast 2005;22:271-84.
33. Nisiotou AA, Spiropoulos AE, Nychas G-JE. Yeast community structures and dynamics in healthy and Botrytis-affected grape must fermentations. Appl Environ Microb 2007;73:6705-13.
34. Orlić S, Vojvoda T, Babić K, et al. Diversity and oenological characterization of indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae associated with Ž ilavka grapes. World J Microb Biot 2010;26: 1483-9.
35. Paolocci F, Rubini A, Riccioni C, et al. Reevaluation of the life cycle of Tuber magnatum. Appl Environ Microb 2006;72:2390-3.
36. Paradis E. pegas: an R package for population genetics with an integrated-modular approach. Bioinformatics 2010;26: 419-20.
37. Pfliegler WP, Horvath E, Kallai Z, et al. Diversity of Candida zemplinina isolates inferred from RAPD, micro/minisatellite and physiological analysis. Microbiol Res 2014;169:402-10.
38. Pramateftaki PV, Kouvelis VN, Lanaridis P, et al. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the wine yeast Candida zemplinina: intraspecies distribution of a novel group-IIB1 intron with eubacterial affiliations. FEMS Yeast Res 2008;8:311-27.
39. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000;155:945-59.
40. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2010.
41. Rantsiou K, Campolongo S, Alessandria V, et al. Yeast populations associated with grapes during withering and their fate during alcoholic fermentation of high-sugar must. Aust J Grape Wine R 2013;19:40-6.
42. Rantsiou K, Dolci P, Giacosa S, et al. Candida zemplinina can reduce acetic acid produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in sweet wine fermentations. Appl Environ Microb 2012;78: 1987-94.
43. Sadoudi M, Tourdot-Marechal R, Rousseaux S, et al. Yeastyeast interactions revealed by aromatic profile analysis of Sauvignon Blanc wine fermented by single or co-culture of non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces yeasts. Food Microbiol 2012;32:243-53.
44. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987;4: 406-25.
45. Schuelke M. An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 2000;18: 233-34.
46. Schuller D, Cardoso F, Sousa S, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from different grape varieties and winemaking regions. PLoS One 2012;7:e32507.
47. Shimodaira H. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst Biol 2002;51:492-508.
48. SipiczkiM. Candida zemplinina sp. nov., an osmotolerant and psychrotolerant yeast that ferments sweet botrytized wines. Int J Syst Evol Micr 2003;53:2079-83.
49. Sipiczki M. Species identification and comparative molecular and physiological analysis of Candida zemplinina and Candida stellata. J Basic Microbiol 2004;44:471-9.
50. Sipiczki M, Ciani M, Csoma H. Taxonomic reclassification of Candida stellata DBVPG 3827. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 2005;50: 494-8.
51. Stamps JA, Yang LH, Morales VM, et al. Drosophila regulate yeast density and increase yeast community similarity in a natural substrate. PLoS One 2012;7:e42238.
52. Sun Y, Guo JJ, Liu FB, et al. Identification of indigenous yeast flora isolated from the five winegrape varieties harvested in Xiangning, China. Anton Leeuw Int J G 2014;105: 533-40.
53. Suzuki R, Shimodaira H. Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 2006;22:1540-2.
54. Tofalo R, Chaves-López C, Di Fabio F, et al. Molecular identification and osmotolerant profile of wine yeasts that ferment a high sugar grape must. Int J Food Microbiol 2009;130: 179-87.
55. Tofalo R, Schirone M, Torriani S, et al. Diversity of Candida zemplinina strains from grapes and Italian wines. Food Microbiol 2012;29:18-26.
56. Tristezza M, Vetrano C, Bleve G, et al. Biodiversity and safety aspects of yeast strains characterized from vineyards and spontaneous fermentations in the Apulia Region, Italy. Food Microbiol 2013;36:335-42.
57. Urso R, Rantsiou K, Dolci P, et al. Yeast biodiversity and dynamics during sweet wine production as determined by molecular methods. FEMS Yeast Res 2008;8:1053-62.
58. Wang C, Esteve-Zarzoso B, Mas A. Monitoring of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hanseniaspora uvarum, and Starmerella bacillaris (synonym Candida zemplinina) populations during alcoholic fermentation by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Int J Food Microbiol 2014;191:1-9.
59. Zara G, Mannazzu I, Del Caro A, et al. Wine quality improvement through the combined utilisation of yeast hulls and Candida zemplinina/Saccharomyces cerevisiae mixed starter cultures. Aust J Grape Wine R 2014;20:199-207.
60. Zhang H, Richards KD, Wilson S, et al. Genetic characterization of strains of Saccharomyces uvarum from New Zealand wineries. Food Microbiol 2015;46:92-9.
61. Zott K, Claisse O, Lucas P, et al. Characterization of the yeast ecosystem in grapemust and wine using real-time PCR. Food Microbiol 2010;27:559-67.
62. Zott K, Miot-Sertier C, Claisse O, et al. Dynamics and diversity of non-Saccharomyces yeasts during the early stages in winemaking. Int J Food Microbiol 2008;125:197-203.